Part of
Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Peng Wu
[Argumentation in Context 12] 2017
► pp. 177192
References

References

Bootsma, P. & C. Hoetink
(2006) Over lijken. Ontoelaatbaar taalgebruik in de Tweede Kamer. Amsterdam: Boom.Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van
(2010) Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van & R. Grootendorst
(1992) Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fahnestock, J.
(2011) Rhetorical Style. The uses of Language in Persuasion. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haaften, T. van
(2011), ‘Parliamentary Debate and Political Culture: The Dutch Case’. In T. van Haaften et al. (eds), Bending Opinion. Essays on Persuasion in the Public Domain (pp 349–368). Leiden: Leiden University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haaften, T.van
in preparation) ‘Parlementair taalgebruik’.
Leeuwen, M. van
(2015) Stijl en Politiek. Een Taalkundig-Stilistische Benadering van Nederlandse Parlementaire Toespraken. Dissertation Leiden UniversityGoogle Scholar
Mohammed, D.
(2008) Argumentative activity types: Tracing the influence of institutional settings on arguers’ strategic maneuvering. In F. H. van Eemeren, D. C. Williams & I. Z. Zagar (Eds.), Understanding Argumentation. Work in Progress (pp. 55–67). Amsterdam: Sic Sat – Rozenberg.Google Scholar
Plug, H. J.
(2010) Ad-hominem arguments in the Dutch and European Parliaments: Strategic maneuvering in an institutional context. In C. Ilie (Ed.), European Parliaments under Scrutiny (pp. 305–328). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tonnard, Y.
(2011) Getting an Issue on the Table. A Pragma-Dialectical Study of Presentational Choices in confrontational Strategic Maneuvering in Dutch Parliamentary Debate. Dissertation University of Amsterdam.
Turpijn, J.
(2008) Mannen van Gezag. De uitvinding van de Tweede Kamer 1848–1888. Amsterdam: Wereldbibliotheek.Google Scholar
Velde, H. te
(2003) Het Theater van de Politiek. Amsterdam: Wereldbibliotheek.Google Scholar
(2010) Van Regentenmentaliteit tot Populisme. Politieke tradities in Nederland. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Bert Bakker.Google Scholar
(2015) Sprekende Politiek. Redenaars en hun Publiek in de Parlementaire Gouden Eeuw. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Prometheus/Bert Bakker.Google Scholar
Zarefsky, D.
(2009) Strategic Maneuvering in Political Argumentation. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Examining argumentation in context: Fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering (pp. 115–130). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Fahnestock, Jeanne
2021. Analyzing Rhetorical Style: Toward Better Methods. In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36],  pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Herman, Thierry & Steve Oswald
2021. Everybody Knows that There Is Something Odd About Ad Populum Arguments. In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36],  pp. 305 ff. DOI logo
Jansen, Henrike & Maarten van Leeuwen
2021. The presentational dimension of Geert Wilders’s populist argumentative style. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:1  pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2021. Characterizing Argumentative Style: The Case of KLM and the Destructed Squirrels. In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36],  pp. 17 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.