Cover not available
Article published In:
Applied Pragmatics
Vol. 1:1 (2019) ► pp.46–67

Chinese L2 users as active social agents: Sentence final particles variation and identities

 | The University of Arizona
This study investigated the sociolinguistic pragmatic performance of eight advanced Chinese learners from a variationist sociolinguistic perspective, focusing on the variable appearance versus absence of Mandarin sentence final particles (SFPs) in non-interrogative sentences. These learners participated in a Chinese TV talk show and have become popular on social media platforms. The speech data from the talk show (400 tokens) and online data from Chinese social media platform Weibo (400 tokens) were collected and analyzed. These Chinese L2 users productively demonstrated variation in their use of SFPs in non-interrogative sentences, in that they added SFPs to a sentence in around 20% of variable contexts. Rbrul (logistic regression) analyses revealed that the variable presence of SFPs was conditioned by their duration of time spent in China and gender-related personalities. Follow-up case analyses explored how they made use of SFPs in different situations and how they were received by other participants. The study found that these Chinese L2 users became active social agents who made decisions to shift styles in different contexts or to strengthen their identities. The results are discussed within a broader context of identity, language socialization, and L2 social agency. This study also attempts to offer pedagogical implications for the acquisition of Chinese SFPs.
Keywords: variationist sociolinguistics, L2 variation, Chinese sentence final particles, L2 pragmatics, identity
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Previous research on SFPs and acquisition of SFPs
    • 2.2Expanding second language socialization
    • 2.3Sociopragmatic competence and variationist sociolinguistics
  • 3.Methods
    • 3.1Informal talks
    • 3.2 Weibo.com
    • 3.3Data collection
    • 3.4Statistical and qualitative procedures
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Quantitative findings
    • 4.2Qualitative analysis
      • 4.2.1Madam Qian
      • 4.2.2Daddy Mu
      • 4.2.3Summary of findings
  • 5.Discussion and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 20 May 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.00003.han
References (43)
References
Adamson, H. D. (1980). A study of variable syntactic rules in the interlangauge of Spanish-speaking adults. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
(1988). Variation theory and second language acquisition. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
(2009). Interlanguage variation in theoretical and pedagogical perspective. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barron, A. (2005). Variational pragmatics in the foreign language classroom. System, 331, 519–536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Callier, P. (2007). Not so obvious: The sociolinguistic distribution of me in Mandarin Chinese. Poster presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 36, Philadelphia, PA.
Chan, M. (1997). Gender differences in the Chinese language: A preliminary report. In H. Lin (Ed.), Proceedings of the Ninth North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL9) (pp. 35–52). Los Angeles: GSIL Publications, University of California.Google Scholar
Chang, H. (2014). Gender difference in online language use. 学理论, 41, 183–184.Google Scholar
Chao, Y. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chuang, T. (2005). The power of cuteness: Female infantilization in urban Taiwan. The Stanford Journal of East Asian Affairs, 5(2), 21–28.Google Scholar
Clyne, M. (2006). Some thoughts on pragmatics, sociolinguistic variation, and intercultural communication. Intercultural Pragmatics, 31, 95–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diao, W. (2014). Peer socialization into gendered L2 Mandarin practices in a study abroad context: Talk in the dorm. Applied Linguistics, 37(5), 599–620. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dinella, L. M., Fulcher, M., & Weisgram, E. S. (2014). Sex-typed personality traits and gender identity as predictors of young adults’ career interests. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 431, 493–504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farris, C. S. (1994). A semiotic analysis of sajiao as a gender marked communication style in Chinese. In M. Jonson & F. Y. L. Chiu (Eds.), Unbound Taiwan: Closeups from a distance (pp. 1–29). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Godwin-Jones, R. (2018). Chasing the butterfly effect: Informal language learning online as a complex system. Language Learning & Technology, 22(2), 8–27.Google Scholar
Huebner, T. (1985). System and variability in interlanguage syntax. Language Learning, 35(2), 141–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, N. (2010). Style shifts among Japanese learners before and after study abroad in Japan: Becoming active social agents in Japanese. Applied Linguistics, 31(1), 45–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. E. (2009). Getting off the GoldVarb Standard: Introducing Rbrul for Mixed-Effects Variable Rule Analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 359–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kinginger, C. (2013). Identity and language learning in study abroad. Foreign Language Annals, 46(3), 339–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koike, D. A., & Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2012). Pragmatic variation in first and second language contexts: Methodological issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lam, W. S. E. (2004). Second language socialization in a bilingual chat room: Global and local considerations. Language Learning & Technology, 81, 44–65.Google Scholar
(2009). Multiliteracies on instant messaging in negotiating local, translocal, and transnational affiliations: A case of an adolescent immigrant. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(4), 377–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Law, S. (1990). The syntax and phonology of Cantonese sentence-final particles (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Boston University, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Lee-Wong, S. M. (1998). Face support-Chinese particles as mitigators: A study of BA A/YA and NE. Pragmatics, 8(3), 387–404. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthews, S., & Virginia, Y. (1994). Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Maynard, S. (1989). Japanese conversation: Self-contextualization through structure and interactional management. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Mougeon, R., Nadasdi, T., & Rehner, K. (2010). The sociolinguistic competence of immersion students. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perry, D. G., & Pauletti, R. E. (2011). Gender and adolescent development. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 211, 61–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shei, C. (2014). Understanding the Chinese language: A comprehensive linguistic introduction. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spence, J. T. (1993). Gender-related traits and gender ideology: Evidence for a multifactorial theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 641, 624–635. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spence, J. T., & Buckner, C. E. (2000). Instrumental and expressive traits, trait stereotypes, and sexist attitudes: What do they signify? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 241, 44–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sun, C. (2006). Chinese: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. A. (2006). Analysing sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2016). Learning speech style in Japanese study abroad: Learners’ knowledge of normative use and actual use. In R. A. van Compernolle & J. McGregor (Eds.), Authenticity, language and interaction in second language contexts (pp. 83–108). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N., Zhang, H., & Li, Q. (2017). Pragmatic competence of heritage learners of Chinese and its relationship to social contact. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 6(1), 7–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E. (1988). Variation in interlanguage. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Terkourafi, M. (2012). Between pragmatics and sociolinguistics: Where does pragmatic variation fit in? In C. Felix-Brasdefer & D. Koike (Eds.), Pragmatic variation in first and second language contexts: Methodological issues (pp. 295–318). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Compernolle, R. A., & Williams, L. (2011). Metalinguistic explanations and self-reports as triangulation data for interpreting second language sociolinguistic performance. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 26–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Reconceptualizing sociolinguistic competence as mediated action: Identity, meaning-making, agency. Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 234–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Compernolle, R. A., Williams, L., & McCourt, C. (2011). A corpus-driven study of second-person pronoun variation in L2 French synchronous computer-mediated communication. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8(1), 67–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, C. (2013). Acquisition of three Chinese sentence-final particles by English learners. 華語文教學研究, 10(1), 61–88.Google Scholar
Zheng, L., Lippa, R. A., & Zheng, Y. (2011). Sex and sexual orientation differences in personality in China. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 401, 533–541. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Liu, Chang
2023. A critical understanding of second language acquisition from two sociolinguistic strands: The Variationist approach and the Investment Perspective. Journal of Language Teaching 3:3 ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Diao, Wenhao & Chen Chen
2022. L2 use of pragmatic markers in peer talk: Mandarin utterance-final particles. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60:4 ► pp. 1293 ff. DOI logo
Ren, Wei
2022. Effects of proficiency and gender on learners’ use of the pragmatic marker 吧ba. Lingua 277 ► pp. 103405 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.