Cover not available
Part of
Language Acquisition in Study Abroad and Formal Instruction Contexts
Edited by Carmen Pérez-Vidal
[AILA Applied Linguistics Series 13] 2014
► pp. 217–234

Chapter 9. Comparing progress in academic writing after formal instruction and study abroad

| Universitat Pompeu Fabra
| Universitat Pompeu Fabra
In this chapter, we consider progress in the domain of academic writing by 73 advanced-level EFL learners within the SALA Project. We compare their essays before and after a 6-month period of Formal Instruction at home (FI/AH), a 3-month period of Study Abroad (SA), and 15 months after SA. We seek to throw light onto one of the objectives in SALA, namely, to what extent writing improves with the practice and instruction received during FI/AH, in contrast with allegedly some practice done but none or little instruction received during SA. We also aim at contributing to an under-researched area in SA studies (but see Sasaki 2004, 2007, 2011). Progress in writing is measured via quantitative measures in the domains of complexity, accuracy, and fluency (CAF), building upon previous work (see Pérez-Vidal & Juan-Garau 2009, 2011, and Pérez-Vidal, Juan-Garau, & Mora 2012). After the SA, but not after the FI context, significant gains were found in the domains of fluency and complexity, but not in the domain of accuracy, and these gains were maintained 15 months after returning from abroad.
Published online: 8 July 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.13.11ch9
References (30)
References
Bardovi-Harlig, K. 1992. A second look at T-unit analysis: Reconsidering the sentence. TESOL Quarterly 26(2): 390–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barquin, E. 2012. Writing Development in a Study Abroad Context. PhD dissertation, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
Biber, D. 2006. University Language: A Corpus-based Study of Spoken and Written Registers [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bulté, B. & Housen, A. 2012. Defining and operationalizing L2 complexity. In Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency. Investigating Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency in SLA [Language Learing & Langauge Teaching 32], A. Housen, F. Kuiken & I. Vedder (eds), 21–47 . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Collentine, J. 2009. Study abroad research: Findings, implications, and future directions. In The Handbook of Language Teaching , M.H. Long & C.J. Doughty (eds), 218–233. Malden MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daller, H., Van Hout, R. & Treffers-Daller, J. 2003. Lexical richness in the spontaneous speech of bilinguals. Applied linguistics 24(2): 197–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R.M. 2007. Practice in a Second Language: Perspectives from Applied Linguistics and Cognitive Ppsychology . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. & Barkhuizen, G.P. 2005. Analysing Learner Language . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Freed, B., So, S. & Lazar, N. 2003. Language learning abroad: How do gains in written fluency compare with gains in oral fluency in French as a second language? ADFL BULLETIN 34(3): 34–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grabe, W. & Kaplan, R.B. 1996. Theory and Practice of Writing: An Applied Linguistic Perspective . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Johns, A.M. 1990. L1 composition theories: Implications for developing theories of L2 composition. In Second Language Writing: Research Insights for the Classroom , B. Kroll (ed.), 37–56. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Housen, A. & Kuiken, F. 2009. Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 30(4): 461. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Llanes, À. 2011. The many faces of study abroad: An update on the research on L2 gains emerged during a study abroad experience. International Journal of Multilingualism 8(3): 189–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk , Vol. 3. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Meara, P. 1994. The year abroad and its effects. Language Learning Journal 10(1): 32–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, J.M., & Ortega, L. 2009. Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied liguistics 30(4): 555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Vidal, C. 2011. Language acquisition in three different contexts of learning: Formal instruction, stay abroad, and semi-immersion (CLIL). In Content and Foreign Language Integrated Learning. Contributions to Multilingualism in European Contexts , Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, J.M. Sierra & F. Gallardo del Puerto (eds), 103–127. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Pérez-Vidal, C. & Juan-Garau, M. 2009. The effect of study abroad (SA) on written performance. In Eurosla Yearbook 9 , L. Roberts, D. Véronique, A. Nilsson & M. Tellier (eds), 269–295. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pérez-Vidal, C., Juan-Garau, M. & Mora, J.C. 2011. The effects of formal instruction and study abroad contexts on foreign language development: The SALA Project. In Implicit and Explicit Language Learning. Conditions, Processes and Knowledge in SLA and Bilingualism , C. Sanz & R.P. Leow (eds), 115–128. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Polio, C 1997. Measures of linguistic accuracy in second language writing research. Language Learning 47(1): 101–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Research methodology in second language writing research: The case of text-based studies. In On Second Language Writing , T.J. Silva & P.K. Matsuda (eds), 91–115. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Ortega, L. 2003. Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college level L2 writing. Applied linguistics 24(4) 492: 518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sasaki, M. 2007. Effects of study-abroad experiences on EFL writers: A multiple-data analysis. Modern Language Journal 91(4): 602–620 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Changes in English as a foreign language students’ writing over 3.5 years: A sociocognitive account. In Writing in Foreign Language Contexts: Learning, Teaching, and Research , R. Manchón (ed.), 49–76. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
. 2011. Effects of varying lengths of study-abroad experiences on Japanese EFL students’ L2 writing ability and motivation: A longitudinal study. TESOL Quarterly 45(1): 81–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sasaki, M., & Hirose, K. 1996. Explanatory variables for EFL students’ expository writing. Language Learning 46(1): 137–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperling, M. 1996. Revisiting the writing-speaking connection: Challenges for research on writing and writing instruction. Review of Educational Research 66(1): 53–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torras, M.R., Navés, T., Celaya, M.L. & Pérez-Vidal, C. 2006. Age and IL development in writing. In Age and the Rate of Foreign Language Learning , C. Muñoz (ed.), 156–182. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Weigle, S.C. 2002. Assessing Writing . Cambridge:CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S. & Kim, H.Y. 1998. Second Language Development in Writing: Measures of Fluency, Accuracy and Complexity [Technical Report 17]. Manoa HI: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Güvendir, Emre, Judith Borràs & Meltem Acar Güvendir
2024. The effects of study abroad on L2 vocabulary development. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 9:1 ► pp. 26 ff. DOI logo
ALTINTAŞ, Nazlı & Arif SARIÇOBAN
2023. The Impacts of Erasmus+ on Foreign Language Development. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 12:2 ► pp. 303 ff. DOI logo
Heinzmann, Sybille, Seraina Paul, Robert Hilbe, Nicole Schallhart & Mirjam Egli Cuenat
2023. Development of productive language skills through language exchange in primary schools in Switzerland – An exploratory intervention study. European Journal of Applied Linguistics 11:1 ► pp. 98 ff. DOI logo
Howard, Martin
2023. Chapter 10. Grammatical development during study abroad. In Methods in Study Abroad Research [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 4], ► pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
Marijuan, Silvia & Cristi Vallejos
2023. Chapter 9. Complexity, fluency and accuracy in study abroad research. In Methods in Study Abroad Research [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 4], ► pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Borràs, Judith & Àngels Llanes
2021. Re-examining the impact of study abroad on L2 development: a critical overview. The Language Learning Journal 49:5 ► pp. 527 ff. DOI logo
Strobl, Carola & Kristof Baten
2021. Writing development during study abroad. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 6:1 ► pp. 124 ff. DOI logo
Strobl, Carola & Kristof Baten
2022. Assessing writing development during study abroad. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 2:1 ► pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
de Alba Quiñones, Virginia, Graciela Vázquez & Francisco Lorenzo
2018. El desarrollo del español académico en los programas para estudiantes universitarios internacionales: las funciones discursivas superiores. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching 5:2 ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Cigliana, Kassie A. & Raquel Serrano
2016. Individual differences in U.S. study abroad students in Barcelona. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 1:2 ► pp. 154 ff. DOI logo
Llanes, Àngels, Elisabet Arnó & Guzman Mancho-Barés
2016. Erasmus students using English as alingua franca: does study abroad in a non-English-speaking country improve L2 English?. The Language Learning Journal 44:3 ► pp. 292 ff. DOI logo
Pérez-Vidal, Carmen
2015. Practice makes best: contrasting learning contexts, comparing learner progress. International Journal of Multilingualism 12:4 ► pp. 453 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.