Cover not available
Part of
Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
[Argumentation in Context 17] 2019
► pp. 211–236

Chapter 12
Shifting from a monological to a dialogical perspective on children’s argumentation

Lessons learned

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical framework and methodology
    • 2.1From a psychological and educational perspective
    • 2.2From the perspective of theories of argumentation
  • 3.Empirical data
  • 4.Findings
    • 4.1Children’s argumentations are often interrupted by the adult
    • 4.2Children are active contributors to critical discussions using multiple argumentations and introducing issues
    • 4.3Standpoints are often co-constructed during the interaction
      • The jigsaw example
    • 4.4Available visual information is not verbally made explicit
      • The missing pieces example
      • The TUC® cookie example (quote from Schär, 2018)
    • 4.5Uses of the argument of authority and “Weltanschauungen”
      • The little Lego® blocks example
  • 5.Discussion and conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 23 September 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.17.12per
References
Aakhus M., Muresan S., & Wacholder N.
(2017) An argument-ontology for a response-centered approach to argumentation mining. In Bex, F., Grasso, F., Green, N. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (CMNA 2016), New York, USA, 9 July 2016. [URL].Google Scholar
Anderson, R. C., Chinn, C., Chang, J., Waggoner, M., & Yi, M.
(1997) On the logical integrity of children’s arguments. Cognition and Instruction, 15(2), 135–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andriessen, J. E. B., & Schwarz, B. B.
(2009) Argumentative design. In A. N. Perret-Clermont, & N. Muller Mirza (Eds.), Argumentation and Education: theoretical foundations and practices (pp. 145–174): Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B.
(2007) The effects of monological and dialogical argumentation on concept learning in evolutionary theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 626–639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, M., Andriessen, J., & Järvelä, S.
(2013) Affective learning together. Social and emotional dimensions of collaborative learning. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Banks-Leite, L.
(1998) Langue et argumentation: considérations sur les échanges linguistiques à l’école maternelle. Psychologie de l’interaction, (7-8).Google Scholar
Bernicot, J., Trognon, A., Guidetti, M., & Musiol, M.
(Eds.) (2002) Pragmatique et psychologie. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S.
(1966) On cognitive growth. In J. S. Bruner, R. R. Olver, & P. M. Greenfield (Eds.), Studies in cognitive growth (pp. 1–67). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Carugati, F., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N.
(2015) Learning and instruction: Social-cognitive perspectives. In J. D. Wright (editor-in-chief) (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 13, pp. 670–676). Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Convertini, J.
(2019) Contributo allo studio dei tipi di argomento in situazioni di problem solving tecnico da parte di bambini in età prescolare (Doctoral dissertation). Neuchâtel: Université de Neuchâtel.
Convertini, J., Gfeller, F., Iannaccone, A., & Perret-Clermont, A. N.
(2017) Construire sa place dans une activité collective entre enfants. Communication au Congrès de la Société Suisse pour la Recherche en Education (SSRE), 26-28 juin 2017.Google Scholar
Danish, J. A., & Enyedy, N.
(2015) Latour goes to kindergarten: Children marshaling allies in a spontaneous argument about what counts as science. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 5, 5–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R.
(1984) Speech acts in argumentative discussions. Dordrecht / Cinnaminson: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R.
(1987) Fallacies in pragma-dialectical perspective. Argumentation, 1(3), 283–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R.
(2004) A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Felton, M., & Kuhn, D.
(2001) The development of argumentative discourse skill. Discourse Processes, 32(2&3), 135–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Golder, C.
(1996) La production de discours argumentatifs : revue de questions. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 116(1), 119–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greco Morasso, S., Miserez-Caperos, C., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N.
(2015) L’argumentation à visée cognitive chez les enfants. Une étude exploratoire sur les dynamiques argumentatives et psychosociales. In N. Muller Mirza, & C. Buty (Eds.), L’argumentation dans les contextes de l’éducation (pp. 39–82). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Greco, S., Mehmeti, T., & Perret-Clermont, A. N.
(2017) Do adult-children dialogical interactions leave space for a full development of argumentation? A case study. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 6(2), 193–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greco, S., Perret-Clermont, A.-N., Iannaccone, A., Rocci, A., Convertini, J., & Schär, R.
(2018) Analyzing implicit premises within children’s argumentative inferences. In S. Oswald, & D. Maillat (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation (pp. 147–167), Fribourg 2017. London: College Publications.Google Scholar
Greco, S., Schär, R., Perret-Clermont, A.-N., & Iannaccone, A.
(2017) Argumentation as a dialogic interaction in everyday talk: Adults and children “playing by the rules” in board game play. Presented at the International Association for Dialogue Analysis IADA, Bologna.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grize, J.-B.
(1996) Logique naturelle et communications. Paris: Presses universitaires de France. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundeide, K.
(1985) The tacit background of children’s judgments. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Iannaccone, A., Perret-Clermont, A. N., & Convertini, J.
in preparation). Children as investigators of Brunerian “Possible worlds”. The role of narrative scenarios in children’s argumentative thinking.
Jackson, S.
(2018) Reason-giving and the natural normativity of argumentation. Topoi (online first). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kohler, A.
in preparation). Approches psychologiques de situations de malentendu dans des activités de didactique des sciences (Doctoral dissertation). University of Neuchâtel.
Kuhn, D.
(1991) The Skills of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993) Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 73(3), 319–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, D., & Park, S.-H.
(2005) Epistemological understanding and the development of intellectual values. International Journal of educational research, 43(3), 111–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linell, P.
(2009) Rethinking language, mind and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Lombardi, E., Greco, S., Massaro, D., Schär, R., Manzi, F., Iannaccone, A., Perret-C. A. N., & Marchetti, A.
(2018) Does a good argument make a good answer? Argumentative reconstruction of children’s justifications in a second order false belief task. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miserez-Caperos, C.
(2017) Etude de l’argumentation à visée cognitive dans des interactions entre adulte et enfants : un regard psychosocial sur le modèle pragma-dialectique. Thèse de doctorat. Institut de psychologie et éducation, Université de Neuchâtel. Retrieved from [URL].Google Scholar
Muller Mirza, N.
(2010) Psychosocial dimensions in argumentative learning interactions: identity dynamics and transformation. In M. Baker, J. Andriessen, & S. Järvelä (Eds.), Affective learning together (pp. 233–250).Google Scholar
Muller Mirza, N., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N.
(Eds.) (2009) Argumentation and education. Theoretical foundations and practices. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muller Mirza, N., Perret-Clermont, A.-N., Tartas, V., & Iannaccone, A.
(2009) Psychosocial Processes in Argumentation. In N. Muller Mirza, & A.-N. Perret-Clermont (Eds.), Argumentation and Education (pp. 67–90). Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musi, E., & Aakhus, M.
(2018) Discovering argumentative patterns in energy polylogues: A macroscope for argument mining. Argumentation (online first) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nonnon, E.
(1996) Activités argumentatives et élaboration de connaissances nouvelles : le dialogue comme espace d’exploration. Langue Française, 112(1), 67–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) Préface. L’argumentation dans les contextes de l’éducation. In N. Muller Mirza, & C. Buty (Eds.), L’argumentation dans les contextes de l’éducationL’argumentation dans les contextes de l’éducation (pp. 1–11). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Perret-Clermont, A. N., Arcidiacono, F., Lamas-Breux, S., Greco, S., & Miserez-Caperos, C.
(2015) Knowledge-oriented argumentation in children. In Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice (pp. 135–149). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J.
(1926) La représentation du monde chez l’enfant. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. (Transl. in English: Piaget, J. (1929). The child’s conception of the world. London, New York Harcourt, Brace and Co.).Google Scholar
(1972) Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Human Development, 15(1), 1–12. (republished: (2008). Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Human Development, 51, 40-47). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1974) La prise de conscience. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
(1980) Les formes élémentaires de la dialectique. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B.
(1967) La psychologie de l'enfant. Paris: PUF. (English edition 1969/2000, The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
(1966) La psychologie de l’enfant et de l’adolescent. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France (Transl. in English: Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The Psychology of the Child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Plantin, C.
(1996) Le trilogue argumentatif. Présentation de modèle, analyse de cas. Langue Française, 112, 9–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) L’argumentation. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Pramling, N., & Säljö, R.
(2015) The clinical interview: The child as a partner in conversation vs. the child as an object of research. In S. Robson, & S. Flannery Quinn (Eds.), The routledge international handbook of young children’s thinking and understanding (pp. 87–95). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rapanta, C., Garcia-Mila, M., & Gilabert, S.
(2013) What is meant by argumentative competence? An integrative review of methods of analysis and assessment in education. Review of Educational Research, 83(4), 483–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rigotti, E., & Greco Morasso, S.
(2009) Argumentation as an object of interest and as a social and cultural resource. In N. Muller Mirza, & A. N. Perret-Clermont (Eds.), Argumentation and education (pp. 1–61). New York, NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Comparing the argumentum model of topics to other contemporary approaches to argument schemes: The procedural and material components. Argumentation, 24, 489–512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rigotti, E., & Greco, S.
(2019) Inference in argumentation: A topical approach to argument schemes. New York, NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rocci, A.
(2005) Connective predicates in monologic and dialogic argumentation. Studies in Communication Sciences (Special Issue: Argumentation in Dialogic Interaction), 97–118.Google Scholar
(2006) Pragmatic inference and argumentation in intercultural communication. Intercultural Pragmatics, 3 (4), 409–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Analysing and evaluating persuasive media discourse in context. In: M. Burger (Ed.), L’analyse linguistique des discours médiatiques. Entre sciences du langage et sciences de la communication (pp. 247–284). Québec: Nota Bene.Google Scholar
Rommetveit, R.
(1976) On the architecture of intersubjectivity. In L. H. Strickland, K. J. Gergen, & F. J. Aboud (Eds.), Social psychology in transition (pp. 215–221). New York: Plenum Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schär, R. G.
(2018a) On the negotiation of issues in discussions among small children and their parents. TRANEL Travaux Neuchâtelois de Linguistique, 68, 17–25.Google Scholar
(2018b) An argumentative analysis of the emergence of issues in adult-children discussions (PhD Dissertation). Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano.
Schär, R., Greco, S.
(2018). The emergence of issues in everyday discussions between adults and children. International Journal of Semiotics and Visual Rhetoric, 2(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, B.
(2008) ESCALATE: The white book. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Schwarz, B., & Baker, M.
(2017) Dialogue, argumentation and education: History, theory and practice. New York City, New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traverso, V.
(1999) L’Analyse de la conversation. Paris: Editions Nathan.Google Scholar
Trognon, A., Batt, M., Sorsana, C., & Saint-Dizier, V.
(2011) Argumentation and dialogue. In A. Trognon, M. Batt, J. Caelen, & D. Vernant (Eds.), Logical properties of dialogue (pp. 147–186). Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy (PUN).Google Scholar
Veneziano, E.
(Ed.) (1999) La conversation : instrument, objet et source de connaissance (Psychologie de l’interaction No. 7–8). Paris : L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 10 other publications

Bauri, Swagatanjali
2022. Arguing with Children: Exploring Problems of Charity and Strawmanning. Argumentation 36:3 ► pp. 415 ff. DOI logo
Convertini, Josephine
2021. Psychosocial Obstacles in Young Children Argumentative Interactions. Education Sciences 11:5 ► pp. 224 ff. DOI logo
Convertini, Josephine
2021. An Interdisciplinary Approach to Investigate Preschool children’s Implicit Inferential Reasoning in Scientific Activities. Research in Science Education 51:1 ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Greco, Sara
2021. Young children as rational interlocutors. In An Argumentative Analysis of the Emergence ofIssuesin Adult-Children Discussions [Argumentation in Context, 19], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Iannaccone, Antonio, Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont & Josephine Convertini
2019. Children as Investigators of Brunerian “Possible Worlds”. The Role of Narrative Scenarios in children’s Argumentative Thinking. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 53:4 ► pp. 679 ff. DOI logo
Kohler, Alaric
2023. Approches psychologiques de situations de malentendu dans des activités de didactique des sciences. Bulletin de psychologie N° 582:4 ► pp. 316 ff. DOI logo
Molinari, Gaëlle, Nathalie Muller Mirza & Valérie Tartas
2021. Regards croisés des approches cognitives et socioculturelles sur l’apprentissage collaboratif : quelles contributions dans le domaine de l’éducation ?. Raisons éducatives N° 25:1 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Perret-Clermont, Anne-Nelly
2022. Socio-cognitive Conflict. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Perret-Clermont, Anne-Nelly
2022. Socio-cognitive Conflict. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible, ► pp. 1517 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. An Argumentative Analysis of the Emergence ofIssuesin Adult-Children Discussions [Argumentation in Context, 19], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.