Alonso, I. (2007). Newspaper editorials and comment articles: A Cinderella genre? Revista Electrónica de Linguística Aplicada, 1, 1–9.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Amossy, R. (2001). Ethos at the crossroads of disciplines: Rhetoric, pragmatics, and sociology. Poetics Today 22(1), 1–23. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Auer, J. J. (1962). The counterfeit debates. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Background, perspective, effects (pp.142–150). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arthos, J. (2003). Where there are no rules or systems to guide us: Argument from example in hermeneutic rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 89(4), 320–344. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aswany, A. (2011). On the state of Egypt (J. Wright, Trans.). Cairo/NY: The American University in Cairo Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aswany, A. (2006). The Yacoubian Building (Humphrey Davies, Trans.). NY: Harpercollins![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, R. W. (1990). Sadat and after: Struggles for Egyptian political soul. London: I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd Publishers. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baldick, C. (2008) Oxford dictionary of literary terms. New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beckson, K. & Ganz, A. (1975). Literary Terms: A Dictionary. New York. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beinin, F. (2009). Workers’ struggles under ‘socialism’ and ‘neoliberalism’. In R. Mahdi, & P. Marfleet, P. (Eds.), Egypt: Moment of change (pp.87–102). Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bernaerts, L. (2010). Cuckoo’s Nest: Elements of a narrative speech-act analysis. Narrative, 18(3), 276–299. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Black, E. (1970). The second persona. The Quarterly Journal of Speech LVI (2), 109–119. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blackham, H. J. (1985). The fable as literature. London: The Atholne Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Booth, W. (1961). The rhetoric of fiction. Chicago/London: The Chicago University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brownlee, J. (2002). The decline of pluralism in Mubarak’s Egypt. Journal of Democracy, 13(4), 6–14. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chatman, S. (1978). Story and discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film. Lthaca: Cornell University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Conboy, M. (2004). Journalism: A critical history. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crisp, P. (2001). Allegory: Conceptual metaphor in history. Language and Literature, 10(1), 5–19. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Currie, G. (1990). The nature of fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dearing, J. & Rogers, E. (1996). Agenda setting. London/New Delhi: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Demon, K. (1997). A paradigm for the analysis of paradigms: The rhetorical exemplum in ancient and imperial Greek theory. Rhetorica, 15 (2), 125–158. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Opinions and ideologies in editorials. February 24 2015 [URL]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Eemeren, F. H. (2011). In context: Giving contextualization its rightful place in the study of argumentation. Argumentation, 25, 141–161. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Eemeren, F. H. (2016). Identifying argumentative patterns: A vital step in the development of pragma-dialectics. Argumentation, 30, 1–23. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Eemeren, F. H. & Garssen, B. (2013). Argumentative patterns of discourse. In Virtues of argumentation: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation [Online Source].![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Eemeren, F. H. & Grootendorst, R. (1984). Speech acts in argumentative discussions. Berlin/Dordrecht: De Gruyter/Floris. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Eemeren, F. H. & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum..![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Eemeren, F. H. & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A Systematic Theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Eemeren, F. H. & Houtlosser, R. (2002). Strategic manoeuvring: Maintaining a delicate balance. In F. H. van Eemeren & Houtlosser, P. (Eds.), Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis (pp.131–160). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Eemeren, F. H. & Houtlosser, P. (2005a). More about an arranged marriage. In C. A. Willard (Ed.), Critical problems in argumentation: Selected papers from the 13th Biennial Conference on Argumentation Sponsored by the American Forensic Association and National Communication Association August, 2003 (pp.345–355). Washington, DC: National Communication Association.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Eemeren, F. H. & Houtlosser, P. (2005b). Theoretical construction and argumentative reality: An analytic model of critical discussion and conventionalized types of argumentative activity. In D. Hitchcock (Ed.), The uses of argument: Proceedings of a Conference at McMaster University (pp.75–84). Hamilton, Ontario: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Eemeren, F. H. & Houtlosser, P. (2006). Strategic maneuvering: A synthetic recapitulation. Argumentation, 20, 381–392. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Eemeren, F. H., Houtlosser, P. & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2002). Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, presentation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Eemeren, F. H., Houtlosser, P. & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2007). Argumentative indicators in discourse: A pragma-dialectical study. Dordrecht: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Freeley, A. J., & Steinberg, D. L. (2005). Argumentation and debate: Critical thinking for reasoned decision making. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Friend, S. (2008). Imagining fact and fiction. In K. Stock & K. Thomson-Jones (Eds.), New waves in aesthetics (pp.150–169). Basingstoke: Palgrave. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
García-Carpintero, M. (2013). Norms of fiction-making. British Journal of Aesthetics, 53(3), 339–357. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gardaz, M. (2009). The path of jihad in The Yacoubian building. Journal of Religion and Film, 13(1), 4–14.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garssen, B. (1997). Argumentatieschema’s in pragma-dialectisch perspectief: Een theoretisch en empirisch onderzoek. Doctoral dissertation. University of Amsterdam.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ghabra, S. (2015). The Egyptian revolution: Causes and dynamics. In L. Sadiki (Ed.), Routledge handbook of the Arab Spring: Rethinking democratization (pp.199–214). London/New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
González Rodríguez, M. J. (2007). On the interpretation of ideology through comment articles: two views in opinion discourse. Revista Electrónica de Lingüística Aplicada, 1, 49–68![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Govier, T. & Ayers, L. (2012). Logic, parables and argument. Informal Logic, 32(2), 161–189. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. NY: International Publishers.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hollihan, T. & Baaske, K.. (1994). Arguments and arguing. New York: Waveland Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hudson, R. A. (1996). Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacobs, R. N. & Townsley, E. (2011). The space of opinion: Media intellectuals and the public sphere. New York: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
James, H. (1948). The art of fiction and other essays. New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jones, C. J. (1980). Mass media codes of ethics and councils. Paris: UNESCO.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kassem, M. (2004). Egyptian politics: The dynamics of authoritarian rule. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Khatib, L. (2010). Arab film and Islamic fundamentalism. In J. Curran (Ed.), Media and society (pp.316–334). London: Bloomsbury Academic.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kjeldsen, J. E. (2017). The real Rhetorical Audience. In A. Runjić-Stoilova & G. Varošanec-Škarić, (Eds.) New Insights into Rhetoric and Argumentation (pp.19–39). Split: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lanser, S. S. (1981). The narrative act: Point of view in prose fiction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lasswell, H. D. (1927). Propaganda technique in the World War. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levinson, S. C. (1992). Activity types and language. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp.66–100). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lubbock, P. (1975). The craft of fiction. NY: The Viking Press. (Original work published in 1921)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lynch, M. (2008). Political opportunity structures: Effects of the Arab media. In K. Hafez (Ed.), Arab media: Power and weakness (pp.17–32). New York: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mahdi, R. (2009). The democracy movement: Cycles of protest. In R. Mahdi & P. Marfleet (Eds.), Egypt: Moment of change (pp.87–102). Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martel, M. (1983). Political campaign debates: Images, strategies, tactics. New York, NY: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mazid, B. M. (2009). Date palms, language and the power of knowledge: An analysis of a fable from Kalila and Dimna. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 2515–2534![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mcquail, D. (1997). Audience analysis. London/New Delhi: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor and political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. Hampshire, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Omar, A. (2016a). Maneuvering strategically by means of an allegorical beast fable in political communication. In D. Mohamed & M. Lewinski (Eds.), Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the 1st. European conference on argumentation, Lisbon, June 9-12, 2015. Volume II (pp.579–594). London: College Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Omar, A. (2016b). Strategic maneuvering in supporting the feasibility of political change: A pragma-dialectical analysis of Egyptian anti-regime columns. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Amsterdam.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Omar, A. (2018). The strategic use of examples in supporting a positive evaluation of a political group. In S. Oswald & D. Maillat (Eds.), Argumentation and inference. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg June 20-23, 2017. Volume II (pp.755–768). London: College Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Omar, A. (in press). The strategic use of argumentation from example in re-evaluating a people: The case of Al Aswany’s pro-democratization columns. Journal of Argumentation in Context.
Perelman, C. & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. (J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver, Trans.). London: University of Notre Dame Press. (Original work published in 1958)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pilgram, R. (2015). A doctor’s argument by authority: An analytical and empirical study of strategic manoeuvring in medical consultation. Doctoral dissertation. University of Amsterdam.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Putnam, L., Wilson, S. & Turner, D. (1990). The evolution of policy arguments in teachers’ negotiations. Argumentation, 4, 129–152. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Richter, C. (2008). The effects of Islamist media on the mainstream press in Egypt. In K. Hafez (Ed.), Arab media: Power and weakness (pp.46–68). New York: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Riffe, D., Lacy, S. & Fico, F. G. (1998). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Salisbury, H. (1988). A time of change: A reporter’s tale of our time. New York: Harper & Row.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schank, R. & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and Understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmid, W. (2010). Narratology: An introduction. New York: Walter de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, J. R. (1975). The logical status of fictional discourse. New Literary History, 6 (2), 319–332. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social realty. London: Penguin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shapiro, S. (2009). Revolution: Facebook-style. The New York Times Magazine. (22/1/2009).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Soliman, S. (2011). The autumn of dictatorship: Fiscal crisis and political change in Egypt under Mubarak. (P. Daniel, Trans.) Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sparks, C. & Campell, C. (1987). The inscribed reader of the British quality press. European journal of communication, 2, 455–472. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stableford, B. (2009). The A to Z of fantasy literature. Maryland/Toronto/Oxford: The Scarecrow Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stewart, S. (1991). Notes on distressed genres. The Journal of American Folklore, 104, 5–31. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Swedenburg, T. (2012). Imagined Youths. In R. Mahdi, & P. Marfleet, P. (Eds.), Egypt: Moment of change (pp.285–294). Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tabishat, M. (2012). Society in cinema: Anticipating the revolution in Egyptian fiction and movies. Social Research, 79(2), 377–396.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Talisse, R. (2012). Deliberation In D. Estlund (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of political philosophy. NY: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tarouty, S. (2015). Businessmen, clientelism, and authoritarianism in Egypt. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tartoussieh, K. (2012). The Yacoubian Building: A slice of pre-January 25 Egyptian society? Cinema Journal, 52(1), 156–159. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Uspensky, B. (1973). A poetics of composition: The structure of the artistic text and typology of a compositional form. (V. Zavarin & S. Wittig, Trans.). Berkley, CA: University of California Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Walton, D. (1990). Practical reasoning: Goal-driven, knowledge-based action-guiding argumentation. Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Walton, K. (1990). Mimesis and make-believe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Younis, S. (2014). Hal Kanat al-Thawrah Tahwul Demoqrati: al-Dawlah wa al-Thawrah wa al-Demoqratiyyah [Was the revolution a democratic transition? State, revolution, and democracy]. al-Demoqratiyyah [Journal of Democracy], 56, 50–56.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ziegelmuller, G. & Dause, C. (1975). Argumentation: inquiry and advocacy. Englewood, Cliffs, NJ: Printence-Hall.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)