Part of
Corpus Approaches to Grammaticalization in EnglishEdited by Hans Lindquist and Christian Mair
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 13] 2004
► pp. 121–150
Edited by Hans Lindquist and Christian Mair
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 13] 2004
► pp. 121–150
Corpus linguistics and grammaticalisation theory
Statistics, frequencies, and beyond
The paper argues for a closer collaboration between corpus linguists and grammaticalisation theorists. Corpora have a number of benefits: First, they make it possible to study incipient or ongoing processes of grammaticalisation. Secondly, a quantitative-cum-qualitative analysis of corpus data makes it possible to shed light on important theoretical issues. Thirdly, corpora allow a better take on the textlinguistic, genre and discourse factors relevant to grammaticalisation.
The general points made are illustrated with data provided in the digitally accessible quotation base of the OED. On the basis of the evidence, I propose a distinction between two types of grammaticalisation, a “dynamic” one, which is reflected in massive shifts of frequency, and a “static” one, which can be characterised as the occasional use of lexical items in grammatical function.
Cited by
Cited by 42 other publications
Aaron, Jessi Elana
2010. Pushing the envelope: Looking beyond the variable context. Language Variation and Change 22:1 ► pp. 1 ff. 
Bouso, Tamara
2017. Muttering Contempt and Smiling Appreciation: Disentangling the History of the Reaction Object Construction in English. English Studies 98:2 ► pp. 194 ff.
Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2005. Lexicalization and Language Change,
Collins, Peter
2023. Modals and Quasi-Modals in English World-Wide. Journal of English Linguistics 51:3 ► pp. 265 ff.
DENIS, DEREK & SALI A. TAGLIAMONTE
2018. The changingfuture: competition, specialization and reorganization in the contemporary English future temporal reference system. English Language and Linguistics 22:3 ► pp. 403 ff.
Diskin, Chloé
2017. HeikePichler (ed.). Discourse‐Pragmatic Variation and Change in English: New Methods and Insights. Cambridge, U.K./New York: Cambridge University Press. 2016. 324 pp. Hb (9781107055766) US$110.00.. Journal of Sociolinguistics 21:2 ► pp. 293 ff.
Dong, Zhen & Fan Pan
2022. Book Review. Lingua 279 ► pp. 103430 ff.
Feltgen, Quentin
2024. Is language change chiefly a social diffusion affair? The role of entrenchment in frequency increase and in the emergence of complex structural patterns. Frontiers in Complex Systems 2
Flach, Susanne
2021. From movement into action to manner of causation: changes in argument mapping in the into-causative. Linguistics 59:1 ► pp. 247 ff.
Heine, Bernd, Heiko Narrog & Haiping Long
Loetzsch, Martin, Remi van Trijp & Luc Steels
2008. Typological and Computational Investigations of Spatial Perspective. In Modeling Communication with Robots and Virtual Humans [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4930], ► pp. 125 ff.
Loiseau, Sylvain
2011. Les faits statistiques comme objectivation ou comme interprétation : statistiques et modèles basés sur l'usage. Travaux de linguistique n°62:1 ► pp. 59 ff.
Loiseau, Sylvain
2015. Les différentes formes de la fréquence textuelle : proposition d’inventaire. Langages N° 197:1 ► pp. 5 ff.
Lorenz, David
2023. Could Be it’s Grammaticalization: Usage Patterns of the Epistemic Phrases(it) Could/Might Be. Journal of English Linguistics 51:2 ► pp. 133 ff.
Marttinen Larsson, Matti
2023. Modelling incipient probabilistic grammar change in real time: the grammaticalisation of possessive pronouns in European Spanish locative adverbial constructions. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 19:2 ► pp. 177 ff.
McCafferty, Kevin
2014. “I DONT CARE ONE CENT WHAT [Ø] GOYING ON IN GREAT Britten”: BE-Deletion IN IRISH ENGLISH. American Speech 89:4 ► pp. 441 ff.
McCafferty, Kevin
2016. Emigrant Letters: Exploring the ‘Grammar of the Conquered’. In Sociolinguistics in Ireland, ► pp. 218 ff.
Moore, Colette
2007. The Spread of Grammaticalized Forms. Journal of English Linguistics 35:2 ► pp. 117 ff.
Mourón‐Figueroa, Cristina
2008. A Semantic Analysis ofby‐Phrases in the York Cycle1. Studia Neophilologica 80:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
MÉNDEZ-NAYA, BELÉN
2008. On the history ofdownright. English Language and Linguistics 12:2 ► pp. 267 ff.
MÉNDEZ-NAYA, BELÉN
2008. Special issue on English intensifiers. English Language and Linguistics 12:2 ► pp. 213 ff.
Neels, Jakob
2015. The history of the quasi-auxiliaryuse(d)to. Journal of Historical Linguistics 5:2 ► pp. 177 ff.
Nordrum, Lene
2015. Exploring spontaneous-event marking though parallel corpora. Languages in Contrast 15:2 ► pp. 230 ff.
Olofsson, Arne
2011. PrepositionalfollowingRevisited. Studia Neophilologica 83:1 ► pp. 5 ff.
Petré, Peter
2016. Unidirectionality as a cycle of convention and innovation. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30 ► pp. 115 ff.
Pichler, Heike
2021. Grammaticalization and language contact in a discourse-pragmatic change in progress: The spread ofinnitin London English. Language in Society 50:5 ► pp. 723 ff.
Polzenhagen, Frank
2022. Reconsidering accounts of the grammaticalization of auxiliaries. In Figurative Thought and Language in Action [Figurative Thought and Language, 16], ► pp. 113 ff.
Rohdenburg, Günter
2013. Using the OED quotations database as a diachronic corpus. In Research Methods in Language Variation and Change, ► pp. 136 ff.
Salameh Jiménez, Shima
2024. Chapter 1. Linguistic change in the 20th century. In Language Change in the 20th Century [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 340], ► pp. 17 ff.
Schwarz, Sarah
2019. Signs of grammaticalization. In Developments in English Historical Morpho-Syntax [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 346], ► pp. 199 ff.
Schweinberger, Martin
2020. Analyzing change in the American English amplifier system in the fiction genre. In Corpora and the Changing Society [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 96], ► pp. 223 ff.
SIEMUND, PETER
2014. The emergence of English reflexive verbs: an analysis based on theOxford English Dictionary. English Language and Linguistics 18:1 ► pp. 49 ff.
Stange, Ulrike
2023. So Grown Stale? On Intensifying and Emphasizing Uses of Preverbalsoin Present-Day American English. American Speech: A Quarterly of Linguistic Usage 98:3 ► pp. 235 ff.
Stratton, James M.
2020. A diachronic analysis of the adjective intensifierwellfrom Early Modern English to Present Day English. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 65:2 ► pp. 216 ff.
Stratton, James M.
TAGLIAMONTE, SALI A., MERCEDES DURHAM & JENNIFER SMITH
2014. Grammaticalization at an early stage: futurebe going toin conservative British dialects. English Language and Linguistics 18:1 ► pp. 75 ff.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2014. Toward a constructional framework for research on language change. In Grammaticalization – Theory and Data [Studies in Language Companion Series, 162], ► pp. 87 ff.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2014. Toward a constructional framework for research on language change. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 1:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2015. Toward a coherent account of grammatical constructionalization. In Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 18], ► pp. 51 ff.
WATANABE, TAKUTO
2011. ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE IMMEDIATE FUTURE USE OF BE ABOUT TO IN THE HISTORY OF ENGLISH WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO LATE MODERN ENGLISH. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 28:1 ► pp. 56 ff.
Yaguchi, Michiko
2023.
Development of the Subject of BE
going to
in Grammaticalisation from the 1820s to 2010s in Comparison with BE
about to
. English Studies 104:7 ► pp. 1287 ff.
Yanning, Yang
2023. The diachronic analysis of resultative constructions. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 5:1 ► pp. 80 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.