Cover not available
Part of
Implicitness: From lexis to discourse
Edited by Piotr Cap and Marta Dynel
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 276] 2017
► pp. 121–146

Chapter 6
Implicitness via overt untruthfulness

Grice on Quality-based figures of speech

| University of Łódź

Grice’s (1989a [1975], 1989b [1978]) conversational implicature is a salient manifestation of implicitness, whilst the four figures of speech contingent on flouting the first maxim of Quality constitute an important group of phenomena that promote conversational implicature. Implicitness is then central to the figures of: metaphor, irony, hyperbole and meiosis. This chapter gives an exegesis of Grice’s view of these Quality-based figures of speech, which enjoy a special status in his framework of conversational logic. The critical analysis is performed against the backdrop of the pertinent neo-Gricean and post-Gricean scholarship. This chapter thus sheds new light on selected vexing issues in Grice’s philosophy, with some being (unjustly) taken for granted or oversimplified, and other ones being the subject of ongoing debates.

Keywords: implicature, saying, Quality, truthfulness, overt untruthfulness, flouting, Grice, irony, metaphor, meiosis, hyperbole
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Maxim nonfulfilment as the source of implicature
  • 3.Quality and truthfulness
    • 3.1Truthfulness and saying
  • 4.Grice’s vew of metaphor, irony, hyperbole and meiosis and criticism thereof
  • 5.Quality-based figures as an alleged flaw in Grice’s proposal of implicature
  • Epilogue
  • Author queries
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 June 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.276.06dyn
References
Akmajian, Adrian, Richard Demers, Ann Farmer, and Robert M. Harnish
2001 Linguistics: An Introduction to Language and Communication. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baptista, Luca
2014 “Say What? On Grice on What Is Said.” European Journal of Philosophy 22 (1): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benton, Matthew
2014 “Gricean Quality.” Noûs. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhaya Nair, Rukimi
1985 “Telling Lies: Some Literary and Other Violations of Grice’s Maxim of Quality.” Nottingham Linguistic Circular 14: 53–71.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert
1983 “Asserting.” Noûs 17: 637–650. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Camp, Elisabeth
2006 “Contextualism, Metaphor and What Is Said.” Mind & Language 21(3): 280–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carston, Robyn
2002 Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colston, Herbert
2000 “On Necessary Conditions for Verbal Irony Comprehension.” Pragmatics and Cognition 8: 277–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colston, Herbert, and Jennifer O’Brien
2000 “Contrast and Pragmatics in Figurative Language: Anything Understatement Can Do, Irony Can Do Better.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1557–1583. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Bethan
2000 “Grice’s Cooperative Principle: Getting the Meaning Across.” Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 8: 1–26.Google Scholar
2007 “Grice’s Cooperative Principle: Meaning and Rationality.” Journal of Pragmatics 39: 2308–2331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dinges, Alexander
2015 “Innocent Implicatures.” Journal of Pragmatics 87: 54–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2008 “There Is Method in the Humorous Speaker’s Madness: Humour and Grice’s model.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 4(1): 159–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011a “Turning Speaker Meaning on Its Head: Non-Verbal Communication and Intended Meanings.” Pragmatics and Cognition 3: 422–447. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011b “A Web of Deceit: A neo-Gricean View on Types of Verbal Deception.” International Review of Pragmatics 3(2): 137–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013a “Being Cooperatively Impolite: Grice’s Model in the Context of (Im)Politeness Theories.” In Research Trends in Intercultural Pragmatics, ed. by Istvan Kecskes and Jesus Romero-Trillo, 55–83. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013b “Irony from a Neo-Gricean Perspective: On Untruthfulness and Evaluative Implicature.” Intercultural Pragmatics 10: 403–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “Intention to Deceive, Bald-Faced Lies, and Deceptive Implicature: Insights into Lying at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface .” Intercultural Pragmatics 12: 309–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016a “Contrasting and Combining Covert and Overt Untruthfulness: On Lying, Deception, Irony and Metaphor.” Pragmatics & Cognition 23: 175–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 "The irony of irony: Irony based on truthfulness." Corpus Pragmatics 1: 3-36.Google Scholar
Fogelin, R
1988 Figuratively Speaking. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1983 “The Domain of Pragmatics.” In Language and Communication, ed. by Jack Richards, and Richard Schmidt, 29–59. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Garmendia, Joana
2010 “Irony Is Critical.” Pragmatics & Cognition 18: 397–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “She’s (Not) a Fine Friend: “Saying” and Criticism in Irony.” Intercultural Pragmatics 8: 41–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “A (Neo)Gricean Account of Irony: An Answer to Relevance Theory.” International Review of Pragmatics 7: 40–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garmendia, Joana, and Kepa Korta
2007 “The Point of Irony.” In Language, Representation and Reasoning, ed. by Mixel Aurnague, Kepa Korta, and Jesus M. Larrazabal, 189–200. Bilbao: upv-ehu.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond
1994 The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul
1989a [1975] “Logic and Conversation.” In Studies in the Way of Words, Herbert Paul Grice, 22–40. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1989b [1978] “Further Notes on Logic and Conversation.” Studies in the Way of Words, Herbert Paul Grice, 41–57. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Grice, H.P.
1989d [1968] “Utterer’s Meaning and Intentions”. In Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press., 86–116.Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul
1989c “Retrospective Epilogue.” In Studies in the Way of Words, Herbert Paul Grice, 339–386. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen
1984 The Theory of Communicative Action I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Transl. by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael
2015 Im/Politeness Implicatures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haverkate, Henk
1990 “A Speech Act Analysis of Irony.” Journal of Pragmatics 14: 77–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jary, Mark
2010 Assertion. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Livnat, Zohar
2004 “On Verbal Irony, Meta-Linguistic Knowledge and Echoic Interpretation.” Pragmatics & Cognition 12: 57–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “Quantity, Truthfulness and Ironic Effect.” Language Sciences 33(2): 305–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahon, James
2015 “The Definition of Lying and Deception.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), ed. by Edward N. Zalta, URL = [URL] Google Scholar
Meibauer, Jörg
2005 “Lying and Falsely Implicating.” Journal of Pragmatics 37: 1373–1399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Lying at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Boston/Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mooney, Annabelle
2004 “Co-operation, Violation and Making Sense.” Journal of Pragmatics 36: 899–920. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nemesi, Attila
2010 “Data-Gathering Methods in Research on Hyperbole Production and Interpretation.” In The Role of Data at the Semantic-Pragmatic Interface, ed. by Eniko T. Nemeth and Karoly Bibok, 381–417. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrick, Neal
2004 “Hyperbole, Extreme Case Formulations.” Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1727–1739. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ozar, Anne
2008 The Moral Significance of Sincerity. PhD Thesis. Fordham University.Google Scholar
Pagin, Peter
2015 “Assertion.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2015 Edition), ed. by Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = [URL] Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles
1934 “Belief and Judgment.” In Collected Papers, vol. 5, ed. by Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss, 376–387. Cambridge: Harvard.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1986 “Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims.” Human Studies 9: 219–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reimer, Marga
2013 “Grice on Irony and Metaphor: Discredited by the Experimental Evidence?” International Review of Pragmatics 5: 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saul, Jennifer
2012. Lying, Misleading, and the Role of What Is Said. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, John
1657 Mysterie of Rhetorique Unvail'd. Facsimile reprint of 1st ed., London: George Everfden.Google Scholar
Soames, Scott
2008 “Drawing the line between meaning and implicature—and relating both to assertion.” Noûs 42: 440–4655. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stokke, Andreas
2013 “Lying and Asserting.” Journal of Philosophy 110: 33–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vincent Marrelli, Jocelyne
2003 “Truthfulness.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert, and Chris Bulcaen, 1–48. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 Words in the Way of Truth. Truthfulness, Deception, Lying across Cultures and Disciplines. Napoli: Edizione Scientifiche Italiane.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre
1995 “Is There a Maxim of Truthfulness?” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 7: 197–212.Google Scholar
2006 “The Pragmatics of Verbal Irony: Echo or Pretence?” Lingua 116: 1722–1743. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
2000 [2002, 2012] “Truthfulness and Relevance.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics: 215–254. [Reprinted as Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber. 2002. “Truthfulness and Relevance.” Mind 111: 583–632; “Truthfulness and Relevance.” In D. Wilson, and D. Sperber. Meaning and Relevance, 47–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Google Scholar
2012 “Explaining Irony.” In Meaning and Relevance, Deirdre Wilson, and Dan Sperber. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 123–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Dynel, Marta
2016. Comparing and combining covert and overt untruthfulness. Pragmatics & Cognition 23:1 ► pp. 174 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2016. On untruthfulness, its adversaries and strange bedfellows. Pragmatics & Cognition 23:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2020. To Say the Least: Where Deceptively Withholding Information Ends and Lying Begins. Topics in Cognitive Science 12:2 ► pp. 555 ff. DOI logo
HIRATA, ICHIRO
2021. IMPLICATURES OF VOCATIVES AND THEIR THEORETICAL IMPLICATIONS. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 37:2 ► pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Figuring out Figuration [Figurative Thought and Language, 14], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.