Cover not available

Article In: Studies in Language: Online-First Articles

Anticausativization and lability in Late Latin

The effect of usage frequency on their distribution

ORCiD logo with link | Ghent University
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This paper investigates the effect of usage frequency on the alternation between anticausativization and lability in Late Latin. For many verbs entering the causal–noncausal alternation (‘John opens the door’ vs. ‘The door opens’), the intransitive alternant is either unmarked in lability or marked by the mediopassive voice or a reflexive pronoun. Previous research suggested that factors such as control, telicity, and Aktionsart influence the selection among these strategies. Drawing on a representative sample of Latin texts dating from 200 to 600 CE, this study offers corpus-based evidence on how these parameters align with the form–frequency correspondence principle. The data show that verbs with higher semantic transitivity tend to occur more frequently in their transitive alternant, and that control is a subject property more associated with transitive uses. I therefore argue that usage frequency plays a pivotal role in shaping transitivity in the diachrony of anticausativization and lability.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical remarks
    • 2.1Anticausativization: Diathesis and semantic constraints
    • 2.2Anticausativization in Latin
      • 2.2.1Mediopassive
      • 2.2.2Reflexivity
      • 2.2.3Lability
    • 2.3Variation in anticausativization: Two hypotheses
      • 2.3.1Transitivity as a continuum
      • 2.3.2Form-frequency correspondence
  • 3.Methodological remarks
    • 3.1Corpus and data collection
    • 3.2Annotation
      • Strategy
      • Event
      • Aktionsart
      • Telic, Dynamic, Durative
      • Animacy
      • Control
      • Causalness
    • 3.3Hypotheses
    • 3.4Statistical approach
  • 4.Semantic variation in anticausativization
    • 4.1Statistical analysis
      • 4.1.1Bivariate analysis
      • 4.1.2Multivariate analysis
    • 4.2Aktionsart and causalness
      • 4.2.1Actionality
      • 4.2.2Causalness in the diachrony of Latin
      • 4.2.3Frequency and actionality
    • 4.3Relational properties and anticausativization: Control
      • 4.3.1Control and the encoding of anticausativization
      • 4.3.2Frequency and control
    • 4.4Frequency, semantic transitivity and encoding
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Data availability
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • Author queries
  • References
References (110)
References
Adams, James N. 2003. Bilingualism and the Latin language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. Social variation and the Latin language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Florian Schäfer. 2015. External arguments in transitivity alternations: A layering approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bahrt, Nicklas N. 2021. Voice syncretism. Berlin: Language Science Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baldi, Philip. 1999. The foundations of Latin. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Becker, Laura. 2024. Zero marking in inflection: A token-based approach. Journal of Language Modelling 12(2). 349–413. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bentley, Delia. 2024a. The causative alternation in Italian: A case study in the parallel architecture of grammar. In Edward Gibson & Moshe Poliak (Eds.), From fieldwork to linguistic theory: A tribute to Dan Everett (Empirically Oriented Theoretical Morphology and Syntax 15), 225–273. Berlin: Language Science Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2024b. Internally caused change as change by inner predisposition: Comparative evidence from Romance. Journal of Linguistics 60(3). 483–525. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Piermarco & Mario Squartini. 1995. An attempt at defining the class of ‘gradual completion verbs.’ In Piermarco Bertinetto, Valentina Bianchi, James Higginbotham & Mario Squartini (Eds.), Temporal reference, aspect and actionality, vol. 11: Semantic and syntactic perspectives, 11–26. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cennamo, Michela. 1993. The reanalysis of reflexives: A diachronic perspective. Napoli: Liguori.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. The loss of the voice dimension between Late Latin and Early Romance. In Monika S. Schmid, Jennifer R. Austin & Dieter Stein (Eds.), Historical Linguistics 1997: Selected papers from the 13th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Düsseldorf, 10–17 August 1997 (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 164), 77–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. The rise and grammaticalization paths of Latin fieri and facere as passive auxiliaries. In Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö (Eds.), Passivization and typology: Form and function (Typological Studies in Language 68), 311–336. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Voice. In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (Eds.), The Oxford guide to the Romance languages, 967–980. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. Anticausatives and lability in Italian and French: A diachronic-synchronic comparative study. In Silvia Luraghi & Elisa Roma (Eds.), Valency over time: Diachronic perspectives on valency patterns and valency orientation, 265–304. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. Anticausativization in Latin and Early Italo-Romance: The semantics of predicates and the syntax of voice. In Domenica Romagno, Francesco Rovai, Michele Bianconi & Marta Capano (Eds.), Variation, contact, and reconstruction in the ancient Indo-European languages (Brill’s Studies in Historical Linguistics 17), 243–273. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cennamo, Michela, Thórhallur Eythórsson & Jóhanna Barðdal. 2015. Semantic and (morpho)syntactic constraints on anticausativization: Evidence from Latin and Old Norse-Icelandic. Linguistics 53(4). 677–729. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clackson, James. 2009. Indo-European linguistics: an introduction (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Eve V. & Herbert H. Clark. 1978. Universals, relativity, and language processing. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of human language, vol. 11: Method&theory, 225–277. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1985. Causative verb formation and other verb-deriving morphology. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 31: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 309–348. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. 2nd edn. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 2006. Syntaxe générale. Vol. 21: La phrase. Paris: Lavoisier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2024. Transitivity, valency, and voice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2003. Typology and universals (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Verbs: Aspect and causal structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 2019. The grammar network: How linguistic structure is shaped by language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feltenius, Leif. 1977. Intransitivizations in Latin. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flobert, Pierre. 1975. Les verbes déponents latins: Des origines à Charlemagne. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, John, Sanford Weisberg, Brad Price, Michael Friendly & Jangman Hong. 2003. effects: Effect Displays for Linear, Generalized Linear, and Other Models. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fruyt, Michèle. 2011. Grammaticalization in Latin. In Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (Eds.), New perspectives on historical Latin syntax, vol. 41: Complex sentences, grammaticalization, typology, 661–864. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geniušienė, Emma. 1987. The typology of reflexives. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gianollo, Chiara. 2014. Labile verbs in Late Latin. Linguistics 52(4). 945–1002. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, T. 1985. Iconicity, isomorphism, and non-arbitrary coding in syntax. In John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax: Proceedings of a symposium on iconicity in syntax, Stanford, June 24–26, 1983 (Typological Studies in Language 6), 187–220. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, John N. 1991. The collapse and replacement of verbal inflection in Late Latin/Early Romance: How would one know? In Roger Wright (ed.), Latin and the Romance languages in the Early Middle Ages, 83–99. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph Harold. 1966. Language universals: With special reference to feature hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haiman, John. 1980. The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation. Language 56(3). 515–540. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1987. Transitivity alternations of the anticausative type. Cologne: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, University of Cologne. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. The grammaticization of passive morphology. Studies in Language 14(1). 25–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (Eds.), Causatives and transitivity (Studies in Language Companion Series 23), 87–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries. Cognitive Linguistics 19(1). 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Universals of causative and anticausative verb formation and the spontaneity scale. Lingua Posnaniensis 58(2). 33–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. Explaining grammatical coding asymmetries: Form — frequency correspondences and predictability. Journal of Linguistics 57(3). 605–633. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, Andreea Calude, Michael Spagnol, Heiko Narrog & Eli̇F. Bamyaci. 2014. Coding causal — noncausal verb alternations: A form — frequency correspondence explanation. Journal of Linguistics 50(3). 587–625. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hatcher, Anna Granville. 1942. Reflexive verbs, Latin, Old French, Modern French. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 2004. Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer, Christopher Kennedy & Beth Levin. 1999. Scalar structure underlies telicity in “degree achievements”. In Tanya Matthews & Devon Strolovitch (Eds.), Proceedings of SALT IX, 127–144. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heidinger, Steffen. 2010. French anticausatives: A diachronic perspective. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Frequenz und die Kodierung der Kausativ-Antikausativ-Alternation im Französischen. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 62(1). 31–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. The persistence of labile verbs in the French causative-anticausative alternation. Linguistics 52(4). 1003–1024. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Causalness and the encoding of the causative — anticausative alternation in French and Spanish. Journal of Linguistics 51(3). 562–594. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heidinger, Steffen & Richard Huyghe. 2024. Semantic roles and the causative-anticausative alternation: evidence from French change-of-state verbs. Linguistics 62(1). 159–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herman, József. 2002. La disparition du passif synthétique latin: Nouvel essai sur l’ècrit et le parlé en latin mérovingien. Estudis Romànics 241. 31–46.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirt, Hermann. 1937. Indogermanische Grammatik, Teil VII, Syntax II. Die Lehre vom einfachen und zusammengesetzten Satz. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofmann, Johann Baptist & Anton Szantyr. 1965. Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2). 251–299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hothorn, Torsten & Achim Zeileis. 2011. partykit: A toolkit for recursive partytioning. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Inglese, Guglielmo. 2020. The Hittite middle voice: Synchrony, diachrony, typology (Brill’s Studies in Indo-European Languages & Linguistics 20). Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. Anticausativization and basic valency orientation in Latin. In Silvia Luraghi & Elisa Roma (Eds.), Valency over time: Diachronic perspectives on valency patterns and valency orientation, 133–168. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. Cross-linguistic sources of anticausative markers. Linguistic Typology at the Crossroads 2(2). 127–186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Inglese, Guglielmo, Giulia Mazzola & Eugenio Goria. Forthcoming. What is an anticausative marker and where do anticausative markers come from? In Guglielmo Inglese, Giulia Mazzola & Eugenio Goria (eds.), Diachronic and typological perspectives on anticausativization (Typological Studies in Language). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Joffre, Marie-Dominique. 1995. Le verbe latin, voix et diathèse (Bibliothèque d’études classiques 4). Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Ingrid. 2007. Middle voice. Lingua 117(10). 1677–1714. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. The middle voice (Typological Studies in Language 23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klaiman, M. H. 1991. Grammatical voice (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 59). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koontz-Garboden, Andrew. 2009. Anticausativization. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 27(1). 77–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. The monotonicity hypothesis. In Violeta Demonte & Louise McNally (eds.), Telicity, change, and state: A cross-categorial view of event structure, 139–161. 1st edn. Oxford: Oxford University Pres. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid. 1998. Passive, anticausative and classification of Verbs: The case of Vedic. In Leonid Kulikov & Heinz Vater (eds.), Typology of verbal categories, 139–168. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011a. Voice typology. In Jae J. Song (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, 368–398. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011b. Passive to anticausative through impersonalization: The case of Vedic and Indo-European. In Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), Studies in language companion series, vol. 1241, 229–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. Les verbes labiles dans l’histoire de la famille indo-européenne: une perspective typologique diachronique. In Peter Lauwers, Katia Paykin, Mihaela Ilioaia, Machteld Meulleman & Pascale Hadermann (eds.), Quand le syntagme nominal prend ses marques : du prédicat à l’argument, 191–216. Reims: EPURE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid & Nikolaos Lavidas. 2013. Reconstructing passive and voice in Proto-Indo-European. Journal of Historical Linguistics 3(1). 98–121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Introduction. Linguistics 52(4). 871–877. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1991. Predicate classes and participation. In Hansjakob Seiler & Waldfried Premper (eds.), Partizipation: Das Sprachliche Erfassen von Sachverhalten, 183–239. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Situation types, valency frames and operations. In Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages, vol. 21: Case studies from Austronesia, the Pacific, Americas, and theoretical outlook, 1547–1596. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Letuchiy, Alexander. 2010. Lability and spontaneity. In Patrick Brandt & Marco García García (eds.), Transitivity: Form, meaning, acquisition, and processing (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 166), 237–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 26). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia. 2022. Basic valency orientation, the anticausative alternation, and voice in PIE. In Melanie Malzahn, Hannes Fellner & Theresa-Susanna Illés (eds.), Zurück zur Wurzel — Struktur, Funktion und Semantik der Wurzel im Indogermanischen: Akten der Tagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 13. bis 16. September 2016 in Wien, 185–196. Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia, Guglielmo Inglese & Daniel Kölligan. 2021. The passive voice in ancient Indo-European languages: inflection, derivation, periphrastic verb forms. Folia Linguistica Historica 42(2). 339–391. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martínez Rojas, Lucía, Verónica Orqueda, Francisca Toro Varela & Berta González Saavedra. 2021. Desarrollo diacrónico de las funciones de se y sibi del latín arcaico al latín clásico. Boletín de Filología 561. 483–557. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merlo, Paola. 2016. Quantitative computational syntax: some initial results. Italian Journal of Computational Linguistics 2(1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, D.Gary. 2010. Language change and linguistic theory. Vol. 21: Morphological, syntactic, and typological change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Næss, Åshild. 2007. Prototypical transitivity (Typological Studies in Language 72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna, David A. Peterson & Jonathan Barnes. 2004. Transitivizing and detransitivizing languages. Linguistic Typology 8(2). 149–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norberg, Dag Ludvig. 1943. Syntaktische Forschungen auf dem Gebiet des Spätlateins und des frühen Mittellateins (Uppsala Universitets Årsskrift 9). Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ongenae, Tim A. F. 2024. Permittito aperiat oculum: Typological considerations on P-lability and its interaction with morphosyntactic alignment in Latin medical texts. Folia Linguistica Historica 45(1). 79–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forthcoming. Anticausativization and lability in Latin before 200 CE: The role of transitivity parameters in the syntax of anticausativization. In Guglielmo Inglese, Eugenio Goria & Giulia Mazzola (eds.), Diachronic and typological perspectives on anticausativization (Typological Studies in Language). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pinkster, Harm. 2015. The Oxford Latin syntax. Vol. 11: The simple clause. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2025. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin. 2010. Reflections on manner/result complementarity. In Malka Rappaport Hovav, Edit Doron & Ivy Sichel (eds.), Lexical semantics, syntax, and event structure, 21–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ripley, Brian. 2009. nnet: Feed-forward neural networks and multinomial log-linear models [R package]. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rovai, Francesco. 2019. Impersonal passives and the suffix -r in the Indo-European languages. In Michela Cennamo & Claudia Fabrizio (eds.), Historical linguistics 2015: Selected papers from the 22nd International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Naples, 27–31 July 2015 (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 348), 188–216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samardžić, Tanja & Paola Merlo. 2018. The probability of external causation: An empirical account of crosslinguistic variation in lexical causatives. Linguistics 56(5). 895–938. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sánchez Salor, E. 1981. El incremento de la construcción intransitiva en latín tardío. Revista Española de Lingüística 11(2). 373–410.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schäfer, Florian. 2008. The syntax of (anti-)causatives: External arguments in change-of-state contexts (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 126). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. The causative alternation. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(2). 641–681. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 1986. The passive: A comparative linguistic analysis. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota S. 1997. The parameter of aspect (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 43). 2nd edn. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thesaurus Linguae Latinae (TLL). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Toro, Francisca, Verónica Orqueda & Demian Inostroza. 2022. Reevaluating the etymology of Latin reflexives. Folia Linguistica Historica 43(1). 33–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tubino-Blanco, Mercedes. 2020. Causative/Inchoative in Morphology. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. & David P. Wilkins. 1996. The case for ‘effector’: Case roles, agents, and agency revisited. In Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning, 289–322. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66(2). 143–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vietri, Simonetta. 2023. Causalness and the Encoding of the Causative/ anticausative Alternation in Italian Psych Verbs. Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie occidentale (571). 57–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wehr, Barbara. 1995. SE-Diathese im Italienischen (Romanica Monacensia 37). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wickham, Hadley. 2016. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis (Use R!). New York: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wickham, Hadley & Jennifer Bryan. 2015. readxl: Read Excel files [R package]. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wickham, Hadley, Romain François, Lionel Henry, Kirill Müller & Davis Vaughan. 2014. dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wickham, Hadley, Davis Vaughan & Maximilian Girlich. 2014. tidyr: Tidy messy data. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando & Seppo Kittilä. 2019. Grammatical voice (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue