Article published In:
Applied Pragmatics
Vol. 1:2 (2019) ► pp.119153
References
Berger, E., & Pekarek Doehler, S.
(2018) Tracking change over time in storytelling practices: A longitudinal study of second language talk-in-interaction. In S. Pekarek Doehler, J. Wagner, & E. González-Martínez (Eds.), Longitudinal studies on the organization of social interaction (pp. 67–102). London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolden, G.
(2009) Beyond answering: Repeat-prefaced responses in conversation. Communication Monographs, 76(2), 121–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burch, A. R.
(2014) Pursuing information: A conversation analytic perspective on communication strategies. Language Learning, 64(3), 651–684. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clancy, P., Thompson, S., Suzuki, R., & Tao, H.
(1996) The conversational use of reactive tokens in English, Japanese, and Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics, 261, 355–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, A., Schmitt, R., & Mondada, L.
(2010) Agenda and emergence: Contingent and planned activities in a meeting. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(6), 1700–1718. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dings, A.
(2014) Interactional competence and the development of alignment activity. The Modern Language Journal, 98(3), 742–756. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drummond, K., & Hopper, R.
(1993) Back channels revisited: Acknowledgment tokens and speakership incipiency. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26(2), 157–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W. and Theodórsdóttir, G.
(2017) Constructing L2 learning spaces: Ways to achieve learning inside and outside the classroom. Applied Linguistics, 38(2) 143–164.Google Scholar
Ford, C., & Thompson, S.
(1996) Interaction units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 134–184). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R.
(2001) When listeners talk: Response tokens and recipient stance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C.
(1984) Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 225–246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1986) Between and within: Alternative sequential treatments of continuers and assessments. Human Studies, 91, 205–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society, 181, 53–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018) Co-operative action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greer, T.
(2017) L1 speaker turn design and emergent familiarity in opening sequences of second language Japanese interaction. In T. Greer, M. Ishida, & Y. Tateyama (Eds.), Interactional competence in Japanese as an additional language (pp. 369–407). Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Hall, J. K.
(2018) From L2 interactional competence to L2 interactional repertoires: Reconceptualizing the objects of L2 learning. Classroom Discourse, 9(1), 25–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. K., & Pekarek Doehler, S.
(2011) L2 interactional competence and development. In J. K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp. 1–15). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayano, K.
(2013) Question design in conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 395–414). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hayashi, M.
(2003) Joint utterance construction in Japanese conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J.
(1984a) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social actions: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299–345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1984b) Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
(2002)  Oh-prefaced responses to assessments: A method of modifying agreement/ disagreement. In C. E. Ford, B. A. Fox, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp. 196–224). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ishida, M.
(2011) Engaging in another person’s telling as a recipient in L2 Japanese: Development of interactional competence during one-year study-abroad. In G. Pallotti & J. Wagner (Eds.), L2 learning as social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 45–85). Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
(2017) Developing recipient competence during study abroad. In T. Greer, M. Ishida, & Y. Tateyama (Eds.), Interactional competence in Japanese as an additional language (pp. 253–292). Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G.
(1984) On stepwise transition from talk about a trouble to inappropriately next-positioned matters. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversational analysis (pp. 191–222). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kasper, G.
(2006) Speech acts in interaction: Towards discursive pragmatics. In K. Bardovi-Harlig, J. C. Félix-Brasdefer, & A. S. Omar (Eds.), Pragmatics and language learning, 111 (pp. 281–314). Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Kasper, G., & Wagner, J.
(2014) Conversation analysis in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34(2), 171–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koschmann, T.
(2013) Conversation analysis and learning in interaction. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1038–1043). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lee, S.-H.
(2013) Response design in conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.) The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 415–432). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Levinson, S.
(2006) On the human ‘interaction engine’. In N. J. Enfield & S. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition, and interaction (pp. 39–69). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Mondada, L.
(2016) Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(3), 336–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nishizaka, A.
(2016) The use of demo-prefaced response displacement for being a listener to distressful experiences in Japanese interaction. Text & Talk, 36(6), 635–656. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, H. T.
(2012) Developing interactional competence: A conversation analytic study of patient consultations in pharmacy. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018) A longitudinal perspective on turn design: From role-plays to workplace patient consultations. In S. Pekarek Doehler, J. Wagner, & E. González-Martínez (Eds.), Longitudinal studies on the organization of social interaction (pp. 195–224). London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, S.
(2018) Elaborations on L2 interactional competence: The development of L2 grammar-for-interaction. Classroom Discourse, 9(1), 3–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, S., & Berger, E.
(2016) L2 interactional competence as increased ability for context-sensitive conduct: A longitudinal study of story-openings. Applied Linguistics, 39(4), 555–578.Google Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, S., & Pochon-Berger, E.
(2015) The development of L2 interactional competence: Evidence from turn-taking organization, sequence organization, repair organization and preference organization. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 233–267). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A.
(1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A., & Heritage, J.
(2013) Preference. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.) The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 210–228). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Prior, M.
(2018) Accomplishing “rapport” in qualitative research interviews: Empathic moments in interaction. Applied Linguistics Review, 9(4), 487–512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruusuvuori, J., & Peräkylä, A.
(2009) Facial and verbal expressions in assessing stories and topics. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42(4). 377–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 501, 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.
(1968) Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70(6), 1075–1095. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1982) Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of “uh huh” and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 71–93). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
(1993) Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26(1), 99–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998) Body torque. Social Research, 65(3), 535–596.Google Scholar
(2007) Sequence organization in interaction I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T.
(2008) Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(1), 31–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N.
(2014) Development of interactional competence in Japanese as a second language: Use of incomplete sentences as interactional resources. The Modern Language Journal, 98(2), 518–535.Google Scholar
Talmy, S.
(2009) Resisting ESL: Categories and sequence in a critically “motivated” analysis of classroom interaction. In H. T. Nguyen & G. Kasper (Eds.) Talk-in-interaction: Multilingual perspectives (pp. 181–213). Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Tanaka, H.
(1999) Turn-taking in Japanese conversation: A study in grammar and interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2000) The particle ne as a turn-management device in Japanese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 321, 1135–1176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Theodórsdóttir, G.
(2011) Second language interaction for business and learning. In J. K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp. 93–116). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018) L2 teaching in the wild: A closer look at correction and explanation practices in everyday L2 interaction. The Modern Language Journal, 1021, 30–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vance, T.
(1987) An introduction to Japanese phonology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, J.
(2015) Designing for language learning in the wild: Creating social infrastructures for second language learning. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on L2 learning (pp. 75–104). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Wagner, J., Pekarek Doehler, S., & González-Martinez, E.
(2018) Longitudinal research on the organization of social interaction: Current developments and methodological challenges. In S. Pekarek Doehler, J. Wagner, & E. González-Martínez (Eds.), Longitudinal studies on the organization of social interaction (pp. 3–35). London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, M. & Yanagimachi, T.
(2017) Co-construction of an L2 speaker’s interactional competence: Recipient responses in an interview activity. In T. Greer, M. Ishida, & Y. Tateyama (Eds.), Interactional competence in Japanese as an additional language (pp. 115–140). Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Garre-León, Víctor
2024. Sequence organization in L2 interactions. Applied Pragmatics 6:1  pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Greer, Tim
2022. Dealing with Disaligned and Misaligned Recipiency: Storytelling in Homestay Contexts. In Storytelling Practices in Home and Educational Contexts,  pp. 343 ff. DOI logo
Greer, Tim & Johannes Wagner
2023. The interactional ecology of homestay experiences: Locating input within participation and membership. Second Language Research 39:1  pp. 85 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.