Part of
Approaches to Hungarian: Volume 14: Papers from the 2013 Piliscsaba Conference
Edited by Katalin É. Kiss, Balázs Surányi and Éva Dékány
[Approaches to Hungarian 14] 2015
► pp. 536
References (24)
References
Abeillé, Anne and Godard, Danièle. 2000French word order and lexical weight”. In The Nature and Function of Syntactic Categories, Syntax and Semantics, Robert Borsley (ed), 325–358. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alberti, Gábor. 1997. “Restrictions on the Degree of Referentiality of Arguments in Hungarian Sentences”. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 44 (3-4): 341–362.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Climbing for Aspect – with no Rucksack.” In Verb Clusters; A study of Hungarian, German and Dutch. Linguistics Today 69, Katalin É. Kiss and Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 253–289. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alberti, Gábor, and Farkas, Judit. 2013. “Book review: Syntax of Dutch, Nouns and Noun Phrases”. Lingua 133: 375–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alberti Gábor and Medve Anna. 2000. “Focus Constructions and the “Scope–Inversion Puzzle” in Hungarian”. Approaches to Hungarian 7, Gábor Alberti and István Kenesei (eds), 93–118. Szeged: JATE Press.Google Scholar
. 2002/2005. Generatív grammatikai gyakorlókönyv. Budapest: Janus Books / Gondolat.Google Scholar
Bartos Huba. 2000Az inflexiós jelenségek szintaktikai háttere.” In Strukturális magyar nyelvtan. I. Mondattan, Kiefer Ferenc (ed), 653–762. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Broekhuis, Hans and Keizer, Evelien and Dikken, Marcel den. 2012. Syntax of Dutch – Nouns and Noun Phrases, Vol I-II. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001Derivation by phase.” In Ken Hale: a life in language, Michael Kenstowitz (ed), 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
É. Kiss Katalin. 1992Az egyszerű mondat szerkezete”. In Strukturális magyar nyelvtan. I. Mondattan, Kiefer Ferenc (ed), 79–179. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
. 1998Mondattan”. In Új magyar nyelvtan, É. Kiss Katalin and Kiefer Ferenc and Siptár Péter (eds), 15–184. Budapest: Osiris.Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin. 2000. “The Hungarian Noun Phrase is like the English Noun Phrase”. Approaches to Hungarian 7, Gábor Alberti and István Kenesei (eds), 119–149. Szeged: JATE Press.Google Scholar
. 2002. The Syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 119–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009Is free postverbal order in Hungarian a syntactic or a PF phenomenon?” In: The Sound Pattern of Syntax, Nomi Erteschik-Shir and Lisa Rochman (eds), 53–71. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland. 2010. “Collapsing the Head Final Filter and the Head Complement Parameter”. Working Papers in Linguistics 20: 35–65. Venice: University of Venice.Google Scholar
Kiefer, Ferenc(ed.). 1992. Strukturális magyar nyelvtan I. Mondattan. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda and Szabolcsi, Anna. 1998. Verbal complexes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Laczkó Tibor. 2000Az ige argumentumszerkezetét megőrző főnévképzés.” In Strukturális magyar nyelvtan. III. Morfológia, Kiefer Ferenc (ed), 293–452. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1988On the Function of Agreement”. In Agreement in Natural Languages. Approaches, Theories, Descriptions, M. Barlow and Charles A. Ferguson (eds.), 55–65. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Lipták, Anikó K. 2011. “A fragmentumok mondattana a magyarban”. Általános Nyelvészeti Tanulmányok XXIII, Bartos Huba (ed), 317–349.Google Scholar
Rákosi, György. 2009. “Ablative causes in Hungarian”. Approaches to Hungarian 11, Marcel den Dikken and Robert M. Vago (eds.), 167–196. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna and Laczkó, Tibor. 1992A főnévi csoport szerkezete”. In Strukturális magyar nyelvtan. I. Mondattan, Kiefer Ferenc (ed), 179–298. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Szendrői, Kriszta. 2003. “A strees-based approach to the syntax of Hungarian focus”. The Linguistic Review 20. 37–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1982. “Another argument that passive is transformational”. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 160–163.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Dékány, Éva
2021. Possessive DPs. In The Hungarian Nominal Functional Sequence [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 100],  pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Alberti, Gábor, Judit Farkas & Veronika Szabó
Alberti, Gábor & Judit Farkas
2015. Az elidegeníthető birtoklást kifejező -j- képző esete a -(Vt)t főnévképzővel és más főnévképzőkkel. Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat 2:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.