This paper proposes a syntactic account of the variation Hungarian case assigning adpositions exhibit in their word order and extraction properties. The empirical generalization is that if a P allows the prepositional word order then it can also be stranded by its complement and it also has a particle use, but not vice versa. We suggest that some Ps are inserted in the Place/Path head and cannot move higher. Ps allowing the particle use and P-stranding are inserted in a higher head, namely p. The particle use and P-stranding involve PlaceP/PathP extraction from pP, separating the adposition from its complement. PlaceP/PathP and pP are head-final. A subset of Ps inserted in p may move into a higher, left-headed projection, deriving a prepositional order. We also account for the fact that some case assigning Ps may appear without a complement. We suggest that this is due to a difference in the licensing of deictic here/there complements, which may remain silent: those Ps have a seemingly intransitive use that allow here/there as their complement.
Asbury, Anna. 2008. The Morphosyntax of Case and Adpositions: University of Utrecht dissertation.
Asbury, Anna, Berit Gehrke & Veronika Hegedűs. 2007. One size fits all: Prefixes, particles, adpositions and cases as members of the category P. In Cem Keskin (ed.), Uil OTS yearbook 2006, 1–17. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg & Ian Roberts. 2007. Disharmonic word-order systems and the Final-over-Final-Constraint FOFC. In Antonietta Bisetto & Francesco E. Barbieri (eds.), Proceedings of the XXXIII incontro di grammatica generativa, 86–105. Bologna: Universitá di Bologna.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2010. Mapping spatial PPs: An introduction. In Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Mapping spatial PPs: The cartography of syntactic structures 6, 3–25. New York: Oxford University Press.
Creissels, Denis. 2006. Suffixes casuels et postpositions en hongrois. Bulletin de la société de linguistique de Paris 101(1). 225–272.
Dékány, Éva. 2011. A profile of the Hungarian DP. The interaction of lexicalization, agreement and linearization with the functional sequence. Tromsø: University of Tromsø dissertation.
Dér, Csilla. 2012. Mennyire (prototipikus) névutók a ragvonzó névutók a magyarban?. In Gábor Tolcsvai Nagy & Tátrai Szilárd (eds.), Konstrukció és jelentés, 11–29. Budapest: ELTE BTK.
Dér, Csilla. 2013. A kontextus szerepe a magyar ragvonzó névutók viselkedésében. In Grammatika és kontextus. Új szempontok az uráli nyelvek kutatásában III, 9–19. Budapest: ELTE Finnugor Tanszék.
Dikken, Marcel den. 2010. On the functional structure of locative and directional PPs. In Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Mapping spatial PPs: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 6, 74–126. New York: Oxford University Press.
É. Kiss, Katalin. 1999. Mi tartozik a névutók osztályába?. Magyar nyelvjárások 37. 167–172. [URL].
É. Kiss, Katalin. 2002. The Syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
É. Kiss, Katalin. 2014a. Az ősmagyar SOV szórendtől az ómagyar ’topik fókusz V X*’ szórendig. In Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), Magyar történeti mondattan, 14–33. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
É. Kiss, Katalin (ed.). 2014b. The evolution of functional left peripheries in Hungarian syntax. Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 11. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
É. Kiss, Katalin. 2014c. The evolution of functional left peripheries in the Hungarian sentence. In Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), The evolution of functional left peripheries in Hungarian syntax, 9–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
É. Kiss, Katalin (ed.). 2014d. Magyar történeti mondattan. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Egedi, Barbara. 2014a. The DP-cycle in Hungarian and the functional extension of the noun phrase. In Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), The evolution of functional left peripheries in Hungarian syntax. Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 11, 56–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Egedi, Barbara. 2014b. Főnévi kifejezések: határozottság, névelőhasználat, birtokos szerkezetek. In Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), Magyar történeti mondattan, 95–125. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Emonds, Joseph E. 1985. A unified theory of syntactic categories. Studies in generative grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.
Gelderen, Elly van. 2011. The linguistic cycle: Language change and the language faculty. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hegedűs, Veronika. 2006. Hungarian spatial PPs. Nordlyd: Tromsø University Working Papers in Linguistics 33(2). 220–233.
Hegedűs, Veronika. 2013. Non-verbal predicates and predicate movement in Hungarian: University of Tilburg dissertation.
Hegedűs, Veronika. 2014a. The cyclical development of Ps in Hungarian. In Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), The evolution of functional left peripheries in Hungarian syntax Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 11, 122–147. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hegedűs, Veronika. 2014b. A névutós kifejezések grammatikalizációja és belső szerkezeti változásai. In Magyar történeti mondattan, 154–176. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Horvath, Julia. 1978. Verbal prefixes: a non-category in Hungarian. Glossa: an international journal of lingustics 12(2). 137–162.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1973. The base rules for prepositional phrases. In Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds.), A festschrift for Morris Halle, 345–356. New York: Holt.
Kayne, Richard S. 2004. Here and there. In Lexique, syntaxe et lexique-grammaire, 253–275. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kenesei, István. 1992. Az alárendelt mondatok szerkezete [The structure of embedded clauses]. In Ferenc Kiefer (ed.), Strukturális magyar nyelvtan 1. Mondattan. [Hungarian structural grammar 1. Syntax], 529–714. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Koopman, Hilda. 2000. Prepositions, postpositions, circumpositions, and particles. The structure of Dutch PPs. In Hilda Koopman (ed.), The Syntax of Specifiers and Heads. Collected Essays of Hilda Koopman Routledge leading linguistics, 204–260. London: Routledge.
Koopman, Hilda. 2010. Prepositions, postpositions, circumpositions, and particles. In Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Mapping spatial PPs The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 6, 26–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marácz, László. 1984. Postposition stranding in Hungarian. In Werner Abraham & Sjaak de Mey (eds.), Groninger arbeiten zur germanistischen linguistik 24, 127–161. Groningen: University of Groningen.
Marácz, László. 1985. A magyar névutós csoportról. Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 87. 173–180.
Marácz, László. 1986. Dressed or naked: The case of the PP in Hungarian. In Abraham Werner & Sjaak de Meij (eds.), Topic, Focus and Configurationality, 227–252. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Marácz, László. 1989. Asymmetries in Hungarian: Rijksuniversität Groningen dissertation.
Pantcheva, Marina. 2011. Decomposing Path: University of Tromsø dissertation.
Radics, Katalin. 1992. Fossilized gerunds with possessive endings in Hungarian. In István Kenesei & Csaba Pléh (eds.), Approaches to Hungarian 4, 283–300. Szeged: JATE.
Rákosi, György. 2010. On snakes and locative binding in Hungarian. In Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG10 Conference, 396–415. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. [URL]
Riemsdijk, Henk van. 1978. A case study in syntactic markedness: The binding nature of Prepositional Phrases. Lisse: The Peter de Ridder Press.
Riemsdijk, Henk van. 1990. Functional prepositions. In Ham Pinkster & Inge Genee (eds.), Unity in Diversity: Papers Presented to Simon C. Dik on his 50th Birthday, 229–241. Dordrecht: Foris.
Riemsdijk, Henk van. 1997. Push chains and drag chains: Complex predicate split in Dutch. In Shigeo Tonoike (ed.), Scrambling, 7–33. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.
Riemsdijk, Henk van & Riny Huybregts. 2002. Location and locality. In Marc van Oostendorp & Elena Anagnostopoulou (eds.), Progress in grammar: Articles at the 20th anniversary of the Comparison of Grammatical Models Group in Tilburg, 1–23. Amsterdam: Meertens Instituut.
Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou. 2003. Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Spencer, Andrew J. & Gregory T. Stump. 2013. Hungarian pronominal case and the dichotomy of content and form in inflectional morphology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31(4). 1207–1248.
Surányi, Balázs. 2009. Locative particle and adverbial incorporation at the interfaces. In Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), Adverbs and adverbial adjuncts at the interfaces Interface explorations 20, 39–74. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Svenonius, Peter. 2003. Limits on P: Filling in holes vs. falling in holes. Nordlyd: Tromsø University Working Papers in Linguistics 31(2). 430–445.
Svenonius, Peter. 2010. Spatial P in English. In Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Mapping spatial PPs. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 6, 127–160. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Trommer, Jochen. 2008. “Case suffixes”, postpositions and the Phonological Word in Hungarian. Linguistics 46(2). 403–437.
Zwarts, Joost. 1997. Vectors as relative positions: a compositional semantics of modified PPs. Journal of Semantics 14. 57–86.
Zwarts, Joost & Yoad Winter. 2000. Vector space semantics: a model-theoretic analysis of locative prepositions. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 9. 169–211.
2020. Back to restitutives (again): A syntactic account of restitutive and counterdirectional verbal particles in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Academica 67:3 ► pp. 319 ff.
Dékány, Éva
2018. The position of case markers relative to possessive agreement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36:2 ► pp. 365 ff.
Dékány, Éva
2021. Introduction. In The Hungarian Nominal Functional Sequence [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 100], ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.