Angle, P.M
ed. (1958) Created equal? The complete Lincoln-Douglas debates of 1858. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bestor, A
(1964) The American Civil War as a Constitutional crisis. American historical review, 69:327–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brest, P
(1980) The misconceived quest for the original understanding. Boston University law review, 60:204–238.Google Scholar
Burke, K
(1945/1969) A grammar of motives. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Carey, R.M
(1964) The first campaigner: Stephen A. Douglas. New York: Vantage.Google Scholar
Chemerinsky, E
(1987) Interpreting the Constitution. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Commager, H.S
(1938) Documents of American history (2 vols.). New York: F.S. Crofts.Google Scholar
Eisenhower, D.D
(1957a) Obstruction of justice in the state of Arkansas. Federal register, 1957, p. 7628.Google Scholar
(1957b) Radio and television address to the American people on the situation in Little Rock. Public papers of the Presidents: Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1957 (pp. 689–694). Washington: National Archives and Records Service.Google Scholar
The Federalist
Multiple editions exist.
Fehrenbacher, D.E
(1978) The Dred Scott case: Its significance in American law and politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freehling, W.W
(1965) Prelude to civil war: The nullification crisis in South Carolina, 1816–1836. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Gallie, W.B
(1964) Philosophy and the historical understanding. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
Howe, D.W
(1979) The political culture of the American Whigs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jasinski, J
(1986a) The anti-federal vision of America in the Constitutional debate of 1787–1788. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication Association.
(1986b) Rhetorical practice and its visions of the public in the ratification debate of 1787–1788. Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Kammen, M
(1986) A machine that would go of itself: The Constitution in American culture. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Kekes, J
(1977) Essentially contested concepts: A reconsideration. Philosophy & rhetoric, 10:71–89. Spring.Google Scholar
Levinson, S
(1982) Law as literature. Texas Law Review, 60:373–404.Google Scholar
(1988) Constitutional faith. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, J.C
(1960) The federalist era. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Reed, T.B
ed. (1903) Modern eloquence(15 vols.). Philadelphia: John D. Morris.Google Scholar
Reid, H.O
(1956) The Supreme Court decision and interposition. Journal of Negro education, 25:109–117. Summer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sapir, E
(1934) Symbolism. In Encyclopedia of the social sciences (E.R.A. Seligman, Ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Scott, J.A
ed. (1963) Living documents in American history. New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
Storing, H.J
(1981) What the anti-federalists were for. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weisburg, R
(1986) Text into theory: A literary approach to the Constitution. Georgia law review, 20:939–994.Google Scholar
White, J.B
(1984) When words lose their meaning: Constitutions and reconstitutions of language, character, and community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wrage, E.J. & Baskerville, B
ed. (1962) American forum: Speeches on historic issues, 1788–1900. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar