Article published In:
Australian Review of Applied LinguisticsVol. 37:2 (2014) ► pp.101–122
Investigating teachers’ written corrective feedback practices in a Saudi EFL context
How do they align with their beliefs, institutional guidelines, and students’ preferences?
In recent years there have been a growing number of studies on written corrective feedback (WCF), particularly in terms of the efficacy of different types of WCF. However, few of these studies have investigated what shapes teachers’ WCF practices and how they align with students’ preferences. This study, conducted with staff and students in a large Saudi university that has strict guidelines on WCF provision, examined the teachers’ WCF practices in relation to the institutional guidelines, their own beliefs about the most effective forms of WCF as well as their students’ preferences. Data collected included the feedback given by three teachers on their students’ writing (15 students per teacher), follow-up interviews with the teachers, and questionnaires completed by the students. The study found that although the teachers followed the strict guidelines and provided comprehensive indirect feedback, these practices did not always accord with their beliefs. Most of the WCF given tended to be on mechanics, and the teachers seemed unaware that this was the main focus of their feedback. They were also largely unaware that their students preferred direct feedback and mainly on grammar. We conclude our paper with some policy recommendations.
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].
References
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U.
(2010) Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(4), 207–217. 
Casanave, C. P.
(2003) Looking ahead to more sociopolitically–oriented case study research in L2 writing scholarship: (But should it be called “post–process”?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 85–102.
Diab, R. L.
(2005) EFL university students’ preferences for error correction and teacher feedback on writing. TESL Reporter, 38(1), 27–51.
Ellis, R.
(2010) Cognitive, social, and psychological dimensions corrective feedback. In R. Batstone (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning (pp. 151–165). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H.
(2008) The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36(3), 353–371.
Ferris, D.
(1999) The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 1–11.
(2002) Treatment of error in second language student writing: University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor, MI.
(2003) Response to student writing: Implications for second language students: Routledge.
Ferris, D. R.
(2006) Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short–and long–term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 81–104). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ferris, D., Brown, J., Liu, H. S., & Stine, M. E. A.
(2011) Responding to L2 students in college writing classes: Teacher perspectives. Tesol Quarterly, 45(2), 207–234.
Grami, M.
(2005) The effect of teachers’ written feedback on ESL students’ perception: A study in a Saudi ESL university–level context. Annual Review of Education, Communication and Language Sciences, 21.
Halimi, S. S.
(2008) Indonesian teachers’ and students’ preferences for error correction. Wacana, 101(11), 50–71.
Hamouda, A.
(2011) A study of students and teachers’ preferences and attitudes towards correction of classroom written errors in Saudi EFL context. English Language Teaching, 4(3), p128.
Hamp-Lyons, L.
(2007) The impact of testing practices on teaching.International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 487–504): Springer.
Hyland, K.
(2003) Second language writing. Ernst Klett Sprachen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F.
(2006) Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, I.
(2004) Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 285–312.
(2008) Understanding teachers’ written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 69–85.
(2009) Ten mismatches between teachers’ beliefs and written feedback practices. ELT Journal, 63(1), 12–22.
Leki, I.
(1991) The Preferences of ESL Students for Error Correction in College‐Level Writing Classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24(3), 203–218.
(2006) “You cannot ignore”: Graduate L2 students’ experience of and response to written feedback practices within their disciplines. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in ESL writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 266–285). Campbridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2007) Undergraduates in a second language: Challenges and complexities of academic literacy development. New York: Lawarence Erlbaum.
Merriam, S. B.
(2002) Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Montgomery, J. L., & Baker, W.
(2007) Teacher-written feedback: Student perceptions, teacher self-assessment, and actual teacher performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(2), 82–99.
Polio, C.
(2003) Research on second language writing: An overview of what we investigate and how. Exploring the dynamics of second language writing, 35–65.
Sheen, Y.
(2007) The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. Tesol Quarterly, 41(2), 255–283.
(2010) Differential effects of oral and written corrective feedback in the ESL classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 201–234.
Sheen, Y., Wright, D., & Moldawa, A.
(2009) Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System, 37(4), 556–569.
Storch, N., & Tapper, J.
(2000) The focus of teacher and student concerns in discipline–specific writing by university students. Higher Education Research and Development, 19(3), 337–355.
Storch, N. & Wigglesworth, G.
(2010a) Students’ engagement with feedback on writing: the role of learner agency/beliefs. In Batstone R (ed), Sociocognitive Perspectives on Language Use and Language Learning (pp. 166–185). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
(2010b) Learners’ processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing. Case studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 303–334.
Truscott, J.
(1996) The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language learning, 46(2), 327–369.
Van Beuningen, C., de Jong, N., & Kuiken, F.
(2012) Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing. Language Learning, 62(1), 1–41.
Cited by
Cited by 32 other publications
Ahmed, Abdelhamid M.
2020. Feedback in EFL Writing: Arab World Contexts, Issues, and Challenges. In Feedback in L2 English Writing in the Arab World, ► pp. 1 ff. 
Alhumaid, Anwar
2023. Exploring EFL female teachers' and undergraduate students' perceptions regarding written corrective feedback. Saudi Journal of Language Studies 3:3 ► pp. 144 ff.
Alshuraidah, Ali & Neomy Storch
2019. Investigating a collaborative approach to peer feedback. ELT Journal 73:2 ► pp. 166 ff.
Athimni, Moez, Safa Yaakoubi & Hanin Bouzaiene
2020. Research on Feedback in EFL Classes in the MENA Region: State of the Art. In The Assessment of L2 Written English across the MENA Region, ► pp. 325 ff.
Ben Hedia, Najoua
2020. How Writing Teachers’ Beliefs Influence Grading Practices. In The Assessment of L2 Written English across the MENA Region, ► pp. 143 ff.
Cheng, Xiaolong & Lawrence Jun Zhang
2021. Teacher Written Feedback on English as a Foreign Language Learners’ Writing: Examining Native and Nonnative English-Speaking Teachers’ Practices in Feedback Provision. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Cheng, Xiaolong & Lawrence Jun Zhang
2022. Teachers Helping EFL Students Improve Their Writing Through Written Feedback: The Case of Native and Non-native English-Speaking Teachers' Beliefs. Frontiers in Psychology 13
Cheng, Xiaolong, Lawrence Jun Zhang & Qiaozhen Yan
2021. Exploring teacher written feedback in EFL writing classrooms: Beliefs and practices in interaction. Language Teaching Research ► pp. 136216882110576 ff.
Dang, Trang Thi Doan
2018. EFL learners’ roles in a mediational process of written corrective feedback. In Transformation and Empowerment through Education, ► pp. 36 ff.
Ghosn-Chelala, Maria & Wessam Al-Chibani
2018. Screencasting: supportive feedback for EFL remedial writing students. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology 35:3 ► pp. 146 ff.
Halim, Tanzina, Rizwana Wahid & Shanjida Halim
2021. EFL students' attitudes toward corrective feedback: a study conducted at undergraduate level. Saudi Journal of Language Studies 1:1 ► pp. 40 ff.
Jakobson, Liivi
2020. Vuxna nybörjarstuderandes uppfattningar om skriftlig lärarrespons på skrivande i svenska som andraspråk. Educare :4 ► pp. 1 ff.
John Burrell, 이제영 & Jee Eun Lee
2016. Korean University Student Preferences for Written Corrective Feedback on English Writing. Journal of the Korea English Education Society 15:3 ► pp. 35 ff.
KARAAĞAÇ ZAN, Gül & Nur YİĞİTOĞLU
2018. Exploring Novice And Experienced Teachers’ Beliefs And Practices Of Written Feedback. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 19:2 ► pp. 355 ff.
Kessler, Matt
2023. Written corrective feedback in an online community: A typology of English language learners’ requests and interlocutors’ responses. Computers and Composition 67 ► pp. 102752 ff.
Kim, YouJin & Tamanna Mostafa
2021. Teachers’ and Students’ Beliefs and Perspectives about Corrective Feedback. In The Cambridge Handbook of Corrective Feedback in Second Language Learning and Teaching, ► pp. 561 ff.
Liu, Kailin & Neomy Storch
2023. Second language learners’ engagement with written feedback. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 46:1 ► pp. 4 ff.
Liu, Xiaohan
2024. Understanding the development and implementation of teachers’ beliefs of written corrective feedback: A study of two novice transborder teachers in mainland China. Teaching and Teacher Education 142 ► pp. 104519 ff.
M Albelihi, Hani Hamad
2022. Written corrective feedback: A comparative study of the preferences and beliefs of EFL teachers and learners in Saudi Arabia. F1000Research 11 ► pp. 452 ff.
Mulati, Dyah Fitri, Joko Nurkamto & Nur Arifah Drajati
2020. THE TEACHERS’ BELIEFS IN TEACHER WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON THE STUDENTS' WRITING. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics & Literature) 5:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Pearson, William S.
2020. Research article titles in written feedback on English as a second language writing. Scientometrics 123:2 ► pp. 997 ff.
Pearson, William S.
2020. Predictors of citations in written feedback on ESL writing research. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management 14:1 ► pp. 55 ff.
Reynolds, Barry Lee & Xiaofang Zhang
2022. Medical School Students’ Preferences for and Perceptions of Teacher Written Corrective Feedback on English as a Second Language Academic Writing: An Intrinsic Case Study. Behavioral Sciences 13:1 ► pp. 13 ff.
Saeli, Hooman & An Cheng
2021. Discrepancies in Teachers’ Perceptions and Reported Practices: The Case of Written Feedback in an EFL Context. European Journal of Applied Linguistics 9:2 ► pp. 307 ff.
Shen, Rongyi & Sin Wang Chong
2023. Learner engagement with written corrective feedback in ESL and EFL contexts: a qualitative research synthesis using a perception-based framework. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 48:3 ► pp. 276 ff.
Soleimani, Neda, Mohammad Rahimi & Michelle Mingyue Gu
2021. (Mis) Alignment of Iranian EFL Teacher’s Written Corrective Feedback beliefs and practices from an Activity Theory Perspective. Cogent Education 8:1
Storch, Neomy
2018. Written corrective feedback from sociocultural theoretical perspectives: A research agenda. Language Teaching 51:2 ► pp. 262 ff.
Storch, Neomy & Ali Alshuraidah
2020. Chapter 5. Languaging when providing and processing peer feedback. In Languaging in Language Learning and Teaching [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 55], ► pp. 112 ff.
Zhang, Lawrence Jun & Xiaolong Cheng
2021. Examining the effects of comprehensive written corrective feedback on L2 EAP students’ linguistic performance: A mixed-methods study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 54 ► pp. 101043 ff.
Zhang, Tiefu, Xuemei Chen, Jiehui Hu & Pattarapon Ketwan
2021. EFL Students' Preferences for Written Corrective Feedback: Do Error Types, Language Proficiency, and Foreign Language Enjoyment Matter?. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Zheng, Yao, Shulin Yu, Chunhong Liu & Lianjiang Jiang
2022. Mapping research on second language writing teachers: A review on teacher cognition, practices, and expertise. System 109 ► pp. 102870 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.