Mobile Menu
New
Books
Forthcoming titles
New in paperback
New titles by subject
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
Book Series
Journals & Yearbooks
New serials
Latest issues
Currently in production
Catalog
Books
Active series
Other series
Collections
Open-access books
Text books & Course books
Dictionaries & Reference
By JB editor
Journals & Yearbooks
Active serials
Other
By JB editor
Software
Browse by person
Browse by subject
Advanced Search
Downloadable lists
Printed catalogs
E-book collections
Online Resources
Customer Services
Contact
Amsterdam (Main office)
Philadelphia (North American office)
Directions
Book Orders
General
US, Canada & Mexico
E-books
Examination & Desk Copies
Journal Subscriptions
General information
Access to the electronic edition
Terms of Use
Journal collections
Journal mutations
Rights & Permissions
Mailing List
E-newsletter
Book Gazette
For Authors
Proposals for Books
Proposals for Book Series
Proposals for Journals
Submissions to Journals
Editorial Manager
Ethics Statement
Kudos
Open Access Policy
Rights Policy
For Librarians
Evidence-Based Acquisition
E-book Collections
Journal Collections
Open Access information
Journal mutations
Part of
Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
[
Argumentation in Context
17] 2019
► pp.
335
–
336
◄
previous
Index
A
Activist discourse
6, 179–180
Advocacy argument(ation)
3, 33–42, 44, 53–54
Ambiguity
4, 103–104, 114, 327, 329, 332
Analogical reasoning
268, 271–272, 278, 284–286
Analogy argument(ation)
see
comparison argument(ation)
Argumentative indicator
17, 186
Argument(ation) scheme
19–28, 36–38, 178–179, 187, 239–241, 243–244, 247, 276, 323–324, 327
Argumentum ad consequentiam
10, 322–329
Argumentum ad hominem
5, 22–23, 137–152, 329, 331
Argumentum model of topics
217, 230, 232
Audience demand
38, 43, 52, 78, 81
C
“Checkers” speech
4, 85, 96–97
Charity
1–2, 17, 85
Children’s argumentation
7, 211–217, 220, 226, 232
Climate communication/debate
5, 157–170
Comparative argument
see
comparison argumentation
Comparison argumentation
9, 22, 24–27, 39, 48, 51, 66, 167, 239–240, 247, 249, 258, 261, 268–272, 276–277, 279, 283–287, 289–296
Confrontational maneuvering
70–80
Content analysis
8, 245–257, 261
Context
2, 5, 8, 16–17, 19, 22–23, 40, 95–96, 106–107, 113, 138, 144, 151, 214–215, 217, 224n2, 230, 238, 241, 245, 247, 252n12, 262, 268, 274, 279, 293, 300
Counter–argument(ation)
9, 195, 199, 204, 216, 293, 296
Counter–consideration
see
counter–argument(ation)
Critical question
3, 8, 22, 38, 42, 48, 66, 229, 258–260, 262, 323–324
D
Debate
5, 35, 39–41, 103, 113, 117, 140–145, 147–149, 158–159, 161, 166–167, 169, 199, 200–204, 207–208, 299
Deductive logic
see
deductive reasoning
Deductive process
see
deductive reasoning
Deductive reasoning
8, 214–216, 267–272, 275, 279, 285–286
Definition
4, 66, 118, 125, 128, 131
Ultimate definition
4, 119, 125, 130–131, 281
Dialectic(al)
39, 52, 62, 66, 195, 204, 207, 324–325
Difference of opinion
37, 62, 67, 72–76, 104, 220, 227, 299–300, 306, 308, 310, 312–314, 316
Mixed
301, 303–304, 317
Multiple
7, 9, 74, 77, 190–192, 220, 231, 303–304, 308, 310, 312–314, 316–317
Non–mixed
301, 303–304, 317
Single
9, 71, 76, 217, 303–304, 306, 308, 310, 312–313, 316–317
Dilogue
159, 162
Diplomatic press conference
see
press conference
Disagreement
15–16, 28, 37n2, 85, 113, 164, 166–167, 170, 206, 299, 301–304, 310, 314, 317
Dispositive
3, 33, 42–44
Dissociation
3, 63–67, 70–76, 165–170
Doctor–patient communication/consult
8, 237, 242, 245, 247, 257–258, 260, 262
E
Emotion
40, 42, 50, 54, 119, 126, 205, 284, 293, 295
Enact(ment)
4, 51, 53–55, 169–170
Epistemological
164, 196, 213
Ethos
36, 40, 49, 141, 151, 206
Evocation
5, 19, 169–170
External perspective
19
F
Fallaciousness
5, 9–10, 24n9, 81, 86, 95, 103–104, 113–114, 137–139, 141, 150, 229, 322–332
Hidden
9, 323, 332
Framing
38, 149, 161, 164–167, 221
I
Ideology
9, 35, 120–121, 125–126, 131
Implicit premise
190, 215–216, 218
Inferential–procedural premise
217–220, 231
Insider (perspective)
see
internal perspective
Institutional point
9, 33, 38, 41, 54, 67–69, 315, 317
Internal perspective
2, 13, 18–19
Interpretative argumentation in law
8, 267–268, 274–277, 279
Interpersonal
104, 195, 197, 202–203, 206–207, 215, 309
L
Legal argument(ation)
8, 267, 268n2, 272–273, 275, 279
M
Material–contextual premise
217–218, 224, 226, 231
Metaphor
5, 167, 169–170
N
Narrative (affordance/theory)
118–127, 131–132, 145–146, 164, 167, 169–170, 287–293, 295–296
Non–argument
6, 166–169
Normative pragmatics
159
O
Outsider (perspective)
see
external perspective
P
Persuasion
14, 40, 113–114, 150, 284, 293, 296
Philosophical argument(ation)
9, 299–300, 304, 313–315, 317
Polarization
150, 158–159, 295
Polylogue
9, 159–160, 167, 169, 308
Pragma–dialectics
2–3, 6, 9, 17n5, 34, 37–38, 42n12, 62, 64, 67, 70, 81, 103, 113, 175, 195–196, 230, 239, 256, 299–303, 306, 314–315, 317, 323–325
Pragmatic argument(ation)
8, 10, 36, 178, 192, 230, 246–247, 255–256, 259–262, 325–329, 332
Presence
5, 126, 130
Presentational device
3, 38, 43, 78–81, 181–182, 184, 188, 190–192
Presidential rhetoric
130
Press conference
3, 61–62, 67–70, 80–81
Probative obligation/responsibility
167
Propaganda
9, 282–285, 292–296
Prototypical argumentative pattern
6, 8, 178, 188, 192, 238, 262
Prototypical type of argumentation
239, 246–247, 251n10, 260–261
Q
Question
80, 301–316
R
Rhetoric
14, 38, 65, 114, 126, 130, 170, 195
Rhetorical Charity
see
charity
Rhetorical dilemma
91
Rule of Law
8, 76, 267–268, 272–274, 276, 279
S
Slippery slope argument(ation)
20–27
Socio–cultural psychology
211
Spokesperson
68–69, 77–79
Standpoint
66, 70–76, 159, 178–179, 220–221, 238–243, 251n10, 258, 301–303, 306, 317, 322–323, 326, 328
Stereotypical argumentative pattern
178, 182, 192
Stereotypical type of argumentation
239, 246–247, 251n10, 252, 255–256, 258, 261–262
Strategic maneuvering
see
strategic manoeuvring
Strategic manoeuvring
2–3, 10, 34, 38, 62, 66, 77–80, 317, 323–328
Symptomatic argumentation
8, 66, 239, 243–27, 252–261
T
Technical sphere
157
Topical potential
3, 38, 78–81
Topos
159, 177
U
Unexpressed premise
see
implicit premise
V
Value (system)
4, 37n6, 63, 73, 98, 118–121, 125, 131, 207, 278
Visual argument(ation)
175, 188–192