The place of construction grammar between field and frame
Dylan Glynn | Institut Charles V, Université Paris 7
Construction Grammar focuses on the meaning encoded in the syntagmatic structures of language. However, syntagmatic meaning and coding interact in a complex way with paradigmatic structures such as lexis, metonymy, and metaphor. How can Construction Grammar capture the formal and semantic structure of entrenched schematic constructions while rigorously accounting for all these parameters? Based on the analysis of the conceptual domain of ‘stealing’ in English, this study demonstrates that through combining three different approaches to linguistic structure, the study of the semantic frame, the cognitive model, and the onomasiological lexical field, we can more properly appreciate and explain lexical, metaphoric, and constructional interplay.
2024. Disentangling constructional networks: integrating taxonomic effects into the description of grammatical alternations. Linguistics Vanguard 10:s1 ► pp. 29 ff.
Wyroślak, Piotr
2023. Accusative-instrumental alternation in Polish. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 68:1 ► pp. 41 ff.
2012. An Integrated Approach to Conventionality and Its Implications for the Semantics of Emotion Terms. stap 47:1 ► pp. 25 ff.
Glynn, Dylan
2010. Synonyme, lexical fields, and grammatical constructions. A study in usage-based cognitive semantics. In Cognitive Foundations of Linguistic Usage Patterns, ► pp. 89 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.