Article published In:
Controversies, Communication and the BodyEdited by Joseph Lehmann
[Pragmatics & Cognition 23:3] 2016
► pp. 390–403
Edited by Joseph Lehmann
[Pragmatics & Cognition 23:3] 2016
► pp. 390–403
Remarks on the Barthesian notion of punctum
This paper aims to be a compendium on the significance of images as an effective mediator in communication. The research work has resulted from the assumption that it is possible to think of the image as an intrinsically ethical mediator in communication. It has been amply demonstrated that the use of images can reach a level within a communication that is inherently ethical, able to take effective account of an otherness. There cannot exist, in this sense, a communication that is not an appeal, a search for the other, inside this kind of exchange, with full respect of the other’s essence. A communication that makes use of images in an ethical manner will also be more immediate and certainly more effective. In order to address these issues, this paper’s investigation has been deepened with the semiotics bibliography of French essayist Roland Barthes, with particular reference to those essays concerning a kind of poetics of the punctum, an analysis in relation to those images that are able to disrupt the relationship between observer and observed.
Keywords: relationship, Barthes, empowerment, communication, efficacy, image, punctum, ethics, stadium
References
Arnheim, R
2009 Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye (New Version). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Barthes, R. & A. Lavers
1972 The Romans in films. Mythologies, 26–28. New York: Hill and Wang.
Barthes, R. & S. Heath
1977 Image, music, text. New York: Hill and Wang.
Barthes, R
1980 Camera Lucida: Reflections on photography. London: Jonathan Cape.
Barthes, R. & R. Howard
1982 Empire of signs. New York: Hill and Wang.
Didi Huberman, G
2004 L’image brûle
. Art Press 251. 68–73.
Gadamer, H.G
1994 Heidegger’s ways. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Gelo, F., A.C. Klassen & E. Gracely
2015 Patient use of images of artworks to promote conversation and enhance coping with hospitalization. Arts & Health: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice 7(1). 42–53. 
Gelo, O
2008 La metafora tra pensiero e linguaggio: Considerazioni teoriche e livelli d’analisi. Vie della metafora – linguistica, filosofia, psicologia. Corfinio: primeVie Edizioni, 149–176.
Moll, J.M.H
1986 Doctor-patient communication in rheumatology: Studies of visual and verbal perception using educational booklets and other graphic material. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 451. 198–209.
Potter, M.C., B. Wyble, C.E. Hagmann & E.S. McCourt
2014 Detecting meaning in RSVP at 13 ms per picture. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 76(2). 270–279.
Ratner, C
2002 Subjectivity and objectivity in qualitative methodology. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative social research 3(3). Retrieved from [URL]
Scarafile, G
2011 Il Demone di Lermontov. Variazioni al confine tra etica ed estetica. Raleigh: Lulu Enterprises Inc.
2016 Etica delle immagini. Brescia: Morcelliana.
Scheler, M
2005 On the rehabilitation of virtue (E. Kelly, Trans.). American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79(1). 21–37.
Schooley, B., T. San Nicolas-Rocca & R. Burkhard
2015 Patient provider communications in outpatient clinic settings: A clinic-based evaluation of mobile device and multimedia mediated communications for patient education. JMIR MhealthUhealth 3(1). e2.
Watzlawick, P., J.B. Bavelas & D.D. Jackson
1967 Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.
Zitlow, C.S. & H. Noden
2000 Image grammar: Using grammatical structures to teach writing. The English Journal 90(1). 141–143.