Word order variation in Chinese existential constructions with V-măn
A corpus-based analysis
Under
Talmy’s (2000a) framework of Figure and Ground segregation, this
paper examines the word order variation between constructions [NP
Figure V-
măn NP
Ground] and
[NP
Ground V-
măn NP
Figure] regarding Chinese existential phenomenon, that is,
Mìfēng fēi-măn le huāyuán. ‘Bees swarm in the garden.’ and
Huāyuán fēi-măn le mìfēng. ‘The
garden swarms with bees.’
In this data-driven study, 263 monosyllabic verbs are investigated and 1456 news texts are collected for a
quantitative analysis. This study has successfully identified linguistic factors that can better account for the distributional
patterns of the word order alternation in the corpora. Results of the VARBRUL analysis indicate that topicality of the post verbal
NP and definiteness of Figure NP play a relatively crucial role in determining the word order choice, while semantic type of verb
and animacy of Figure NP are less influential. This paper presents a variationist perspective on the motivations that trigger the
use of Chinese existential construction [NPGround V-măn NPFigure].
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Focus of this study
- 3.Literature review
- 3.1Topicality of the post-verbal NP
- 3.2Discourse familiarity of the two NPs
- 3.3Word length of the two NPs
- 3.4Animacy of the Figure NP
- 3.5Definiteness of the Figure NP
- 3.6Semantic type of the verb
- 4.Methodology
- 4.1Data sources
- 4.2Sampling
- 4.3Statistical tools
- 4.4Coding
- 4.5Research questions
- 5.Results
- 5.1General distribution of the two constructions
- 5.2Significant factors identified
- 6.Discussion
- 6.1Topicality of post-verbal NP
- 6.2Definiteness of figure NP
- 6.3Discourse familiarity of two NPs
- 6.4Animacy of figure NP
- 6.5Semantic type of verb
- 7.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (56)
References
Anderson, Stephen R. (1971). On the role of deep structure
in semantic interpretation. Foundations of
Language, 71, 387–396.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Birner, Betty J. (1994). Information status and word
order: An analysis of English
Inversion. Language, 701, 233–259. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bock, Kathryn, Loebell, Helga, & Morey, Randal (1992). From
conceptual roles to structural relations: Bridging the syntactic cleft. Psychological
Review, 99(1), 150–171. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Branigan, Holly P., Pickering, Martin J., & Tanaka, Mikihiro (2008). Contributions
of animacy to grammatical function assignment and word order during
production. Lingua, 118, (2), 172–189. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bresnan, Joan (1994). Locative
inversion and the architecture of universal
grammar. Language, 701, 72–131. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan, & Thompson, Sandra (1997). Three
frequency effects in syntax. In Annual Meeting of the Berkeley
Linguistics Society, 23(1). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan (2006). From
usage to grammar: The mind’s response to
repetition. Language, 821, 711–733. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chen, Rong (2003). English
inversion: A ground-before-figure
construction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, William, & Cruse, D. Alan (2004). Cognitive
linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dong, Cheng-ru (2009). Cunzaiju de renzhi yanjiu: Jiyu canzhaodian de xingweilian moshi [Toward a cognitive study of the existential-presentational construction: A reference point-based Action Chain
Model]. Suzhou: Suzhou University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dowty, David (2000). ‘The
garden swarms with bees’ and the fallacy of ‘argument
alternation’. In Yael Ravin & Claudia Leacock (Eds.), Polysemy:
Theoretical and computational
approaches (pp.111–128). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dowty, David (2001). The
semantic assymmetry of ‘argument alternations’ (and why it
matters). In G. van der Meer, & ter Meulen, A. G. B. (Eds), Groninger
Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik [Making Sense: From Lexeme to
Discourse] (pp. 171–86). Groningen: Center for Language and Cognition.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Doyle, Arthur Conan, & Rathbone, Basil (1895). A
scandal in Bohemia. Chicago: Donohue, Henneberry.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Foley, William A. (1994). Information
structure. In Ronald E. Asher (Ed.), The
encyclopedia of language and
linguistics (pp. 1678–1685). New York: Pergamon Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar
approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hawkins, John A. (1994). A performance theory of order and
constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hu, Wenze (1995). Verbal
semantics of the presentative sentences. Linguistics
Study, 100–112.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, C. T. James (1987). Existential sentences in
Chinese and (in)definiteness. In Eric Reuland & Alice ter Meulen (Eds.), The
representation of
(in)definiteness (pp. 226–253). Cambridge: MIt Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, Chu-Ren, Kilgarriff Adam, Yiching Wu, Chih-Ming Chiu, Simon Smith, Pavel Rychly, Ming-Hong Bai & Keh-Jiann Chen (2005). Chinese
Sketch Engine and the extraction of grammatical collocations. Paper presented to
the the Fourth SIGHAN Workshop on Chinese Language Processing, Jeju
Island, Republic of Korea, 2005.
Kilgarriff, Adam, Rychly, Pavel, Smrz, Pavel, & Tugwell, David (2004). The
sketch engine. Paper presented to the
Euralex, Lorient, 2004.
Labov, William (1972). Sociolinguistic
patterns, No. 4. University of Pennsylvania Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar:
Theoretical
prerequisites,
volume
1
1. Stanford, CA: Stanford university press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W. (2001). Cognitive linguistics,
language pedagogy, and the English present tense. In Martin Pütz, Susanne Niemeier and René Dirven (Eds.), Applied
cognitive linguistics: Theory and language
acquisition (pp. 3–39). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levin, Beth (1993). English
verb classes and alternations. Cambridge: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, Charles N., & Thompson, Sandra A. (1975). The semantics function
of word order: A case study in Mandarin. In Charles Li (Ed.), Word
order and word order
change (pp. 163–195). Austin: University of Texas Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liu, Yue-hua, Wen-yu Pan, & Wei Gu (2001). Shiyong xiandai HanYu yufa [Modern Chinese grammar for teachers of
Chinese as a second language and advanced learners of
Chinese]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McDonald, Janet L., Bock, Kathryn, & Kelly, Michael H. (1993). Word and world order:
Semantic, phonological, and metrical determinants of serial position. Cognitive
Psychology, 25 (2), 188–230. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pan, Haihua (1996). Imperfective
aspect ZHE, agent deletion, and locative inversion in Mandarin Chinese. Natural Language and
Linguistic Theory, 141, 409–432. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quirk, Randolph (1972). A
grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman Group.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sabar, Nadav (2010). Existentials
as existentials: On topic-comment structure in existential
sentences. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Safir, Kenneth (1982). Syntactic
chains and the definiteness effect. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Särndal, Carl-Erik, Swensson, Bengt, & Wretman, Jan (2003). Model
assisted survey sampling. New York: Springer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Seoane, Elena (2009). Syntactic
complexity, discourse status and animacy as determinants of grammatical variation in Modern
English. English Language and
Linguistics 13 (3), 365–384. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sornicola, Rosanna (2006). Interaction
of syntactic and pragmatic factors on basic word order in the languages of
Europe. In Giuliano Bernini & Marcia L. Schwartz (Eds.), Pragmatic
organization of discourse in the languages of
Europe (pp. 357–544). Berlin: de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tagliamonte, Sali (2006). Analysing
sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tai, James H-Y. (2005). Conceptual structure and
conceptualizations in Chinese. Language and
Linguistics, 6, (4) 539–574.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Talmy, Leonard (2000a). Toward
a cognitive semantics: Concept structuring
systems,
volume
1
1. Cambridge: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Talmy, Leonard (2000b). Toward
a cognitive semantics: Typology and process in concept
structuring,
volume
2
1. Cambridge: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tang, Ting-chi (1979). Guoyu yufa yanjiu lunji [Collection of studies on Mandarin
grammar]. Taipei: Student Book.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Xing, Janet Zhiqun (2006). Teaching and learning Chinese as
a foreign language: A pedagogical
grammar,
volume
1
1. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Xu, Lie-jiong, & Liu, Dan-qing (2007). Huati de jiegou yu gongneng [Topic: structural and functional
analysis]. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yang, Suying, & Pan, Haihua (2001). A
constructional analysis of the existential structure. In Haihua Pan (Ed.), Studies
in Chinese Linguistics
II (pp. 189–208). Hong Kong: Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yao, Yao (2014). Predicting
the use of BA construction in Mandarin Chinese discourse: A modeling study with two
verbs. In Wirote Aroonmanakun, Prachya Boonkwan, & Thepchai Supnithi (Eds.), Proceedings
of the 28th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computing
(PACLIC28). Thailand: Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhang, Lan (2008). Locative
inversion and aspect markers le and zhe in Mandarin Chinese. Paper presented at
the North American Conference Chinese Linguistics-20, The Ohio State
University.
Links of the Corpora
Chinese Word Sketch: [URL]