Cover not available
Part of
Lifespan Acquisition and Language Change: Historical sociolinguistic perspectives
Edited by Israel Sanz-Sánchez
[Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 14] 2024
► pp. 150–178

Chapter 7
Tracing the emergence of the voseo/tuteo semantic split in Río de la Plata second person subjunctives

The role of child language acquisition

ORCID logo | Texas A&M University
ORCID logo | The University of Texas at San Antonio
This study documents the history of second person singular informal variation in Rioplatense Spanish. It focuses on the competition between voseo and tuteo forms in the subjunctive and proposes that the outcome of this variation can be linked to the acquisition of these forms by children. In contrast with other verb forms in the variety, which eradicated tuteo progressively, in the subjunctive tuteo prevailed in epistemic contexts, while voseo continued to be possible in deontic contexts. By combining data from the historical record (Study 1) with converging data from contemporary children acquiring the same structures (Study 2), we show that the subjunctive forms most likely to select tuteo are acquired later, making them more susceptible to normative influence. Because changes in the second singular present subjunctive coincided with the spread of public education in the region, we argue that the semantic split resulted from the interaction of linguistic, social, and developmental factors, and sketch a sociohistorical account for the actuation of this change.
Keywords: voseo, tuteo, Rioplatense Spanish, subjunctive, diachronic change, language acquisition, language variation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A brief sociodemographic history of the Río de la Plata
  • 3.Address forms in RPS
    • 3.1The diachrony of informal address in RPS
    • 3.2The Spanish subjunctive
    • 3.3The voseo/tuteo subjunctive split in RPS
  • 4.Study 1: History of the voseo/tuteo subjunctive split
    • 4.1Data sources
    • 4.2Data coding
    • 4.3Results and discussion
  • 5.Study 2: The acquisition of subjunctive split
    • 5.1Participants
    • 5.2Stimuli and procedure
    • 5.3Results and discussion
  • 6.Language acquisition and the historical sociolinguistics of voseo/tuteo variation in the 2sg subjunctive
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 4 April 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ahs.14.07moy
References (54)
References
Academia Mexicana de la Lengua. 2022. Corpus Diacrónico y Diatópico del Español de América (CORDIAM), [URL] (27 February, 2022)
Barrenechea, Ana (ed.). 1987. El habla culta de la ciudad de Buenos Aires: Materiales para su estudio. Buenos Aires: Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Bertolotti, Virginia. 2015. A mí de vos no me trata ni usted ni nadie: Sistemas e historia de las formas de tratamiento en la lengua española en América. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México/Universidad de la República, Uruguay.Google Scholar
Boyd-Bowman, Peter. 1985. Indice geobiográfico de más de 56 mil pobladores de la América Hispánica. Volume 1. Mexico City: Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas, UNAM.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2002. Main clauses are innovative, subordinate clauses are conservative. Consequences for the nature of constructions. In Joan Bybee & Michael Noonan (eds.), Complex sentences in grammar and discourse: Essays in honor of Sandra A. Thompson, 1–17. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deen, Kamil. 2016. Mood alternations. In Jeffrey Lidz, William Snyder & Joe Pater (eds.), The Oxford handbook of developmental linguistics, 367–385. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel. 2009. Language acquisition in creolization and, thus, language change: Some cartesian-uniformitarian boundary conditions. Language and Linguistics Compass 3/4. 888–971. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Tullio, Angela. 2010. El voseo argentino en tiempos del Bicentenario. RASAL Lingüística 1–2. 47–72.Google Scholar
Dracos, Melisa, Pablo E. Requena & Karen Miller. 2019. Acquisition of mood selection in Spanish-speaking children. Language Acquisition 26. 106–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fábregas, Antonio. 2014. A guide to subjunctive and modals in Spanish: questions and analyses. Borealis–An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 3. 1–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fontanella de Weinberg, María Beatriz. 1971. El voseo en Buenos Aires en las dos primeras décadas del siglo XIX. Thesaurus 26. 495–514.Google Scholar
. 1979. La oposición “cantes/cantés” en el español de Buenos Aires. Thesaurus 34. 72–83.Google Scholar
. 1987. El español bonaerense. Cuatro siglos de evolución lingüística (1580–1980). Buenos Aires: Hachette.Google Scholar
. 1993. Usos americanos y peninsulares de segunda persona singular. In Ana María Barrenechea, Luis Martínez Cuitiño & Elida Lois (eds.), Actas del III Congreso Argentino de Hispanistas, 144–153. Buenos Aires: Asociación Argentina de Hispanistas.Google Scholar
. 1999. Sistemas pronominales de tratamiento usados en el mundo hispánico. In Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Volumen 1, 1401–1425. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
García, Negroni, María Marta & Silvia Ramirez Gelbes. 2004. Politesse et alternance vos/tú en espagnol du Río de la Plata. Le cas du subjonctif. In Actes du colloque “Pronoms de deuxième personne et formes d’adresse dans les langues d’Europe”. Paris: Instituto Cervantes.Google Scholar
Gathercole, Virginia, Eugenia Sebastián & Pilar Soto. 1999. The early acquisition of Spanish verbal morphology: Across-the-board or piecemeal knowledge? International Journal of Bilingualism 3(2–3). 133–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Negative commands in Spanish-speaking children: No need for recourse to Relativized Minimality (a reply to Grinstead 2000). Journal of Child Language 29(2). 393–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Germani, Gino. 1966. Mass immigration and modernization in Argentina. Studies in International Comparative Development Studies 2. 165–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goebel, Michael. 2010. Gauchos, gringos, and gallegos: The assimilation of Italian and Spanish immigrants in the making of modern Uruguay 1880–1930. Past and Present 208(1). 191–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haverkate, Henk. 1979. Impositive sentences in Spanish: Theory and description in linguistic pragmatics. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Hudson Kam, Carla. 2015. The impact of conditioning variables on the acquisition of variation in adult and child learners. Language 91(4). 906–937. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hudson Kam, Carla & Elissa Newport. 2005. Regularizing unpredictable variation: The roles of adult and child learners in language formation and change. Language Learning and Development 1(2). 151–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Getting it right by getting it wrong: When learners change languages. Cognitive Psychology 59(1). 30–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mary. 2013. The pragmatic alternation between two negative imperatives in Argentinian Spanish. Unpublished PhD dissertation. The Ohio State University.
. 2016a. Pragmatic variation in voseo and tuteo negative commands in Argentinian Spanish. In María Irene Moyna & Susana Rivera-Mills (eds.), Forms of address in the Spanish of the Americas, 127–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016b. Epistemicity in voseo and tuteo negative commands in Argentinian Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 97. 37–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mary & John Grinstead. 2011. Variation in the voseo and tuteo negative imperatives in Argentine Spanish. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 17. 99–104. Article 12.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony. 1989. Reflexes of grammar patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1. 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 2001. Principles of linguistic change. Volume 2: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lozano, Anthony. 1995. Cognitive development, deontic and epistemic subjunctives. Hispanic Linguistics 6/7. 93–115.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian. 2000. The CHILDES project: The database. Volume 2. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McMahon, Robert & Rex Forehand. 2005. Helping the noncompliant child: Family-based treatment for oppositional behavior. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Moyna, María Irene. 2009. Child acquisition and language change: Voseo evolution in Río de la Plata Spanish. In Joe Collentine, Barbara Lafford, MaryEllen García & Francisco Marcos Marín (eds.), Proceedings of the 2007 Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, 131–142. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
. 2020. Formas de tratamiento y mitigación en el español de Montevideo. In Tatiana Maranhão de Castedo & Ana Berenice Peres Martorelli (eds.), El voseo en América, Origen, usos y aplicación, 165–197. Curitiba: Appris.Google Scholar
Moyna, María Irene & Israel Sanz-Sánchez. 2023. Out of the mouths of babes: The role of children in the formation of the Río de la Plata address system. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 9(2). 189–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nahum, Benjamín. 1968. La estancia alambrada. Montevideo: Arca.Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 2005. The modal confusion: On terminology and the concepts behind it. In Ales Klinge, Henrik Hegel Müller (eds.), Modality: Studies in form and function, 5–38. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Oroño, Mariela. 2014. La escuela y la lengua en la construcción de la identidad nacional uruguaya: Los libros de lectura usados en la escuela pública en los años 40 del siglo XX. Boletín de Filología 49(2). 215–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Frank. 2001. Mood and modality. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penny, Ralph. 1991. A history of the Spanish language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, Ana. 1998. The acquisition of mood selection in Spanish relative clauses. Journal of Child Language 25(3). 585–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prevedello, Nora Lilí. 1989. El voseo en el habla de Córdoba: Dos fuerzas en pugna. In Luz Arrigoni de Allamand (ed.), Actas del II Congreso Argentino de Hispanistas, Volume 1, 287–300. Mendoza: Facultad de Filosofía y Letras.Google Scholar
Requena, Pablo E., Dracos, Melisa, & Miller, Karen. 2017. Acquisition of Spanish mood selection in complement clauses. In Maria LaMendola & Jennifer Scott (eds.), Proceedings of the 41st Boston University Conference on Language Development, Volume 2, 563–575. Somerville, MA. Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Naranjo, Jeannette, & Ana Pérez-Leroux. 2010. In the wrong mood at the right time: Children’s acquisition of the Spanish subjunctive in temporal clauses. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 55(2). 227–255.Google Scholar
Sanz-Sánchez, Israel & María Irene Moyna. 2023. Children as agents of language change: Diachronic evidence from Latin American Spanish phonology. Journal of Historical Linguistics 13(3). 327–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sarreal, Julia. 2014. The Guaraní and their missions: A socioeconomic history. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Selinker, Larry. 1972. Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 10. 209–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siracusa, María Isabel. 1972. Morfología verbal del voseo en el habla culta de Buenos Aires. Filología 16. 201–213.Google Scholar
Spalding, Hobart. 1972. Education in Argentina, 1890–1914: The limits of oligarchical reform. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 3(1). 31–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sucazes, Daniel & Orual Andina. Undated. Indicadores demográficos: Variables estadísticas relevantes durante el siglo XX. Área sociodemográfica. Fascículo 4: Educación y Capacitación. Montevideo: Instituto Nacional de Estadística.
Wagner, Suzanne Evans. 2012. Age grading in sociolinguistic theory. Language and Linguistic Compass 6. 371–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zubillaga, Carlos. 1993. Hacer la América: Estudios históricos sobre la inmigración española al Uruguay. Montevideo: Fin de Siglo.Google Scholar