Cover not available
Part of
Parallel Corpora for Contrastive and Translation Studies: New resources and applications
Edited by Irene Doval and M. Teresa Sánchez Nieto
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 90] 2019
► pp. 183–195

PEST

A parallel electronic corpus of state treaties

| University of Tampere, Finland
| University of Tampere
| University of Tampere

This chapter introduces the Parallel Electronic corpus of State Treaties (PEST). The current plan is to compile a parallel corpus, which will include treaties concluded between Russia and Finland, Finland and Sweden, and Sweden and Russia. In addition, there will be a subcorpus of international conventions in all three languages plus English, to be used as reference data. The chapter describes the structure of the subcorpora (number of documents, their chronological distribution and topics featured), and it also addresses the challenges of balancing such a corpus. In the future, this material can be used for studies ranging from lexicon and semantics to grammar, style, discourse, translation studies, and language for special purposes.

Keywords: legal language, language of state treaties, balanced corpus, compiling parallel corpora
Article outline
  • 1.General
  • 2.PEST corpus
  • 3.The Russian–Finnish section: Can a parallel corpus be balanced?
  • 4.Other sections of the corpus
    • 4.1The Sweden–Finland section
    • 4.2The Russia–Sweden section
    • 4.3Multilateral international treaties
  • 5.Great expectations
  • Acknowledgement
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 20 March 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.90.11mik
References
Andor, József
2004 The master and his performance: An interview with Noam Chomsky. International Pragmatics 1(1): 93–111.Google Scholar
Baker, Mona
1996 Corpus-based translation studies: The challenges that lie ahead. In Terminology, LSP and Translation, Harold Somers (ed.), 175–187. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1993 Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing 8: 243–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bunn-Livingstone, Sandra L.
2002 Juricultural Pluralism Vis-À-Vis Treaty Law: State Practice and Attitudes. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Hollis, Duncan B. et al.
2005 National Treaty Law and Practice. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Mikhailov, Mikhail
2017 Are classical principles of corpus compiling applicable to parallel corpora of literary texts? In Translation Studies and Translation Practice: Proceedings of the 2nd International TRANSLATA Conference, 2014 Part 1 [Forum Translationswissenschaft 19], Lew N. Zybatow, Andy Stauder & Michael Ustaszewski (eds), 151–157. Frankfurt: Peter Lang,Google Scholar
Mikhailov, Mikhail & Santalahti, Miia
2017 Mistä kertoo valtiosopimusten kieli? Tapaustutkimus interferenssistä Suomen ja Venäjän välisissä valtiosopimuksissa (What can we tell from the language of state treaties? Case study on interference in treaties between Finland and Russia). MikaEL, Electronic Journal of the KäTu Symposium on Translation and Interpreting Studies 10: 73–87.Google Scholar
Olohan, Maeve
2004 Introducing Corpora in Translation Studies. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prieto Ramos, Fernando
2011 El traductor como redactor de instrumentos jurídicos: el caso de los tratados internacionales (Translator as an editor of legal instruments: The case of international treaties). JoSTrans 15: 200–214.Google Scholar
Probirskaja, Svetlana
2009 Rajankäyntiä: Suomen ja Venäjän kahdenväliset valtiosopimukset käännöstieteellisen avainsana-analyysin valossa (Across the Border: Finnish and Russian State Treaties in the Light of Keyword Analysis). PhD dissertation, Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
Souma, Julia, Kudashev, Igor & Mikhailov, Mikhail
2017 Otricanie v russkih i finskih versiâh dvustoronnih dogovorov meždu Rossiej i Finlândiej: opyt korpusnogo issledovaniâ (Negation in Russian and Finnish versions of the state treaties between Russia and Finland: A corpus-based research). In Conference Proceedings Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies (Komp'juternaja lingvistika i intellektual'nye tehnologii). 23nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies – 2017. Moscow.
Toury, Gideon
2012 Descriptive Translation Studies – and Beyond, rev. edn. [Benjamins Translation Library 100]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valtiosopimusopas
2012 Kansainvälisten ja EU-sopimusten valmistelua ja voimaansaattamista koskevat ohjeet (Manual on preparation and ratification of international and EU treaties). Helsinki: Publications of the Finnish Ministry of Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar
Zanettin, Federico
2012 Translation-Driven Corpora: Corpus Resources for Descriptive and Applied Translation Studies. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Bajčić, Martina
2021. Linguistic Comparison within CJEU’s Decision-Making: A Debunking Exercise. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 34:5 ► pp. 1433 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.