The study of argumentation from a speech act perspective

Cited by 9 other publications

Eemeren, Frans H. van & Rob Grootendorst

2003. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation,

van Eemeren, Frans H. & Rob Grootendorst

2015. The History of the Argumentum Ad Hominem Since the Seventeenth Century. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 611 ff.

Feteris, Eveline T.

2013. Strategic Maneuvering with the Argumentative Role of Legal Principles in the Case of the “Unworthy Spouse”. In Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives [Law and Philosophy Library, 102], ► pp. 85 ff.

Tseronis, Assimakis

2021. How Face Threatening Are Disagreement Moves? A Proposal for an Integration of Insights from Politeness Theory into Argumentation Theory. In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36], ► pp. 167 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans

2013. The Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 1 ff.

Van Eemeren, Frans H. & Peter Houtlosser

2003. A Pragmatic View of the Burden of Proof. In Anyone Who Has a View [Argumentation Library, 8], ► pp. 123 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H. & Peter Houtlosser

2015. A Pragmatic View of the Burden of Proof. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 455 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H. & Ton van Haaften

2023. The Making of Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-dialectical View. Argumentation 37:3 ► pp. 341 ff.

van Poppel, Lotte

2017. Chapter 6. The strategic function of variants of pragmatic argumentation in health brochures. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 93 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.