Cover not available
Article published In:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 34:2 (2011) ► pp.193–215

Vocabulary learning

A comparison of learners of English as a second and third langauge

The purpose of this study is to compare the vocabulary learning of monolingual learners of English as a second language with bilingual learners of English as a third language. The study is based on data from 52 monolingual Persian-speaking learners of English and 45 bilingual Azeri-Persian-speaking learners of English. All the participants were females studying English as a foreign language at two universities in Iran. The informants were exposed to two incidental and four intentional vocabulary learning exercises. They were then measured at four difficulty levels using the Vocabulary Knowledge Scale (Paribakht & Wesche, 1997). Variables such as English language proficiency, intelligence, family educational background, gender, age and type of university were controlled. The third language learners outperformed their second language counterparts at all word difficulty levels. The findings are discussed in relation to bilinguals’ higher level of executive and inhibitory control.
Keywords: bilingualism, third language learning, second language learning, vocabulary learning, inhibitory control
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 1 January 2011
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.34.2.04dib
References (32)
Andrews, L. & Young, J. (1999). English interactions. South Melbourne: Macmillan Education Australia.Google Scholar
Amir Kabir (2002). The English to Persian dictionary. Tehran: Amir Kabir.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism in development. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Grady, C., Chau, W., Ishii, R., Gunji, A. & Pantev, C. (2005). Effect of bilingualism on cognitive control in the Simon task: Evidence from MEG. NeuroImage, 241, 40–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Klein, R. & Viswanathan, M. (2004). Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. Psychology & Aging, 191, 290–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cenoz, J. & Valencia, J. F. (1994). Additive trilingualism: Evidence from the Basque country. Applied Psycholinguistics, 151, 195–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dehghani, Y. (2002). Persian. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Ethnologue. Languages of Iran. Retrieved November 9, 2007, from [URL].
Fraser, C. A. (1999). Lexical processing strategy use and vocabulary learning through reading. SSLA, 211, 225–241.Google Scholar
Hamers, J. F. & Blanc, M. H. A. (2000). Bilinguality and bilingualism. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hatch, E. & Brown, C. (1995). Vocabulary, semantics, and language education. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Javadi, A. (1989). Azarbayjan va zaban-i an: Awza va mushkilat-i Turki-i Azari dar Iran [Azerbaijan and its language: The problems of Azeri-Turkish in Iran]. Pidmont, CA: Shirkat-i Ketab-i Jahan.Google Scholar
Javadi, H. (1996). Azeri publications in Iran. Critique: Critical Middle Eastern Studies, 81, 79–88.Google Scholar
Jessner, U. (2008). Teaching third languages: Findings, trends and challenges. Language Teaching, 411, 15–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keshavarz, M. H. & Astaneh, H. (2004). The impact of bilinguality on the learning of English vocabulary as a foreign language (L3). Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 7 (4), 295–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lasagabaster, D. (2000). The effect of three bilingual education models on linguistic creativity. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 381, 55–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B. & Nation, P. (1999). A Vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing, 16 (1), 33–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Modirkhamene, S. (2006). The reading achievement of third language versus second language learners of English in relation to the Interdependence Hypothesis. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13 (4), 280–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, C. (2000). Bilingualism and trilingualism in school students in Catalonia. In J. Cenoz & U. Jessner, (Eds.), English in Europe: The acquisition of a third language. (pp. 157–178). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Okita, Y. & Jun Hai, G. (2001). Learning of Japanese Kanji character by bilingual and monolingual Chinese speakers. In J. Cenoz B. Hufeisen & U. Jessner, (Eds.), Looking beyond second language acquisition: Studies in tri-and multilingualism. (pp. 63–73). Tubingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Oxford University Press. (1995). Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary (5th ed.). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Paribakht, S. T. & Wesche, M. (1997). Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary development. In J. Coady & T. N. Huckin, (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 174–200). New York: CUP.Google Scholar
Peal, E. & Lambert, W. E. (1962). The relation of bilingualism to intelligence. Psychological Monographs, 761, 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pilar, M. & Jorda, S. (2003). Metapragmatic awareness and pragmatic production of third language learners of English: A focus on request acts. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 7 (1), 43–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ringbom, H. (1987). The role of L1 in foreign language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. (1995). Bilingualism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sanders, M. & Meijers, G. (1995). English as L3 in the elementary school. ITL Review of Applied linguistics, 107–8, 59–78.Google Scholar
Sanz, C. (2000). Bilingual education enhances third language acquisition: Evidence from Catalonia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 211, 23–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tahririan, M. H. (1993). Developing reading proficiency. Tehran: Payame Noor University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. (1988). The role played by metalinguistic awareness in second and third language learning. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 9 (30), 235–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Gelderen, A., Schoonen, R., de Glopper, K., Hulstijn, J., Snellings, P., Simis, A. & Stevenson, M. (2003). Roles of linguistic knowledge, metacognitive knowledge and processing speed in L3, L2 and L1 reading comprehension. The International Journal of Bilingualism., 7 (1), 7–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wesche, M. & Paribakht, S. T. (2000). Reading-based exercises in second language vocabulary learning: An introspective study. The Modern Language Journal., 84 (2), 196–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Li, Jiaxin, Er-Hu Zhang, Haihui Zhang, Hecui Gou & Hong-Wen Cao
2024. Retrieval practice plus feedback benefits a third language vocabulary learning. International Journal of Multilingualism 21:2 ► pp. 1014 ff. DOI logo
Karacan, Cemil Gökhan & Kenan Dikilitaş
2020. Vocabulary Learning Strategies of Italian-Turkish Bilingual Students: Impact of Simultaneous and Sequential Acquisition. Sustainable Multilingualism 17:1 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Oliver, Rhonda, Honglin Chen & Stephen Moore
2016. Review of selected research in applied linguistics published in Australia (2008–2014). Language Teaching 49:4 ► pp. 513 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.