This paper describes extensions of pragma-dialectical theory for analysing learning processes in students’ argumentation dialogues. It is argued that although pragma-dialectics is the most appropriate theory in this context, it needs to be ‘psychologised’ by the consideration of additional discursive, dialogical, epistemological, interpersonal and affective dimensions of dialogue. In conclusion, prospects for new rapprochement between argumentation theory and psychology are discussed.
2019. Knowing, Remembering, and Relating to Others Online: A Commentary. Topics in Cognitive Science 11:4 ► pp. 825 ff.
Baker, Michael J., Françoise Détienne & Flore Barcellini
2017. Argumentation and Conflict Management in Online Epistemic Communities: A Narrative Approach to Wikipedia Debates. In Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts, ► pp. 141 ff.
2018. Frans H. van Eemeren and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans: Argumentation: Analysis and Evaluation. Argumentation 32:1 ► pp. 151 ff.
ISMAIL, THAMARASSERI & K. A. SHEJEENA
2022. EFFECTIVENESS OF SCAFFOLDED VEE DIAGRAM, AN INSTRUCTIONAL
STRATEGY FOR SCIENCE STUDENTS AT SECONDARY LEVEL. i-manager's Journal of Educational Technology 18:3 ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.