Cover not available
Article published In:
Trends in Second Language Pragmatics Research Part I:
[Applied Pragmatics 4:2] 2022
► pp. 178–198

Corpus linguistics in L2 pragmatics research

ORCID logo | University of Arizona
In second language acquisition, corpus linguistics (CL) enjoys prominence as a methodology valuable for its descriptive power in the textual analysis of patterns. Within second language (L2) pragmatics, CL has been increasingly influential in shaping our understanding of learners’ pragmatic capacities and articulating new insights and possibilities. In this narrative review, I take a broad view of corpora in L2 pragmatics research with a focus on automatization, size, representativeness, temporal design, and annotation. This is followed by a review of representative research highlighting language proficiency, prosodic pragmatics, pragmatic particles and oral fluency, and pragmatics pedagogy. I conclude with future directions where the discussion centers on bringing CL and other methodologies together for pragmatic analysis and extending the use of these methodologies to more L2 pragmatic learning contexts.
Keywords: learner corpus research, corpus linguistics, pragmatic annotation, prosodic pragmatics, pragmatic markers, speech acts
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The use of corpora in L2 pragmatics research
  • 3.Review of representative research in learner corpus pragmatics
    • 3.1Comparison of L1 and L2 pragmatic performance
    • 3.2Language proficiency
    • 3.3Prosodic pragmatics
    • 3.4Pragmatic particles and spoken fluency
    • 3.5Pragmatics instruction
  • 4.Future directions
    • 4.1Combination of corpus linguistics with other methodologies for pragmatic analysis
    • 4.2Extension of contexts for L2 pragmatic learning
  • 5.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 13 April 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.00008.fer
References (86)
References
Aijmer, K. (1996). Conversational routines in English: Convention and creativity. Studies in language and linguistics. Longman.Google Scholar
(2002). Modality in advanced Swedish learners’ written interlanguage. In S. Granger, J. Hung, & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching (pp. 55–76). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Well I’m not sure I think… The use of well by non-native speakers. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16 (2), 231–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). General extenders in learner language. In N. Groom, M. Charles, & S. John (Eds.), Corpora, grammar and discourse. In honour of Susan Hunston (pp. 211–233). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersen, G. (2018). Corpus construction. In A. H. Jucker, K. P. Schneider, & W. Bublitz (Eds.), Methods in pragmatics (pp. 467–494). De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anthony, L., & Baker, P. (2015). ProtAnt: A tool for analyzing the prototypicality of texts. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20 (3), 273–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Archer, D., & Culpeper, J. (2018). Pragmatic annotation. In A. H. Jucker, K. P. Schneider & W. Bublitz (Eds.), Methods in Pragmatics (pp. 493–525). De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2019). Formulaic language in second language pragmatics research. In A. Siyanova-Chanturia & A. Pellicer-Sanchez (Eds.), Understanding formulaic language. A second language acquisition perspective (pp. 97–114). Routledge.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bastos, M. T. (2011). Proficiency, length of stay, and intensity of interaction and the acquisition of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8 (3), 347–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., Mossman, S., & Su, Y. (2017). The effect of corpus-based instruction on pragmatic routines. Language Learning & Technology, 21 (3), 76–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barron, A. (2019). Using corpus-linguistics methods to track longitudinal development: Routine apologies in the study abroad context. Journal of Pragmatics, 146 1, 87–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belz, J. A., & Vyatkina, N. (2005). Learner corpus analysis and the development of L2 pragmatic competence in networked intercultural language study: The case of German modal particles. Canadian Modern Language Review, 62 (1), 17–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). The pedagogical mediation of a developmental learner corpus for classroom-based language instruction. Language Learning and Technology, 12 (3), 33–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus Linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buysse, L. (2014). ‘We went to the restroom or something’ General extenders and stuff in the speech of Dutch learners of English. In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), The yearbook of corpus linguistics and pragmatics 2014: New empirical and theoretical paradigms (pp. 213–237). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, H.-I. (2010). Contrastive learner corpus analysis of epistemic modality and interlanguage pragmatic competence in L2 writing. Arizona Working Papers in Second Language Acquisition and Teaching, 17 1, 27–51.Google Scholar
Clancy, B., & O’Keeffe, A. (2015). Chapter 13. Pragmatics. In D. Biber, & R. Reppen (Eds.). The Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics (pp. 235–251). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conrad, S. (2005). Corpus linguistics and L2 teaching. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 393–410). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J., Mackey, A., & Taguchi, N. (2018). Second language pragmatics. From theory to research. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Czerwionka, L., & Olson, D. J. (2020). Pragmatic development during study abroad. L2 intensifiers in spoken Spanish. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 6 (2), 125–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cock, S. (2004). Preferred sequences of words in NS and NNS speech. Belgian Journal of English Language and Literatures (BELL) New Series 2, 225–246. [URL]
De Felice, R., & Deane, P. (2012). Identifying speech acts in e-mails: Toward automated scoring of the TOEIC® E-Mail Task. ETS research report no. RR-12-16. Educational Testing Service. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J. W., Chafe, W., Meyer, C., Thompson, S. A., Englebretson, R., & Martey, N. (2000–2005). Santa Barbara corpus of spoken American English (1–4). Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Fernández, J. (2013). A corpus-based study of vague language use by learners of Spanish in a study abroad context. In C. Kinginger (Ed.), Social and cultural aspects of language learning in study abroad (pp. 299–332). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández, J., & Davis, T. (2021). Overview of available learner corpora. In N. Tracy-Ventura & M. Paquot (Eds.), Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and corpora (pp. 147–159). Routledge.Google Scholar
Fernández, J., & Staples, S. (2021). Pragmatic approaches. In N. Tracy-Ventura & M. Paquot (Eds.), Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and corpora (pp. 242–253). Routledge.Google Scholar
Fernández, J., & Yuldashev, A. (2011). Variation in the use of general extenders and stuff in instant messaging interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 23(10), 2610–2626. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Using a corpus-informed pedagogical intervention to develop language awareness toward appropriate lexicogrammatical choices. L2 Journal, 7 (4), 91–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández, J., Gates Tapia, A., & Lu, X. (2014). Oral proficiency and pragmatic marker use in L2 spoken Spanish: The case of pues and bueno. Journal of Pragmatics, 74 1, 150–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fung, L., & Carter, R. (2007). Discourse markers and spoken English: Native and learner use in pedagogic settings. Applied Linguistics, 28 (3), 410–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gablasova, D. & Brezina, V. (2015). Does speaker role affect the choice of epistemic adverbials in L2 speech? Evidence from the Trinity Lancaster Corpus. In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), Yearbook of corpus linguistics and pragmatics 2015 (pp. 117–136). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gablasova, D., & Brezina, V. (2018). Disagreement in L2 spoken English: From learner corpus research to corpus-based teaching materials. In V. Brezina & L. Flowerdew (Eds.), Learner corpus research: New perspectives and applications (pp. 69–89). Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., Mcenery, T., Boyd, E. (2017). Epistemic stance in spoken L2 English: The effect of task and speaker style. Applied Linguistics, 38 (5), 613–637. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G. (2008). Hesitation markers among EFL learners: Pragmatic deficiency or difference? In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), Corpus and pragmatics. A Mutualistic entente (pp. 119–149). De Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2015). From design to collection of learner corpora. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research (pp. 9–34). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G., & Gries, S. Th. (2009). Corpora and experimental methods: A state-of-the-art review. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5 (1), 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G., De Cock, S. & Granger, S. (2010). Louvain international database of spoken English interlanguage. Handbook and CD-ROM. Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Gilquin, G., Granger, S. & Paquot, M. (2007). Learner corpora: The missing link in EAP pedagogy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6 (4), 319–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Götz, S., & Mukherjee, J. (2017). Investigating the effect of the study abroad variable on learner output: A pseudo-longitudinal study on spoken German learner English. In A. McEnery, D. Gablasova, V. Brezina, & L. Flowerdew (Eds.), Learner corpus research: New perspectives and applications (pp. 47–65). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Granger, S. (2008). Learner corpora. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook (pp. 259–275). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2017). Learner corpora in foreign language education. In S. Thorne, & S. May (Eds.), Language, education and technology. Encyclopedia of language and education (3rd ed., pp. 427–440). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, M., Baumann, S., & Benzmüller, R. (2005). German intonation in autosegmental-metrical phonology. In S.-A. Jun (Ed.), Prosodic typology. The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 55–83). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gut, U. (2009). Non-native speech: A corpus-based analysis of phonological and phonetic properties of L2 English and German. Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasselgren, A. (1994). Lexical teddy bears and advanced learners: A study into the ways Norwegian students cope with English vocabulary. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4 (2), 237–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002). Learner corpora and language testing: Smallwords as markers of learner fluency. In S. Granger, J. Hung, & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (pp. 143–173). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hellermann, J., & Vergun, A. (2007). Language which is not taught: The discourse marker use of beginning adult learners of English. Journal of Pragmatics, 39 (1), 157–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K. & Tse, P. (2005). Hooking the reader: A corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts. English for Specific Purposes, 24 (2), 123–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7 (2), 173–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ishikawa, S. (2013). The ICNALE and sophisticated contrastive interlanguage analysis of Asian Learners of English. In S. Ishikawa (Ed.), Learner corpus studies in Asia and the world, 1 1 (pp. 91–118). Kobe University.Google Scholar
Jucker, A. H., Schneider, G., Taavitsainen, I., & Breustedt, B. (2008). Fishing for compliments: Precision and recall in corpus linguistic compliment research. In A. H. Jucker & I. Taavitsainen (Eds.), Speech acts in the history of English (pp. 273–294). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, A. H., Schreier, D., & Hundt, M. (Eds.) (2009). Corpora: Pragmatics and discourse. Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kang, O. & Kermad, A. (2019). Prosody in L2 pragmatics. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics (78–92). Routledge.Google Scholar
Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Lee, J. J., & Deakin, L. (2016). Interactions in L1 and L2 undergraduate student writing: Interactional metadiscourse in successful and less-successful argumentative essays. Journal of Second Language Writing, 33 1, 21–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levon, E. (2016). Qualitative analysis of stance. In P. Baker, & J. Egbert (Eds.), Triangulating methodological approaches in corpus linguistics research (pp. 152–166). Routledge.Google Scholar
Lin, Y. L. (2017). Co-occurrence of speech and gestures: A multimodal corpus linguistic approach to intercultural interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 117 1, 155–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maden-Weinberger, U. (2008). Modality as indicator of L2 proficiency? A corpus-based investigation into advanced German interlanguage. In M. Walter & P. Grommes (Eds.), Fortgeschrittene Lernervarietäten: Korpuslinguistik und Zweitspracherwerbsforschung (pp. 141–64). Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Milà-Garcia, A. (2018). Pragmatic annotation for a multi-layered analysis of speech acts: A methodological proposal. Corpus Pragmatics, 2 1, 265–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paquot, M., & Plonsky, L. (2017). Quantitative research methods and study quality in learner corpus research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 3 (1), 61–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J., & Hirschberg, J. (1990). The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan, & M. E. Pollack (Eds.), Intentions in communication (271–311). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Polat, B. (2011). Investigating acquisition of discourse markers through a developmental learner corpus. Journal of Pragmatics, 43 (15), 3745–3756. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramírez-Verdugo, M. D. (2008). A cross-linguistic study on the pragmatics of intonation in directives. In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), Pragmatics and corpus linguistics: A mutualistic entente (205–233). De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, J. (2010). Directives in office hour consultations: A corpus-informed investigation of learner and expert usage. English for Specific Purposes, 29 (2), 94–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romero-Trillo, J. (2019). Prosodic pragmatics and feedback in intercultural communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 151 1, 91–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosen, A. (2019). The use of smallwords in the speech of German learners of English. A corpus-based study of the factors of instruction and natural exposure. In S. Götz, & J. Mukherjee (Eds), Learner corpora and language teaching (pp. 219–241). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rühlemann, C. (2017). Integrating corpus-linguistic and conversation-analytic transcription in XML: The case of backchannels and overlap in storytelling interaction. Corpus Pragmatics, 1 1, 201–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rühlemann, C., & O’Donnell, M. B. (2012). Introducing a corpus of conversational stories. Construction and annotation of the Narrative Corpus . Corpus Linguistics and Linguistics Theory, 8 (2), 313–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shin, J.-Y., Velázquez, A. J., Swatek, A., Staples, S., & Partridge, R. S. (2018). Examining the effectiveness of corpus-informed instruction of reporting verbs in L2 first-year college writing. L2 Journal, 10 (3), 31–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Staples, S., & Fernández, J. (2019). Corpus linguistics approaches to L2 pragmatics research. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics (pp. 241–254). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svartvik, J., & Quirk, R. (1980). A corpus of English conversation. Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2013). Production of routines in L2 English: Effect of proficiency and study abroad experience. System, 41 (1), 109–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N., & Collentine, J. (2018). Language learning in a study-abroad context: Research agenda. Language Teaching, 51 (4), 553–566. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N., & Roever, C. (2017). Second language pragmatics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tracy-Ventura, N., Mitchell, R., & McManus, K. (2016). The LANGSNAP longitudinal learner corpus. In M. Alonso-Ramos (Ed.), Spanish learner corpus research: Current trends and future perspectives (pp. 117–142). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vaughan, E., & Clancy, B. (2013). Small corpora and pragmatics. In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), Yearbook of corpus linguistics and pragmatics 2013: New domains and methodologies (pp. 53–73). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vyatkina, N., & Cunningham, D. J. (2015). Learner corpora and pragmatics. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research (pp. 281–304). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walsh, S. (2013). Classroom discourse and teacher development. Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weisser, M. (2014). Speech act annotation. In K. Aijmer & C. Rühlemann (Eds.), Corpus pragmatics: A handbook (pp. 84–113). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). Speech acts in corpus pragmatics: Making the case for an extended taxonomy. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 25 (4), 400–426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yuldashev, A., Fernández, J., & Thorne, S. (2013). Second language learners’ contiguous and discontiguous multi-word unit use over time. Modern Language Journal, 97 (S1), 31–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Taguchi, Naoko
2023.  Collecting and Analyzing L2 Pragmatics Data . In Current Approaches in Second Language Acquisition Research, ► pp. 195 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.