This chapter offers a diachronic analysis of the use of personal pronouns in English law reports. Results show that law reports are narrative texts with high frequencies of third person pronouns. However, markers of subjectivity, involvement and interpersonality, such as first and second person pronouns, are also amply represented–a feature which distinguishes law reports from other formal, specialized text types, as well as from other legal documents. In addition, law reports seem to have developed over time, becoming more involved, subjective and interpersonal, a tendency that coincides with a major change in the history of law reporting in English.
1999The development of person agreement markers: From pronouns to higher accessibility markers. In Usage-based Models of Language, Michael Barlow & Suzanne Kemmer (eds), 197–260. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Atkinson, Dwight
1996The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975: A sociohistorical discourse analysis. Language in Society 2(3): 333–371.
Atkinson, Dwight
1999Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context. The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Badger, Richard
2003Legal and general: Towards a genre analysis of newspaper law reports. English for Specific Purposes 22: 249–263.
Baker, John
2003The Oxford History of the Laws of England, Vol. VI: 1483–1558. Oxford: OUP.
Benveniste, Émile
1971Problems in General Linguistics. Coral Gables FL: University of Miami Press.
Bhatia, Vijay K.
1993Analysing Genre. Language Use in Professional Settings. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Biber, Douglas
1988Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP.
Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward
1997Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. In To Explain the Present: Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen, Terttu Nevalainen & Leena Kahlas-Tarkka (eds), 253–275. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Breeze, Ruth
2010They say, we do: Writer’s strategic positioning in the discourse of political communication research. In Lorés-Sanz, Mur-Dueñas & Lafuente-Millán (eds), 163–179.
Breeze, Ruth
2014The discursive construction of professional relationships through the legal letter of advice. In Breeze, Gotti & Sancho-Guinda (eds), 281–302.
Breeze, Ruth, Gotti, Maurizio & Sancho-Guinda, Carmen
(eds)2014Interpersonality in Legal Genres. Bern: Peter Lang.
Breivega, Kjersti, Dahl, Trine & Fløttum, Kjersti
2002Traces of self and others in research articles. A comparative pilot study of English, French and Norwegian research articles in medicine, economics and linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 12(2): 218–239.
Claridge, Claudia
2012Linguistic levels: Styles, registers, genres, text types. In English Historical Linguistics. An International Handbook, Vol. 1, Alexander Bergs & Laurel J. Brinton (eds), 237–253. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Comrie, Bernard
1975Polite plurals and predicate agreement. Language 51(2): 406–418.
Cornish, William, Anderson, J. Stuart, Cocks, Ray, Lobban, Michael, Polden, Patrick & Smith, Keith
2010The Oxford History of the Laws of England, Vol. XI: 1820–1914. Oxford: OUP.
Corpus of Early Modern English Statutes
2017 Unpublished corpus. Compiled by Anu Lehto. University of Helsinki.
Craig, Hugh
1999Authorial attribution and computational stylistics: If you can tell authors apart, have you learned anything about them?Literary and Linguistic Computing 14(1): 103–113.
Crystal, David
1994The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.
2017The Corpus of Historical English Law Reports 1535–1999 (CHELAR): A resource for analysing the development of English legal discourse. ICAME Journal 41: 53–82.
Gea-Valor, María-Lluisa
2010The emergence of the author’s voice in book reviewing: A contrastive study of academic vs. non-academic discourse. In Lorés-Sanz, Mur-Dueñas & Lafuente-Millán (eds), 117–135.
Gotti, Maurizio
2010Identity traits in written academic discourse across languages and cultures. In Lorés-Sanz, Mur-Dueñas & Lafuente-Millán (eds), 41–59.
Görlach, Manfred
1999Nineteenth-Century England: An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.
Görlach, Manfred
2001Eighteenth-Century English. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter.
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisƚaw
2011Patterns of Linguistic Variation in American Legal English. A Corpus-based Study. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Greenberg, Daniel
2008The techniques of gender-neutral drafting. In Drafting Legislation. A Modern Approach, Constantin Stefanou & Helen Xanthaki (eds), 63–76. London: Routledge.
Grund, Peter
2007From tongue to text: The transmission of the Salem witchcraft examination records. American Speech 82(2): 119–150.
Hafner, Christoph A.
2014Stance in a professional legal genre. The barrister’s opinion. In Breeze, Gotti & Sancho-Guinda (eds), 137–160.
2005.‘We do not seem to have a theory … The theory I present here attempts to fill this gap’: Inclusive and exclusive pronouns in academic writing. Applied Linguistics 26(3): 343–375.
Herrando-Rodrigo, Isabel
2010“If you suffer from… check the Internet”: The role of engagement and self-mention devices in medical research articles and electronic popularizations. In Lorés-Sanz, Mur-Dueñas & Lafuente-Millán (eds), 255–274.
Hiltunen, Risto
1990Chapters on Legal English. Aspects Past and Present of the Language of the Law. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.
Hoadley, Daniel
2015The curious case of the judgment enhancers. In Magrath (ed), 17–27.
Holborn, Guy
2015The old law reporters. In Magrath (ed), 29–36.
Huber, Magnus
2007The Old Bailey Proceedings, 1764–1834. Evaluating and annotating a corpus of 18th- and 19th-century spoken English. In Annotating Variation and Change [Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 1], Anneli Meurman-Solin & Arja Nurmi (eds). Helsinki: University of Helsinki [URL]
Huber, Magnus, Nissel, Magnus, Maiwald, Patrick & Widlitzki, Bianca
2012The Old Bailey Corpus. Spoken English in the 18th and 19th centuries. [URL]
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.
Hyland, Ken
2001Humble servants of the discipline? Self mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes 20(3): 207–226.
Hyland, Ken
2002Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1091–1112.
Hyland, Ken
2005Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 7(2): 173–192.
2001I am how I sound. Voice as self-representation in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 10: 3–33.
Jaffe, Alexandra
2009Introduction: The sociolinguistics of stance. In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, Alexandra Jaffe (ed), 1–28. Oxford: OUP.
Kearns, Martin
2007Legal English. Madrid: Colex.
Kilgarriff, Adam
2001Comparing corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 6(1): 97–133.
Kuo, Chih-Hua
1999The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for Specific Purposes 18(2): 121–138.
Kytö, Merja
1996Manual to the Diachronic Part of The Helsinki Corpus of English Texts. Coding Conventions and Lists of Source Texts, 3rd edn. Helsinki: Department of English, University of Helsinki.
Kytö, Merja & Walker, Terry
2003The linguistic study of Early Modern English speech-related texts: How ‘bad’ can ‘bad’ data be?Journal of English Linguistics 31: 221–148.
Kytö, Merja & Culpeper, Jonathan
2006A Corpus of English Dialogues, 1560–1760. [URL]
Lafuente-Millán, Enrique, Mur-Dueñas, Pilar, Lorés-Sanz, Rosa & Vázquez-Orta Ignacio
2010Interpersonality in written academic discourse. In Lorés-Sanz, Mur-Dueñas & Lafuente-Millán (eds), 13–39.
Lass, Roger
1999Phonology and morphology. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. III: 1476–1776, Roger Lass (ed), 56–186. Cambridge: CUP.
2017Binomials and multinomials in Early Modern English Parliamentary Acts. In Binomials in the History of English, Joanna Kopaczyk & Hans Sauer (eds), 261–278. Cambridge: CUP.
(eds)2010Constructing Interpersonality: Multiple Perspectives on Written Academic Genres. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Lyons, John
1982Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor, ergo sum? In Speech, Place, and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics, Robert J. Jarvella & Wolfgang Klein (eds), 101–124. New York NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Maci, Stefania
2006 An emerging medical genre: The research letter. Paper presented at the conference on Identity and Culture in English Domain-Specific Discourse: Methodological Issues and Preliminary Studies. October 19–20, Naples, Italy.
Magrath, Paul
2015aThe past, present, and future of the ICLR. In Magrath (ed), 5–15.
Magrath, Paul
(ed)2015bThe Law Reports 1865–2015. Anniversary Edition. London: The Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales.
Marín Pérez, María José & Rea Rizzo, Camino
2012Structure and design of the British Law Report Corpus (BLRC): A legal corpus of judicial decisions from the UK. Journal of English Studies 10: 131–145.
Mazzi, Davide
2014“The words are plain and clear …”: On interpersonal positioning in the discourse of judicial interpretation. In Breeze, Gotti & Sancho-Guinda (eds), 39–62.
Mellinkoff, David
1963The Language of the Law. Boston MA: Little, Brown & Co.
Mitchell, Paul
2015Between speech and writing. In Magrath (ed), 37–46.
Mur-Dueñas, Pilar
2007“I/we focus on…”: A cross-cultural analysis of self-mentions in business management research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7: 15–26.
OED = Oxford English Dictionary. Third edition in progress: OED Online, March 2000–, John A. Simpson (ed). [URL]
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
R version 3.3.1 2016A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Core Team. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. [URL]
Rahimivand, Masumeh & Kuhi, Davud
2014An exploration of discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences 98: 1492–1501.
Ratia, Maura
2005Personal pronouns in argumentation: An early tobacco controversy. In Opening Windows on Texts and Discourses of the Past [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 134], Janne Skaffari, Matti Peikola, Ruth Carroll, Risto Hiltunen & Brita Wårvik (eds), 123–141. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ratia, Maura & Suhr, Carla
2011Medical pamphlets: Controversy and advertising. In Medical Writing in Early Modern English, Irma Taavitsainen & Päivi Pahta (eds), 180–203. Cambridge: CUP.
2011Introducing the Corpus of Historical English Law Reports: Structure and compilation techniques. Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos 17: 99–120.
2015Diachronic and Synchronic Aspects of Legal English: Past, Present, and Possible Future of Legal English. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Scowen, Clive
2015150 not out. In Magrath (ed), 3–4.
Shoemaker, Robert B.
2008The Old Bailey Proceedings and the representation of crime and criminal justice in eighteenth-century London. Journal of British Studies 47(3): 559–180.
Taavitsainen, Irma & Pahta, Päivi
2010Scientific discourse. In Historical Pragmatics, Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds), 549–586. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Tang, Ramona & Suganthi, John
1999The ‘I’ in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun. English for Specific Purposes 18: 23–39.
Tessuto, Girolamo
2006Opinions of counsel: An exploratory survey of generic features. In Explorations in Specialized Genres, Vijay K. Bhatia & Maurizio Gotti (eds), 291–308. Bern: Peter Lang
Tiersma, Peter M.
1999Legal Language. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
1998Who am I/Who are we in academic writing?International Journal of Applied Linguistics 8(2): 163–190.
Vázquez Rozas, Victoria & García-Miguel, José M.
2006Transitividad, subjetividad y frecuencia de uso. Actes del VII Congrés de Lingüística General. Barcelona, 18–21 April 2006. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona.
Wales, Katie
1996Personal Pronouns in Present-day English. Cambridge: CUP.
2016Taboo language and swearing in 18th century and 19th century English. A diachronic study based on the Old Bailey Corpus. In Corpus Linguistics on the Move: Exploring and Understanding English Through Corpora, María José López-Couso, Belén Méndez-Naya, Paloma Núñez-Pertejo & Ignacio M. Palacios-Martínez (eds), 313–336. Leiden: Brill.
Williams, Christopher
2007[2005]Tradition and Change in Legal English. Verbal Constructions in Prescriptive Texts, 2nd edn. Bern: Peter Lang.
Williams, Christopher
2008The end of the ‘masculine rule’? Gender-neutral legislative drafting in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Statute Law Review 3(1): 139–153.
Williams, Christopher
2013Changes in the verb phrase in legislative language in English. In The Verb Phrase in English. Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora, Bas Aarts, Joanne Close, Geoffrey Leech & Sean Wallis (eds), 353–371. Cambridge: CUP.
Wydick, Richard C.
2005[1978]Plain English for Lawyers, 5th edn. Durham NC: Carolina Academic Press.
2023. TheCorpus of Contemporary English Legal Decisions, 1950–2021 (CoCELD): A new tool for analysing recent changes in English legal discourse. ICAME Journal 47:1 ► pp. 109 ff.
Wood, Margaret
2022. A lexico-grammatical comparison of statutory law and popular written language. Research in Corpus Linguistics 10:2 ► pp. 16 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.