The aim of the present chapter is to reconstruct the relationship between thought experiments and real experiments in pragmatics. In the first part, Searle’s (1969) thought experiment on Kennst du das Land, wo die Zitronen blühn? is analysed with the help of the p-model. The second part reconstructs the argumentation structure of the real experiments reported on in Holtgraves & Ashley (2001), and shows that the latter and Searle’s thought experiment closely interact. Basically, their relationship is characterised by the dynamic process of the cyclic, prismatic and retrospective re-evalutation of information in the sense of the p-model. However, they have different strengths and weaknesses. Accordingly, the generalised finding is that the conscious integration of real and thought experiments as data sources within some research may considerably enhance the reliability of pragmatic hypotheses.
2011Thought experiments. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [URL] (23September 2013).
Cohen, Philip R. & Levesque, Hector J
1990Rational interaction as the basis for communication. In Intentions in communication, Philip R. Cohen, Jerry L. Morgan & Martha E. Pollack (eds), 221–256. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Collins, Harry M
1985Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. Beverly Hills CA: Sage.
Gibbs, Raymond W
1983Do people always process the literal meaning of indirect requests?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 9: 524–533.
Gooding, David
1993What is experimental about thought experiment? In PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1992, Vol. 2: Symposia and Invited Papers, 280–290. East Lansing MI: Philosophy of Science Association.
Grice, Paul
1989a [1957]Meaning. In Grice 1989c, 213–223.
Grice, Paul
1989bUtterer’s meaning and intentions. In Grice 1989c, 86–116.
Grice, Paul
1989cStudies in the Way of Words. Cambridge MA.: Harvard University Press.
2010On stage setting thought experiments in cognitive linguistics: A case study. In Von Katastrophen, Zeichen und vom Ursprung der menschlichen Sprache, Cornelia Stroh (ed.), 7–30. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
Kertész, András & Kiefer, Ferenc
2013From thought experiments to real experiments in pragmatics. In Perspectives on Philosophy and Pragmatics, Alessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo & Marco Carapezza (eds). Berlin: Springer.
Kertész, András & Rákosi, Csilla
2012Data and Evidence in Linguistics. A Plausible Argumentation Model. Cambridge: CUP.
Kertész, András & Rákosi, Csilla
This volume a. Introduction: The state of the art and the structure of the book.
Kertész, András & Rákosi, Csilla
This volume b. The p-model of data and evidence in linguistics.
Keysar, Boaz, Shen, Yeshayahu, Glucksberg, Sam & Horton, William S
2000Conventional language: How metaphorical is it?Journal of Memory and Language 43: 576–593.
Kühne, Ulrich
2005Die Methode des Gedankenexperiments. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Meggle, Georg & Ulkan, Maria
1979Kennst du das Land, wo die Zitronen blühn? (Zu Searles Kritik an Grice). Papiere zur Linguistik 20: 75–87.
Meibauer, Jörg
2012Pragmatic evidence, context, and story design. An essay on recent developments in experimental pragmatics. Language Sciences 34(6): 768–776. (= Kertész, András, Schwarz-Friesel, Monika & Consten, Manfred (eds), Converging Data Types in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier).
Moue, Aspasia S., Masavetas, Kyriakos A. & Karayianni, Haido
2006Tracing the developments of thought experiments in the philosophy of natural sciences. Journal for the General Philosophy of Science 37: 61–75.
Nersessian, Nancy J
1993In the theoretician’s laboratory: Thought experimenting as mental modelling. In Proceedings of the 1992 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 2, 291–301. East Landing MI: Philosophy of Science Association.
Nersessian, Nancy J
1991The cognitive sciences and the history of science. In Proceedings, joint HSS-SHOT conference on Critical Problems and Research Frontiers in History of Science and Technology, October 1991, 92–116. Madison WI.
Norton, John D
1991Thought experiments in Einstein’s work. In Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy, Tamara Horowitz & Gerard J. Massey (eds), 129–48. Savage MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Norton, John D
2002On thought experiments: Is there more to the argument?[URL]>/
Noveck, Ira A. & Sperber, Dan
2007The why and how of experimental pragmatics. In Pragmatics, Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.), 184–212. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Noveck, Ira A. & Reboul, Anne
2008Experimental Pragmatics: a Gricean turn in the study of language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12(11): 425–431.
Rákosi, Csilla
2011aMetatheoretical reconstruction of psycholinguistic experiments. Part 1. Sprachtheorie und germanistische Linguistik 21(1): 55–93. (Csatár, Péter (ed.), Metapher, Metonymie und Argumentation/Metaphor, Metonymy and Argumentation 1. Münster: Nodus).
Rákosi, Csilla
2011bMetatheoretical reconstruction of psycholinguistic experiments. Part 2. Sprachtheorie und germanistische Linguistik, 21.2 [= Csatár, Péter (ed), Metapher, Metonymie und Argumentation/Metaphor, Metonymy and Argumentation 2. Münster: Nodus], 159–187.
Rákosi, Csilla
2012The fabulous engine: Strengths and flaws of psycholinguistic experiments. Language Sciences 34(6): 682–702. (= Kertész, András, Schwarz-Friesel, Monika & Consten, Manfred (eds), Converging Data Types in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier).
Schegloff, Emanuel A
1991Conversational analysis and socially shared cognition. In Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, Lauren B. Resnick, John M. Levine & Stephanie D. Teasley (eds), 150–171. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Searle, John R
1969Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: CUP.
Searle, John R. & Vanderveken, Daniel
1985Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: CUP.
2015. The Puzzle of Thought Experiments in Conceptual Metaphor Research. Foundations of Science 20:2 ► pp. 147 ff.
Kertész, András
2016. Poor vs. Good Thought Experiments in Pragmatics: A Case Study. In Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 9], ► pp. 643 ff.
2016. On the Inferential Structure of Indirect Reports. In Indirect Reports and Pragmatics [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 5], ► pp. 435 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.