Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse
Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation
In Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse, Frans H. van Eemeren brings together the dialectical and the rhetorical dimensions of argumentation by introducing the concept of strategic maneuvering. Strategic maneuvering refers to the arguer’s continual efforts to reconcile aiming for effectiveness with being reasonable. It takes place in all stages of argumentative discourse and manifests itself simultaneously in the choices that are made from the topical potential available at a particular stage, in adaptation to audience demand, and in the use of specific presentational devices. Strategic maneuvering derails when in the specific context in which the discourse takes place a rule for critical discussion has been violated, so that a fallacy has been committed. Van Eemeren makes clear that extending the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation by taking account of strategic maneuvering leads to a richer and more precise method for analyzing and evaluating argumentative discourse.
[Argumentation in Context, 2] 2010. xii, 308 pp.
Publishing status:
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Preface | pp. xi–xii
-
Chapter 1. Analyzing argumentative discourse | pp. 1–24
-
Chapter 2. Strategic maneuvering between effectiveness and reasonableness | pp. 25–50
-
Chapter 3. Dialectical and rhetorical perspectives on argumentative discourse | pp. 51–92
-
Chapter 4. Three inseparable aspects of strategic maneuvering | pp. 93–128
-
Chapter 5. Strategic maneuvering in conventionalized communicative practices | pp. 129–162
-
Chapter 6. Determining the strategic function of argumentative moves | pp. 163–186
-
Chapter 7. Fallacies as derailments of strategic maneuvering | pp. 187–212
-
Chapter 8. Strategic maneuvering with the burden of proof | pp. 213–240
-
Chapter 9. Strategic maneuvering in response to presumed inconsistency or fallaciousness | pp. 241–262
-
Chapter 10. Setting up an agenda for further research | pp. 263–274
-
-
Index of names | pp. 295–298
-
Index of terms | pp. 299–308
“Van Eemeren’s book offers its readers a comprehensive, unified, updated, self- contained, and well-written account of the extended theory of pragma-dialectics. As such it constitutes a key text of contemporary theory of argumentation, straight from the horse’s mouth. The author shows how the concept of strategic maneuvering can be used to combine dialectical and rhetorical points of view, and how the resulting extended theory works when applied to the analysis and evaluation of argumentation in various domains of communicative activity. The book contains fresh approaches to fallacies, burden of proof, and inconsistency. It is very rich in discussing historical roots as well as contributions from related contemporary research, and even sets up an agenda for future research. ”
Erik C. W. Krabbe, Professor emeritus of logic and argumentation, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
“This is an impressive book. For anyone interested in getting an up-to-date synopsis of this influential argumentation perspective, Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse is a must read.”
Karen Tracy, University of Colorado, in Journal of Argumentation in Context, Vol. 1:2 (2012)
Cited by (491)
Cited by 491 other publications
Augé, Anaïs
2024. Situationally-triggered metaphor as political argument. Journal of Argumentation in Context 13:1 ► pp. 106 ff. 
Blair, J. Anthony, Hans V. Hansen & Christopher W. Tindale
2024. Tilting the Frame: A Different View of the Landscape of Argumentation. Topoi
Gozdz-Roszkowski, Stanislaw
2024. Hostility to Religion or Protection Against Discrimination? Evaluation and Argument in a Case of Conflicting Principles. SSRN Electronic Journal
Greco, Sara, Sara Cigada & Chiara Jermini-Martinez Soria
2024. The naming of emotions in dispute mediators’ strategic manoeuvring: a case study using a French language corpus. Text & Talk 44:1 ► pp. 25 ff.
Molek-Kozakowska, Katarzyna
2024. Legitimizing the interventions recommended in “European Research Area Policy Agenda 2022–2024”. Journal of Language and Politics
Musi, Elena
2024. Framing to Make an Argument: The Case of the Genocide Hashtag in the Russia-Ukraine war. Argumentation 38:3 ► pp. 269 ff.
Ouyang, Wenqi & Yanlin Liao
2024. The Potentiality of a Virtuous Pragma-Dialectics. Topoi
Popa, Eugen Octav
2024. Convincing in Pragma-Dialectics: A Critical Reassessment. Topoi
Rasoulikolamaki, Sahar, Surinderpal Kaur & Neda Salahshour
2024. A multimodal analysis of (de)legitimation through argumentation in extremist discourse: The case of Dabiq
. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 12:2 ► pp. 263 ff.
Schumann, Jennifer & Steve Oswald
2024. Pragmatic perspectives on disagreement. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 12:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Stöckl, Hartmut & Assimakis Tseronis
Wu, Nan & Yubin Qian
2024. Strategic manoeuvring of argumentation in Chinese corporate public relations discourses. Discourse & Communication 18:3 ► pp. 452 ff.
Zenker, Frank, Jan Albert van Laar, B. Cepollaro, A. Gâţă, M. Hinton, C. G. King, B. Larson, M. Lewiński, C. Lumer, S. Oswald, M. Pichlak, B. D. Scott, M. Urbański & J. H. M. Wagemans
2024. Norms of Public Argumentation and the Ideals of Correctness and Participation. Argumentation 38:1 ► pp. 7 ff.
Akkermans, Aranka, Sanne Prins, Amber S. Spijkers, Jean Wagemans, Nanon H. M. Labrie, Dick L. Willems, Marcus J. Schultz, Thomas G. V. Cherpanath, Job B. M. van Woensel, Marc van Heerde, Anton H. van Kaam, Moniek van de Loo, Anne Stiggelbout, Ellen M. A. Smets & Mirjam A. de Vos
2023. Argumentation in end-of-life conversations with families in Dutch intensive care units: a qualitative observational study. Intensive Care Medicine 49:4 ► pp. 421 ff.
Allani, Samira & Silvia Molina-Plaza
2023. Comparing the Portrayal of the Fall of the Berlin Wall in Two Spanish Newspapers: A Multimodal Analysis. In Language of the Revolution [Palgrave Studies in Languages at War, ], ► pp. 357 ff.
Dello Russo, Silvia, Atieh S. Mirfakhar & Mariella Miraglia
2023. What is the narrative for practice? A review of recommendations on feedback and a guide to writing impactful practical implications. Applied Psychology 72:4 ► pp. 1624 ff.
Demir, Yeliz & Juliette Schaafsma
2023. Argumentative strategies to evade state apologies: The Turkish example. Discourse Studies 25:4 ► pp. 493 ff.
Eriksson, Anders
Fiammenghi, Carlotta
2023. Argumentative pro-vaccination and anti-vaccination narratives in the MMR vaccine-autism controversy. Communication and Medicine
Gaffal, Margit & Jesús Padilla Gálvez
2023. Conclusion. In Dynamics of Rational Negotiation, ► pp. 115 ff.
Hansen, Hans V.
2023. Committing Fallacies and the Appearance Condition. Argumentation 37:2 ► pp. 253 ff.
Hayward, Brent A.
2023. An argumentation analysis of testimony about positive behaviour support and chemical restraint in Australia’s Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities ► pp. 1 ff.
Hernández Rodríguez, Ernesto
2023. Intencionalidad argumentativa suposicional escrita para tratar de explicar un texto literario en bachillerato. Lenguaje 51:2 ► pp. 337 ff.
Howdle, Giles
2023. Microtargeting, Dogwhistles, and Deliberative Democracy. Topoi 42:2 ► pp. 445 ff.
Lewiński, Marcin, Mark Aakhus & Karen Tracy
2023. Argumentation in Complex Communication: Managing Disagreement in a Polylogue Cambridge University Press, 263 pp. Argumentation 37:3 ► pp. 493 ff.
Mercuri, Chiara
2023. Characterization Frames Constructing Endoxa in Activists’ Discourse About the Public Controversy Surrounding Fashion Sustainability. Topoi 42:2 ► pp. 635 ff.
Mitchell, Gordon R.
2023. Covid-19 and public debate over gain-of-function research on
potentially pandemic pathogens. Journal of Argumentation in Context 12:3 ► pp. 307 ff.
Nadeem, Nahla
2023. Exploring TED Speakers’ Narrative Positioning from a Strategic Maneuvering Perspective: A Single Case Study from Winch’s (2014) TED Talk. Argumentation 37:3 ► pp. 437 ff.
Pietrucci, Pamela
2023. Neofascist “Thugs,” Pandemic Protests, Populisms: Giorgia Meloni’s Cerchiobottismo and the Rise of Fratelli D’Italia During the Pandemic. Javnost - The Public 30:1 ► pp. 51 ff.
Santulli, Francesca
2023. Genre as a Context for Persuasion: The Construction of Identities in Different Forms of Institutionalised Discourse. A Case Study. In Exploring Contextualism and Performativity [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 30], ► pp. 57 ff.
Seppanen, Marita
2023. The quality of argumentation and metacognitive reflection in engineering co-Design. European Journal of Engineering Education 48:1 ► pp. 75 ff.
Serafis, Dimitris & Assimakis Tseronis
2023. The front page as a canvas for multimodal argumentation: Brexit in the Greek press. Frontiers in Communication 8
Strukowska, Marta E.
2023. Argumentative indicators in the adjudication of Russia-Ukraine dispute. A pragma-dialectical study. Scripta Neophilologica Posnaniensia 23 ► pp. 77 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans & Bart Garssen
2023. A functional diversity of argumentative styles. Discourse Studies 25:4 ► pp. 510 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Ton van Haaften
2023. The Making of Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-dialectical View. Argumentation 37:3 ► pp. 341 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Ton van Haaften
2024. The Making of Pragma-Dialectics: A Synopsis. Topoi
Vodová, Petra & Iva Svačinová
2023. Arguing in their own way or adapting to the masculine world? An analysis of male and female argumentative styles in the Czech Chamber of Deputies. The Journal of Legislative Studies ► pp. 1 ff.
Wu, Peng & Tian-bao Zhou
2023. Argumentative patterns based on pragmatic argumentation at China’s diplomatic press conferences. Discourse Studies 25:4 ► pp. 549 ff.
ZHU, Lei & Wei WANG
2023. Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Nanon Labrie: argumentation between doctors and patients: understanding clinical argumentative discourse. Argumentation 37:1 ► pp. 147 ff.
رمضان تركي جواد
2023. دراسة تداولية للجدل في رواية تشارلز ديكنز "اوليفر تويست". مجلة آداب الفراهيدي 15:53 ► pp. 603 ff.
م.د. عباس عيدان عبيد
2023. المناورة الإستراتيجية للإنتقاد في خطاب مِت رومني: دراسة تحليل خطاب نقدي. Journal of Education College Wasit University 52:1 ► pp. 391 ff.
Abd-Alsahab, Abeer Mahdi & Dr. Sarab Khalil
2022. DECEPTIVE ROLES OF WOMEN IN ARABIC AND ENGLISH LITERATURE CONTEXT: A PRAGMATIC STUDY. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SOCIAL SCIENCES & HUMANITIES 12:02 ► pp. 396 ff.
Alves do Nascimento França, Hális
2022. Rethinking Interpretative Arguments. In New Developments in Legal Reasoning and Logic [Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 23], ► pp. 129 ff.
Bletsas, Marina
2022. Paroemiological argumentation in Italian and French journalistic discourse. Journal of Argumentation in Context 11:2 ► pp. 180 ff.
Bura, Kateryna
2022. Місце мультимодальної арґументації в процесі ухвалення рішень. Multiversum. Philosophical almanac 1:1 ► pp. 125 ff.
Castro, Diego
2022. Argumentation in Suboptimal Settings. Argumentation 36:3 ► pp. 393 ff.
Fancourt, Nigel & Liam Guilfoyle
2022. Interdisciplinary perspective-taking within argumentation: students’ strategies across science and religious education. Journal of Religious Education 70:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Leal, Fernando & Hubert Marraud
2022. Final Cross-Examination. In How Philosophers Argue [Argumentation Library, 41], ► pp. 437 ff.
Leal, Fernando & Hubert Marraud
2022. Argumentation Theories. In How Philosophers Argue [Argumentation Library, 41], ► pp. 21 ff.
Leal, Fernando & Hubert Marraud
2022. Intertwined Structures. In How Philosophers Argue [Argumentation Library, 41], ► pp. 347 ff.
Martins, Marina & Fabrizio Macagno
2022. An analytical instrument for coding and assessing argumentative dialogues in science teaching contexts. Science Education 106:3 ► pp. 573 ff.
Palmieri, Rudi, Chiara Mercuri & Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati
2022. Persuasive Reasons in Crowdfunding Campaigns: Comparing Argumentative Strategies in Successful and Unsuccessful Projects on Kickstarter. International Journal of Strategic Communication 16:2 ► pp. 332 ff.
Santulli, Francesca & Chiara Degano
2022. Agreement: An Argumentation Perspective. In Agreement in Argumentation [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 31], ► pp. 27 ff.
Santulli, Francesca & Chiara Degano
2022. Agreement and Persuasion. In Agreement in Argumentation [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 31], ► pp. 1 ff.
Santulli, Francesca & Chiara Degano
2022. A Presidential Debate: Exploiting Agreement in an Adversarial Context. In Agreement in Argumentation [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 31], ► pp. 145 ff.
Serakioti, Dimitra & Petros Stefaneas
2022. Ambiguity in Argumentation: The Impact of Contextual Factors on Semantic Interpretation. Studia Humana 11:3-4 ► pp. 18 ff.
Wildfeuer, Janina & Joseph Adika Coffie
2022. #socialiseresponsibly. Analyzing the Rhetorical Structure of Heineken TV Commercials During the Pandemic. Frontiers in Communication 7
Álvares, Maria
Anthony Blair, J.
2021. Technical Terminology and Argument Analysis and Appraisal. In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36], ► pp. 61 ff.
Archer, Dawn, Piotr Jagodziński & Rebecca Jagodziński
2021. Activity Types and Genres. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 206 ff.
Bilstrup Finsen, Andreas, Gerard J. Steen & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2021. How do scientists criticize the computer metaphor of the brain?. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:2 ► pp. 171 ff.
Boer, Lianne J. M.
2021. International Law As We Know It,
Bogaards, Maarten
Boogaart, Ronny, Henrike Jansen & Maarten van Leeuwen
2021. Introduction: From Argumentation to Language—And Vice Versa. In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36], ► pp. 1 ff.
Coombes, Michael & Annemaré Kotzé
2021. “Did Augustine Win?” Another Look at an Old Question about the Contra Fortunatum. Journal of Early Christian History 11:3 ► pp. 18 ff.
Eemeren, Frans H. van
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2011. In Context. Argumentation 25:2 ► pp. 141 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2012. The Pragma-Dialectical Theory Under Discussion. Argumentation 26:4 ► pp. 439 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2013. In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics. Argumentation 27:1 ► pp. 49 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2015. In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 31 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2015. The Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation Under Discussion. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 181 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2015. Bingo! Promising Developments in Argumentation Theory. In Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 28], ► pp. 3 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2015. In Reasonableness. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 223 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2015. The Role of Logic in Analyzing and Evaluating Argumentation. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 667 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2015. The Pragma-Dialectical Method of Analysis and Evaluation. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 521 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2015. Strategic Maneuvering. In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2015. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse in political deliberation. In Argumentation in Political Deliberation [Benjamins Current Topics, 76], ► pp. 11 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2015. From Ideal Model of Critical Discussion to Situated Argumentative Discourse: The Step-by-Step Development of the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 127 ff.
Van Eemeren, Frans H.
2015. Rhetoric, Argument, and Persuasion. In The International Encyclopedia of Communication,
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2015. In Context Giving Contextualization Its Rightful Place in the Study of Argumentation. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 645 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2015. Fallacies as Derailments of Argumentative Discourse Acceptance Based on Understanding and Critical Assessment. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 575 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2015. Bingo! Promising Developments in Argumentation Theory. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 55 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2015. Rhetoric, Argument, and Persuasion. In The International Encyclopedia of Communication, ► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2016. Identifying Argumentative Patterns: A Vital Step in the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. Argumentation 30:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2017. Chapter 2. Argumentative patterns viewed from a pragma-dialectical perspective. In Prototypical Argumentative Patterns [Argumentation in Context, 11], ► pp. 7 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2017. Context-dependency of argumentative patterns in discourse. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2017. Chapter 2. In what sense do modern argumentation theories relate to Aristotle?. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 11 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2017. Chapter 10. The dependency of argumentative patterns on the institutional context. In Prototypical Argumentative Patterns [Argumentation in Context, 11], ► pp. 157 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2017. Chapter 3. Fallacies as derailments of argumentative discourse. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 37 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2017. Chapter 8. Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse in political deliberation. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 123 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2018. Descriptive Studies of Argumentative Discourse. In Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective [Argumentation Library, 33], ► pp. 71 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2018. Commentary on “The role of argumentative strategies in the construction of emergent common ground in a patient-centered approach to the medical encounter”. Journal of Argumentation in Context 7:2 ► pp. 157 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2018. A Model of a Critical Discussion. In Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective [Argumentation Library, 33], ► pp. 33 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2018. Analysis as Resolution-Oriented Reconstruction. In Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective [Argumentation Library, 33], ► pp. 89 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2018. Building a Theory of Argumentation. In Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective [Argumentation Library, 33], ► pp. 19 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2018. Argumentation Theory as a Discipline. In Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective [Argumentation Library, 33], ► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2018. Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse. In Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective [Argumentation Library, 33], ► pp. 111 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2018. Distinguishing Between Different Kinds of Argumentative Practices. In Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective [Argumentation Library, 33], ► pp. 129 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2019. Argumentative Style: A Complex Notion. Argumentation 33:2 ► pp. 153 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2022. Characterising an MEP’s argumentative style. Journal of Argumentation in Context 11:1 ► pp. 6 ff.
Egres, Dorottya
2021. Strategic maneuvering in extended polylogues. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:2 ► pp. 145 ff.
Fahnestock, Jeanne
2021. Analyzing Rhetorical Style: Toward Better Methods. In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36], ► pp. 79 ff.
Feng, Jieyun, Fan Zhao & Aiqing Feng
2021. Strategic Manoeuvring by Dissociation in Corporate Crisis Communication: The Case of the 2017 United Airlines’ Passenger Dragging-Off Incident. Argumentation 35:2 ► pp. 321 ff.
Ferreira, Maria
2021. Compliance with EU Law and Argumentative Discourse: Representing the EU as a Problem-Solving Multilevel Governance System through Discursive Structures of Argumentation. Argumentation 35:4 ► pp. 645 ff.
Ferreira, Maria
2021. A Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Memory Politics: Spanish Contemporary Memory Politics, Populism Studies, and Argumentative Dialectics. Journal of Nationalism, Memory & Language Politics 15:2 ► pp. 130 ff.
Galimberti, Carlo, Antonio Bova, Carmen Spanò & Ilaria Vergine
2021. Polydimensional Structure and Psychosocial Functions of the Direct Address in TV Series. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Godden, David
2021. The Compliment of Rational Opposition: Disagreement, Adversariality, and Disputation. Topoi 40:5 ► pp. 845 ff.
Greco, Sara & Chiara Jermini-Martinez Soria
2021. Mediators’ reframing as a constitutive element of a reconciliatory argumentative style. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:1 ► pp. 73 ff.
Greco, Sara & Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati
2021. Rhetoric. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible, ► pp. 1 ff.
Greco, Sara & Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati
2021. Rhetorics. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible, ► pp. 1 ff.
Greco, Sara & Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati
2022. Rhetoric. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible, ► pp. 1431 ff.
Greco, Sara & Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati
2022. Rhetoric. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible, ► pp. 1 ff.
Haaften, Ton van & Maarten van Leeuwen
2021. On the relation between argumentative style and linguistic style. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:1 ► pp. 97 ff.
Herman, Thierry & Steve Oswald
2021. Everybody Knows that There Is Something Odd About Ad Populum Arguments. In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36], ► pp. 305 ff.
Hernández, Alfonso
2021. Journalists’ moves in political press conferences and their implications for accountability. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:3 ► pp. 281 ff.
Hernández, Alfonso
2023. Disentangling Critical Questions from Argument Schemes. Argumentation 37:3 ► pp. 377 ff.
Jansen, Henrike & Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
2021. Strategic Manoeuvring with the Expression “Not for Nothing”. In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36], ► pp. 285 ff.
Jansen, Henrike & Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
2020. Argumentative Use and Strategic Function of the Expression ‘Not for Nothing’. Argumentation 34:2 ► pp. 143 ff.
Jansen, Henrike & Maarten van Leeuwen
2021. The presentational dimension of Geert Wilders’s populist argumentative style. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:1 ► pp. 121 ff.
Lecompte-Van Poucke, Margo
2021. The value of a pragma-functional approach to intercultural conflict discourses. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 3:1 ► pp. 130 ff.
Macagno, Fabrizio & Rosalice Botelho Wakim Souza Pinto
2021. Reconstructing Multimodal Arguments in Advertisements: Combining Pragmatics and Argumentation Theory. Argumentation 35:1 ► pp. 141 ff.
Msagalla, Brighton & Marianna Visser
2021. Agenda-setting through topic shift in Tanzanian parliamentary debate: The derailment of strategic manoeuvring. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 39:4 ► pp. 327 ff.
Pilgram, Roosmaryn & Lotte van Poppel
2021. The Strategic Use of Metaphor in Argumentation. In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36], ► pp. 191 ff.
Popa, Eugen Octav, Vincent Blok & Renate Wesselink
2021. An Agonistic Approach to Technological Conflict. Philosophy & Technology 34:4 ► pp. 717 ff.
Pruś, Jakub
2021. How Can Modifications of Meaning Influence Argumentation? The Concept and Typology of Semantic Arguments. Argumentation 35:3 ► pp. 483 ff.
Reijven, Menno H.
2021. The co-construction of campaign argumentation on U.S.A. late-night talk shows. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:3 ► pp. 397 ff.
Reijven, Menno H.
2023. Review of Wu (2023): Responding to questions at press conferences: Confrontational maneuvering by Chinese spokespersons. Journal of Argumentation in Context 12:3 ► pp. 353 ff.
Reijven, Menno H.
Stevens, Katharina & Daniel H. Cohen
2021. Angelic Devil’s Advocates and the Forms of Adversariality. Topoi 40:5 ► pp. 899 ff.
Svačinová, Iva
2021. Demosthenes’ strategic maneuvering in theFirst Olynthiac. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:3 ► pp. 315 ff.
Svačinová, Iva
2021. Pragma-Dialectical Reconstruction of Crisis Diary-Writing as a Communicative Activity Type. Argumentation 35:2 ► pp. 237 ff.
Svačinová, Iva
2022. Three forms of internal negotiation through the activity of private diary-writing. Journal of Argumentation in Context 11:2 ► pp. 243 ff.
Svačinová, Iva
2024. Consolation Through Argumentation? Prototypical and Stereotypical Argumentative Patterns in Secular Eulogies. Argumentation 38:3 ► pp. 289 ff.
Verhagen, Arie
2021. Argumentation in Evolution: On the Relation Between Dyadic and Public Communication. In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36], ► pp. 37 ff.
Visser, Jacky, John Lawrence, Chris Reed, Jean Wagemans & Douglas Walton
2021. Annotating Argument Schemes. Argumentation 35:1 ► pp. 101 ff.
Barceló Aspeitia, Axel Arturo
2020. Whataboutisms and Inconsistency. Argumentation 34:4 ► pp. 433 ff.
Barebina, Natal’ya Sergeevna, Mikail Ismailovich Tagiev & Sergey Alexandrovich Tiguntsev
2020. Interpretative Component of Argumentative Constructions of Criticism in the English-Language Reviews as Explication of Assessment in Scientific Discourse. Philology. Theory & Practice 13:9 ► pp. 181 ff.
Bjaiya al-mas'ud, Hameed Hassoon & Abdullah Muhammad Naif
2020. Deception in American Propaganda: A Pragma-Rhetorical Perspective. Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities 27:10 ► pp. 34 ff.
Boogaart, Ronny
2020. Expressives in Argumentation: The Case of Apprehensive Straks (‘Shortly’) in Dutch. In From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild [Argumentation Library, 35], ► pp. 185 ff.
Fairclough, Isabela & Irina Diana Mădroane
2020. An Argumentative Approach to “Framing”. Framing, Deliberation and Action in an Environmental Conflict. Co-herencia 17:32 ► pp. 119 ff.
Ilchenko, Olga & Natalia Kramar
2020. ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES: KEEPING UP WITH THE TIMES. Studia Linguistica :16 ► pp. 40 ff.
Lukianova, Ekaterina & Timothy Steffensmeier
López, Federico E.
2020. Argument Evaluation in Philosophy: Fallacies as Strategic Maneuvering. In From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild [Argumentation Library, 35], ► pp. 63 ff.
Macagno, Fabrizio & Sarah Bigi
2020. Analyzing dialogue moves in chronic care communication. Journal of Argumentation in Context 9:2 ► pp. 167 ff.
Navarro, María G.
2020. Emergencia del institucionalismo en la teoría argumental. Azafea: Revista de Filosofía 22:1 ► pp. 167 ff.
Novak, Marko
2020. Multi-modal argumentation and rhetoric in judicial proceedings. Argumentation and Advocacy 56:1 ► pp. 41 ff.
Olayinka Unuabonah, Foluke
2020. Argumentation in Nigerian investigative public hearings. Journal of Argumentation in Context 9:2 ► pp. 199 ff.
Oswald, Steve, Sara Greco, Johanna Miecznikowski, Chiara Pollaroli & Andrea Rocci
Oswald, Steve & Thierry Herman
2020. Give the Standard Treatment of Fallacies a Chance! Cognitive and Rhetorical Insights into Fallacy Processing. In From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild [Argumentation Library, 35], ► pp. 41 ff.
Rossini, Antonio
2020. An Early Renaissance Altarpiece by Domenico Veneziano: A Case of Visual Argumentation?. Argumentation 34:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
Sijadu, Zameka Paula
2020. Metaphors as strategic manoeuvring in isiXhosa traditional argumentative political discourse. South African Journal of African Languages 40:2 ► pp. 198 ff.
Andrade Uribe, Schumann Javier
2019. El argumento ad verecundiam en la relación médico-paciente: estudio de caso en procedimientos estéticos. Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación :18 ► pp. 1 ff.
Ayala, Ricardo A
2019. Twenty years of management of care in Chile: what we know, what we do not know, what is yet to come. An analysis of arguments. Medical Humanities 45:3 ► pp. 267 ff.
Figueiras, Rita
2019. Punditry as a reward system: audience construction and the logics of the punditry sphere. Critical Studies in Media Communication 36:2 ► pp. 171 ff.
González González, Manuela, Julder Gómez & Mariantonia Lemos
2019. Theoretical Considerations for the Articulation of Emotion and Argumentation in the Arguer: A Proposal for Emotion Regulation in Deliberation. Argumentation 33:3 ► pp. 349 ff.
Grigorov, Diyan Nikolov & A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
2019. Hypothetical Questions as Strategic Devices in Negotiation. Negotiation Journal 35:3 ► pp. 363 ff.
Huang, Lue & Chuanrui Zhang
2019. Review: Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres. Argumentation 33:3 ► pp. 455 ff.
Jakaza, Ernest
2019. Intersubjective Stance and Argumentation in Zimbabwean Parliamentary Discourse. In Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ], ► pp. 97 ff.
Jakaza, Ernest
2023. (Re)thinking and (Re)theorising ‘Multi’ and Its Futures in Academic Discourse Studies. In Multidisciplinary Knowledge Production and Research Methods in Sub-Saharan Africa, ► pp. 91 ff.
Juthe, André
2019. Reconstructing Complex Pro/Con Argumentation. Argumentation 33:3 ► pp. 413 ff.
Lavalette, Kiki Y. Renardel de, Corina Andone & Gerard J. Steen
2019. Figurative analogies and how they are resisted in British Public Bill Committee debates. Metaphor and the Social World 9:1 ► pp. 107 ff.
Lind, Judith
2019. The rights of intended children: The best interests of the child argument in assisted reproduction policy. Childhood 26:3 ► pp. 352 ff.
Miserez-Caperos, Céline
2019. Francesco Arcidiacono & Antonio Bova (2017). Interpersonal argumentation in educational and professional
contexts
. Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:3 ► pp. 392 ff.
Mădroane, Irina Diana
2019. Chapter 3. Television dispositives and the enactment of advocacy arguments. In Argumentation in Actual Practice [Argumentation in Context, 17], ► pp. 33 ff.
Omar, Ahmed Abdulhameed
2019. The strategic use of argumentation from example in re-evaluating a people. Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:2 ► pp. 214 ff.
Prata, Maria José, Bruno de Sousa, Isabel Festas & Albertina L. Oliveira
2019. Cooperative methods and self-regulated strategies development for argumentative writing. The Journal of Educational Research 112:1 ► pp. 12 ff.
Renardel de Lavalette, Kiki Yvonne, Corina Andone & Gerard J. Steen
2019. I did not say that the government should be plundering anybody’s savings. Journal of Language and Politics 18:5 ► pp. 718 ff.
Rigotti, Eddo & Sara Greco
2019. Modern and Contemporary Approaches. In Inference in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 34], ► pp. 169 ff.
Rigotti, Eddo & Sara Greco
2019. Advanced Theoretical Perspectives and Open Questions. In Inference in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 34], ► pp. 247 ff.
Rigotti, Eddo & Sara Greco
2019. Cicero’s Topica and the Establishment of the Topical Tradition by Boethius. In Inference in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 34], ► pp. 59 ff.
Rodrigues, Soledade, Marcin Lewiński & Mehmet Ali Üzelgün
Stevens, Katharina
2019. The Roles We Make Others Take: Thoughts on the Ethics of Arguing. Topoi 38:4 ► pp. 693 ff.
Xiong, Minghui & Linqiong Yan
2019. Mencius’s Strategies of Political Argumentation. Argumentation 33:3 ► pp. 365 ff.
Yan, Lin-qiong & Xiong Ming‑hui
2019. Refutational Strategies in Mencius’s Argumentative Discourse on Human Nature. Argumentation 33:4 ► pp. 541 ff.
Adler, Silvia, F. Neveu, B. Harmegnies, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
2018. Annonces des ’journées portes ouvertes’ : style concis et présence énonciative. SHS Web of Conferences 46 ► pp. 01016 ff.
Al-Hindawi, Fareed Hameed & Wafaa Sahib Mehdi Mohammed
2018. Towards an Analytical Model in Critical Pragmatics. SSRN Electronic Journal
Byczyk, Marcin
2018. The Codification of the Polish Substantial Criminal Law in the Sejm Debates 1818. In Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity [Studies in the History of Law and Justice, 12], ► pp. 173 ff.
Csordás, Hédi Virág & Gábor Forrai
2018. What argumentation theory can teach us about commercials: Strategic maneuvering and the ‘tulip test’. Society and Economy 40:3 ► pp. 389 ff.
de Oliveira, Maria do Carmo Leite & Silvia Maura Rodrigues Pereira
2018. Formulations in Delicate Actions: A Study of Analyst Questions in Earnings Conference Calls. International Journal of Business Communication 55:3 ► pp. 293 ff.
Greco, Sara, Rebecca Schär, Chiara Pollaroli & Chiara Mercuri
2018. Adding a temporal dimension to the analysis of argumentative discourse:Justified reframingas a means of turning a single-issue discussion into a complex argumentative discussion. Discourse Studies 20:6 ► pp. 726 ff.
Hansson, Sten
2018. Defensive semiotic strategies in government: a multimodal study of blame avoidance. Social Semiotics 28:4 ► pp. 472 ff.
Hansson, Sten
2018. Analysing opposition–government blame games: argument models and strategic maneuvering. Critical Discourse Studies 15:3 ► pp. 228 ff.
Karnieli-Miller, Orit & Galit Neufeld-Kroszynski
2018. The potential of argumentation theory in enhancing patient-centered care in breaking bad news
encounters. Journal of Argumentation in Context 7:2 ► pp. 120 ff.
Marraud, Hubert
2018. Arguments from Ostension. Argumentation 32:3 ► pp. 309 ff.
Musi, Elena & Mark Aakhus
2018. Discovering Argumentative Patterns in Energy Polylogues: A Macroscope for Argument Mining. Argumentation 32:3 ► pp. 397 ff.
Okuda, Hiroko & Takeshi Suzuki
2018. Prime Minister Abe’s challenge to the Japanese Postwar Constitution. Journal of Argumentation in Context 7:1 ► pp. 18 ff.
Oswald, Steve, Thierry Herman & Jérôme Jacquin
2018. Introduction. In Argumentation and Language — Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations [Argumentation Library, 32], ► pp. 1 ff.
Pan, Dawei
2018. “Doctors Killed My Baby”: Argumentative Patterns in Medical Disputes in China. Health Communication 33:10 ► pp. 1267 ff.
Pan, Dawei, Yanjin Chen & Shier Ju
2018. Argumentative Patterns in Chinese Medical Consultations. Argumentation 32:1 ► pp. 37 ff.
Rocci, Andrea, Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati & Chiara Pollaroli
2018. The argumentative and rhetorical function of multimodal metonymy. Semiotica 2018:220 ► pp. 123 ff.
Tribastone, Miriam & Sara Greco
2018. Framing in News Discourse. In Empirical Research on Semiotics and Visual Rhetoric [Advances in Multimedia and Interactive Technologies, ], ► pp. 71 ff.
van Bijnen, Emma & Sara Greco
van Laar, Jan Albert & Erik C. W. Krabbe
2018. The Role of Argument in Negotiation. Argumentation 32:4 ► pp. 549 ff.
van Laar, Jan Albert & Erik C.W. Krabbe
2016. Fair and unfair strategies in public controversies. Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:3 ► pp. 315 ff.
Wagemans, Jean H. M.
2018. Commentary on “The potential of argumentation theory in enhancing patient-centered care in breaking bad news encounters”. Journal of Argumentation in Context 7:2 ► pp. 138 ff.
Weigand, Edda
Wu, Peng
2018. Frans H. van Eemeren: Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Argumentation 32:4 ► pp. 609 ff.
Wu, Peng
2019. “I Have No Comment”: Confrontational Maneuvering by Declaring a Standpoint Unallowed or Indisputable in Spokespersons’ Argumentative Replies at the Regular Press Conferences of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Argumentation 33:4 ► pp. 489 ff.
Wu, Peng
2019. Chapter 4. Dissociation as strategic maneuvering in spokespersons’ argumentative replies at Chinese diplomatic press conferences. In Argumentation in Actual Practice [Argumentation in Context, 17], ► pp. 61 ff.
Wu, Peng
2019. Confrontational Maneuvering by Dissociation in Spokespersons’ Argumentative Replies at the Press Conferences of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Argumentation 33:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Wu, Peng
2021. The uncompromising confrontational argumentative style of the spokespersons’ replies at the regular press conferences of
China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:1 ► pp. 26 ff.
Ylä-Anttila, Tuukka
2018. Populist knowledge: ‘Post-truth’ repertoires of contesting epistemic authorities. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 5:4 ► pp. 356 ff.
Yu, Shiyang & Frank Zenker
2018. Peirce Knew Why Abduction Isn’t IBE—A Scheme and Critical Questions for Abductive Argument. Argumentation 32:4 ► pp. 569 ff.
Zhang, Chuanrui & Cihua Xu
2018. Argument by Multimodal Metaphor as Strategic Maneuvering in TV Commercials: A Case Study. Argumentation 32:4 ► pp. 501 ff.
Šorm, Ester & Gerard J. Steen
2018. Chapter 3. VISMIP. In Visual Metaphor [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 18], ► pp. 47 ff.
Aakhus, Mark & Marcin Lewiński
2017. Advancing Polylogical Analysis of Large-Scale Argumentation: Disagreement Management in the Fracking Controversy. Argumentation 31:1 ► pp. 179 ff.
Andone, Corina & Florin Coman-Kund
2017. Argumentative patterns in the European Union’s directives. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:1 ► pp. 76 ff.
Bermejo-Luque, Lilian
2017. Chapter 3. Argumentative and non-argumentative rhetorical content. In Argumentation across Communities of Practice [Argumentation in Context, 10], ► pp. 57 ff.
Catenaccio, Paola
2017. Chapter 9. Caught between profitability and responsibility. In Argumentation across Communities of Practice [Argumentation in Context, 10], ► pp. 197 ff.
Chuanrui, Zhang & Xu Cihua
2017. Argument by multimodal metaphor as strategic maneuvering in video advertising. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:3 ► pp. 359 ff.
de Bustos, Eduardo
2017. Parables: Crossroads Between the Cognitive Theory of Metaphor and Argumentation Theory. In Narration as Argument [Argumentation Library, 31], ► pp. 83 ff.
Gascón, José Ángel
2017. Brothers in Arms: Virtue and Pragma-Dialectics. Argumentation 31:4 ► pp. 705 ff.
Gascón, José Ángel
2024. Beyond Reasonableness: Argumentative Virtues in Pragma-Dialectics. Topoi
Greco, Sara
2017. F. H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen (eds): Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory. Argumentation 31:1 ► pp. 213 ff.
Greco, Sara
2017. Using Argumentative Tools to Understand Inner Dialogue. Argumentation 31:2 ► pp. 331 ff.
Greco, Sara
2018. Frans H. van Eemeren and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans: Argumentation: Analysis and Evaluation. Argumentation 32:1 ► pp. 151 ff.
Greco, Sara
2021. Review of Brambilla (2020): The quest for argumentative equivalence. Argumentative patterns in political interpreting contexts. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:3 ► pp. 418 ff.
Greco, Sara, Teuta Mehmeti & Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont
2017. Do adult-children dialogical interactions leave space for a full development of argumentation?. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:2 ► pp. 193 ff.
Green, Nancy L.
2017. Roosmaryn Pilgram (2015). A Doctor’s Argument by Authority
. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:2 ► pp. 271 ff.
Groarke, Leo
2017. Chapter 3. Editorial cartoons and ART. In Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres [Argumentation in Context, 14], ► pp. 82 ff.
Gâţă, Anca
2017. Ahmed Omar (2016). Strategic Maneuvering in Supporting the Feasibility of Political Change. A Pragma-Dialectical
Analysis of Egyptian Anti-regime Columns
. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:2 ► pp. 254 ff.
Gâţă, Anca
2017. Chapter 17. Strategic maneuvering with presentational choices in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reports. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 309 ff.
Gâţă, Anca
2017. Strategic maneuvering with presentational choices in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reports. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:2 ► pp. 137 ff.
Gâță, Anca
2021. Characteristics of a detached argumentative style in public policy analysis. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:1 ► pp. 46 ff.
Hitchcock, David
2017. Postscript. In On Reasoning and Argument [Argumentation Library, 30], ► pp. 335 ff.
Hoppmann, Michael
2017. Competition and conflict between communicative norms. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:2 ► pp. 220 ff.
Iannaccone, Antonio & Francesco Arcidiacono
2017. Argumentation in Dialogue: Final Conclusions. In Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts, ► pp. 201 ff.
Ilie, Cornelia
2017. Chapter 4. Questioning the questionable. In Argumentation across Communities of Practice [Argumentation in Context, 10], ► pp. 73 ff.
Ilie, Cornelia
2024. Crisis manipulation. In Manufacturing Dissent [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 339], ► pp. 1 ff.
Impedovo, Maria Antonietta, Alice Delserieys-Pedregosa, Corinne Jégou & Konstantinos Ravanis
2017. Shadow Formation at Preschool from a Socio-materiality Perspective. Research in Science Education 47:3 ► pp. 579 ff.
Jacquin, Jérôme
2017. Chapter 9. Embodied argumentation in public debates. In Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres [Argumentation in Context, 14], ► pp. 240 ff.
Jansen, Henrike
2017. Chapter 12. The space for strategic manoeuvring in adjudicating a freedom of speech case in the Netherlands. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 193 ff.
Jansen, Henrike
2017. The space for strategic manoeuvring in adjudicating a freedom of speech case in the Netherlands. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:2 ► pp. 105 ff.
Jansen, Henrike
2017. “You Think That Says a Lot, but Really it Says Nothing”: An Argumentative and Linguistic Account of an Idiomatic Expression Functioning as a Presentational Device. Argumentation 31:4 ► pp. 615 ff.
Jansen, Henrike
Lawrence, John, Jacky Visser, Chris Reed, Randy Allen Harris & Chrysanne Di Marco
2017. Harnessing rhetorical figures for argument mining. Argument & Computation 8:3 ► pp. 289 ff.
Linqiong, Yan
2017. Chapter 16. A pragma-dialectical approach to governmental crisis communication. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 281 ff.
Linqiong, Yan
2017. A pragma-dialectical approach to governmental crisis communication. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:3 ► pp. 315 ff.
Macagno, Fabrizio & Douglas Walton
2017. Evaluating Relevance and Commitments in Rhetorical Straw Man. In Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 14], ► pp. 143 ff.
Na, Yang
2017. Strategic maneuvering by persuasive definition in corporate crisis communication. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:3 ► pp. 344 ff.
Paglieri, Fabio & Chris Reed
2017. Introduction: Theoretical and Technological Perspectives on Online Arguments. Philosophy & Technology 30:2 ► pp. 131 ff.
Paliewicz, Nicholas S. & George F. (Guy) McHendry
2017. When good arguments do not work: post-dialectics, argument assemblages, and the networks of climate skepticism. Argumentation and Advocacy 53:4 ► pp. 287 ff.
Palmieri, Rudi
2017. The Role of Argumentation in Financial Communication and Investor Relations. In The Handbook of Financial Communication and Investor Relations, ► pp. 45 ff.
Peng, Wu
2017. Chapter 13. Strategic maneuvering by personal attacks at press conferences of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12],
Peng, Wu
2017. Chapter 13. Strategic maneuvering by personal attacks at press conferences of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 225 ff.
Peng, Wu
2017. Strategic maneuvering by personal attacks in spokespersons’ argumentative replies at diplomatic press conferences. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:3 ► pp. 285 ff.
Peng, Wu & Xu Cihua
2017. Argumentative discourse in contemporary China. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:3 ► pp. 277 ff.
Pilgram, Roosmaryn
2017. Chapter 7. Argumentation in doctor-patient interaction. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 109 ff.
Pinchao, Lu
2017. Wu Peng. (2017). Discourse and trade dispute: A discourse-analytic research on Sino-US trade disputes over tire imports
. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:3 ► pp. 381 ff.
Rocci, Andrea
2017. Meaning and Argumentation. In Modality in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 29], ► pp. 33 ff.
Rocci, Andrea
2017. Case Studies of Italian Modal Constructions in Context. In Modality in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 29], ► pp. 371 ff.
Rocci, Andrea
2017. Introduction. In Modality in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 29], ► pp. 1 ff.
Rocci, Andrea
2017. Types of Conversational Backgrounds and Arguments. In Modality in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 29], ► pp. 275 ff.
Rocci, Andrea
2017. Three Views of Modality in Toulmin. In Modality in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 29], ► pp. 105 ff.
Rocci, Andrea
2017. Relative Modality and Argumentation. In Modality in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 29], ► pp. 197 ff.
Snoeck Henkemans, A. Francisca
2017. Chapter 15. Strategic manoeuvring with hyperbole in political debate. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 269 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Wu Peng
2017. Chapter 1. Introduction Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 1 ff.
van Poppel, Lotte
2017. Chapter 6. The strategic function of variants of pragmatic argumentation in health brochures. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 93 ff.
van Poppel, Lotte
2018. Commentary on “Implicit persuasion in medical decision-making: an overview of implicitly steering behaviors and a reflection on explanations for the use of implicitly steering behaviors”. Journal of Argumentation in Context 7:2 ► pp. 228 ff.
van Poppel, Lotte
2021. The Study of Metaphor in Argumentation Theory. Argumentation 35:1 ► pp. 177 ff.
Visser, Jacky
2017. Speech Acts in a Dialogue Game Formalisation of Critical Discussion. Argumentation 31:2 ► pp. 245 ff.
Walton, Douglas & Marcin Koszowy
2017. Arguments from authority and expert opinion in computational argumentation systems. AI & SOCIETY 32:4 ► pp. 483 ff.
Wierda, Renske & Jacky Visser
2017. Chapter 5. Direct-to-consumer advertisements for prescription drugs as an argumentative activity type. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 77 ff.
Wildfeuer, Janina & Chiara Pollaroli
2017. Chapter 7. Seeing the untold. In Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres [Argumentation in Context, 14], ► pp. 190 ff.
Andone, Corina & Andrea Rocci
2016. Argumentation in journalism: Professional practices and the public sphere. Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Boukala, Salomi
2016. Rethinking topos in the discourse historical approach: Endoxon seeking and argumentation in Greek media discourses on ‘Islamist terrorism’. Discourse Studies 18:3 ► pp. 249 ff.
Boukala, Salomi
2019. (Re)Introducing the Aristotelian Topos/Topoi in the Discourse Historical Approach: Key Methodological Concepts. In European Identity and the Representation of Islam in the Mainstream Press, ► pp. 85 ff.
Burger, Marcel & Laura Delaloye
2016. The framing of argumentation in the making of a political editorial. Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:1 ► pp. 29 ff.
Demir, Yeliz
2016. Maneuvering strategically in a press conference to diminish political responsibility for a critical event. Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:2 ► pp. 191 ff.
Demir, Yeliz
2017. Chapter 10. Multi-participant TV debate as an argumentative activity type. In Argumentation across Communities of Practice [Argumentation in Context, 10], ► pp. 229 ff.
DEMİR, Yeliz
2020. Patterns of Responses to Abusive Ad Hominem Attacks: The Case of Facebook News-commenting. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 37:2 ► pp. 290 ff.
Duerringer, Christopher M. & Z. S. Justus
2016. Tropes in the Rhetoric of Gun Rights: A Pragma-Dialectic Analysis. Argumentation and Advocacy 52:3 ► pp. 181 ff.
Fabregat, Silvia Martínez
2016. Irony as a Visual Argument. In Epistemology, Knowledge and the Impact of Interaction [Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, 38], ► pp. 297 ff.
Fairclough, Isabela
2016. Evaluating policy as argument: the public debate over the first UK austerity budget. Critical Discourse Studies 13:1 ► pp. 57 ff.
Fairclough, Isabela
2019. Deontic power and institutional contexts. Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:1 ► pp. 136 ff.
Fairclough, Isabela
2020. Is “Conductive Argument” a Single Argument?. In From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild [Argumentation Library, 35], ► pp. 223 ff.
Heiss, Sarah N. & Benjamin R. Bates
2016. When a Spoonful of Fallacies Helps the Sweetener Go Down: The Corn Refiner Association’s Use of Straw-Person Arguments in Health Debates Surrounding High-Fructose Corn Syrup. Health Communication 31:8 ► pp. 1029 ff.
Ihnen Jory, Constanza
2016. Negotiation and Deliberation: Grasping the Difference. Argumentation 30:2 ► pp. 145 ff.
Jacquin, Jérôme & Marta Zampa
2016. Do we still need an army like in the First World War? An argumentative analysis of a television debate on abolishing compulsory military service in Switzerland. Discourse & Communication 10:5 ► pp. 479 ff.
Jakaza, Ernest & Marianna Visser
2016. ‘Subjectivity’ in newspaper reports on ‘controversial’ and ‘emotional’ debates: An appraisal and controversy analysis. Language Matters 47:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Jakaza, Ernest & Marianna W. Visser
2016. Argumentation and Appraisal in Divergent Zimbabwean Parliamentary Debates. In Political Discourse in Emergent, Fragile, and Failed Democracies [Advances in Electronic Government, Digital Divide, and Regional Development, ], ► pp. 126 ff.
Kharmandar, Mohammad Ali
2016. Argumentation-based literary translation quality assessment. Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:2 ► pp. 139 ff.
Leal, Fernando
2016. Review of: Frans H. van Eemeren (2015): Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics, Cham (CH), Springer (= Argumentation Library, 27), 880 pp.. Argumentation 30:4 ► pp. 527 ff.
Leal, Fernando
Leal, Fernando
2019. Chapter 16. On philosophical argumentation. In Argumentation in Actual Practice [Argumentation in Context, 17], ► pp. 299 ff.
Leal, Fernando
2020. Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds.): From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild: A Variety of Contributions to Argumentation Theory. Argumentation 34:3 ► pp. 389 ff.
Leal, Fernando
2020. On the Importance of Questioning Within the Ideal Model of Critical Discussion. Argumentation 34:4 ► pp. 405 ff.
Leal, Fernando
2022. Is Natural Selection in Trouble? When Emotions Run High in a Philosophical Debate. Argumentation 36:4 ► pp. 541 ff.
Livnat, Zohar
2016. Review of Popa (2016): Thought Experiments in Academic Communication. A Pragma-Dialectical Method for Reconstructing the Argumentative Use of Imaginary Scenarios in Academic Disputes. Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:3 ► pp. 348 ff.
Mohammed, Dima
2016. Goals in Argumentation: A Proposal for the Analysis and Evaluation of Public Political Arguments. Argumentation 30:3 ► pp. 221 ff.
Mohammed, Dima
2018. Exercising Accountability in European Parliamentary Debates on Statements: An Argumentative Perspective. In Argumentation and Language — Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations [Argumentation Library, 32], ► pp. 243 ff.
Mohammed, Dima
2019. Standing Standpoints and Argumentative Associates: What is at Stake in a Public Political Argument?. Argumentation 33:3 ► pp. 307 ff.
Palmieri, Rudi & Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati
2016. Multiple Audiences as Text Stakeholders: A Conceptual Framework for Analyzing Complex Rhetorical Situations. Argumentation 30:4 ► pp. 467 ff.
Palmieri, Rudi & Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati
2017. Practical reasoning in corporate communication with multiple audiences. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:2 ► pp. 167 ff.
Palmieri, Rudi & Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati
2021. Strategic Communication with Multiple Audiences: Polyphony, Text Stakeholders, and Argumentation. International Journal of Strategic Communication 15:3 ► pp. 159 ff.
Palmieri, Rudi & Johanna Miecznikowski
Rocci, Andrea & Margherita Luciani
2016. Economic-financial journalists as argumentative intermediaries. Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:1 ► pp. 88 ff.
Rodgers, Elena
2016. A Rhetorical Analysis of Folk Linguistic Discourse: The Case of Twang. American Speech 91:4 ► pp. 393 ff.
Sorlin, Sandrine
2016. Manipulative Moves: Between Persuasion and Coercion. In Language and Manipulation in House of Cards, ► pp. 107 ff.
Sorlin, Sandrine
2016. Power & (Fictional) Politics. In Language and Manipulation in House of Cards, ► pp. 1 ff.
Sorlin, Sandrine
2024. Chapter 10. A plea for hypocrisy. In The Pragmatics of Hypocrisy [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 343], ► pp. 231 ff.
Wodak, Ruth
2016. Dialogue matters: transcending dichotomies. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 11:4 ► pp. 367 ff.
Wodak, Ruth
2016. Argumentation, Political. In The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication, ► pp. 1 ff.
Aakhus, Mark
2015. Deliberation digitized. In Argumentation in Political Deliberation [Benjamins Current Topics, 76], ► pp. 101 ff.
Aakhus, Mark
2017. The Communicative Work of Organizations in Shaping Argumentative Realities. Philosophy & Technology 30:2 ► pp. 191 ff.
Adams, Brian E.
2015. Working through disagreement in deliberative forums. The Social Science Journal 52:2 ► pp. 229 ff.
Al-Duleimi, Abbas Deygan Darweesh & Waleed Ridha Hammoodi
2015. A Pragmatic Study of Strategic Maneuvering in Selected Political Interviews. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 05:01 ► pp. 79 ff.
Arroyo, José Luis Blas
2015. Pragmatics of Political Discourse. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff.
Bova, Antonio
Bova, Antonio
2017. The Role of the Teacher in Promoting Argumentative Interactions in the Learning Contexts of Higher Education. In Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts, ► pp. 75 ff.
Bova, Antonio
2020. Un estudio de los argumentos de autoridad utilizados por los padres con sus hijos durante las comidas. Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación :19 ► pp. 1 ff.
Brambilla, Emanuele
2015. Argumentative equivalence as the reproduction of strategic maneuvering in interpreted texts. Journal of Argumentation in Context 4:3 ► pp. 299 ff.
Brambilla, Emanuele
2017. Interpreting legal arguments. Insights from the first ICC trial
. International Journal of Legal Discourse 2:2 ► pp. 177 ff.
Brambilla, Emanuele
2022. Antifascist argumentation in Giacomo Matteotti’s 1924 speech to the Italian Parliament. Journal of Argumentation in Context 11:1 ► pp. 27 ff.
Brambilla, Emanuele
2023. On the defence of antifascist Italy in Alcide De Gasperi’s 1946 speech to the Paris Peace Conference. Discourse Studies 25:4 ► pp. 473 ff.
Carranza, Isolda E.
2015. Narrating and Arguing. In The Handbook of Narrative Analysis, ► pp. 57 ff.
Coposescu, Liliana
2015. Argumentation strategies in mediated professional interactions. In Persuasive Games in Political and Professional Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 26], ► pp. 161 ff.
Cummings, Louise
2015. Argument from Authority. In Reasoning and Public Health: New Ways of Coping with Uncertainty, ► pp. 67 ff.
Dahl, John Magnus R.
2015. Visual argumentation in political advertising. Journal of Argumentation in Context 4:3 ► pp. 286 ff.
Doury, Marianne & Assimakis Tseronis
2015. The place of counter discourse in two methods of public deliberation. In Argumentation in Political Deliberation [Benjamins Current Topics, 76], ► pp. 75 ff.
Garssen, Bart
2015. Strategic maneuvering in European Parliamentary Debate. In Argumentation in Political Deliberation [Benjamins Current Topics, 76], ► pp. 33 ff.
Garssen, Bart
2015. Pragma‐dialectics. In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ► pp. 1 ff.
Garssen, Bart
2016. Problem-Solving Argumentative Patterns in Plenary Debates of the European Parliament. Argumentation 30:1 ► pp. 25 ff.
Garssen, Bart
2017. Chapter 9. Strategic maneuvering in European Parliamentary debate. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 145 ff.
Jackson, Sally
2015. Design Thinking in Argumentation Theory and Practice. Argumentation 29:3 ► pp. 243 ff.
Jackson, Sally
2018. Frans H. van Eemeren and Wu Peng (eds): Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics. Argumentation 32:2 ► pp. 293 ff.
Kjeldsen, Jens E.
2015. The Study of Visual and Multimodal Argumentation. Argumentation 29:2 ► pp. 115 ff.
Lauwers, Jeroen, Tom Deneire & David Eelbode
Migdalek, Maia Julieta, Celia Renata Rosemberg & Cristian Santibáñez Yáñez
2015. La Génesis de la Argumentación. Un Estudio con Niños de 3 a 5 Años en Distintos Contextos de Juego. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura 19:3
Niño, Douglas & Danny Marrero
2015. The Agentive Approach to Argumentation: A Proposal. In Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 28], ► pp. 53 ff.
Pollaroli, Chiara & Andrea Rocci
2015. The argumentative relevance of pictorial and multimodal metaphor in advertising. Journal of Argumentation in Context 4:2 ► pp. 158 ff.
Polyzou, Alexandra
2015. PRESUPPOSITION IN DISCOURSE. Critical Discourse Studies 12:2 ► pp. 123 ff.
Raccah, Pierre-Yves
2015. Linguistic Argumentation as a Shortcut for the Empirical Study of Argumentative Strategies. In Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 28], ► pp. 279 ff.
Siegel, Harvey
2015. Argumentative Norms: How Contextual Can They Be? A Cautionary Tale. In Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 28], ► pp. 205 ff.
Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. & J. H. M. Wagemans
2015. Reasonableness in Context: Taking into Account Institutional Conventions in the Pragma-Dialectical Evaluation of Argumentative Discourse. In Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 28], ► pp. 217 ff.
Tuzet, Giovanni
2015. On the Absence of Evidence. In Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation [Law and Philosophy Library, 112], ► pp. 37 ff.
Uzelgun, Mehmet Ali, Dima Mohammed, Marcin Lewiński & Paula Castro
2015. Managing disagreement through yes, but… constructions: An argumentative analysis. Discourse Studies 17:4 ► pp. 467 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans, Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels
2015. The Extended Pragma-Dialectical Argumentation Theory Empirically Interpreted. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 759 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Peter Houtlosser
2015. Strategic Maneuvering: Examining Argumentation in Context. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 381 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Sally Jackson & Scott Jacobs
2015. Argumentation. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 3 ff.
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
2015. Identity as a resource to shape mediation in dialogic interaction. Language and Dialogue 5:3 ► pp. 355 ff.
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
2017. Strategic maneuvering in dispute mediation. Argumentation and Advocacy 53:3 ► pp. 234 ff.
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
2024. Review of Lewiński & Aakhus (2023): Argumentation in Complex Communication: Managing Disagreement in a Polylogue. Language and Dialogue 14:1 ► pp. 163 ff.
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
Warglien, Massimo & Peter Gärdenfors
2015. Meaning Negotiation. In Applications of Conceptual Spaces [Synthese Library, 359], ► pp. 79 ff.
Benoit, William & Jennifer M. Benoit-Bryan
2014. A functional analysis of the 2010 Australian Prime Minister debate. Journal of Argumentation in Context 3:2 ► pp. 153 ff.
Clary-Lemon, Jennifer
2014. Irish emigration in the 1970s: The ‘problem’ discourse of political elites. Discourse & Society 25:5 ► pp. 619 ff.
Degano, Chiara
2014. Textuality on the Web. In Innovative Methods and Technologies for Electronic Discourse Analysis [Advances in Human and Social Aspects of Technology, ], ► pp. 414 ff.
Degano, Chiara
2014. USNational Security Strategy: Different presidencies, different rhetoric?. In Let's talk politics [Argumentation in Context, 6], ► pp. 149 ff.
Degano, Chiara
Degano, Chiara
2017. Chapter 12. Visual arguments in activists’ campaigns. In Argumentation across Communities of Practice [Argumentation in Context, 10], ► pp. 291 ff.
Eckstein, Justin
Eckstein, Justin
2017. Radiolab’s Sound Strategic Maneuvers. Argumentation 31:4 ► pp. 663 ff.
Haaften, Ton van
2014. Review of Ihnen Jory (2012): Pragmatic argumentation in law-making debates. Instruments for the analysis and evaluation of pragmatic argumentation at the Second Reading of the British Parliament. Journal of Argumentation in Context 3:3 ► pp. 333 ff.
van Haaften, Ton
2017. Chapter 11. Strategic maneuvering with presentational choices in Dutch parliamentary debate. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 177 ff.
Ieţcu-Fairclough, Isabela
2014. Review of Andone (2013): Argumentation in political interviews. Analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency. Journal of Argumentation in Context 3:3 ► pp. 325 ff.
Kwon, Winston, Ian Clarke & Ruth Wodak
2014. Micro‐Level Discursive Strategies for Constructing Shared Views around Strategic Issues in Team Meetings. Journal of Management Studies 51:2 ► pp. 265 ff.
Labrie, Nanon & Peter J. Schulz
2014. Does Argumentation Matter? A Systematic Literature Review on the Role of Argumentation in Doctor–Patient Communication. Health Communication 29:10 ► pp. 996 ff.
Lewiński, Marcin & Mark Aakhus
2014. Argumentative Polylogues in a Dialectical Framework: A Methodological Inquiry. Argumentation 28:2 ► pp. 161 ff.
Mazzi, Davide
Mazzi, Davide
2022. The Irish Public Discourse on Covid-19 at the Intersection of Legislation, Fake News and Judicial Argumentation. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 35:3 ► pp. 1233 ff.
Mazzi, Davide
2024. “…A Matter of Grave Concern”: Online Hate Speech in Ireland at the Intersection of Legislation and Case Law. In Handbook on Cyber Hate [Law and Visual Jurisprudence, 13], ► pp. 313 ff.
Paglieri, Fabio & Cristiano Castelfranchi
2014. Trust, relevance, and arguments. Argument & Computation 5:2-3 ► pp. 216 ff.
Palmieri, Rudi & Eddo Rigotti
Ribeiro, Henrique Jales
2014. The Role of Analogy in Philosophical Discourse. In Systematic Approaches to Argument by Analogy [Argumentation Library, 25], ► pp. 275 ff.
Rigotti, Eddo
2014. The Nature and Functions of Loci in Agricola’s De Inuentione Dialectica. Argumentation 28:1 ► pp. 19 ff.
Rigotti, Eddo
2014. Review of van Eemeren & Garssen (2012): Exploring Argumentative Contexts. Journal of Argumentation in Context 3:2 ► pp. 199 ff.
van Laar, Jan Albert
2014. Criticism in Need of Clarification. Argumentation 28:4 ► pp. 401 ff.
van Laar, Jan Albert
2021. Improving Argumentative Skills in Education: Three Online Discussion Tools. In Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate , ► pp. 87 ff.
Walton, Douglas
2014. Speech Acts and Indirect Threats in Ad Baculum Arguments. A Reply to Budzynska and Witek. Argumentation 28:3 ► pp. 317 ff.
Walton, Douglas
2015. Profiles of Dialogue: A Method of Argument Fault Diagnosis and Repair. Argumentation and Advocacy 52:2 ► pp. 91 ff.
Xenitidou, Maria & Sara Greco Morasso
2014. Parental discourse and identity management in the talk of indigenous and migrant speakers. Discourse & Society 25:1 ► pp. 100 ff.
Bova, Antonio & Francesco Arcidiacono
2013. Investigating children’s Why-questions: A study comparing argumentative and explanatory function. Discourse Studies 15:6 ► pp. 713 ff.
Bova, Antonio & Francesco Arcidiacono
2013. Invoking the Authority of Feelings as a Strategic Maneuver in Family Mealtime Conversations. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 23:3 ► pp. 206 ff.
Bova, Antonio & Francesco Arcidiacono
Crosswhite, James
2013. The Rhetorical Unconscious of Argumentation Theory:. Philosophy & Rhetoric 46:4 ► pp. 392 ff.
Danblon, Emmanuelle
2013. The Reason of Rhetoric. Philosophy & Rhetoric 46:4 ► pp. 493 ff.
Feteris, Eveline T.
2013. Strategic Maneuvering with the Argumentative Role of Legal Principles in the Case of the “Unworthy Spouse”. In Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives [Law and Philosophy Library, 102], ► pp. 85 ff.
Feteris, Eveline T.
2016. Prototypical Argumentative Patterns in a Legal Context: The Role of Pragmatic Argumentation in the Justification of Judicial Decisions. Argumentation 30:1 ► pp. 61 ff.
Feteris, Eveline T.
2017. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach of Legal Argumentation. In Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 1], ► pp. 201 ff.
Feteris, Eveline T.
2017. Chapter 5. The role of pragmatic argumentation in the justification of judicial decisions. In Prototypical Argumentative Patterns [Argumentation in Context, 11], ► pp. 71 ff.
Feteris, Eveline T.
2017. Chapter 4. The role of the judge in legal proceedings. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 59 ff.
Feteris, Eveline T.
2021. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach of Legal Argumentation as Specific Form of Rational Discussion. In Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, ► pp. 1 ff.
Feteris, Eveline T.
2023. Pragma-Dialectical Approach of Legal Argumentation as Specific Form of Rational Discussion. In Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, ► pp. 2800 ff.
Johnson, Ralph H. & Christopher W. Tindale
2013. Introduction. Philosophy & Rhetoric 46:4 ► pp. 379 ff.
Kloosterhuis, Harm
2013. The Logic of Indirect Insulting in Legal Discussions: A Speech Act Perspective. SSRN Electronic Journal
Kloosterhuis, Harm
2013. The Rule of Law and the Ideal of a Critical Discussion. In Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives [Law and Philosophy Library, 102], ► pp. 71 ff.
Kloosterhuis, Harm
2014. Institutional Constraints of Topical Strategic Maneuvering in Legal Argumentation: The Case of Insultingg. SSRN Electronic Journal
Kloosterhuis, Harm
2015. Institutional Constraints of Topical Strategic Maneuvering in Legal Argumentation. The Case of ‘Insulting’. In Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation [Law and Philosophy Library, 112], ► pp. 67 ff.
Macagno, Fabrizio
2013. Strategies of Character Attack. Argumentation 27:4 ► pp. 369 ff.
Macagno, Fabrizio
2014. Manipulating Emotions: Value-Based Reasoning and Emotive Language. Argumentation and Advocacy 51:2 ► pp. 103 ff.
Poggi, Isabella, Francesca D’Errico, Laura Vincze & Alessandro Vinciarelli
2013. Introduction. In Multimodal Communication in Political Speech. Shaping Minds and Social Action [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7688], ► pp. 1 ff.
Popa, Eugen
2013. Review of Suzuki, Kato, Kubota & Murai (2012): Proceedings of the 4th Tokyo Conference on Argumentation. Journal of Argumentation in Context 2:3 ► pp. 346 ff.
Rocci, Andrea & Marta Zampa
2013. Peter A. Cramer: Controversy as News Discourse. Argumentation 27:3 ► pp. 327 ff.
Rubinelli, Sara
2013. Argumentation as Rational Persuasion in Doctor-Patient Communication. Philosophy & Rhetoric 46:4 ► pp. 550 ff.
Rubinelli, Sara
2018. Logos and pathos in Aristotle’s Rhetoric . A journey into the role of emotions in rational persuasion in rhetoric. Revue internationale de philosophie n° 286:4 ► pp. 361 ff.
Tseronis, Assimakis
2013. Review of Fairclough & Fairclough (2012): Political discourse analysis. A method for advanced students. Journal of Argumentation in Context 2:2 ► pp. 269 ff.
Tseronis, Assimakis
2017. Chapter 18. Analysing multimodal argumentation within the pragma-dialectical framework. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 335 ff.
Tseronis, Assimakis
2018. Multimodal argumentation: Beyond the verbal/visual divide. Semiotica 2018:220 ► pp. 41 ff.
Tseronis, Assimakis
2021. How Face Threatening Are Disagreement Moves? A Proposal for an Integration of Insights from Politeness Theory into Argumentation Theory. In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36], ► pp. 167 ff.
Tseronis, Assimakis
2022. Use and abuse of the strategic function ofin factandfranklywhen qualifying a standpoint. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 473 ff.
van den Hoven, Paul & Ying Yang
2013. The Argumentative Reconstruction of Multimodal Discourse, Taking the ABC Coverage of President Hu Jintao’s Visit to the USA as an Example. Argumentation 27:4 ► pp. 403 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen
2013. Viewing the Study of Argumentation as Normative Pragmatics. In Perspectives on Pragmatics and Philosophy [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 1], ► pp. 515 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen
2014. Argumentation by Analogy in Stereotypical Argumentative Patterns. In Systematic Approaches to Argument by Analogy [Argumentation Library, 25], ► pp. 41 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen
2015. Exploiting the Room for Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse Dealing with Audience Demand in the European Parliament. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 861 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen
2015. Viewing the Study of Argumentation as Normative Pragmatics. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 275 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen
2015. Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse with the Help of Speech Act Conditions. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 469 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen
2016. Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse with the Help of Speech Act Conditions. In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 4], ► pp. 447 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen
2019. Chapter 17. And then you are left holding the baby!. In Argumentation in Actual Practice [Argumentation in Context, 17], ► pp. 321 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen
2020. A Variety of Contributions to Argumentation Theory. In From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild [Argumentation Library, 35], ► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen
2023. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach to the Fallacies Revisited. Argumentation 37:2 ► pp. 167 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2013. Research in Related Disciplines and Non-Anglophone Areas. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2013. Argumentation Theory. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2013. Formal Dialectical Approaches. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2013. The Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2013. The New Rhetoric. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2013. Postclassical Backgrounds. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2014. The Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 517 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2014. Argumentation Theory. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2014. Formal Dialectical Approaches. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 301 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2014. Research in Related Disciplines and Non-Anglophone Areas. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 677 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2014. Postclassical Backgrounds. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 141 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2014. The New Rhetoric. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 257 ff.
Walton, Douglas & Giovanni Sartor
2013. Teleological Justification of Argumentation Schemes. Argumentation 27:2 ► pp. 111 ff.
Zenker, Frank
2013. What Do Normative Approaches to Argumentation Stand to Gain from Rhetorical Insights?. Philosophy & Rhetoric 46:4 ► pp. 415 ff.
Andone, Corina
2012. Review of Peters (2012): Argument and innovation. Theoretical and empirical explorations in knowledge claim evaluation. Journal of Argumentation in Context 1:3 ► pp. 387 ff.
Andone, Corina
2015. The burden of proof in dealing with political accountability. In Persuasive Games in Political and Professional Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 26], ► pp. 19 ff.
Andone, Corina
2015. Pragmatic Argumentation in European Practices of Political Accountability. Argumentation 29:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Andone, Corina
2016. Argumentative Patterns in the Political Domain: The Case of European Parliamentary Committees of Inquiry. Argumentation 30:1 ► pp. 45 ff.
Andone, Corina
2016. Delimiting the burden of proof in political interviews. Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:1 ► pp. 74 ff.
Andone, Corina
2017. Chapter 14. Delimiting the burden of proof in political interviews. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 255 ff.
Andone, Corina
2017. Chapter 4. The role of pragmatic and majority argumentation in reports of European parliamentary committees of inquiry. In Prototypical Argumentative Patterns [Argumentation in Context, 11], ► pp. 53 ff.
Andone, Corina
2022. Crisis Response Strategies in Political Interviews: A European Union Perspective. In Adversarial Political Interviewing, ► pp. 193 ff.
Greco Morasso, Sara
2012. Review of van Eemeren (2009): Examining argumentation in context: Fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering. Journal of Argumentation in Context 1:3 ► pp. 379 ff.
Morasso, Sara Greco
2012. Contextual frames and their argumentative implications: A case study in media argumentation. Discourse Studies 14:2 ► pp. 197 ff.
Labrie, Nanon
2012. Strategic Maneuvering in Treatment Decision-Making Discussions: Two Cases in Point. Argumentation 26:2 ► pp. 171 ff.
Labrie, Nanon
Mercier, Hugo
2012. Looking for Arguments. Argumentation 26:3 ► pp. 305 ff.
Nettel, Ana Laura & Georges Roque
2012. Introduction. Argumentation 26:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Roque, Georges
2012. Visual Argumentation: A Further Reappraisal. In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 22], ► pp. 273 ff.
Roque, Georges
2017. Chapter 1. Rhetoric, argumentation, and persuasion in a multimodal perspective. In Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres [Argumentation in Context, 14], ► pp. 26 ff.
Spranzi, Marta
2012. The Nature and Purpose of Aristotelian Dialectic Revisited: Argumentation Theory, Scientific Controversies and Epistemology. In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 22], ► pp. 163 ff.
van den Hoven, Paul
2012. The Narrator and the Interpreter in Visual and Verbal Argumentation. In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 22], ► pp. 257 ff.
van den Hoven, Paul
2012. E. Feteris, B. Garssen and F. Snoeck Henkemans (eds): Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics. In Honor of Frans H. van Eemeren. Argumentation 26:3 ► pp. 409 ff.
van den Hoven, Paul
2017. Narratives and Pragmatic Arguments: Ivens’ The 400 Million. In Narration as Argument [Argumentation Library, 31], ► pp. 103 ff.
van den Hoven, Paul
2018. Discussing discourse modalities in argument theory: Reconsidering a paradigm
. Semiotica 2018:220 ► pp. 19 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels
2012. Effectiveness Through Reasonableness Preliminary Steps to Pragma-Dialectical Effectiveness Research. Argumentation 26:1 ► pp. 33 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels
2012. The Extended Pragma-Dialectical Argumentation Theory Empirically Interpreted. In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 22], ► pp. 323 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels
2012. The disguisedabusive ad hominemempirically investigated: Strategic manoeuvring with direct personal attacks. Thinking & Reasoning 18:3 ► pp. 344 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels
2015. Effectiveness Through Reasonableness: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 773 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels
2015. The Disguised ad baculum Fallacy Empirically Investigated. Strategic Maneuvering with Threats. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 815 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels
2015. The Disguised abusive ad hominem Empirically Investigated: Strategic Maneuvering with Direct Personal Attacks. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 795 ff.
Zarefsky, David
2012. A Challenge and an Opportunity for Argumentation Studies. Argumentation and Advocacy 48:3 ► pp. 175 ff.
Zarefsky, David
2014. Pragma-Dialectical Analysis of Rhetorical Texts: The Case of Barack Obama in Cairo with Dima Mohammed. In Rhetorical Perspectives on Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 24], ► pp. 253 ff.
Zarefsky, David
2019. The Practice of Argumentation,
Arcidiacono, Francesco & Antonio Bova
2011. Argumentative strategies for conflict management and resolution in Italian and Swiss families. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 30 ► pp. 1385 ff.
Fairclough, Isabela & Norman Fairclough
2011. Practical reasoning in political discourse: The UK government’s response to the economic crisis in the 2008 Pre-Budget Report. Discourse & Society 22:3 ► pp. 243 ff.
Krabbe, Erik C. W. & Jan Albert van Laar
2011. The Ways of Criticism. Argumentation 25:2 ► pp. 199 ff.
Wagemans, Jean H. M.
2011. The Assessment of Argumentation from Expert Opinion. Argumentation 25:3 ► pp. 329 ff.
Lewiński, Marcin
2010. Collective Argumentative Criticism in Informal Online Discussion Forums. Argumentation and Advocacy 47:2 ► pp. 86 ff.
Lewiński, Marcin
2011. Towards a Critique-Friendly Approach to the Straw Man Fallacy Evaluation. Argumentation 25:4 ► pp. 469 ff.
Lewiński, Marcin
2015. Debating multiple positions in multi-party online deliberation. In Argumentation in Political Deliberation [Benjamins Current Topics, 76], ► pp. 151 ff.
Lewiński, Marcin
2016. Shale gas debate in Europe: Pro-and-con dialectics and argumentative polylogues. Discourse & Communication 10:6 ► pp. 553 ff.
Plug, H José
2010. Institutional Boundaries on the Evaluation of Argumentation in Legislative Discussions. Legisprudence 4:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
Plug, H. José
2017. Chapter 13. Attacks on the cartoonist’s strategic manoeuvring. In Argumentation across Communities of Practice [Argumentation in Context, 10], ► pp. 217 ff.
Plug, H. José
Rubinelli, Sara, Peter J. Schulz & Uwe Hartung
2010. “Your risk is low, because …”: argument-driven online genetic counselling. Argument & Computation 1:3 ► pp. 199 ff.
Kienpointner, Manfred
Kienpointner, Manfred
Kienpointner, Manfred
2012. When Figurative Analogies Fail: Fallacious Uses of Arguments from Analogy. In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 22], ► pp. 111 ff.
Kienpointner, Manfred
2017. Chapter 5. Reason and passion in political rhetoric. In Argumentation across Communities of Practice [Argumentation in Context, 10], ► pp. 99 ff.
Kienpointner, Manfred
2019. Kati Hannken-Illjes: Argumentation. Einführung in die Theorie und Analyse der Argumentation. Narr/Francke/Attempto: Tübingen, 2018, 193 pp. Argumentation 33:1 ► pp. 147 ff.
Kienpointner, Manfred
2021. The pen is mightier than the sword. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9:2 ► pp. 215 ff.
Kienpointner, Manfred
2021. Review of van Eemeren (2018): Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:2 ► pp. 262 ff.
Kienpointner, Manfred
Kienpointner, Manfred
Kienpointner, Manfred
2023. Introduction. Discourse Studies 25:4 ► pp. 465 ff.
Kienpointner, Manfred
2023. Review of van Eemeren, Garssen, Greco, van Haaften, Labrie, Leal & Wu (2022): Argumentative Style. Journal of Argumentation in Context 12:2 ► pp. 243 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2015. R. In The Concise Encyclopedia of Communication, ► pp. 517 ff.
[no author supplied]
2015. Introduction. In Argumentation in Political Deliberation [Benjamins Current Topics, 76], ► pp. 1 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2021. Bibliographie. In L'argumentation dans le discours, ► pp. 309 ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Fundamentals of Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 13 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Communication Studies
Main BIC Subject
CFG: Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
Main BISAC Subject
LAN015000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Rhetoric