Abstractness or complexity?
The case of Hungarian /aː/
The purpose of this paper is to see if Hungarian /aː/, a well-behaved back vowel in terms of vowel harmony and of its phonological properties in general, is indeed a proper back vowel phonetically, too. Native speakers of this language (including some Hungarian linguists) have the impression that the vowel /aː/ is realised in present-day Hungarian more or less as a front vowel. However, there have been no reliable objective measurements to support or contradict that impression so far. In the present investigation it turns out that there is a historical change going on in Hungarian in the articulatory gesture of /aː/. The paper also offers some discussion as to whether that change in the phonetic makeup of this vowel should be reflected by its phonological analysis (feature composition). The dilemma we face is one between increased abstractness and increased complexity of analysis.
References (47)
References
Abari, Kálmán & Gábor Olaszy. 2012. A formánsmenetek rendszere CVC kapcsolatok magánhangzóiban a C képzési helyének függvényében [The system of vowel formant trajectories in CVC sequences depending on the place of articulation of the consonants]. In: Mária Gósy (ed.), Beszédkutatás 2012 [Speech Research 2012], 70–93. Budapest: MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézet Kempelen Farkas Beszédkutató Laboratórium.
Beke, András & Tekla Etelka Gráczi. 2010. A magánhangzók semlegesedése a spontán beszédben [Vowel neutralisation in spontaneous speech]. In: Judit Navracsics (ed.), Nyelv, beszéd, írás. Pszicholingvisztikai tanulmányok I. [Language, speech, and writing. Studies in psycholinguistics, vol. I], 57–64. Veszprém: Pannon Egyetem.
Bezdek, James C. 1981. Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms. New York: Plenum Press. 

Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2011. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. [URL] (25 October 2011)
Bolla, Kálmán. 1995. Magyar fonetikai atlasz. A szegmentális hangszerkezet elemei [An atlas of Hungarian phonetics. Elements of segmental sound structure]. Budapest: Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó.
Brunner, Jana, Satrajit Ghosh, Philip Hoole, Melanie Matthies, Mark Tiede & Joseph Perkell. 2011. The influence of auditory acuity on acoustic variability and the use of motor equivalence during adaptation to a perturbation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 54. 727–739. 

Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
Dankovičová, Jana & Francis Nolan. 1999. Some acoustic effects of speaking style on utterances for automatic speaker verification. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 29. 115–229. 

Diehl, Randy L., Björn Lindblom, Kathryn A. Hoemeke & Richard P. Fahey. 1996. On explaining certain male-female differences in the phonetic realization of vowel categories. Journal of Phonetics 24. 187–208. 

Eckert, Penelope. 1989. The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation. Language Variation and Change 1. 245–267. 

Fant, Gunnar. 1973. Speech sounds and features. Cambridge MA and London: MIT Press.
Gelfer, Marylou Pausewang & Victoria A. Mikos. 2005. The relative contributions of speaking fundamental frequency and formant frequencies to gender identification based on isolated vowels. Journal of Voice 19. 544–554. 

Giegerich, Heinz J. 1992. English phonology: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press. 

Gósy, Mária. 2004. Fonetika, a beszéd tudománya [Phonetics, the science of speech]. Budapest: Osiris Kiadó.
Gósy, Mária. 2012a. BEA – A multifunctional Hungarian spoken language database. The Phonetician 105/106. 50–61.
Gósy, Mária 2012b. Az alsóbb nyelvállású magyar magánhangzók formánsszerkezete [The formant structure of Hungarian low vowels]. In: Mária Gósy (ed.), Beszéd, adatbázis, kutatások [Speech, database, research], 43–66. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Gráczi, Tekla Etelka & Viktória Horváth. 2010. A magánhangzók realizációja spontán beszédben [The realisation of vowels in spontaneous Hungarian]. In: Mária Gósy (ed.), Beszédkutatás 2010 [Speech Research 2010], 5–16. Budapest: MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézet Kempelen Farkas Beszédkutató Laboratórium
.
Hayes, Bruce, Kie Zuraw, Péter Siptár & Zsuzsa Londe. 2009. Natural and unnatural constraints in Hungarian vowel harmony. Language 85. 821–862. 10.1353/lan.0.0169.
Henton, Caroline. 1995. Cross-language variation in the vowels of female and male speakers. In: Kjell Elenius & Peter Branderud (eds.), Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 420–423. Stockholm: Stockholm University.
Hillenbrand, James M. & Michael J. Clark. 2009. The role of f0 and formant frequencies in distinguishing the voices of men and women. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 71. 1150–1166. 

Johnson, Keith. 1997. Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In: Keith Johnson & John W. Mullenix (eds.), Talker variability in speech processing, 145–166. San Diego: Academic Press.
Kahn, Juliette, Nicolas Audibert, Jean-François Bonastre & Solange Rossato. 2011. Inter- and intra-speaker variability in French: an analysis of oral vowels and its implication for automatic speaker verification. In: Wai-Sum Lee & Eric Zee (eds.), Proceedings of the XVIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1002–1005. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.
Kempelen, Wolfgang von. 1791. Mechanismus der menschlichen Sprache nebst der Beschreibung seiner sprechenden Maschine. Wien: J. V. Degen.
Kovács, Magdolna. 2004. Pros and cons about Hungarian [a:]. Grazer Linguistische Studien 62. 65–75.
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change. I. Internal factors. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Lindblom, Björn. 1990. Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H and H theory. In: William J. Hardcastle & Alain Marchal (eds.), Speech production and speech modelling, 403–440. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 

Lindblom, Björn, Randy Diehl & Carl Creeger. 2009. Do ‘Dominant Frequencies’ explain the listener’s response to formant and spectrum shape variations? Speech Communication 51. 622–629. 

Magdics, Klára. 1965. A magyar beszédhangok akusztikai szerkezete [The acoustic structure of Hungarian speech sounds]. Nyelvtudományi Értekezések 49. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Mooshammer, Christine, Pascal Perrier & Susanne Fuchs. 2008. Speaker-specific patterns of token-to-token variability. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123. 3076–3076. 

Obleser, Jonas, Thomas Elbert, Aditi Lahiri & Carsten Eulitz. 2003. Cortical representation of vowels reflects acoustic dissimilarity determined by formant frequencies. Cognitive Brain Research 15. 207–213. 

Ohala, John. 1993. The phonetics of sound change. In Charles Jones (ed.), Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives, 237–278. Harlow, Essex: Longman.
Olaszy, Gábor. 1985. A magyar beszéd leggyakoribb hangsorépítő elemeinek szerkezete és szintézise [The structure and synthesis of the most frequent constitutive elements of Hungarian speech]. Nyelvtudományi Értekezések 121. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Pettigrew, Andrew M. 1990. Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organization Science 1. 267–292. 

Rebrus, Péter, Péter Szigetvári & Miklós Törkenczy. 2012. Dark secrets of Hungarian vowel harmony. In: Eugeniusz Cyran, Henryk Kardela & Bogdan Szymanek (eds.), Sound, structure and sense. Studies in memory of Edmund Gussmann, 491–508. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
Recasens, Daniel & Aina Espinosa. 2006. Dispersion and variability of Catalan vowels. Speech Communication 48. 645–666. 

Shiller, Douglas M., Rafael Laboissière & David J. Ostry. 2002. Relationship between jaw stiffness and kinematic variability in speech. Journal of Neurophysiology 88. 2329–2340. 

Siptár, Péter & Miklós Törkenczy. 2000. The phonology of Hungarian. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
Slifka, Janet. 2005. Acoustic cues to vowel–schwa sequences for high front vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118. 2037. 

Szende, Tamás. 1999. Hungarian. In: Handbook of the International Phonetic Association, 104–107. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tarnóczy, Tamás. 1965. Acoustic analysis of Hungarian vowels. Quarterly Progress and Status Report 1. 8–12. (Speech Transmission Laboratory–KHT, Stockholm).
Törkenczy, Miklós. 2011. Hungarian vowel harmony. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, 2963–2989. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Törkenczy, Miklós, Péter Szigetvári & Péter Rebrus. 2013. Harmony that cannot be represented. In Johan Brandtler, Valéria Molnár & Christer Platzack (eds.), Approaches to Hungarian. Volume 13: Papers from the 2011 Lund Conference, 229–252. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 

Vértes, O. András. 1980. A magyar leíró hangtan története az újgrammatikusokig [The history of descriptive Hungarian phonology up to the Neogrammarians]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Vértes, O. András. 1982. Az artikuláció akusztikus vetülete [The acoustic projection of articulation]. In Kálmán Bolla (ed.), Fejezetek a magyar leíró hangtanból [Chapters from descriptive Hungarian phonetics], 155–165. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Wardhaugh, Ronald. 2006. An introduction to sociolinguistics. Fifth edition. Malden MA: Blackwell.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Siptár, Péter
2015.
Neutrality and variation: what are they?.
Theoretical Linguistics 41:1-2

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.