References
Barbatsis, G. S. (1996). “Look, and I will show you something you will want to see:” Pictorial engagement in negative political campaign commercials. Argumentation and Advocacy, 33, 69–80.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barnhurst, K. G., Vari, M., & Rodríguez, Í. (2004). Mapping visual studies in communication. Journal of Communication, 54, 616–644. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barthes, R. (1977). Rhetoric of the image. In R. Barthes, Image – text – music (pp. 32–51). London: Fontana.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bateman, J. A. (2014). Text and image. A critical introduction to the visual/verbal divide. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bateman, J. A., Tseng, C., Seizov, O., Jacobs, A., Lüdtke, A., Müller, M. G., & Herzog, O. (2016). Towards next-generation visual archives: Image, film and discourse. Visual Studies, 31, 131–154. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Benson, T. W. (1974).
Joe: An essay in the rhetorical criticism of film. Journal of Popular Culture, 8, 610–618. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bex, F., Lawrence, J., Snaith, M., & Reed, C. (2013). Implementing the argument web. Communications of the ACM, 56, 66–73. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Birdsell, D. S., & Groarke, L. (1996). Toward a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 33, 1–10.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Birdsell, D. S., & Groarke, L. (2007). Outlines of a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 43, 103–113. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blair, A. J. (2004). The rhetoric of visual arguments. In C. A. Hill, & M. Helmers (Eds.), Defining visual rhetorics (pp. 41–62). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blair, A. J. (2012). Rhetoric, dialectic, and logic as related to argument. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 45, 148–164. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blair, A. J. (2015). Probative norms for multimodal visual arguments. Argumentation, 29, 217–233. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bloomfield, E. F., & Sangalang, A. (2014). Juxtaposition as visual argument: Health rhetoric in Super Size Me and Fat Head
. Argumentation and Advocacy, 50, 141–157. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bonsiepe, G. (1965). Visual/verbal rhetoric. Ulm 14/15/16, 23–40.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Deppermann, A. (Ed.). (2013). Conversation analytic studies of multimodal interaction. Special issue Journal of Pragmatics, 46. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dove, I. J. (2013). Visual arguments and meta-arguments. In D. Mohammed, & M. Lewiński (Eds.), Virtues of argumentation: Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22–26 May 2013 (pp. 1–15). Ontario: OSSA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dove, I. J. (2016). Visual scheming: Assessing visual arguments. Argumentation and Advocacy, 52, 254–264. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dove, I. J. (this volume). Arguing with illustrations: A visual archaeological debate about the proper place of Australopithecus Africanus
.
Durand, J. (1970). Rhétorique et image publicitaire. Communications, 15, 70–95. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Feteris, E. T. (2013). The use of allusions to literary and cultural sources in argumentation in political cartoons. In H. van Belle, P. Gillaerts, B. van Gorp, D. van de Mieroop, & K. Rutten (Eds.), Verbal and visual rhetoric in a media world (pp. 415–428). Leiden: Leiden University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Finnegan, C. A. (2001). The naturalistic enthymeme and visual argument: Photographic representation in the “skull controversy.” Argumentation and Advocacy, 37, 133–149.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fleming, D. (1996). Can pictures be arguments? Argumentation and Advocacy, 33, 11–22.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Forceville, C. (2005). Addressing an audience: Time, place, and genre in Peter van Straaten’s calendar cartoons. Humor, 18, 247–278. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Forceville, C. (2006). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (pp. 379–402). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Forceville, C. (2014). Relevance Theory as model for analysing multimodal communication. In D. Machin (Ed.), Visual communication (pp. 51–70). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Forceville, C., & Clark, B. (2014). Can pictures have explicatures? Linguagem em (Dis)curso, 14, 451–472. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.). (2009). Multimodal metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Foss, S. K. (2005). Theory of visual rhetoric. In K. L. Smith, S. Moriarty, G. Barbatsis, & K. Kenney (Eds.), Handbook of visual communication. Theory, methods, and media (pp. 141–152). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frow, J. (2015). Genre (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gaede, W. (1981). Vom Wort zum Bild: Kreativ-methoden der Visualisierung. Munich: Wirtschaftsverlag Langen-Müller.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gelang, M., & Kjeldsen, J. E. (2011). Nonverbal communication as argumentation. In F. H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen, D. Godden, & G. Mitchell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th international conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, June 29–July 2, 2010 (pp. 567–576). Amsterdam: SicSat.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbons, M. G. (2007). Seeing the mind in the matter: Functional brain imaging as framed visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 43, 175–188. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gigante, M. E. (2012). Accommodating scientific illiteracy: Award-winning visualizations on the covers of Science
. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 42, 21–38. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gilbert, M. A. (1994). Multi-modal argumentation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 24, 159–177. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Godden, D. (2017). On the norms of visual argument: A case for normative non-revisionism. Argumentation, 31, 395–431.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Groarke, L. (1996). Logic, art and argument. Informal Logic, 18, 116–131. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Groarke, L. (2002). Are musical arguments possible? In F. H. van Eemeren, A. J. Blair, C. A. Willard, & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 419–422). Amsterdam: SicSat.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Groarke, L. (2015). Going multimodal: What is a mode of arguing and why does it matter? Argumentation, 29, 133–155. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Groarke, L. (this volume). Editorial cartoons and ART: Arguing with Pinocchio.
Groarke, L., Palczewski, C. H., & Godden, D. (2016). Navigating the visual turn in argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 52, 217–235. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Groarke, L., & Tindale, C. W. (2013). Good reasoning matters! (5th ed.). Toronto: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gronbeck, B. E. (1978). Celluloid rhetoric: On genres of documentary. In K. K. Campbell, & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), Form and genre: Shaping rhetorical action (pp. 139–161). Falls Church, VA: Speech Communication Association.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gronbeck, B. E. (1995). Unstated propositions: Relations among verbal, visual, and acoustic languages. In S. Jackson (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th SCA/AFA conference on argumentation (pp. 539–542). Annandale, VA: SCA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gross, A. G., & Harmon, J. E. (2014). Science from sight to insight: How scientists illustrate meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Groupe µ. (1992). Traité du signe visuel. Pour une rhétorique de l’image. Paris: Seuil.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hample, D. (2005). Arguing: Exchanging reasons face to face. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hariman, R. (2015). Between confusion and boredom in the study of visual argument. Argumentation, 29, 239–242. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hill, C. A., & Helmers, M. (Eds.). (2004). Defining visual rhetorics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iversen, M. H. (this volume). Employing film form and style in the argumentative analysis of political advertising.
Jacquin, J. (this volume). Embodied argumentation in public debates. The role of gestures in the segmentation of argumentative moves.
Jewitt, C. (2014a). An introduction to multimodality. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (2nd ed., pp. 15–30). London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jewitt, C. (Ed.). (2014b). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., & O’Halloran, K. (2016). Introducing multimodality. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnson, R. H. (2003). Why ‘visual arguments’ aren’t arguments. In A. J. Blair, D. Farr, H. V. Hansen, R. H. Johnson, & C. W. Tindale (Eds.), Informal logic @25: Proceedings of the Windsor conference (pp. 1–13). Ontario: OSSA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kenney, K., & Scott, L. M. (2003). A review of the visual rhetoric literature. In L. M. Scott, & R. Batra (Eds.), Persuasive imagery: A consumer response perspective (pp. 17–56). London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kišiček, G. (2015). The role of prosodic features in the analysis of multimodal argumentation. In B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell, & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th international conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, July 1–4, 2014 (pp. 730–740). Amsterdam: SicSat.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kita, S. (Ed.). (2003). Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kjeldsen, J. E. (2012). Pictorial argumentation in advertising: Visual tropes and figures as a way of creating visual argumentation. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Topical themes in argumentation theory: Twenty exploratory studies (pp. 239–256). Dordrecht: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kjeldsen, J. E. (2015). The study of visual and multimodal argumentation. Argumentation, 29, 115–132. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kjeldsen, J. E. (2016a). Studying rhetorical audiences: A call for qualitative reception studies in argumentation and rhetoric. Informal Logic, 36, 136–158. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kjeldsen, J. E. (2016b). Symbolic condensation and thick representation in visual and multimodal communication. Argumentation and Advocacy, 52, 265–280. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kjeldsen, J. E. (this volume). The rhetorical and argumentative potentials of press photography.
Klug, N. -M., & Stöckl, H. (Eds.). (2016). Handbuch Sprache im multimodalen Kontext [Handbook of language in multimodal contexts]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kostelnick, C., & Roberts, D. D. (1998). Designing visual language: Strategies for professional communicators. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images. The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lake, R. A., & Pickering, B. A. (1998). Argumentation, the visual, and the possibility of refutation: An exploration. Argumentation, 12, 79–93. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Machin, D. (2007). Introduction to multimodal analysis. New York: Bloomsbury.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McQuarrie, E. F., & Phillips, B. J. (Eds.). (2008). Go figure! New directions in advertising rhetoric. Armonk New York: ME Sharp.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Medhurst, M. J. (1978). Image and ambiguity: A rhetorical approach to the Exorcist
. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 44, 73–92. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Medhurst, M. J., & Benson, T. W. (Eds.). (1984). Rhetorical dimensions in media. A critical casebook. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Medhurst, M. J., & DeSousa, M. A. (1981). Political cartoons as rhetorical form: A taxonomy of graphic discourse. Communication Monographs, 48, 197–236. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Messaris, P. (1997). Visual persuasion: The role of images in advertising. London: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nöth, W. (1995). Handbook of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
O’Keefe, D. J. (1977). Two concepts of argument. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 13, 121–128.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Olson, L. C. (2007). Intellectual and conceptual resources for visual rhetoric: A re-examination of scholarship since 1950. The Review of Communication, 7, 1–20. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Olson, L. C., Finnegan, C. A., & Hope, D. S. (Eds.). (2008). Visual rhetoric: A reader in communication and American culture. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Patterson, S. W. (2010). “A picture held us captive:” The later Wittgenstein on visual argumentation. Cogency, 2, 105–134.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pfau, R., Steinbach, M., & Woll, B. (Eds.). (2012). Sign language: An international handbook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poggi, I. (this volume). The “seeds” of charisma: Multimodal rhetoric of Mussolini’s discourse.
Poggi, I., & Vincze, L. (2009). Gesture, gaze and persuasive strategies in political discourse. In M. Kipp, J. Martin, P. Paggio, & D. Heylen (Eds.), Multimodal corpora. From models of natural interaction to systems and applications (pp. 73–92). Dordrecht: Springer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pollaroli, C. (2016). T(r)opical patterns in advertising: The argumentative relevance of multimodal metaphor in print advertisements. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prelli, L. J. (Ed.). (2006). Rhetorics of display. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ripley, L. M. (2008). Argumentation theorists argue that an ad is an argument. Argumentation, 22, 507–519. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roque, G. (2012). Visual argumentation. A further reappraisal. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Topical themes in argumentation theory: Twenty exploratory studies (pp. 273–288). Dordrecht: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roque, G. (this volume). Rhetoric, argumentation, and persuasion in a multimodal perspective.
Scott, L. M. (1994). Images in advertising: The need for a theory of visual rhetoric. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 252–273. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shelley, C. (2001). Aspects of visual argument: A study of the March of Progress. Informal Logic, 21, 85–96. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Slade, C. (2003). Seeing reasons: Visual argumentation in advertisements. Argumentation, 17, 145–160. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tseronis, A. (2013). Argumentative functions of visuals: Beyond claiming and justifying. In D. Mohammed, & M. Lewiński (Eds.), Virtues of argumentation: Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22–26 May 2013 (pp. 1–17). Ontario: OSSA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tseronis, A. (2015). Multimodal argumentation in news magazine covers: A case study of front covers putting Greece on the spot of the European economic crisis. Discourse, Context & Media, 7, 18–27. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tseronis, A. (forthcoming). Multimodal argumentation: Beyond the verbal-visual divide. Special issue, Semiotica.
Tseronis, A., & Forceville, C. (this volume). The argumentative relevance of visual and multimodal antithesis in Frederick Wiseman’s documentaries.
Tseronis, A., & Pollaroli, C. (Eds.). (forthcoming). Pragmatic insights for multimodal argumentation. Special issue International Review of Pragmatics, 10.
Tversky, B. (2005). Visuospatial reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak, & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 209–240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van den Hoven, P. (2012). Getting your ad banned to bring the message home? A rhetorical analysis of an ad on the US national debt. Informal Logic, 32, 381–402. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van den Hoven, P. (2015). Cognitive semiotics in argumentation: A theoretical exploration. Argumentation, 29, 157–176. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van den Hoven, P., & Schilperoord, J. (this volume). Perspective by incongruity. Visual argumentative meaning in editorial cartoons.
Van den Hoven, P., & Yang, Y. (2013). The argumentative reconstruction of multimodal discourse. Taking the ABC coverage of president Hu Jintao’s visit to the USA as an example. Argumentation, 27, 403–424. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Eemeren, F. H. (2011). In context. Giving contextualization its rightful place in the study of argumentation. Argumentation, 25, 141–161. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., Krabbe, E. C. W., Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., Verheij, B., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2014). Handbook of argumentation theory. Dordrecht: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S., & Jacobs, S. (1993). Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Tuscaloosa and London: University of Alabama Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Eemeren, F. H., Houtlosser, P., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2007). Argumentative indicators in discourse. A pragma-dialectical study. Dordrecht: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Rees, A. M. (2001). Argument interpretation and reconstruction. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Crucial concepts in argumentation theory (pp. 165–199). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wenzel, J. (1990). Three perspectives on argument. In R. Trapp, & J. Schuertz (Eds.), Perspectives on argumentation: Essays in honor of Wayne Brockriede (pp. 9–16). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wildfeuer, J., & Pollaroli, C. (this volume). Seeing the untold. Multimodal argumentation in movie trailers.