Part of
Austronesian Undressed: How and why languages become isolating
Edited by David Gil and Antoinette Schapper
[Typological Studies in Language 129] 2020
► pp. 996
References
Anderson, Stephen R.
1982Where’s morphology? Linguistic Inquiry 13: 571–612.Google Scholar
1985Typological distinctions in word formation. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Volume III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, T. Shopen (ed.), 3–56. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1992A-morphous Morphology. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter M.
2005Grammaticalization of polysynthesis (with special reference to spoken French). 4th Typological School, Tsakhkadzor, Armenia, 26 September 2005.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark
1994Morphology by Itself, Stems and Inflectional Classes. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Azizul Rahman Abdul Rahman
1995Bahasa Rahsia Bahasa Melayu (Secret Languages in Malay). Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Google Scholar
Baerman, Matthew, Brown, Dunstan & Corbett, Greville G.
2017Morphological Complexity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bagemihl, Bruce
1988Alternate Phonologies and Morphologies. PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.Google Scholar
1989The crossing constraint and backwards languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7: 481–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blust, Robert A.
1988Austronesian Root Theory: An Essay on the Limits of Morphology [Studies in Language Companion Series 19]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009The Austronesian Languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Mchombo, Sam M.
1995The lexical integrity principle: Evidence from Bantu. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13: 181–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin
2018The lexicalist hypothesis: Both wrong and superfluous. Language 94:1–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brugman, Claudia & Conners, Thomas
2018Register properties of SMS and Twitter in Indonesian: A contrastive study. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chambert-Loir, Henri
1998Slang and secret tongues. In Indonesian Heritage, Language and Literature, John H. McGlynn (ed.), 132–133. Singapore: Archipelago Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1965Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Conners, Thomas, Bowden, John & Gil, David
2015Valency classes in Jakarta Indonesian. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, A. Malchukov & B. Comrie (eds), 941–986. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Dardjowidjojo, Soenjono
1978Sentence Patterns of Indonesian. Honolulu HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W.
2010–2012Basic Linguistic Theory. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2002Word: A typological framework. In Word. A Cross-Linguistic Typology, Robert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 1–41. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Donohue, Mark & Sawaki, Yusuf
2007Papuan Malay pronominals: Forms and functions. Oceanic Linguistics 47: 253–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
2005Order of subject, object, and verb. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 386–9. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Embick, David
2015The Morpheme: A Theoretical Introduction. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fabre d’Olivet, Antoine
1816La langue hébraïque restituée et le vétitable sens des mots hébreux rétabli et prouvé par leur analyse radicale. Paris: J.-M. Eberhart.Google Scholar
Geertzen, Jeroen, Blevins, James P. & Milin, Petar
2016The informativeness of linguistic unit boundaries. Italian Journal of Linguistics 28(2):1–24.Google Scholar
Gil, David
1985What does grammar include? Theoretical Linguistics 12: 165–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990הבטים בתאוריה פרוזודית: הבית היאמבי-על-יאמבי (hebetim beteoria prozodit: habayit hayambi-ʕal-yambi ‘Aspects of Prosodic Theory; The Iambic-over-Iambic Quatrain’). Hebrew Linguistics 28–30:111–122. (In Hebrew)Google Scholar
1991The Muwaššaħ: Artistic convention or cognitive universal. In Israel Oriental Studies XI, Studies in Medieval Arabic and Hebrew Poetics, Sasson Somekh (ed.), 137–159. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
1993‘Il pleut doucement sur la ville’: The rhythm of a metaphor. Poetics Today 14: 49–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994The structure of Riau Indonesian. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 17: 179–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999aRiau Indonesian: A language without words. Fifth International Conference on the Languages of Far East, South-East Asia and West Africa, St. Petersburg, Russia, 9 September 1999.
1999bWhy words? Criteria for bond strength between morphemes in Riau Indonesian. Third Meeting of the Association for Linguistic Typology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 27 August 1999.
2000Syntactic categories, cross-linguistic variation and universal grammar. In Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes, Petra M. Vogel & Bernard Comrie (eds), 173–216. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001Creoles, complexity and Riau Indonesian. Linguistic Typology 5: 325–371.Google Scholar
2002aLudlings in Malayic languages: An introduction. In PELBBA 15, Pertemuan Linguistik Pusat Kajian Bahasa dan Budaya Atma Jaya: Kelima Belas, (Fifteenth Linguistics Conference of the Atma Jaya language and Culture Research Centre), Bambang Kaswanti Purwo (ed.), 125–180. Jakarta: Unika Atma Jaya.Google Scholar
2002bThe prefixes di- and N- in Malay / Indonesian dialects. In The History and Typology of Western Austronesian Voice Systems, Fay Wouk & Malcolm Ross (eds), 241–283. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
2004aLearning about language from your handphone; dan, and and & in SMSs from the Siak River Basin. In Kolita 2, Konferensi Linguistik Tahunan Atma Jaya, Katharina Endriati Sukatmo (ed.), 57–61. Jakarta: Pusat Kajian Bahasa dan Budaya, Unika Atma Jaya.Google Scholar
2004bRiau Indonesian sama: Explorations in macrofunctionality. In Coordinating Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 58], Martin Haspelmath (ed.), 371–424. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005aFrom repetition to reduplication in Riau Indonesian. In Studies on Reduplication, Bernhard Hurch (ed.), 31–64. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005bWord order without syntactic categories: How Riau Indonesian does it. In Verb First: On the Syntax of Verb-Initial Languages, [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 73], Andrew Carnie, Heidi Harley & Sheila A. Dooley (eds), 243–263. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006aEarly human language was Isolating-Monocategorial-Associational. In The Evolution of Language, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference (EVOLANG6), Angelo Cangelosi, Andrew D. M. Smith & Kenny Smith (eds), 91–98. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
2006bIntonation and thematic roles in Riau Indonesian. In Topic and Focus, Cross-Linguistic Perspectives on Meaning and Intonation, Chungmin Lee, Matthew Gordon & Daniel Büring (eds), 41–68. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
2008How complex are isolating languages?” In Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 94], Matti. Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki & Fred Karlsson, (eds), 109–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009aAustronesian nominalism and the thinginess illusion. Theoretical Linguistics 35: 95–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009bHow much grammar does it take to sail a boat? In Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable, Geoffrey Sampson, David Gil & Peter Trudgill (eds), 19–33. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2009cRiau Indonesian: What kind of a language is it? Kongres Internasional Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia (International Conference of the Linguistic Society of Indonesia) KIMLI 2009, 29–61. Malang: Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia and Universitas Negeri Malang.Google Scholar
2012Where does predication come from? Canadian Journal of Linguistics 57: 303–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Riau Indonesian: A language without nouns and verbs. In Flexible Word Classes: Typological Studies of Underspecified Parts of Speech, Jan Rijkhoff & Eva van Lier (eds), 89–130. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015The Mekong-Mamberamo linguistic area. In Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia, The State of the Art, Nicholas J. Enfield & Bernard Comrie (eds), 266–355. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2016Describing languoids: When incommensurability meets the language-dialect continuum. Linguistic Typology 20: 439–462. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017Isolating-Monocategorial-Associational language. In Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science, 2nd edn, Henri Cohen & Claire Lefebvre (eds), 471–510. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1963Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Grammar, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 73–113. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec
1993Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Vergnaud, Jean-Roger
1987An Essay on Stress. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2009An empirical test of the agglutination hypothesis. In Universals of Language Today [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 76], Sergio Scalise, Elisabetta Magni & Antonietta Bisetto (eds), 13–29. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistics studies. Language 86: 663–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011aThe gradual coalescence into ‘Words’ in grammaticalization. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 342–355. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2011bThe indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax. Folia Linguistica 45: 31–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Defining vs. diagnosing linguistic categories: A case study of clitic phenomena. In How Categorical Are Categories? New Approaches to the Old Questions of Noun, Verb, and Adjective [Studies in Generative Grammar 122], Joanna Błaszczak, Dorota Klimek-Jankowska & Krysztoff Migdalski (eds), 273–304. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016The serial verb construction: Comparative concept and cross-linguistic generalizations. Language and Linguistics 17: 291–319.Google Scholar
2018The last word on polysynthesis: A review article. Linguistic Typology 22: 307–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019aHow comparative concepts and descriptive linguistic categories are different. In Aspects of Linguistic Variation, Daniël van Olmen, Tanja Mortelmans & Frank Brisard (eds), 83–114. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
2019bIndexing and flagging, and head and dependent marking. Te reo, the Journal of the Linguistic Society of New Zealand 62(1): 93–115.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F.
1944Review of Linguistic Interludes and Morphology: The Descriptive Analysis of Words (1944 edition) both by Eugene A. Nida. Language 20: 252–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1954Two models of grammatical description. Word 10: 210–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1960The origin of speech. Scientific American 203: 88–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hordofa, Kebbede & Unseth, Peter
1986‘BirdTalk’ in Oromo. Quaderni di Studi Etiopici 6–7: 74–83.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray S.
1977X-Bar Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, John
1980X̅ Morphology. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, Victoria Burke & James Pustejovsky (eds), 155–172. Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Jukes, Anthony
2015Asserting peripherality in Sulawesi: Local varieties and the rejection of Jakarta-based norms. 19th International Symposium on Malay/Indonesian Linguistics (ISMIL19), Jambi, Indonesia, 14 June 2015.
Katamba, Francis
1993Morphology. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L.
1976Towards a universal definition of subject. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 303–333. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kluge, Angela
2014A Grammar of Papuan Malay. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, Natalie
1991Talking Backwards, Looking Forwards: The French Language Game Verlan. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Lerdahl, Fred
1992Cognitive constraints on compositional systems. Contemporary Music Review 6: 97–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerdahl, Fred & Jackendoff, Ray
1983A Generative Theory of Tonal Music. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Juliette
1985A Metrical Theory of Syllabicity. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle
1980On the Organization of the Lexicon. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Manns, Howard
2010Indonesian slang in internet chatting. In Studies in Slang and Slogans, Sola Babatunde, Akin Odebunmi, Akin Adetunji & Mahfouz Adedimeji (eds), 71–99. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
2005On the assumption of the sentence as the basic unit of syntactic structure. In Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories [Studies in Language Companion Series 72] Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges & David S. Rood (eds), 169–183. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevins, Andrew & Endress, Ansgar
2007The edge of order: Analytic bias in ludlings. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 12: 43–53.Google Scholar
Peterson, John
2008Kharia: A South Munda Language, Vol. 1: Grammatical Analysis. Habilitation thesis, University of Osnabrück.Google Scholar
Rizzolo, Olivier
2007Utrovački and Šatrovački: Description and theoretical perspectives of two Serbo-Croatian language games. In Linguistic Investigations into Formal Description of Slavic Languages, Hans-Werner Eroms, Ludwig M. Eichinger, Vilmos Agel & Peter Hellwig (eds), 27–40. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1921Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York NY: Harcourt, Brace and Co.Google Scholar
Shen, Yeshayahu
1985Action Structure in the Narrative Text. PhD dissertation, Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
1988Schema Theory and the processing of narrative texts: The X-Bar story grammar and the notion of discourse topic. Journal of Pragmatics 12: 639–676. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989The X-Bar grammar for stories: Story grammar revisited. Text 9: 415–467. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shoshany, Ronit
1986Prosodic structures in Jeremiah’s poetry. Folia Linguistica Historica 7: 167–206.Google Scholar
Sneddon, James Neil
1996Indonesian: A Comprehensive Grammar. Canberra: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
2006Colloquial Jakartan Indonesian. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Tadmor, Uri
2004The morpheme structure of prehistoric Malay: An internal reconstruction. Eighth Symposium on Malay/Indonesian Linguistics (ISMIL8), Penang, Malaysia 1 August 2004.Google Scholar
2009Indonesian. In World Loanword Database, Martin Haspelmath & Uri Tadmor (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]> (11 December 2018).
Tallman, Adam J. R.
To appear. Constituency and coincidence in Chácobo (Pano). Studies in Language.
Tallman, Adam J. R. & Epps, Patience
2020Morphological complexity, autonomy, and areality in Amazonia. In Morphological Complexity, Peter Arkadiev & Francesco Gardani (eds). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Tallman, Adam J. R., Wylie, Dennis, Adell, Eric, Bermudez, Natalia, Camacho, Gladys, Epps, Patience, Everdell, Michael, Gutierrez, Ambrocio, Juarez, Cristian & Woodbury, Anthony C.
2018Constituency and the morphology-syntax divide in the languages of the Americas: Towards a distributional typology. 21st Annual Workshop on American Indigenous Languages. University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
van Minde, Don
1997Malayu Ambong: Phonology, Morphology, Syntax, Leiden: CNWS.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin
1981On the notions ‘lexically related’ and ‘head of a word’. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 245–274.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira
1992Prosodic morphology in four Chinese dialects. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1(1): 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar