Chapter 6
Strategic ambiguity as an argumentative resource
The case of Lyndon Johnson, 50 years later
Article outline
- Introduction
- The case study
- The ambiguities
- The bombing halt
- The troop announcement
- Greater reliance on South Vietnam
- The gold crisis and the plea for the surtax
- The withdrawal statement
- Conclusions and implications
-
References
References (7)
References
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, Lyndon B. (1968 [1970]). Withdrawal speech. In Public Papers of the Presidents: Lyndon B. Johnson, 1968–69 (vol. 1, pp. 469–476).
Moĩse, E. E. (2017). The myths of Tet: The most misunderstood event of the Vietnam war. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
Safire, W. (1968). The new language of politics. New York: Random House.
“Westmoreland Requests 206,000 More Men, Stirring Debate in Administration,” New York Times, March 10, 1968, p. 1.
Zarefsky, D. (2019). The practice of argumentation: Effective reasoning in communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press..
Zarefsky, D. (under review). Lyndon Johnson, Vietnam, and the presidency: The speech of March 31, 1968. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.