I give a rough outline of Brandom’s scorekeeping account of conceptual content. The account is meant to be phenomenalist, normativist, expressively complete and non-circular; the question is how and to what extent it succeeds in meeting these goals.
Felka, Katharina, Benjamin Schnieder, Thomas Ede Zimmermann, Miguel Hoeltje, Severin Schroeder, Andreas Kemmerling, Manfred Harth, Geert Keil, Lars Dänzer, Bernd Prien, Nathalie Lötscher, Sarah-Jane Conrad, Peter Schulte & Christian Nimtz
2015. Analytische Sprachphilosophie. In Handbuch Sprachphilosophie, ► pp. 175 ff.
Fossen, Thomas
2014. Politicizing Brandom's Pragmatism: Normativity and the Agonal Character of Social Practice. European Journal of Philosophy 22:3 ► pp. 371 ff.
González de Prado Salas, Javier & Jesús Zamora-Bonilla
2015. Collective Actors without Collective Minds. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Lauer, David
2012. Expressivism and the Layer Cake Picture of Discursive Practice. Philosophia 40:1 ► pp. 55 ff.
Levine, Steven
2019. Pragmatism, Objectivity, and Experience,
Marchettoni, Leonardo
2014. Inferentialism, culture and public deliberation. Philosophy & Social Criticism 40:1 ► pp. 25 ff.
Marchettoni, Leonardo
2018. Brandom on Norms and Objectivity. Critical Horizons 19:3 ► pp. 215 ff.
Whiting, Daniel
2006. Between primitivism and naturalism: Brandom’s theory of meaning. Acta Analytica 21:3 ► pp. 3 ff.
Whiting, Daniel
2008. Meaning Holism andDe ReAscription. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38:4 ► pp. 575 ff.
Whiting, Daniel J.
2008. Conservatives and Racists: Inferential Role Semantics and Pejoratives. Philosophia 36:3 ► pp. 375 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.