Cover not available
Article published In:
Asia-Pacific Language Variation
Vol. 5:2 (2019) ► pp.138–170

Variation in Matukar Panau kinship terminology

 | Australian National University, Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language
Referential kinship terms in Matukar Panau (Oceanic, Papua New Guinea) are obligatorily possessed. Traditionally, kinship terms are directly possessed in Oceanic languages (with an obligatory suffix on the root that agrees with the person and number of the possessor). In Matukar Panau, some kinship terms are also indirectly possessed (with a classifier that agrees with the person and number of the possessor). A third pattern shows double-marking of possessors with directly possessed terms co-occurring with a classifier. I present a multivariate analysis of the predictors that influence the choice of the direct, indirect or double-marked patterns. Older women and younger men are most likely to use the indirect pattern, particularly when discussing their own kin from their households, especially in conversational situations. The indirect possession pattern, then, is used for more integral relationships, what has previously been the semantic domain of direct possession in Oceanic.
Keywords: Oceanic, possession, kinship, classifiers, random forest, mixed-effects regression
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Variation in kinship
    • 2.2Matukar possession
  • 3.The Matukar Panau kinship system
    • 3.1Kinship terms and their sources
    • 3.2Kin term usage
  • 4.Data
  • 5.Study 1
    • 5.1Study 1 data
    • 5.2Study 1 methodology
    • 5.3Study 1 results
  • 6.Study 2
    • 6.1Study 2 data
    • 6.2Study 2 methodology
    • 6.3Study 2 results
  • 7.Discussion
    • 7.1Sociolinguistic variation
    • 7.2The semantics of alienability
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 2 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aplv.00004.bar
References (50)
References
Baayen, R. Harald (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Maechler, Martin, Bolker, Ben, & Walker, Steven (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1), 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beer, Bettina (2015). Cross-sex siblingship and marriage: Transformations of kinship relations among the Wampar, Papua New Guinea. Anthropologica, 211–224.Google Scholar
Chappell, Hillary, & McGregor, William (Eds.). (1996). Prolegomena to a theory of inalienability. The grammar of inalienability: A typological perspective on body part terms and the part-whole relation (pp. 3–30).Google Scholar
Crowley, Terry (1996). Inalienable possession in Paamese grammar. The grammar of inalienability: A typological perspective on body part terms and the part-whole relation, 141, 383–432.Google Scholar
Crowley, Terry, & Lynch, John (2006a). Naman: A vanishing language of Malakula (Vanuatu). Canberra: Pacific linguistics.Google Scholar
(2006b). Tape: A declining language of Malakula (Vanuatu). Canberra: Pacific linguistics.Google Scholar
(2006c). The Avava language of Central Malakula (Vanuatu). Canberra: Pacific linguistics.Google Scholar
Dempwolff, Otto (1936). Grammar of the Graged language. Mimeograph. Lutheran Mission, Narer, Karkar,(Papua New Guinea).Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (1989). The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation. Language Variation and Change, 1(3), 245–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gal, Susan (1979). Language shift: Social determinants of linguistic change in bilingual Austria. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hothorn, Torsten, Bühlmann, Peter, Dudoit, Sabdrube, Molinaro, Annette, & Van Der Laan, Marj J. (2006). Survival ensembles. Biostatistics, 7(3), 355–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hothorn, Torsten, Hornik, Kurt, & Zeileis, Achim (2006). Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 15(3), 651–674. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaspruś, Aloys (1942). The languages of the Mugil District, NE-New Guinea. Anthropos, 37/40 (H. 4/6), 711–778.Google Scholar
Keenan, Elinor (1974). Norm-makers, norm-breakers: Uses of speech by men and women in a Malagasy community. Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, 21, 125–143.Google Scholar
Kryukov, Mikhail V. (1972). Sistema rodstva kitaitsev [Kinship system of the Chinese]. Nauka (VL) ca, 31, 24–27.Google Scholar
(1998). The synchro-diachronic method and the multidirectionality of kinship transformations. Transformations of kinship, 294–331.Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Brockhoff, Per B., & Christensen, Rune H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William (1990). The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change, 2(2), 205–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek (1985). Possessive constructions in Oceanic languages and in Proto-Oceanic. In Andrew Pawley & Lois Carrington (Eds.), Austronesian Linguistics at the 15th Pacific Science Congress (pp. 93–140). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, Floyd Glen (1964). A formal account of the Crow- and Omaha-type kinship terminologies. In Ward H. Goodenough (Ed.), Explorations in cultural anthropology (pp. 351-393). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Lynch, John (1973). Verbal aspects of possession in Melanesian languages. Oceanic Linguistics, 121, 69–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lynch, John, Ross, Malcom, & Crowley, Terry (2002). The oceanic languages. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Marck, Jeff (Forthcoming). Proto Oceanic kin terms. In Malcom Ross & Andrew Pawley (Eds.), The lexicon of Proto Oceanic 6: People: Society. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
McDowell, Nancy (1977). The meaning of "Rope" in a Yuat River Village. Ethnology, 16(2), 175–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meakins, Felicity, & O’Shannessy, Carmel (2005). Possessing variation: Age and inalienability related variables in the possessive constructions of two Australian mixed languages. Monash University Linguistics Papers, 4(2), 43–63.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam, Barth, Danielle, & Schnell, Stefan (2018). Vanuatu languages in the Oceanic shift from direct possession. Paper presented at the Vanuatu Languages Conference, Port Vila, Vanuatu.
Meyerhoff, Miriam (2017). Possession marking in Nkep. Wellington Working Papers in Linguistics, 231, 169–180.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Jill (2007). A grammar of Neve’ei, Vanuatu. Pacific linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Nichols, Patricia (1983). Linguistic options and choices for Black women in the rural South. In Barrie Thorne, Cheris Kramarae, & Nancy Henley (Eds.), Language, gender and society (pp. 54–68). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Nordberg, Bengt (1971). En undersokning av spraket i Eskilstuna. Språkvård, 31, 7–15.Google Scholar
Nordberg, Bengt, & Sundgren, Eva (1998). On observing language change: A Swedish case study. FUMS Rapport nr. 190. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.Google Scholar
Ogawa, Naoko, & [Shibamoto] Smith, Janet (1997). The gendering of the gay male sex class in Japan: A preliminary case study based on Rasen no Sobyoo. In Anna Livia & Kira Hall (Eds.), Queerly phrased: Language, gender, and sexuality (pp. 402–415). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pearce, Elizabeth (2015). A grammar of Unua, Volume 6471. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [URL]
Romaine, Suzanne (1982). Socio-historical linguistics: Its status and methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). Variation in language and gender. In Janet Holmes & Miram Meyerhoff (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (pp. 98–118). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, Malcolm (1988). Proto Oceanic and the Austronesian languages of western Melanesia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
(2002). Takia. In John Lynch, Malcom Ross, & Terry Crowley, The Oceanic languages (pp. 216–248). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
San Roque, Lila, Gawne, Lauren, Hoenigman, Darja, Miller, Julia C., Rumsey, Alan, Spronck, Stef, Carroll, Alice, & Evans, Nicholas (2012). Getting the story straight: Language fieldwork using a narrative problem-solving task. Language Documentation & Conservation, 61, 135–174.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Harold. (1978). Australian kin classification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Cynthia (2010). A grammar of Abma: A language of Pentecost Island Vanuatu. Canberra: Pacific linguistics.Google Scholar
Schnell, Stefan, & Barth, Danielle (2018). Discourse motivations for pronominal and zero objects across registers in Vera’a. Language Variation and Change, 30(1), 51–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strobl, Carolin, Boulesteix, Anne-Laure, Zeileis, Achim, & Hothorn, Torsten (2007). Bias in random forest variable importance measures: Illustrations, sources and a solution. BMC Bioinformatics, 8(25).Google Scholar
Strobl, Carolin, Boulesteix, Anne-Laure, Kneib, Thomas, Augustin, Thomas, & Zeileis, Achim (2008). Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC Bioinfomatics, 9(307).Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A., & Baayen, R. Harald (2012). Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change, 24(2), 135–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter (1974). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1983). On dialect. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tyler, Stephen A. (1966). Context and variation in Koya kinship terminology. American Anthropologist, 68(3), 693–707. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Z’graggen, John A. (1971). Classificatory and typological studies in languages of the Madang District. Pacific Linguistics Series C,19. Canberra, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Davey, Kira & Danielle Barth
2023. Directional constructions in Matukar Panau. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 9:2 ► pp. 156 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.