Cover not available
Part of
Learner Corpora in Language Testing and Assessment
Edited by Marcus Callies and Sandra Götz
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 70] 2015
► pp. 13–34

The Marburg Corpus of Intermediate Learner English (MILE)

Over the last few decades, corpus linguistic research and methodology have had a huge impact on the foreign language classroom, mainly as reference tools but also by introducing new ways of (data-driven) learning into the classroom. A fairly recent trend is the use of corpus-linguistic methods for the study of the development of learner language, which has led to the compilation of a fairly large number of learner corpora. Among other things, this has opened up new avenues for language testing and assessment, e.g. in the context of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). However, although learner corpora seem to lend themselves easily to such purposes, the role they have actually played so far is rather minor in comparison to the huge influence on other aspects of foreign language teaching (at least with regard to German learners of English). The present chapter explores possible reasons and introduces the Marburg Corpus of Intermediate Learner English (MILE) as a potential resource for learner language analysis and for corpus-informed, -based and -driven contributions to language testing and assessment.

Published online: 9 April 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.70.01kre
References
Atwell, E., Howarth, P. & Souter, C
2003 The ISLE corpus: Italian and German spoken learners’ English. ICAME Journal 27: 5–18.Google Scholar
Barlow, M
2005 Computer-based analysis of learner language. In Analysing Learner Language, R. Ellis & G.P. Barkhuizen (eds), 335–357. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Braun, S
2005 From pedagogically relevant corpora to authentic language learning contents. ReCALL 17(1): 47–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Callies, M. and Zaytseva, E
2013 The Corpus of Academic Learner English (CALE) – A new resource for the assessment of writing proficiency in the academic register. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 2(1): 126–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe
2001 Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Dagneaux, E., Denness, S., Granger, S., Meunier, F., Neff, J. & Thewissen, J
2008 Error Tagging Manual. Version 1.3. Louvain-La-Neuve: Centre for English Corpus Linguistics.Google Scholar
Díaz-Negrillo, A. & Domingo-Fernández, J
2006 Error tagging systems for learner corpora. RESLA 19: 83–102.Google Scholar
Gilquin, G., De Cock, S. & Granger, S
2010 The Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage. Handbook and CD-ROM. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Granger, S
1998 The computerized learner corpus: A versatile new source of data for SLA research. In Learner English on Computer, S. Granger (ed.), 3–18. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2002 A bird’s-eye view of computer learner corpus research. In Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching [Language Learning & Language Teaching 6], S. Granger, J. Hung & S. Petch-Tyson (eds), 3–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Error-tagged learner corpora and CALL: A promising synergy. CALICO Journal 20(3): 465–480.Google Scholar
2008 Learner corpora. In Corpus Linguistics. An International Handbook, A. Lüdeling (ed.), 259–275. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Granger, S., Dagneaux, E., Meunier, F. & Paquot, M
2009 The International Corpus of Learner English, Version 2. Handbook and CD-ROM. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Gut, U
2012 The LeaP corpus. A multilingual corpus of spoken learner German and learner English. In Multilingual Corpora and Multilingual Corpus Analysis [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism 14], T. Schmidt & K. Wörner (eds), 3–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardie, A
2014 Modest XML for Corpora: Not a standard, but a suggestion. ICAME Journal 38: 73–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasko, V
2013 Capturing the dynamics of second language development via learner corpus research: A very long engagement. The Modern Language Journal 97(1): 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J. & Filipović, L
2012 Criterial Features in L2 English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Izumi, E., Uchimoto, K. & Isahara, H
2004 The NICT JLE Corpus: Exploiting the language learners’ speech database for research and education. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management 12: 119–125.Google Scholar
Jäkel, O
2010 The Flensburg English Classroom Corpus (FLECC): Sammlung authentischer Unterrichtsgespräche aus dem aktuellen Englischunterricht auf verschiedenen Stufen an Grund-, Haupt-, Real- und Gesamtschulen Norddeutschlands. Flensburg: Flensburg University Press.Google Scholar
Kämmerer, S
2012 Interference in advanced English interlanguage: Scope, detectability and dependency. In Input, Process and Product: Developments in Teaching and Language Corpora, J. Thomas & A. Boulton (eds), 284–297. Brno: Masaryk University Press.Google Scholar
Kreyer, R
2011 Review of Jäkel, O. (2010): The Flensburg English Classroom Corpus (FLECC). Flensburg: Flensburg University Press. Fremdsprachen Lehren und Lernen 40: 136–138.Google Scholar
Leech, G
1998 Learner corpora: What they are and what can be done with them. In Learner English on Computer, S. Granger (ed.), xiv–xx. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lüdeling, A
2008 Mehrdeutigkeiten und Kategorisierung: Probleme bei der Annotation von Lernerkorpora. In Fortgeschrittene Lernervarietäten, M. Walter & P. Grommes (eds), 119–140. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Lüdeling, A., Walter, M., Kroymann, E. & Adolphs, P
2005 Multi-level error annotation in learner corpora. Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference Series 1(1): 105–115.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B
2000 The CHILDES project: Tools for Analyzing Talk, 3rd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Meunier, F
2002 The pedagogical value of native and learner corpora in EFL grammar teaching. In Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching [Language Learning & Language Teaching 6], S. Granger, J. Hung & S. Petch-Tyson (eds), 119–141. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meunier, F. & Littre, D
2013 Tracking learners’ progress: Adopting a dual ‘corpus cum experimental data’ approach. The Modern Language Journal 97: 61–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, J
2002 Korpuslinguistik und Englischunterricht. Eine Einführung. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Nesselhauf, N
2004 Learner corpora and their potential for language teaching. In How to Use Corpora in Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 12], J. Sinclair (ed.), 125–152. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicholls, D
2003 The Cambridge Learner Corpus: Error coding and analysis for lexicography and ELT. In Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2003 Conference, D. Archer, P. Rayson, A. Wilson & T. McEnery (eds), 572–581. Lancaster: University of Lancaster.Google Scholar
Ortega, L. & Iberri-Shea, G
2005 Longitudinal research in second language acquisition: Recent trends and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 25: 26–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L. & Byrnes, H
(eds). 2008 The Longitudinal Study of L2 Capacities. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pérez-Paredes, P
2010 Corpus Linguistics and Language Education in perspective: Appropriation and the possibilities scenario. In Corpus Linguistics in Language Teaching, T. Harris & M. Moreno Jaén (eds), 53–73. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Reznicek, M., Lüdeling, A., Krummes, C., Schwantuschke, F., Walter, M., Schmidt, K., Hirschmann, H. & Andreas, T
2012 Das Falko-Handbuch. Korpusaufbau und Annotationen. Version 2.01. Berlin: Institut für deutsche Sprache und Linguistik, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.Google Scholar
Römer, U
2006 Pedagogical applications of corpora: Some reflections on the current scope and a wish list for future developments. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 54: 121–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Learner language and the norms in native corpora and EFL teaching materials: A case study of English conditionals. In Anglistentag 2006 Halle. Proceedings, S. Volk-Birke & J. Lippert (eds), 355–363. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J
1996 EAGLES. Preliminary Recommendations on Corpus Typology, [URL] (25 July 2014).
Tono, Y
2003 Learner corpora: Design, development and applications. In Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2003 Conference, D. Archer, P. Rayson, A. Wilson & T. McEnery (eds), 800–809. Lancaster: University of Lancaster.Google Scholar
2009 Variability and invariability in learner language. A corpus-based approach. In Corpus Analysis and Variation in Linguistics (Vol. 1) [Tokyo University of Foreign Studies 1], Y. Kawaguchi, M. Minegishi & J. Durand (eds), 67–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012  International Corpus of Crosslinguistic Interlanguage: Project overview and a case study on the acquisition of new verb co-occurrence patterns. In Developmental and Crosslinguistic Perspectives in Learner Corpus Research [Tokyo University of Foreign Studies 4], Y. Tono, Y. Kawaguchi & M. Minegishi (eds), 27–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, H.G
1998 Context, community and authentic language. TESOL Quarterly 32(4): 705–716. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Hoffmann, Tim
2022. Measuring lexical accuracy. In Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in Learner Corpus Research [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 104], ► pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Kawecki, Regis
2022. In what ways are the Semarang University Indonesian learners of French developing an Interlanguage?. European Journal of Applied Linguistics 10:2 ► pp. 227 ff. DOI logo
Kreyer, Rolf
2021. Chapter 5. Collocations in learner English. In Beyond Concordance Lines [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 102], ► pp. 97 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.