Cover not available
Part of
The Expression of Inequality in Interaction: Power, dominance, and status
Edited by Hanna Pishwa and Rainer Schulze
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 248] 2014
► pp. 143–162

Power eliciting elements at the semantic-pragmatic interface

Data from cyberbullying and virtual character assassination attempts

| Technische Universität Berlin

Power, in this article, is to be understood as an instrument of force that is imposed purposely in order to influence, affect or persuade others. The question here is whether such power is due to aggressive expressions (lexical level) or to context-dependent aspects (discourse level) that become relevant when insulting persons via new media. I will distinguish between “cyberbullying” as an attempt to hurt a person’s feelings directly via personal SMS or email and “virtual character assassination attempts” that include third parties as an audience. Potential readers not directly involved are considered a constitutive eliciting element of power. It is assumed that their existence is even more important and effective (in terms of strengthening the perpetrator’s power) than aggressive language.

Published online: 12 June 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.248.06mar
References
Aftab, Parry
2008 “Stop Cyberbullying. What is It? How It Works? Why Cyberbully? Prevention. Take Action. What’s the Law?” [URL] (accessed 24 November 2012).
Aktion Kinder und Jugendschutz Schleswig-Holstein.
2009 “Mobbing an der Schule. Hinweise für Eltern.” [URL] (accessed 24 November 2012)
Arendt, Hannah
1970 Macht und Gewalt. München: Piper.Google Scholar
Belsey, Bill
2006 “Cyberbullying: An Emerging Threat to the ‘Always on’ Generation.” [URL] (accessed 24 November 2012).
Beran, Tanya, and Qing Li
2007 “The Relationship between Cyberbullying and School Bullying.” Journal of Student Wellbeing1(2): 15–33.Google Scholar
Bergmann, Jörg
2000 “Die Macht des Wortes.” In Macht und Abhängigkeit, ed. by Peter 
Buchheim, and Manfred Cierpka, 120–131. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corbineau-Hoffmann, Angelika, and Pascal Nicklas
(eds) 2000 Gewalt der Sprache – Sprache der Gewalt: Beispiele aus philologischer Sicht. Hildesheim: Olms. Google Scholar
Cover, Robert
1986 “Violence and the Word.” Yale Law Journal95: 1601–1629. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cross, Emma-Jane, Ben Richardson, Thaddaeus Douglas, and Jessica Vonkaenel-Flatt
2009 “Virtual Violence: Protecting Children from Cyberbullying.” London: Beatbullying Rochester House. [URL] (accessed 24 November 2012).Google Scholar
Delgado, Richard, and Jean Stefancic
2004 Understanding Words That Wound. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Döring, Nicola
2000 “Identität + Internet = Virtuelle Identität?” forum medienethik2: 65–75.Google Scholar
Ekeh, Peter
1974 Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fawzi, Nayla
2009a Cyber-Mobbing. Ursachen und Auswirkungen von Mobbing im Internet. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
2009b “’Und jeder bekommt es mit …’ Cyber-Mobbing – die Veränderungen gegenüber traditionellem Mobbing.” Blickpunkt1: 8–10.Google Scholar
Feufel, Markus, Frederica S. Stahl, and Soo-Youn Lee
2013 “Was Hänschen nicht googelt, findet Hans nimmermehr? Online-Suche im Vergleich der Generationen.” In Sprache und Kommunikation im technischen Zeitalter. Wieviel Internet (v)erträgt unsere Gesellschaft? ed. by Konstanze Marx, and Monika Schwarz-Friesel, 166–185. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Flanagin, Andrew J., and Miriam J. Metzger
2000 “Perceptions of Internet Information Credibility.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly77(3): 515–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fobbe, Eilika
2011 Forensische Linguistik: Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Gallery, Heike
2000 “’Bin-ich-klick-ich’ – Variable Anonymität im Chat.” In Soziales im Netz. Sprache, soziale Beziehungen und Kommunikationskulturen im Internet, ed. by Caja Thimm, 72–88. Wiesbaden: Opladen.Google Scholar
Gradinger, Petra
2010 Cyberbullying: Mobbing mit neuen Medien. Universität Wien. PhD-Thesis.Google Scholar
Gradinger, Petra, Dagmar Strohmeier, and Christiane Spiel
2009 “Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying. Identification of Risk Groups for Adjustment Problems.” Journal of Psychology217(4): 205–213.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1989 “Logic and Conversation.” In Studies in the Way of Words, ed. by H. Paul Grice, 22–40. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen
1978 “Hannah Arendts Begriff der Macht.” In Politik, Kunst, Religion: Essays über zeitgenössische Philosophen, ed. by Jürgen Habermas, 103–126. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Steffen, Sybille Krämer, and Hannes Kuch
(eds) 2007 Verletzende Worte. Die Grammatik sprachlicher Missachtung. Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar
Hinduja, Sameer, and Justin W. Patchin
2007 “Offline Consequences of Online Victimization.” Journal of School Violence6: 89–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “Cyberbullying: An Exploratory Analysis of Factors Related to Offending and Victimization.” Deviant Behavior29: 129–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Bullying beyond the Schoolyard: Preventing and Responding to Cyberbullying. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
Holod, Oxana
1998 “Einige Besonderheiten des Sprechaktes „Beschimpfung“.” Grazer Linguistische Studien49: 29–36.Google Scholar
Jäger, Reinhold S., Julia Riebel, Uwe Fischer, and Lisa Fluck
2009 “Mobbing bei Schülerinnen und Schülern in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Eine empirische Untersuchung auf der Grundlage einer Online-Befragung im Jahre 2009.” [URL][URL] (accessed 24 November 2012)
Johnson, Thomas, and Barbara Kaye
2002 “Webbelievability: A Path Model Examining How Convenience and Reliance Predict Online Credibility.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 79(3): 619–642. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katzer, Catarina, Detlef Fetchenhauer, and Frank Belschak
2009 “Cyberbullying in Internet-Chatrooms – Wer sind die Täter? Ein Vergleich von Bullying in Internet-Chatrooms mit Bullying in der Schule aus der Täterperspektive.” Zeitschrift für Entwiclungspsychologie und pädagogische Psychologie 41(1): 33–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kepplinger, Hans M
2007 “Reciprocal Effects. Towards a Theory of Mass Media Effects on Decision Makers.” The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics12(2): 3–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiener, Franz
1983 Das Wort als Waffe. Zur Psychologie der verbalen Aggression. Göttingen: Vanderhoeck.Google Scholar
Kleinke, Sonja
2007 “Sprachliche Strategien verbaler Ablehnung in öffentlichen Diskussionsforen im Internet.” In Verletzende Worte. Die Grammatik sprachlicher Missachtung, ed. by Steffen Herrmann, Sybille Krämer, and Hannes Kuch, 311–336. Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar
Kopperschmidt, Josef
1998 “Zwischen ‘Zauber des Wortes’ und ‘Wort als Waffe’. Versuch, über die ‘Macht des Wortes’ zu reden.” In Sprache und/oder Gewalt? ed. by Franz Januschek, and Klaus Gloy, 13–30. Osnabrücker Beiträge zur Sprachtheorie.Google Scholar
Kowalski, Robin M., and Susan P. Limber
2007 “Electronic Bullying Among Middle School Students.” Journal of Adolescent Health41: 22–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kowalski, Robin M., Susan P. Limber, and Patricia W. Agatston
2012 Cyberbullying. Bullying in the Digital Age. 2nd edition. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Luginbühl, Martin
1999 Gewalt im Gespräch. Verbale Gewalt in politischen Fernsehdiskussionen am Beispiel der ‘Arena’. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Marx, Konstanze
2013 “Virtueller Rufmord – Offene Fragen aus linguistischer Perspektive.” In Sprache und Kommunikation im technischen Zeitalter. Wieviel Internet (v)erträgt unsere Gesellschaft? ed. by Konstanze Marx, and Monika Schwarz-Friesel, 237–266. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Marx, Konstanze, and Monika Schwarz-Friesel
(eds) 2013 Sprache und Kommunikation im technischen Zeitalter. Wieviel Internet (v)erträgt unsere Gesellschaft? Berlin, New York: de Gruyter. Google Scholar
Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest (ed.),
2009/2012/2013 JIM-Studie 2009/ 2012/2013. “Jugend, Information, (Multi-) Media. Basisuntersuchung zum Medienumgang 12- bis 19-Jähriger. Stuttgart.” [URL] (accessed 6 April 2014).
Olweus, Dan
1993 Bullying at School: What We Know and What We Can Do. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Runkehl, Jens, Torsten Siever, and Peter Schlobinski
1998 Sprache und Kommunikation im Internet: Überblick und Analysen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Schwarz-Friesel, Monika
2007 Sprache und Emotion. Tübingen and Basel: Francke.Google Scholar
2013 “‘Juden sind zum Töten da’ (studivz.net, 2008) Hass via Internet – Zugänglichkeit und Verbreitung von Antisemitismen im World Wide Web.” In Sprache und Kommunikation im technischen Zeitalter. Wieviel Internet (v)erträgt unsere Gesellschaft? ed. by Konstanze Marx, and Monika Schwarz-Friesel, 213–236. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Smith, Peter, Jess Mahdavi, Manuel Carvalho, and Neil Tippett
2006 “An investigation into cyberbullying, its forms, awareness and impact, and the relationship between age and gender in cyberbullying.” [URL] (accessed 24 November 2012).
Smith, Peter, Jess Mahdavi, Manuel Carvalho, Sonja Fisher, Shanette Russell, and Neil Tippett
2008 “Cyberbullying: Its Nature and Impact in Secondary School Pupils.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry49: 376–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sohn, Dongyoung, and John D. Leckenby
2007 “A Structural Solution to Communication Dilemmas in a Virtual Community.” Journal of Communication57: 435–449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, Nobuyuki
2000 “The Emergence of Generalized Exchange.” American Journal of Sociology105: 1105–1134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannock, Stuart
1999 “Working with Insults: Discourse and Difference in an Inner-city Youth Organization.” Discourse and Society10(3): 317–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willard, Nancy
2007 Cyberbullying and Cyberthreats: Responding to the Challenge of Online Social Aggression, Threats, and Distress. Champaign, Ill: Research Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
2004 “Relevance Theory.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Laurence R. Horn, and Gregory Ward, 607–632. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ybarra, Michele L., and Kimberly J. Mitchell
2004 “Online Aggressor/Targets, Aggressors, and Targets: A Comparison of Associated Youth Characteristics.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry45(7): 1308–1316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ybarra, Michele L., Marie Diener-West, and Philip J. Leaf
2007 “Examining the Overlap in Internet Harassment and School Bullying: Implications for School Intervention.” Journal of Adolescent Health41(6): 42–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar