Article published In:
Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics: Volume 1
Edited by Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
[Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 1] 2003
► pp. 127
Cited by (64)

Cited by 64 other publications

Engel, Alexandra, Elsy Andries, Laura Rosseel, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Freek Van de Velde
Liao, Shengyu, Stefan Th. Gries & Stefanie Wulff
2024. Transfer five ways: applications of multiple distinctive collexeme analysis to the dative alternation in Mandarin Chinese. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory DOI logo
Wang, Menglan, Guiying Jiang & Yan Cheng
2024. A Corpus-Based Multifactorial Study of Help/help to Alternation in Learners’ Language: From the Perspective of Probabilistic Grammar. Sage Open 14:4 DOI logo
Asadpour, Hiwa
2023. Parts of speech and the placement of Targets in the corpus of languages in northwestern Iran. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 19:3  pp. 487 ff. DOI logo
Egan, Thomas
2023. Giving in English and Norwegian. In Ditransitives in Germanic Languages [Studies in Germanic Linguistics, 7],  pp. 365 ff. DOI logo
LEHMANN, CLAUDIA
2023. As if that wasn't enough: Englishas ifclauses as multimodal utterance constructions. English Language and Linguistics 27:1  pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Lehmann, Claudia
2024. Multimodal constructions revisited. Testing the strength of association between spoken and non-spoken features of Tell me about it . Cognitive Linguistics 35:3  pp. 407 ff. DOI logo
Nesset, Tore & Laura A. Janda
2023. A network of allostructions: quantified subject constructions in Russian. Cognitive Linguistics 0:0 DOI logo
Xiang, Keshu & Hui Chang
2023. Multiple Constraints on Second Language Processing of English Dative Alternation. Language Learning and Development 19:4  pp. 437 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Dong & Jiajin Xu
2023. Dative alternation in Chinese. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 28:4  pp. 559 ff. DOI logo
Şafak, Duygu F. & Holger Hopp
2023. Cross-linguistic differences in predicting L2 sentence structure: The use of categorical and gradient verb constraints. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 45:5  pp. 1234 ff. DOI logo
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2022. Cognitive corpus linguistics and pedagogy. Pedagogical Linguistics 3:2  pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Rice, Alexander
2022. A recurring absence gesture in Northern Pastaza Kichwa. Gesture 21:1  pp. 28 ff. DOI logo
徐, 文倩
2022. Review and Prospect of Semantic Research Methods of Synonyms at Home and Abroad. Modern Linguistics 10:03  pp. 366 ff. DOI logo
De Vaere, Hilde, Ludovic De Cuypere & Klaas Willems
2021. Constructional variation with two near-synonymous verbs: the case of schicken and senden in present-day German. Language Sciences 83  pp. 101313 ff. DOI logo
Engel, Alexandra, Jason Grafmiller, Laura Rosseel, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Freek Van de Velde
2021. Chapter 3. How register-specific is probabilistic grammatical knowledge?. In Corpus-based Approaches to Register Variation [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 103],  pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Krawczak, Karolina
2021. Chapter 3. The role of verb polysemy in constructional profiling. In GiveConstructions across Languages [Constructional Approaches to Language, 29],  pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Thuilier, Juliette, Margaret Grant, Benoît Crabbé & Anne Abeillé
2021. Word order in French: the role of animacy. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6:1 DOI logo
De Knop, Sabine
2020. From construction grammar to embodied construction practice. Constructions and Frames 12:1  pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
De Knop, Sabine
2022. From construction grammar to embodied construction practice. In Construction Grammar across Borders [Benjamins Current Topics, 122],  pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Faghiri, Pegah & Pollet Samvelian
2020. Word order preferences and the effect of phrasal length in SOV languages: evidence from sentence production in Persian. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5:1 DOI logo
Gries, Stefan Th., Santa Barbara, Justus Liebig & Sandra C. Deshors
2020. There’s more to alternations than the main diagonal of a 2×2 confusion matrix: Improvements of MuPDAR and other classificatory alternation studies. ICAME Journal 44:1  pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Kessler, Andrea Melanie, Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair, Trond Viggo Grøntvedt, Ida Bjørkheim, Idun Drejer & Mons Bendixen
2020. The Effect of Prototypical #MeToo Features on the Perception of Social-Sexual Behavior as Sexual Harassment. Sexuality & Culture 24:5  pp. 1271 ff. DOI logo
TAKAHASHI, HIDEMITSU
2019. <i>Cognitive Linguistics: SAGE Benchmarks in Language and </i><i>Linguistics </i>. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 36:1  pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Schäfer, Roland
2018. Abstractions and exemplars: The measure noun phrase alternation in German. Cognitive Linguistics 29:4  pp. 729 ff. DOI logo
Schäfer, Roland
2019. Prototype-driven alternations: The case of German weak nouns. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 15:2  pp. 383 ff. DOI logo
Ziegler, Jayden & Jesse Snedeker
2018. How broad are thematic roles? Evidence from structural priming. Cognition 179  pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Cienki, Alan
2017. Utterance Construction Grammar (UCxG) and the variable multimodality of constructions. Linguistics Vanguard 3:s1 DOI logo
Geleyn, Tim
2017. Syntactic variation and diachrony. The case of the Dutch dative alternation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 13:1 DOI logo
Reali, Florencia
2017. Acceptability of Dative Argument Structure in Spanish: Assessing Semantic and Usage‐Based Factors. Cognitive Science 41:8  pp. 2170 ff. DOI logo
Schoonjans, Steven
2017. Multimodal Construction Grammar issues are Construction Grammar issues. Linguistics Vanguard 3:s1 DOI logo
Bernolet, Sarah & Timothy Colleman
2016. Sense-based and lexeme-based alternation biases in the Dutch dative alternation. In Corpus-based Approaches to Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 19],  pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Gries, Stefan Th. & Tobias Bernaisch
2016. Exploring epicentres empirically. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 37:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
MCDONOUGH, KIM & PAVEL TROFIMOVICH
2016. The Role of Statistical Learning and Working Memory in L2 Speakers’ Pattern Learning. The Modern Language Journal 100:2  pp. 428 ff. DOI logo
Römer, Ute
2016. Teaming up and mixing methods: collaborative and cross-disciplinary work in corpus research on phraseology. Corpora 11:1  pp. 113 ff. DOI logo
Schäfer, Roland & Ulrike Sayatz
2016. Punctuation and syntactic structure inobwohlandweilclauses in nonstandard written German. Written Language & Literacy 19:2  pp. 212 ff. DOI logo
Schäfer, Roland & Ulrike Sayatz
2024. Between syntax and morphology: German noun+verb units. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 9:1 DOI logo
Anthony, Laurence & Paul Baker
2015. ProtAnt. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics  pp. 273 ff. DOI logo
Ariel, Mira, Elitzur Dattner, John W. Du Bois & Tal Linzen
2015. Pronominal datives. Studies in Language 39:2  pp. 257 ff. DOI logo
Ford, Marilyn & Joan Bresnan
2015. Generating data as a proxy for unavailable corpus data: the contextualized sentence completion task. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 11:1 DOI logo
Levin, Beth
2015. Semantics and Pragmatics of Argument Alternations. Annual Review of Linguistics 1:1  pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Bernaisch, Tobias, Stefan Th. Gries & Joybrato Mukherjee
2014. The dative alternation in South Asian English(es). English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 35:1  pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Deshors, Sandra C.
2014. A case for a unified treatment of EFL and ESL. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 35:3  pp. 277 ff. DOI logo
Gries, Stefan Th. & Sandra C. Deshors
2014. Using regressions to explore deviations between corpus data and a standard/target: two suggestions. Corpora 9:1  pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Gries, Stefan Th. & Sandra C. Deshors
2015. EFL and/vs. ESL?. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1:1  pp. 130 ff. DOI logo
McDONOUGH, KIM & TATIANA NEKRASOVA-BECKER
2014. Comparing the effect of skewed and balanced input on English as a foreign language learners’ comprehension of the double-object dative construction. Applied Psycholinguistics 35:2  pp. 419 ff. DOI logo
GERWIN, JOHANNA
2013. Give it me!: pronominal ditransitives in English dialects. English Language and Linguistics 17:3  pp. 445 ff. DOI logo
de Marneffe, Marie-Catherine, Scott Grimm, Inbal Arnon, Susannah Kirby & Joan Bresnan
2012. A statistical model of the grammatical choices in child production of dative sentences. Language and Cognitive Processes 27:1  pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Arppe, Antti, Gaëtanelle Gilquin, Dylan Glynn, Martin Hilpert & Arne Zeschel
2010. Cognitive Corpus Linguistics: five points of debate on current theory and methodology. Corpora 5:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
ChoiHyeWon
2010. Analyzing and Predicting Ordering Choices in Korean with a Logistic Regression Model. Korean Journal of Linguistics 35:1  pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
Theijssen, Daphne
2010. Variable Selection in Logistic Regression: The British English Dative Alternation. In Interfaces: Explorations in Logic, Language and Computation [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6211],  pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Colleman, Timothy
2009. Verb disposition in argument structure alternations: a corpus study of the dative alternation in Dutch. Language Sciences 31:5  pp. 593 ff. DOI logo
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle & Stefan Th. Gries
2009. Corpora and experimental methods: A state-of-the-art review. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 5:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Gries, Stefan Th.
2009. What is Corpus Linguistics?. Language and Linguistics Compass 3:5  pp. 1225 ff. DOI logo
Bresnan, Joan & Jennifer Hay
2008. Gradient grammar: An effect of animacy on the syntax of give in New Zealand and American English. Lingua 118:2  pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
HOVAV, MALKA RAPPAPORT & BETH LEVIN
2008. The English dative alternation: The case for verb sensitivity. Journal of Linguistics 44:1  pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Stefanowitsch, Anatol
2008. Negative entrenchment: A usage-based approach to negative evidence. Cognitive Linguistics 19:3 DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2011. References. In Verb Valency Patterns,  pp. 329 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.