Cover not available
Part of
Norms and Usage in Language History, 1600–1900: A sociolinguistic and comparative perspective
Edited by Gijsbert Rutten, Rik Vosters and Wim Vandenbussche
[Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 3] 2014
► pp. 151–170

Nineteenth-century English

Norms and usage

This paper focuses on language variation and change in nineteenth-century England. The first part of the paper is concerned with grammar writing and the influence that grammatical norms may have had on the English language. The second part of the paper takes a closer look at actual language usage. Throughout the paper particular attention is paid to language history ‘from below’, i.e. the linguistic situation of the lower social orders. For instance, the paper confirms, based on empirical data, that you was, a stigmatised feature in prescriptive grammars, was the dominant form in lower-class language usage. All in all, the paper also tries to show that nineteenth-century English still deserves a lot more scholarly attention.
Published online: 19 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ahs.3.07aue
References (67)
References
Alston, Robin Carfrae. 1965–72. A bibliography of the English language from the invention of printing to the year 1800. Leeds: Arnold.Google Scholar
Aarts, Bas, Maria José López-Couso & Belén Méndez-Naya. 2012. Late Modern English: Syntax. In Alex Bergs & Laurel Brinton (eds.), Historical linguistics of English, 869–887. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Aarts, Flor. 1986. William Cobbett: Radical, reactionary and poor man’s grammarian. Neophilologus 70.603–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. William Cobbett’s grammar of the English language. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen XCV.319–332.Google Scholar
Anderwald, Lieselotte. 2012. Clumsy, awkward or having a peculiar propriety? Prescriptive judgements and language change in the 19th century. Language Sciences 34.28–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, Anita. 2012. Late Modern English: Standardization. In Alex Bergs & Laurel Brinton (eds.), Historical linguistics of English, 939–952. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(forthc.) Stylistic Variation. In Anita Auer, Daniel Schreier & Richard J. Watts (eds.), Letter writing and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Auer, Anita & Tony Fairman. 2013. Letters of artisans and the labouring poor (England, c. 1750–1835). In Paul Bennett, Martin Durrell, Silke Scheible & Richard J. Whitt (eds.), New methods in historical corpus linguistics, 77–91. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Auer, Anita, Tony Fairman, Moragh Gordon & Mikko Laitinen. 2014. An electronic corpus of letters of artisans and the labouring poor (England, c. 1750–1835): Compilation principles and coding conventions. In Kristin Davidse, Caroline Gentens, Ditte Kimps & Lieven Vandelanotte (eds.), Recent advances in corpus linguistics: Developing and exploiting corpora. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Bailey, Richard W. 1996. Nineteenth-century English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Baugh, Albert C. & Thomas Cable. 1993. A history of the English language. 4th edition. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Beal, Joan C. 2004. English in modern times 1700–1945. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Edward Finegan 1990–93/2002/2007/2010. A representative corpus of historical English registers (ARCHER). Version 3.1. Consortium of fourteen universities, see [URL].Google Scholar
Cobbett, William. 1818. A grammar of the English language. New York.Google Scholar
Crowley, Tony. 2003. Standard English and politics of language. London: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curme, George O. 1977. A grammar of the English language. Essex, CT: Verbatim.Google Scholar
Dekeyser, Xavier. 1975. Number and case relations in 19th-century British English: A comparative study of grammar and usage. Antwerpen & Amsterdam: De Nederlandsche Boekhandel.Google Scholar
Denison, David. 1998. Syntax. In Suzanne Romaine (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language Vol. IV 1776–1997, 92–329. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Denison, David, Graeme Trousdale & Linda van Bergen. 1994. A corpus of late modern English prose. [URL]Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik. 2005. A corpus of Late Modern English. ICAME Journal 29. 69–82.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, Maria & Richard Lovell Edgeworth. 1815. Essays on practical education, Volume 2. London.Google Scholar
Elspaß, Stephan. 2007. A twofold view ‘from below’: New perspectives on language histories and language historiographies. In Stephan Elspaß, Nils Langer, Joachim Scharloth & Wim Vandenbussche (eds.), Germanic Language Histories ‘from Below’ (1700–2000), 3–9. Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairman, Tony. 2007. Writing and the “Standard”: England, 1795–1834. Multilingua 26–2/3.167–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Strike-throughs: What textual alterations can tell us about writers and their scripts, 1795–1835. In Marina Dossena & Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (eds.), Studies in late modern English correspondence: Methodology and data, 193–211. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Fens-de Zeeuw, Lyda. 2011. Lindley Murray (1745–1826), Quaker and grammarian. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Görlach, Manfred. 1998. An annotated bibliography of 19th-century grammars of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. English in nineteenth-century England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Eighteenth-century English. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1966. Dialect, language, nation. American Anthropologist 68.922–935. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henry, Maura A. 2002. The making of elite culture. In H.T. Dickinson (ed.), A companion to eighteenth-century Britain, 311–28. Malden, MA & Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Hibbert, Christopher. 1998. George III. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ingrams, Richard. 2005. The life and adventures of William Cobbett. London: Harber Perennial.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel. 1755. A dictionary of the English language. London.Google Scholar
Karlin, Daniel & Tom Keymer. 2000. Nineteenth-century fiction. Chadwyck-Healey Ltd. [URL]Google Scholar
Kytö, Merja & Juhani Rudanko. Forthcoming. Corpus of nineteenth-century English (CONCE). Uppsala University and University of Tampere.
Kytö, Merja, Mats Rydén & Erik Smitterberg (eds.). 2006. Nineteenth-century English: Stability and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1999. Phonology and morphology. In Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language Volume III, 1476–1776, 56–186. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laitinen, Mikko. 2009. Singular YOU WAS/WERE variation and English normative grammars in the eighteenth century. In Arja Nurmi & Minna Nevala & Minna Palander-Collin (eds.), The language of daily life in England (1400–1800), 199–217. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lawson, John & Harold Silver. 1973. A social history of education in England. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Leonard, Sterling Andrus. 1929. The doctrine of correctness in English usage 1700–1800. Wisconsin: Madison.Google Scholar
Linn, Andrew. 2006. English grammar writing. In Bas Aarts & April McMahon (eds.), The handbook of English linguistics, 72–92. Malden, MA/Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lowth, Robert. 1762. A short introduction to English grammar. London: A. Millar, R. and J. Dodsley.Google Scholar
Michael, Ian. 1970. English grammatical categories and the tradition to 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1991. More than enough English grammars. In Gerhard Leitner (ed.), English traditional grammars, 11–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milroy, James & Lesley Milroy. 1999. Authority in language: Investigating Standard English. 3rd edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mondorf, Britta. 2012. Late Modern English: Morphology. In Alex Bergs & Laurel Brinton (eds.), Historical linguistics of English, 842–869. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mugglestone, Lynda C. 2006. The Oxford history of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Lindley. 1795. English grammar, adapted to the different classes of learners: With an appendix, containing rules and observations, for assisting the more advanced students to write with perspicuity and accuracy. York.Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti. 1999. Syntax. In Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Vol. III: 1476–1776, 187–331. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W., Clive Upton, Bernd Kortmann, Rajend Mesthrie & Kate Burridge (eds.). 2004. A handbook of varieties of English. Vol 2: Morphology and syntax. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Shelley, Edward. 1848. The people’s grammar; or English grammar without difficulties for ‘the million’. Huddersfield.Google Scholar
Stephens, W.B. 1987. Education, literacy and society, 1830–70: The geography of diversity in provincial England. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Sundby, Bertil, Anne Kari Bjørge & Kari E. Haugland. 1991. A dictionary of English normative grammar 1700–1800. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweet, Henry. 1891–8. A new English grammar, logical and historical. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali. 1998. Was/were variation across the generations: View from the city of York. Language variation and change 10.153–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2002. You was and eighteenth-century normative grammar. In Katja Lenz & Ruth Mölig (eds.), Of dyuersitie & chaunge of langage: Essays presented to Manfred Görlach on the occasion of his 65th birthday, 88–102. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
(ed.). 2008. Grammars, grammarians and grammar-writing in eighteenth-century England. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2008. Grammars, grammarians and grammar writing: An introduction. In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (ed.), Grammars, grammarians and grammar-writing in eighteenth-century England, 1–14. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2010. The usage guide: Its birth and popularity. English today: The international review of the English language 26.14–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1972. A history of English syntax. A transformational approach to the history of English sentence structures. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Vincent, David. 1989. Literacy and popular culture. England 1750–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Visser, F.T. 1970. An historical syntax of the English language. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Wal, Marijke van der. 2006. Onvoltooid verleden tijd. Witte vlekken in de taalgeschiedenis. Amsterdam: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen.Google Scholar
Walker, John. 1791. A critical pronouncing dictionary. London: Robinson.Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph. 1898–1905. The English dialect dictionary. 6 vols. London: Kegan Paul for the English Dialect Society.Google Scholar
Wright, Pip, Joy Wright & Léonie Robinson (eds.). 2004. The diary of a poor Suffolk woodman. Cromer, Norfolk: Poppyland Publishing.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Hyett, James & Carol Percy
2024. Chapter 3. Gender, genre, and prescriptivism. In Unlocking the History of English [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 364], ► pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
Rutten, Gijsbert
2016. Historicizing diaglossia. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20:1 ► pp. 6 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.