Cover not available
Part of
Lifespan Acquisition and Language Change: Historical sociolinguistic perspectives
Edited by Israel Sanz-Sánchez
[Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 14] 2024
► pp. 127–147

Chapter 6
Language acquisition across the lifespan and the emergence of new varieties

ORCID logo | Queen Mary University of London
This chapter examines the role of acquisitional processes in the emergence of new language varieties, exploring the question in two ways. We first consider how different age groups and generations contribute to the emergence of new multi-ethnolects in Europe and in comparable contemporary contact situations. Age of exposure and the social context of acquisition are both shown to alter the course of a given variety. We then look at cases of post-colonial dialect emergence, which we exemplify with cases stemming from British colonialism. These examples are used to show that theories of second language acquisition can account for the development of specific grammatical features over generations, and indeed that those theories can in turn be evaluated by such examples. Overall, these cases show that new varieties are key contexts to understand the role of language acquisition in historical sociolinguistics.
Keywords: new dialect formation, language acquisition, lifespan, historical sociolinguistics, immigration, post-colonial Englishes
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Acquisition across life stages, social meaning, and emergent varieties
    • 2.1The role of acquisition in childhood
    • 2.2The role of acquisition in adolescence
    • 2.3The role of acquisition in adulthood
  • 3.Age of acquisition and generational community change
  • 4.Theories of language acquisition and new dialect formation
  • 5.Language acquisition and the emergence of new varieties: Challenges and opportunities
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 April 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ahs.14.06sha
References (71)
References
Agnihotri, Rama Kant & Amrit Lal Khanna (eds.). 1994. L2 acquisition: Sociocultural and linguistic aspects of English in India. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Auer, Anita, Catharina Peersman, Simon Pickl, Gijsbert Rutten & Rik Vosters. 2015. Historical sociolinguistics: the field and its future. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 1(1). 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ayoun, Dalila. 1996. The subset principle in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics 17(2). 185–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, Derek. 1984. The Language Bioprogram Hypothesis. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7(2). 173–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, Suresh. 2013. Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny, Paul Kerswill, Sue Fox & Eivind Torgersen. 2011. Contact, the feature pool and the speech community: The emergence of Multicultural London English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(2). 151–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davydova, Julia. 2011. The present perfect in non-native Englishes: A corpus-based study. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, Robert. 2020. Input is not a panacea. International Journal of Bilingualism 24(1). 79–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 1997. Age as a sociolinguistic variable. In Florian Coulmas (ed.), The handbook of sociolinguistics, 151–167. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fodor, Janet & William Sakas. 2005. The Subset Principle in syntax: Costs of compliance. Journal of Linguistics 41. 513–569. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foulkes, Paul, Gerry Docherty & Dominic Watt. 2005. Phonological variation in child-directed speech. Language 81(1).177–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Roger & Cecilia Chan. 1997. The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: the ‘failed functional features hypothesis’. Second Language Research 13(3). 187–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilbert, Michaela. 2008. Interrogative inversion in non-standard varieties of English. In Peter Siemund & Noemi Kintana (eds.), Language contact and contact languages, 261–289. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes-Elliott, Sophie. 2021. Calibrate to innovate: Community age vectors and the real time incrementation of language change. Language in Society 50(3). 441–474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Housen, Alex. 2002. The development of tense-aspect in English as a second language and the variable influence of inherent aspect. In Rafael Salaberry & Yasuhiro Shirai (eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology, 155–195. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ingham, Richard. 2017. Maintenance and change in language contact: The case of Anglo- Norman. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 84 (2–3). 383–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kachru, Braj. 1983. The indianization of English: The English language in India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul. 1994. Dialects converging: Rural speech in urban Norway. Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Children, adolescents and language change. Language Variation and Change 8. 177–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, Paul & Eivind Torgersen. 2020. Tracing the origins of an urban youth vernacular: founder effects, frequency and culture in the emergence of Multicultural London English. In Karen Beaman, Isa Buchstaller, Sue Fox, Stephen Levey & James A. Walker (eds.), Socio-grammatical variation and change: In honour of Jenny Cheshire, 249–276. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, Paul & Ann Williams. 2000. Creating a new town koine: children and language change in Milton Keynes. Language in Society 29(1). 65–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kocab, Annemarie, Ann Senghas & Jesse Snedeker. 2016. The emergence of temporal language in Nicaraguan Sign Language. Cognition 156. 147–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 2001. Principles of linguistic change, Vol. 2: Social Factors. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2007. Transmission and diffusion. Language 83(2). 344–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, Donna. 2009. Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25(2). 173–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1999. The development of language: Acquisition, change, and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Meriläinen, Lea & Heli Paulasto. 2014. Embedded inversion as an angloversal: Evidence from inner, outer, and expanding circle Englishes. In Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola & Devyani Sharma (eds.), The Oxford handbook of world Englishes, 191–216. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend. 2001. Male workers’ English in the Western Cape – interlanguage, code-switching and pidginisation. In Stanley Ridge, Elaine Ridge & Sinfree Makoni (eds.), Freedom and discipline: Essays in applied linguistics from Southern Africa, 85–104. New Delhi: Bahri.Google Scholar
Modaressi-Tehrani, Yahya. 1978. A sociolinguistic analysis of modern Persian. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas PhD dissertation.
Mufwene, Salikoko. 2001. The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato & Marianne Hundt (eds.). 2011. Exploring second-language varieties of English and learner Englishes: Bridging a paradigm gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Natascha & Hulk, Aafke. 2001. Crosslinguistic influence in bilingual language acquisition: Italian and French as recipient languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4(1). 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newport, Elissa. 2002. Critical periods in language development. In Lynn Nadel (ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science, 737–740. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Omdal, Helge. 1977. Høyangermålet – en ny dialekt. Språklig Samling 18. 7–9.Google Scholar
O’Shannessy, Carmen. 2005. Light Warlpiri: A new language. Australian Journal of Linguistics 25(1). 31–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oxbury, Rosie & Kathleen McCarthy. 2019. Acquiring a multiethnolect: the production of diphthongs by children and adolescents in West London. In Sasha Calhoun, Paola Escudero, Marija Tabain & Paul Warren (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 2208–2212. International Phonetic Association. [URL] (15 October 2021).
Payne, Arvilla. 1980. Factors controlling the acquisition of Philadelphia dialect by out-of-state children. In William Labov (ed.), Locating language in time and space, 143–178. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 1984. Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Platt, John, Heidi Weber & Ho Mian Lian. 1984. The new Englishes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph. 1990. Language varieties and standard language. English Today 6(1). 3–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Sarah. 2000. Nativization and the genesis of Hawaiian Creole. In John McWhorter (ed.), Language change and language contact in pidgins and creoles, 257–300. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanz-Sánchez, Israel & María Irene Moyna. 2023. Children as agents of language change: Diachronic evidence from Latin American Spanish phonology. Journal of Historical Linguistics 13(3). 327–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Bonnie & Rex Sprouse. 1994. Word order and nominative case in nonnative language acquisition: A longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German interlanguage. In Teun Hoekstra & Bonnie Schwartz (eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar, 317–368. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scovel, Thomas. 2000. A critical review of the critical period research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 20. 213–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selinker, Larry. 1972. Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 10. 209–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Senghas, Ann & Marie Coppola. 2001. Children creating language: How Nicaraguan Sign Language acquired a spatial grammar. Psychological Science 12(4). 323–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serratrice, Ludovica, Antonella Sorace & Sandra Paoli. 2004. Cross-linguistic at the syntax-pragmatics interface: Subjects and objects in Italian-English bilingual and monolingual acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7(3). 183–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharma, Devyani. 2005. Language transfer and discourse universals in Indian English article use. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27(4). 535–566. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Typological diversity in New Englishes. English World-Wide 30(2). 170–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Style dominance: Attention, audience, and the ‘real me’. Language in Society 47(1). 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. Biographical indexicality. In Lauren Hall-Lew, Emma Moore & Robert Podesva (eds.), Social meaning and linguistic variation: Theorizing the third wave, 243–264. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharma, Devyani & Lavanya Sankaran. 2011. Cognitive and social forces in dialect shift: Gradual change in London Asian speech. Language Variation and Change 23. 399–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 1994. Language contact and change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Clarendon. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Singler, John. 2006. Yes, but not in the Caribbean. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 21(2). 337–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, Roumyana. 2008. Meaning in the second language. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jennifer & Mercedes Durham. 2019. Sociolinguistic variation in children’s language: Acquiring community norms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, Antonella & Francesca Filiaci. 2006. Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research 22(3). 339–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, Antonella & Ludovica Serratrice. 2009. Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism 13(2). 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sridhar, Kamal & Shikaripur Sridhar. 1992. Bridging the paradigm gap: Second-language acquisition theory and indigenized varieties of English. In Braj Kachru (ed.), The other tongue, 91–108. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2009. Typological parameters of intralingual variability: grammatical analyticity versus syntheticity in varieties of English. Language Variation and Change 21(3). 319–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & Alexandra D’Arcy. 2009. Peaks beyond phonology: Adolescence, incrementation, and language change. Language 85(1). 58–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah & Terrence Kaufman. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2004. New-dialect formation: The inevitability of colonial Englishes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, Ianthi Maria & Maria Dimitrakopoulou. 2007. The Interpretability Hypothesis: evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 23(2). 215–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Rooy, Bertus. 2011. A principled distinction between error and conventionalized innovation in African Englishes. In Joybrato Mukherjee & Marianne Hundt (eds.), Exploring second-language varieties of English and learner Englishes: Bridging a paradigm gap, 189–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth & M. Rita Manzini. 1987. Parameters and learnability in binding theory. In Thomas Roeper & Edwin Williams. (eds.), Parameter setting, 41–76. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, Lydia. 1989. Universal grammar and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winford, Donald. 2003. An introduction to contact linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Yao, Xinyue. 2016. Cleft constructions in Hong Kong English. English World-Wide 37(2). 197–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Young, Nathan. 2019. Rhythm in late-modern Stockholm – Social stratification and stylistic variation in the speech of men. London: Queen Mary University of London. PhD dissertation.