Receptive vocabulary size estimates for general and academic vocabulary at a multi-campus Australian
university
There are few published estimates of vocabulary sizes amongst students in tertiary education. Research does not
offer estimates of the vocabulary size tertiary students might be expected to possess, though estimates exist for K-12 education,
some EFL contexts, and the general population. Such research is important. For reading comprehension during tertiary education, a
vocabulary of minimally 10,000 words is recommended, along with proficiency in academic vocabulary. A recent study of three
universities in the United Kingdom concluded pedagogical intervention was required, since estimates indicated undergraduates knew
fewer than 10,000 words. A subsequent study of a New Zealand university found students knew 16,000 words and pedagogical
intervention was not required. The current study investigates 433 tertiary students at an Australian university to determine if
students required vocabulary support. It contributes to a research record allowing for comparisons internationally, nationally,
and over time. Methods employed included the Vocabulary Size Test/VST and Academic Vocabulary Test/AVT. Results indicate an
average vocabulary size of 16,117 words, with academic vocabulary well-known.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Current estimates of vocabulary sizes in different educational contexts
- 3.Academic vocabulary knowledge
- 4.The present study
- 5.Methodology
- 6.Results
- 7.Discussion
- 8.Limitations and future research
- 9.Conclusion
-
References
References (46)
References
Amorsen, A., & Miller, M. (2017). Children’s
oral language development and early literacy practices. Educating Young Children: Learning and
Teaching in the Early Childhood
Years,
23
(1), 24–27.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anglin, J. M. (1993). Vocabulary
development: A morphological analysis. With commentary by George A. Miller and Pamela C.
Wakefield. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child
Development,
58
(10), i+iii+v-vi+1-186. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biemiller, A., & Slonim, N. (2001). Estimating
root word vocabulary growth in normative and advantaged populations: Evidence for a common sequence of vocabulary
acquisition. Journal of Educational
Psychology,
93
(3), 498–520. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bourke, T., Mills, R., & Siostrom, E. (2020). Origins
of primary specialisation in Australian education policy: What’s the problem represented to
be? The Australian Educational
Researcher,
47
1, 725–740. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, D., Stewart, J., Stoeckel, T., & McLean, S. (2021). The
coming paradigm shift in the use of lexical units. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition,
43
(5), 950–953. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., Mandera, P., & Keuleers, E. (2016). How
many words do we know? Practical estimates of vocabulary size dependent on word definition, the degree of language input and
the participant’s age. Frontiers in
Psychology,
7
1, 1116–1116. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clay, M. M. (1991). Introducing
a new storybook to young readers. The Reading
Teacher,
45
(4), 264–273. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coxhead, A. (2000). A
new academic word list. TESOL
Quarterly,
34
(2), 213–238. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coxhead, A., Nation, P., & Sim, D. (2014). Creating
and trialling six versions of the Vocabulary Size Test. TESOLANZ
Journal,
22
1, 13–27. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coxhead, A., Nation, P., & Sim, D. (2015). Measuring
the vocabulary size of native speakers of English in New Zealand secondary schools. New Zealand
Journal of Educational
Studies,
50
(1), 121–135. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DiCerbo, P. A., Anstrom, K. A., Baker, L. L., & Rivera, C. (2014). A
Review of the Literature on Teaching Academic English to English Language Learners. Review of
Educational
Research,
84
(3), 446–482. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Duff, D., & Brydon, M. (2020). Estimates
of individual differences in vocabulary size in English: How many words are needed to ‘close the vocabulary
gap’? Journal of Research in
Reading,
43
(4), 454–481. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody
picture vocabulary test (PPVT-4) (4th ed.). Pearson assessments.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, B., Sawyer, J., Gill, R., Medlin, J., & Wilson, D. (2005). Influences
of the learning environment of a regional university campus on its international
graduates. Australian Educational
Researcher,
32
(2), 65–85. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gardner, D., & Davies, M. (2014). A
new academic vocabulary list. Applied
Linguistics,
35
(3), 305–327. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Graves, M. F. (2016). The
vocabulary book: Learning and instruction. Teachers College Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Green, C., & Lambert, J. (2018). Advancing
disciplinary literacy through English for academic purposes: Discipline-specific wordlists, collocations and word families for
eight secondary subjects. Journal of English for Academic
Purposes,
35
1, 105–115. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Green, C. (2022). Computing
curriculum time and input for the incidental learning of academic vocabulary. Language,
Learning and
Technology, 26(
1
), pp. 1–21.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Green, C. (2021). The
oral language productive vocabulary profile of children starting school: A resource for
teachers. Australian Journal of
Education,
65
(1), 41–54. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gyllstad, H., McLean, S., & Stewart, J. (2020). Using
confidence intervals to determine adequate item sample sizes for vocabulary tests: An essential but overlooked
practice. Language Testing, Advanced online
publication, 1–22. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hart, B., & Risley, T. (1995). Meaningful
differences in everyday parenting and intellectual development in young American
children. Brookes.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kong, Y., Seo, Y. S., & Zhai, L. (2018). Comparison
of reading performance on screen and on paper: A meta-analysis. Computers and
Education,
123
1, 138–149. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krashen, S. D. (2004). The
power of reading: Insights from the research. (2nd ed.). Libraries Unlimited; Heinemann.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McLean, S. (2021). The
coverage comprehension model, its importance to pedagogy and research, and threats to the validity with which it is
operationalized. Reading in a Foreign
Language,
33
(1), 126–140. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McLean, S., & Kramer, B. (2015). The
creation of a new vocabulary levels
test. Shiken,
19
(2), 1–11.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McLean, S., Kramer, B., & Beglar, D. (2015). The
creation and validation of a listening vocabulary levels test. Language Teaching
Research,
19
(6), 741–760. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McLean, S., Stewart, J., & Batty, A. O. (2020). Predicting
L2 reading proficiency with modalities of vocabulary knowledge: A bootstrapping
approach. Language
Testing,
37
(3), 389–411. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McQuillan, J. (2020). Harry
Potter and the prisoners of vocabulary instruction: Acquiring academic language at
Hogwarts. Reading in a Foreign
Language,
32
(2), 122–142. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Milton, J., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2013). Vocabulary
size revisited: The link between vocabulary size and academic achievement. Applied Linguistics
Review,
4
(1), 151–172. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How
large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language
Review,
63
(1), 59 – 81. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nation, I. S. P., & Beglar, D. (2007). A
vocabulary size test. The Language
Teacher,
31
(7), 9–13.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pecorari, D., Shaw, P., & Malmström, H. (2019). Developing
a new academic vocabulary test. Journal of English for Academic
Purposes,
39
1, 59–71. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pantelich, M. (2021). A
student-centred approach: The English Language Support Service for international
students. Journal of Academic Language and
Learning,
15
(1), 72–84.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmitt, N., Cobb, T., Horst, M., & Schmitt, D. (2017). How
much vocabulary is needed to use English? Replication of van Zeeland & Schmitt (2012), Nation (2006) and Cobb
(2007). Language
Teaching,
50
(2), 212–226. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmitt, N., Nation, P., & Kremmel, B. (2020). Moving
the field of vocabulary assessment forward: The need for more rigorous test development and
validation. Language
Teaching,
53
(
1
), 109–120. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching
disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational
Review,
78
(1), 40–59. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stewart, J., Stoeckel, T., McLean, S., Nation, P., & Pinchbeck, G. G. (2021). What
the research shows about written receptive vocabulary testing: A reply to Webb. Studies in
Second Language
Acquisition,
43
(2), 462–471. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stoeckel, T., Bennett, P., & McLean, S. (2016). Is
“I Don’t Know” a viable answer choice on the Vocabulary Size Test? TESOL
Quarterly,
50
(4), 965–975. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stoeckel, T., McLean, S., & Nation, P. (2021). Limitations
of size and levels tests of written receptive vocabulary knowledge. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition,
43
(1), 181–203. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stoeckel, T., Stewart, J., McLean, S., Ishii, T., Kramer, B., & Matsumoto, Y. (2019). The
relationship of four variants of the Vocabulary Size Test to a criterion measure of meaning recall vocabulary
knowledge. System
(Linköping),
87
1, 102161. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thomas, D. P. (2020). Rapid
decline and gender disparities in the NAPLAN writing data. Australian Educational
Researcher,
47
(5), 777–796. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Townsend, D., Filippini, A., Collins, P., & Biancarosa, G. (2012). Evidence
for the importance of academic word knowledge for the academic achievement of diverse middle
students. The Elementary School
Journal,
112
(3), 497–518. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wingate, U. (2011). A
comparison of ‘additional’ and ‘embedded’ approaches to teaching writing in the
disciplines. In M. Deane & P. O’Neil (Eds.), Writing
in the
disciplines. (pp. 65–87). Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhang, S., & Zhang, X. (2022). The relationship between vocabulary knowledge and L2 reading/listening comprehension: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research,
26
(4), 696–725. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Malmström, Hans, Diane Pecorari & Marcus Warnby
2023.
Teachers’ receptive and productive vocabulary sizes in English-medium instruction.
Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development ► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.