The Administration’s Middle East Proposal
(1957) Congressional Record, February 11, p. 1856.Google Scholar
Barber, H.W
(1957) The United States in world affairs, 1955. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Bell, C
(1962) Negotiating from strength: A study in the politics of power. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Burke, K
(1937/1961) Attitudes toward history. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Correspondence with the Soviet Union on atomic pool proposal
(1954) Department of State bulletin, 31:478–489.Google Scholar
Creps, E.G
(1980) The conspiracy argument as rhetorical genre. Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
deRivera, J.H
(1968) The psychological dimension of foreign policy. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.Google Scholar
Donovan, R.J
(1956) Eisenhower: The inside story, New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Dulles, J.F
(1953a) Assessment of Soviet gestures. Department of State bulletin, 28:524.Google Scholar
(1953b). The first 90 days. Department of State bulletin, 28:607.Google Scholar
(1953c) Statement by Secretary Dulles. Department of State bulletin, 28:607.Google Scholar
(1953d) Areas for deeds, not words. Department of State bulletin, 28:706.Google Scholar
(1953e) Morals and power. Department of State bulletin, 28:896.Google Scholar
(1953f) The importance of the mutual security program to our national security. Department of State bulletin, 29:92.Google Scholar
(1953g) A test of Soviet good faith. Department of State bulletin, 29:353.Google Scholar
(1953h) Easing international tensions: The role of the U.N. Department of State bulletin,29:405.Google Scholar
(1953i) Soviet note a victory for Western diplomacy. Department of State bulletin, 29:814.Google Scholar
(1954a) The issues at Geneva. Department of State bulletin, 30:744.Google Scholar
(1954b) The goal of our foreign policy. Department of State bulletin, 31:890.Google Scholar
(1954c) Anniversary of “Atoms for Peace” proposal. Department of State bulletin, 31:975.Google Scholar
(1955a) The peace we seek. Department of State bulletin, 32:123.Google Scholar
(1955b) An historic week. Department of State bulletin, 32:875.Google Scholar
(1955c) Cumulative effects of the mutual security program. Department of State bulletin, 32:914.Google Scholar
(1955d) Entering the second decade. Department of State bulletin, 33:527.Google Scholar
(1956) Transcript of Secretary Dulles’ news conference [January 11, 1956]. Department of state bulletin, 34:123.Google Scholar
Eisenhower, D.D
(1960a) The chance for peace. Public papers of the Presidents: Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1953 (p. 184). Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
(1960b) Address to the United Nations General Assembly. Public papers of the Presidents: Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1960(pp. 813–822). Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Falkowski, L.S
(1979) Predicting flexibility with memory profiles. In Psychological models in international politics (L.S. Falkowski, ed.), pp. 49–69. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Fogelin, R.J
(1982) Understanding arguments: An introduction to informal logic, 2nd ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Goodnight, G.T. & Poulakos, J
(1981) Conspiracy rhetoric: From pragmatism to fantasy in public discourse. Western journal of speech communication, 45:299–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harsch, J.C
(1956) John Foster Dulles: A very complicated man. Harper’s, 213:31. September.Google Scholar
Heller, D. & Heller, D
(1960) John Foster Dulles: Soldier for peace. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Holsti, O.R
(1962) The belief system and national images: A case study. Journal of conflict resolution, 6:244–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1970) The “operational code” approach to the study of political leaders: John Foster Dulles’ philosophical and instrumental beliefs. Canadian journal of political science, 3:123–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jervis, R
(1976) Perception and misperception in international politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, E.E. & Davis, K
(1965) From acts to dispositions. In Advances in experimental social psychology (L. Berkowitz, Ed.), 2:220–266. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jones, E.E. & Goethals, G.R
(1972) Order effects in impression formation: Attribution context and the nature of the entity. In Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (E.E. Jones, D.E. Kanouse, H.H. Kelley, R.E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner, ed.), pp. 27–46. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
Kane, T
(1968) The missionary theme in the rhetoric of John Foster Dulles. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Leopold, R.W
(1962) The growth of American foreign policy: A history. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, H.J
(1961) John Foster Dulles. In An uncertain tradition: American Secretaries of State in the twentieth century (N.A. Graebner, ed.), pp. 289–308. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Reagan, R
(1983) Partial text of Reagan’s State of the Union address. Chicago Tribune, sec. 1, p. 13.Google Scholar
Roper, E
(1957) You and your leaders: Their actions and your reactions, 1936–1956. New York:Morrow.Google Scholar
Ross, L
(1977) The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In Advances in experimental social psychology (L. Berkowitz, ed.), 10:Google Scholar
Shepley, J
(1956) How Dulles averted war. Life, Jamuary 16, pp. 70–72ff.Google Scholar
Stebbins, R.P
(1956) The United States in world affairs, 1954. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Stebbins, R.P. & McClellan, G.S
(1955) The United States in world affairs, 1953. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
U.S. Views on Soviet disarmament proposal
(1954) Department of State bulletin, 31:619–626.Google Scholar
Wadsworth, J.J
(1955) U.S. views on latest Soviet disarmament proposals. Department of State bulletin, 32:900.Google Scholar
Yurechko, J.J
(1980) The day Stalin died: American plans for exploiting the Soviet succession crisis of 1953. Journal of strategic studies, 3:67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar