Cover not available
Part of
The Evidential Basis of Linguistic Argumentation
Edited by András Kertész and Csilla Rákosi
[Studies in Language Companion Series 153] 2014
► pp. 133–178

Chapter 6. The development of a taxonomy of verbal disagreements in the light of the p-model

The main objective of this chapter is to find a category system that is the most capable of describing Hungarian disagreement based on certain criteria set beforehand. As none of the rival approaches to disagreement to be introduced in this chapter seem to satisfy each criterion, a new taxonomy is proposed. Distinguishing between strategies and pragmatic force modifiers (PFMs), this new category system is more reliable and more capable of capturing the complex nature of (Hungarian) disagreements that the rival models. A detailed description of the metatheoretical research is provided including a step-by-step description of the analytical procedure(s) employed. By describing each step of the research along with the decisions and re-evaluations of the information at hand as well as the p-context, the chapter demonstrates the cyclic, retrospective and prismatic nature of the plausible argumentation process.

Published online: 23 April 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.153.06koc
References
Aijmer, Karin
1986 Discourse variation and hedging. In Corpus Linguistics, II, New Studies in the Analysis and Exploitation of Computer Corpora , Jan Aarts & Willem Meijs (eds), 1–18. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Bándli, Judit
2009 Az egyet nem értés pragmatikája. PhD dissertation, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, House, Juliane, & Kasper, Gabriele
1989 The CCSARP coding manual. In Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, Shoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House, & Gabriele Kasper (eds), 273–294. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, & Levinson, Stephen
1987  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bousfield, Derek
2008  Impoliteness in Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 167]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
1996 Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 1: 35–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011  Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Bousfield, Derek, & Wichmann, Anne
2003 Impoliteness revisited: With special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1545–1579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Cumming, Susanna, Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan, & Padino, Danae
(eds) 1992 Discourse transcription. In Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 4. Santa Barbara CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Fónagy, Iván
1971  Synthèse de l’ironie . Basel: Karger.Google Scholar
Fónagy, Iván, & Magdics, Klára
1967  A magyar beszéd dallama . Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul
1975 Logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantics , 3: Speech Acts , Peter Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds), 41–58. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Holtgraves, Tom
1997 Yes, but…: Positive politeness in conversation arguments. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 16: 222–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet
1995  Women, Men and Politeness . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Kertész, András, & Rákosi, Csilla
This volume. Evidence and the argumentation structure of linguistic theories.
2012  Data and Evidence in Linguistics. A Plausible Argumentation Model . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koczogh, Helga Vanda
2012 The Effects of Gender and Social Distance on the Expression of Verbal Disagreement Employed by Hungarian Undergraduate Students. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.Google Scholar
Komlósi, Boglárka
2007 Az iróniakutatás elméleti dilemmái a pragmatikában. Nyelvtudomány 3–4: 95–128.
2010 Irony in the semantics-pragmatics interface: A reconstructional model. [URL]
2013 A polarizációs tendencia szerepe az irónia nyilvánvalótételében. A hiperbola és lilotész mint nyomok az irónikus interpretációhoz. Magyar Nyelv 4: 409–420.Google Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga
1993 Disagreement and concession in disputes: On the context sensitivity of preference structures. Language in Society 22: 193–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1983  Principles of Pragmatics . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam
2004  Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markó, Alexandra
2005 A spontán beszéd néhány szupraszegmentális jellegzetessége: Monologikus és dialogikus szövegek összevetése, valamint a hümmögés vizsgálata. Ph.D. dissertation, ELTE, Budapest, Hungary.Google Scholar
2007 A Special Conversational Device: Humming in Hungarian. The Phonetician 95: 28–35.Google Scholar
Mászlainé Nagy, Judit
2010 A jászapáti Magyar és roma kisiskolások nyelvhasználati stratégiáinak kultúraközi elemzése. PhD dissertation, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.Google Scholar
Muntigl, Peter & Turnbull, William
1998 Conversational structure and facework in arguing. Journal of Pragmatics 29(3): 225–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Németh T., Enikő
1996  A szóbeli diskurzusok megnyilatkozáspéldányokra tagolása [Nyelvtudományi értekezések 142]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Nauke, Astrid, & Braun, Angelika
2011 The production and perception of irony in short context-free utterances. ICPhS 7: 1450–1453.Google Scholar
Rees-Miller, Janie
1995 Linguistic Features of Disagreement in Face-to-Face Encounters in University Settings. Ph.D. dissertation, Stony Brook, NY: State University of New York.Google Scholar
2000 Power, severity, and context in disagreement. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1087–1111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, & Wilson, Deirdre
2006 Relevance Theory. In The Handbook of Pragmatic , Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds), 607–632. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Svindt, Veronika
2007 Iróniaértelmezés elméletben és gyakorlatban. Első Század , 1: 171–208. [URL]
2008 Az irónia szupraszegmentális ismertetőjegyei. Félúton 4: 1–15.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1984  Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk Among Friends . Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Toplak Maggie & Katz, Albert N
2000 On the uses of sarcastic irony. Journal of Pragmatics 32(10): 1467–1488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Varga, László
1985 Intonation in the Hungarian sentence. In Approaches to Hungarian , István Kenesei (ed.), 205–224. JATE: Szeged, Hungary.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Decock, Sofie & Anneleen Spiessens
2017. Chapter 6. Face-threatening e-mail complaint negotiation in a multilingual business environment. In Current Issues in Intercultural Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 274], ► pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Hamdan, Hady J. & Radwan S. Mahadin
2021. Disagreement realizations in Arabic. Pragmatics and Society 12:3 ► pp. 349 ff. DOI logo
Koczogh, Helga Vanda
2017. Udvariasság/Udvariatlanság és (in)direktség az egyet nem értés beszédaktusában. Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat 4:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.