Article published In:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 12:1 (1989) ► pp.102121
References
Carroll, J.
(1963) Research on teaching foreign languages. In N. Gage (ed.) Handbook of research in teaching. Chicago, Rand-McNally: 1060–1100.Google Scholar
Færch, C. and G. Kasper
(1983) Strategies in interlanguage communication. London, Longman.Google Scholar
Gardener, R. and W. Lambert
(1972) Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Rowley Mass., Newbury House.Google Scholar
Gass, S.
(1988) Integrating research areas: a framework for second language studies. Applied Linguistics 91: 198–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guiora, A. and W. Acton
(1980) Personality and language behaviour: a restatement. Language Learning 29, 1: 193–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S., M. Long and R. Scarcella
(1979) Age, rate, and eventual attainment in second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly. 13, 4: 573–582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, H.
(1987) A comparative study of the acquisition of German as a first and a second language. Unpublished Ph. D Thesis, Monash University.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. and M. Johnston
(1987) Factors influencing the development of language proficiency. In D. Nunan (ed.) Applying second language acquisition research. Adelaide, National Curriculum and Resources Centre: 45–141.Google Scholar
Snow, C.
(1983) Age differences in second language acquisition: research findings and folk psychology. In K. Bailey, M. Long and S. Peck (eds) Second language acquisition studies. Rowley, Mass., Newbury House: 141–150.Google Scholar
Snow, C. and M. Hoefnagel-Höhle
(1978) Age differences in second language acquisition. In E. Hatch (ed.) Second language acquisition. Rowley, Mass., Newbury house: 333–344.Google Scholar
Wenden, A. and J. Rubin
(eds) (1987) Learner strategies in language learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall International.Google Scholar
Wong-Fillmore, L.
(1979) Individual differences in second language acquisition. In C. Fillmore, D. Kempler and W. Wang (eds) Individual differences in language ability and language behaviour. New York, Academic Press: 203–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar