Cover not available
Part of
Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Peng Wu
[Argumentation in Context 12] 2017
► pp. 1–10

Chapter 1
Introduction Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics

Published online: 12 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.12.01int
References (11)
References
Eemeren, F. H. van (Ed.) (2002). Advances in Pragma-Dialectics. Amsterdam: Sic Sat/Vale Press.Google Scholar
. (2010). Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam etc.: John Benjamins. Argumentation in Context 2. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2017), Prototypical Argumentative Patterns. Exploring the Relationship between Argumentative Discourse and Institutional Context. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Argumentation in Context 9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van, Garssen, B. J., & Meuffels, B. (2009). Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness. Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules. Dordrecht: Springer. Argumentation Library 16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van, & Grootendorst, R. (1984). Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Dordrecht/Berlin: Foris/De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1992). Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale (N.J.): Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(Eds.) (1994). Studies in Pragma-Dialectics. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Google Scholar
(2004). A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van, Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S., & Jacobs, S. (1993). Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse. Tuscaloosa/London: The University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van, Houtlosser, P., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2007). Argumentative Indicators in Discourse. A Pragma-Dialectical Study. Dordrecht: Springer. Argumentation Library 12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (1997). Analysing Complex Argumentation. The Reconstruction of Multiple and Coordinatively Compound Argumentation in a Critical Discussion. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Google Scholar