Cover not available
Part of
Speaking in a Second Language
Edited by Rosa Alonso Alonso
[AILA Applied Linguistics Series 17] 2018
► pp. 197–223

Chapter 9
The Mirroring Project

Improving suprasegmentals and intelligibility in ESL presentations

 | University of Minnesota
The Mirroring Project (Lindgren et al., 2003; Meyers, 2013, 2014) is a pedagogical option helping those who speak in a second language to improve their intelligibility in a holistic, context-sensitive way. Longitudinal, video-recorded evidence shows how the suprasegmental phonology of one adult English L2 learner, an international teaching assistant in a U.S. university, changes over time, as she “mirrors” the speech of an English speaker she herself has selected as a model. Importantly, it is the learner’s suprasegmentals and nonverbal communication movements which were the focus of instruction, and which noticeably improved due to the Mirroring Project. These findings can be accounted for using the Douglas Fir Group’s (2016) transdisciplinary framework, and Baktin’s constructs of double voicing and semantic language play (Cook, 2000; Tarone, 2000; Broner & Tarone, 2001).
Article outline
  • Introduction
    • Review of relevant research on L2 pronunciation
      • Phonology in speaking a L2: Impact of empathy, accommodation, identity, and emotion
      • Suprasegmental phonology: Intelligibility in spoken L2 discourse
      • Pedagogy on pronunciation to improve intelligibility
    • A pedagogical study
      • Participant
      • Pedagogical treatment
      • Data collection
      • Data analysis
      • Results
      • Results of acoustic analysis
      • Time 1. Micro-teaching
      • Time 2.Trial mirroring
      • Time 3.Final mirroring
      • Results of perceptual analysis
    • Discussion and pedagogical implications
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 12 April 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.17.09tar
References (61)
References
Abercrombie, D. (1968). Paralanguage. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 3, 55–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson-Hsieh, J. (1992). Using electronic visual feedback to teach suprasegmentals. System, 20(1), 51–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson-Hsieh, J., Johnson, R., & Koehler, K. (1992). The relationship between native speaker judgments of nonnative pronunciation and deviance in segmentals, prosody and syllable structure. Language Learning, 42, 529–555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1929/1984). Problems in Dostoevsky’s poetics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
(1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin, M. Holquist (Ed.), trans. C. Emerson & M. Holquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Barr, P. (1990). The role of discourse intonation in lecture comprehension. In M. Hewings (Ed.), Papers in discourse intonation (pp. 5–21). Birmingham, UK: University of Birmingham, English Language Research.Google Scholar
Beebe, L. (1980). Sociolinguistic variation and style shifting in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 30, 433–447. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beebe, L., & Giles, H. (1984). Speech-accommodation theories: A discussion in terms of second-language acquisition. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 46, 5–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2017). PRAAT: Doing phonetics by computer. Retrieved from <[URL]> (6 January 2017).
Bolinger, D. (1964). Around the edge of language: Intonation. Harvard Educational Review, 34, 282–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brazil, D. (1997). The communicative value of intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Broner, M., & Tarone, E. (2001). Is it fun? Language play in a fifth grade Spanish immersion classroom, Modern Language Journal, 85, 363–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, G. (1977). Listening to spoken English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D., & Goodwin, J. (2010). Teaching pronunciation: A course book and reference guide (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chun, D. (2002). Discourse intonation in L2: From theory & research to practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H., & Gerrig, R. (1990). Quotations as demonstrations. Language, 66, 764–805. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, G. (2000). Language play, language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, A. (1997). Intonation (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T., & Munro, M. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dittman A. T. (1974). The body movement-speech rhythm relationship as a cue to speech encoding. In S. Weitz (Ed.), Nonverbal communication (pp. 169–181). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Douglas Fir Group (Dwight Atkinson, Heidi Byrnes, Meredith Doran, Patricia Duff, Joan Kelly Hall, Karen Johnson, James Lantolf, Diane Larsen-Freeman, Bonny Norton, John Schumann, Merrill Swain, & Elaine Tarone). (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. Modern Language Journal, 100(Supplement 2016), 19–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foote, J. & McDonough, K. (2017). Using shadowing with mobile technology to improve L2 pronunciation. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 3(1), 34–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fry, D. (1958). Experiments on the perception of stress. Language and Speech, 1, 126–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fudge, E. C. (1984). English word stress. Sydney: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Gilbert, J. (2012). Clear Speech: Pronunciation and listening comprehension in American English (4th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gimson, A. C. (1980). An introduction to the pronunciation of English (3rd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Gorsuch, G. J. (2003). The educational cultures of international teaching assistants and U.S. universities. TESL-EJ, 7(3), 1–17.Google Scholar
Grant, L. (2017). Well said: Pronunciation for clear communication. Student book (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Guiora, A. Beit-Hallami, R., Brannon, R., Dull, C., & Scovel, T. (1972). The effects of experimentally induced changes in ego states on pronunciation ability in a second language: An exploratory study. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 13(5), 421ff. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hahn, L. (2004). Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 201–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kang, O. (2010). Relative salience of suprasegmental features on judgments of L2 comprehensibility and accentedness. System, 38(2), 301–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kang, O., Rubin, D., & Pickering, L. (2010). Suprasegmental measures of accentedness and judgments of language learner proficiency in oral English. The Modern Language Journal, 9, 554–566. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kannellow, V. (2009). The practice of pronunciation teaching in current ELT manuals and handbook: a review. Speak Out: IATEFL Pronunciation Special Interest Group Newsletter, 40, 1–5.Google Scholar
Key, M. R. (Ed.). (1980). The relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krahmer, E., & Swerts, M. (2007). The effects of visual beats on prosodic prominence: Acoustic analyses, auditory perception and visual perception. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 396–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lan, Y. (2011). The generation that’s remaking China. Ted Talks. Retrieved from <[URL]> (5 January, 2017).
Lehiste, I. (1976). Suprasegmentals. In N. J. Lass (Ed.), Contemporary issues in experimental phonetics (pp. 225–239). New York, NY: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levis, J. M. (1999). Intonation in theory and practice, revisited. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 37–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 369–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levis, J. M., & Wichmann, A. (2015). English intonation –Form and meaning. In M. Reed & J. M Levis (Eds.), The handbook of English pronunciation (pp. 139–155). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, J., Meyers, C.M., & Monk, M. (2003). Approaches to accent: The Mirroring Project. Paper presented at the annual conference of Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL), Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
McGregor, A., Zielinski, B., Meyers, C., & Reed, M. (2016). An exploration of teaching intonation using a TED Talk. In J. Levis, H. Le., I. Lucic, E. Simpson, & S. Vo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference of Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching (PSLLT) (pp. 143–159). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.Google Scholar
Major, R. (2001). Foreign accent: The ontogeny and phylogeny of second language phonology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mathis, T., & Yule, G. (1994). Zero quotatives. Discourse Processes, 18, 63–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyers, C. (2013). Mirroring project update: Intelligible accented speakers as pronunciation models. TESOL Video News. Accessed at <[URL]> (9 September, 2016).Google Scholar
(2014). Intelligible accented speakers as pronunciation models. In J. Levis & S. McCrocklin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference of Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching (PSLLT) (pp. 172–176). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.Google Scholar
Moreno, L. (2016). Channeling Charlie: Suprasegmental pronunciation in a second language learner’s performance of others’ voices. Unpublished MA Qualifying Paper. University of Minnesota. Available at the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy: <[URL]>Google Scholar
Murphy, J. M. (2014). Intelligible, comprehensible, non-native models in ESL/EFL pronunciation teaching. System, 42, 258–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pennington, M. (1988). Teaching pronunciation from the top down. University of Hawai’i Working Papers in ESL, 7(1), 203–227.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (1985). Actions speak louder than words: Paralanguage, communication and education. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 259–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, L. (2001). The role of tone choice in improving ITA communication in the classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35(2), 233–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). The structure and function of intonation paragraphs in native and nonnative speaker instructional discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 19–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, D. (1989). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarone, E. (1978). The phonology of interlanguage. In J. C. Richards (Ed.), Understanding second and foreign language learning (pp. l5–33). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
(1988). Variation in interlanguage. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
(2000). Getting serious about language play: Language play, interlanguage variation and second language acquisition. In B. Swierzbin, F. Morris, M. Anderson, C. Klee, & E. Tarone (Eds.), Social and cognitive factors in SLA: Proceedings of the 1999 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 31–54). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2005). Speaking in a second language. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 485–502). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Tarone, E., & Swain, M. (1995). A sociolinguistic perspective on second-language use in immersion classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 79, 166–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomson, R., & Derwing, T. (2015). The effectiveness of L2 pronunciation instruction: A narrative review. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 326–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

McAndrews, Mark
2023. The effects of prosody instruction on listening comprehension in an EAP classroom context. Language Teaching Research 27:6 ► pp. 1480 ff. DOI logo
Corbett, John Blair
2022. The design of a blended learning course to develop conference presentation skills for postgraduate students in medicine. Letras ► pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
LaScotte, Darren K.
2022. L2 Voices and Materials as Tools in Pronunciation Pedagogy. In New Perspectives on Material Mediation in Language Learner Pedagogy [Educational Linguistics, 56], ► pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
LASCOTTE, DARREN K. & ELAINE TARONE
2022. Channeling Voices to Improve L2 English Intelligibility. The Modern Language Journal 106:4 ► pp. 744 ff. DOI logo
Sonsaat‐Hegelheimer, Sinem & Shannon McCrocklin
2022. Research‐informed Materials for Pronunciation Teaching. In Second Language Pronunciation, ► pp. 293 ff. DOI logo
Hardison, Debra M & Martha C Pennington
2021. Multimodal Second-Language Communication: Research Findings and Pedagogical Implications. RELC Journal 52:1 ► pp. 62 ff. DOI logo
LaScotte, Darren, Colleen Meyers & Elaine Tarone
2021. Voice and Mirroring in SLA: Top-Down Pedagogy for L2 Pronunciation Instruction. RELC Journal 52:1 ► pp. 144 ff. DOI logo
Levis, John M
2021. Conversations with Experts – In Conversation with John Levis, Editor of Journal of Second Language Pronunciation. RELC Journal 52:1 ► pp. 206 ff. DOI logo
Pennington, Martha C
2021. Teaching Pronunciation: The State of the Art 2021. RELC Journal 52:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Pennington, Martha C.
2019. ‘Top-Down’ Pronunciation Teaching Revisited. RELC Journal 50:3 ► pp. 371 ff. DOI logo
Goodwin, Janet
2020. Pronunciation Teaching Methods and Techniques. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
LaSCOTTE, DARREN & ELAINE TARONE
2019. Heteroglossia and Constructed Dialogue in SLA. The Modern Language Journal 103:S1 ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.