In:Patterns of Context: Modelling cultural and contextual influence in utterance interpretation
Edited by Elke Diedrichsen and Frank Liedtke
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 356] 2026
► pp. 76–99
The cooperative principle and goal schemas
At the foundations of human communication
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
Is it possible to account for the deep intersubjectivity (“ultra-sociality”) that is special to
humans, in terms of the cognitive-individual notion of goal schemas? I provide a (partially) affirmative answer to
this question, through an analysis of Grice’s Cooperative Principle based on that notion. On the one hand, goal
schemas have a conceptual-predicative structure that is key to understanding pragmatic inferences, but also phenomena
such as the embedding of utterances in activity types, and short-circuiting of implicatures. On the other hand, by
incorporating affective evaluations, goal schemas may account for the social-cultural systems of motivations that
shape individual subjects — well beyond the “motivation to share” that enable joint actions.
Keywords: cooperation, intersubjectivity, ultra-sociality, goals, schemas, implicatures
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Schemas and goal schemas
- 2.1Goal schemas in Grice: The cooperative principle
- 2.2From grice to Levinson: Activity types
- 2.3From Grice to Morgan: Conventions of usage
- 3.Motivations
- 3.1A cognitive model of motivation
- 3.2Sharing motivations: A cognitive-anthropological model
- 3.3From the motivation to share to sharing motivations
- 4.Conclusions: The cooperative principle reloaded
- Author queries
Notes References
References (48)
Arnseth, Hans C., and Ivar Solheim. 2002. “Making
Sense of Shared Knowledge.” In Proceedings of CSCL
2002, Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community, ed.
by Gerry Stahl, 102–110. Boulder: Taylor and Francis.
Arundale, Robert B. 2008. “Against
(Gricean) Intentions at the Heart of Human Interaction.” Intercultural
Pragmatics 5(2): 229–258.
Badre, David. 2013. “Hierarchical
Cognitive Control and the Functional Organization of the Frontal
Cortex.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive
Neuroscience: Volume 2. The Cutting Edges, ed. by Kevin N. Ochsner, and Stephen Kosslyn, 300–317. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark, Herbert, and Susan Brennan. 1991. “Grounding
in Communication.” In Perspectives on Socially Shared
Cognition, ed. by Lauren Resnick, John Levine, and Stephanie Teasley, 127–149. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Cummins, Chris. This
volume. “Inferences from, and about, Context in a Joint Inference
Model of Utterance Interpretation.”
D’Andrade, Roy G. 1992. “Schemas and
Motivation.” In Human Motives and Cultural
Models, ed. by Roy G. D’Andrade, and Claudia Strauss, 23–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De Ruiter, Jan-Peter, Matthijs Noordzij, Sarah Newman-Norlund, Roger Newman-Norlund, Peter Hagoort, Stephen C. Levinson, and Ivan Toni. 2010. “Exploring
the Cognitive Infrastructure of Communication.” Interaction
Studies 11(1): 51–77.
Fuster, Joaquin M. 2001. “The Prefrontal
Cortex — an Update: Time Is of the
Essence.” Neuron 30(2): 319–333.
Gaertner, Lowell, Constantine Sedikides, Michelle Luke, Erin M. O’Mara, Jonathan Iuzzini, Lydia E. Jackson, Huajian Cai, and Quiping Wu. 2012. “A
Motivational Hierarchy Within: Primacy of the Individual Self, Relational Self, or Collective
Self?” Journal of Experimental Social
Psychology 48(5): 997–1013.
Garfinkel, Harold. 1964. “Studies
of the Routine Grounds of Everyday Activities.” Social
Problems 11(3): 225–250.
Gergely, Gyorgy, and Gergely Csibra. 2003. “Teleological
Reasoning in Infancy: The Naïve Theory of Rational Action.” Trends in Cognitive
Sciences 7: 287–292.
. 1975. “Logic and
Conversation.” In Syntax & Semantics 3: Speech
Acts, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
Hassin, Ran R., Hank Aarts, Baruch Eitam, Ruud Custers, and Tali Kleiman. 2009. “Non-Conscious
Goal Pursuit and the Effortful Control of
Behavior.” In Oxford Handbook of Human
Action, ed. by Ezequiel Morsella, John A. Bargh, and Peter M. Gollwitzer, 549–566. New York: Oxford University Press.
Haugh, Michael. 2013. “Speaker
Meaning and Accountability in Interaction.” Journal of
Pragmatics 48(1): 41–56.
Kecskes, Istvan. 2010. “Situation-Bound
Utterances as Pragmatic Acts.” Journal of
Pragmatics 42: 2889–2897.
Kecskes, Istvan, and Fenghui Zhang. 2009. “Activating,
Seeking, and Creating Common Ground: A Socio-Cognitive Approach.” Pragmatics
&
Cognition 17(2): 331–355.
Kukla, Rebecca, and Mark Lance. 2008. ‘Yo!’and
‘Lo!’: The Pragmatic Topography of the Space of Reasons. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
2006. “On the Human
‘Interaction Engine’.” In Roots of Human
Sociality, ed. by Nicholas Enfield, and Stephen C. Levinson, 39–69. London and New York: Routledge.
Liedtke, Frank. This
volume. “Choosing words and using
templates.”
Lodge, Milton, and Charles S. Taber. 2013. The
Rationalizing
Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mazzone, Marco. 2011. “Intentions
as Complex Entities.” Review of Philosophy and
Psychology 2: 767–783.
. 2014a. “Language
and Action. A Common Intentional, Generative, and Inferential Process.” Reti,
saperi,
linguaggi 1(1): 165–178.
. 2018. Cognitive
Pragmatics: Mindreading, Inferences,
Consciousness. Boston/Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
. 2021. “An
Associative Account of Inferences: the Development Towards the
Prototype.” Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e
Psicologia 12(1): 1–15.
Mazzone, Marco, and Emanuela Campisi. 2019. “Constraint-
Based Accounts of Audience Design. Memory is of the Essence.” Reti, Saperi,
Linguaggi 6(29): 351–371.
Miller, Earl K., and Jonathan D. Cohen. 2001. “An
Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function.” Annual Review of
Neuroscience 24(1): 167–202.
Minsky, Marvin. 1975. “A
Framework for Representing Knowledge.” In The
Psychology of Computer Vision, ed. by Patrick H. Winston, 211–277. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Morgan, Jerry L. 1978. “Two Types of
Convention in Indirect Speech Acts.” In Syntax and
Semantics 9: Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 261–280. New York: Academic Press.
Nolan, Brian. This
volume. “The Role of the Situation in Utterance Interpretation:
How Context and Common Ground Inform a Speech Act.”
Quinn, Naomi. 1992. “The
Motivational Force of Self-Understanding.” In Human
Motives and Cultural Models, ed. by Roy G. D’Andrade, and Claudia Strauss, 90–126. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scherer, Klaus, Angela Schorr, and Tom Johnstone, eds. 2001. Appraisal
Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods, Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
Searle, John. 1979. Expression
and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech
Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1986/1995. Relevance.
Communication and Cognition, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Sperber, Dan, and Deidre Wilson. 1987. “Precis
of Relevance: Communication and Cognition.” Behavioral and Brain
Sciences 10: 697–754.
