Part of
Approaches to Hungarian: Volume 14: Papers from the 2013 Piliscsaba Conference
Edited by Katalin É. Kiss, Balázs Surányi and Éva Dékány
[Approaches to Hungarian 14] 2015
► pp. 245265
References (46)
References
Alberti, Gábor. 1997. Argument hierarchy and reflexivization. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 45 (3-4). 215–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartos, Huba. 2011. Hungarian external causatives: monoclausal but bi-eventive. In Tibor Laczkó & Catherine O. Ringen (eds.), Approaches to Hungarian. Volume 12: Papers from the 2009 Debrecen Conference, 1–37. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Luigi Rizzi. 1988. Psych-verbs and θ-theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6. 291–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bene, Annamária. 2005. Az igék bennható/tranzitív/mediális felosztásának morfoszintaktikai következményei. [The applicability of the unergative/ transitive/unaccusative categorization of verbs in the explanation of certain syntactic and morphological features of Hungarian.] PhD dissertation. Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin. 1987. Configurationality in Hungarian. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. The primacy condition of anaphora and pronominal variable binding. In Jan Koster & Eric Reuland (eds.), Long-distance anaphora, 245–262. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1994a. Sentence structure and word order. In Ferenc Kiefer & Katalin É. Kiss (eds.), The syntactic structure of Hungarian: Syntax and Semantics 27, 1–90. San Diego/New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1994b. Scrambling as the base generation of random complement order. In Norbert Corver & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), Studies on scrambling. Movement and non-movement approaches to free-word-order phenomena, 221–256. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002. The Syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Free word order, (non)configurationality and phases. Linguistic Inquiry 39 (3). 441–475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Everaert, Martin, Marijana Marelj & Tal Siloni. 2012. The Theta System: an introduction. In Martin Everaert, Marijana Marelj & Tal Siloni (eds.), The Theta System. Argument structure at the interface, 1–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fadlon, Julie. 2012. Hidden entries: a psycholingustic study of derivational gaps. In Martin Everaert, Marijana Marelj & Tal Siloni (eds.), The Theta System. Argument structure at the interface, 220–226. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert. 2001. Features, θ-roles, and free constituent order. Linguistic Inquiry 32 (3). 405–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Free constituent order: a Minimalist interface account. Folia Linguistica XXXVII (1-2). 191–231.Google Scholar
Horvath, Julia & Tal Siloni. 2011. Causatives across components. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29. 657–704. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horvath, Julia & Tal, Siloni. To appear. The thematic phase and the architecture of grammar. In Martin Everaert, Marijana Marelj, Eric Reuland & Tal Siloni eds. Concepts, syntax and their interface. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1991. Mme Tussaud meets the Binding Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10. 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray & Peter W. Culicover. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kenesei, István, Robert M. Vago & Anna Fenyvesi. 1998. Hungarian. London/New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiefer, Ferenc. 1992. Az aspektus és a mondat szerkezete. In Ferenc Kiefer (eds.), Strukturális Magyar Nyelvtan I. Mondattan, 797–886. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laczkó, Tibor. 2000. A melléknévi és a határozói igeképzők. [The adjectival and the adverbial participial suffixes.] In Ferenc Kiefer (ed.), Strukturális magyar nyelvtan. 3. kötet: Morfológia. [A structural grammar of Hungarian. Volume 3: Morphology.], 409–452. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan. 2010. The locative syntax of experiencers. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 53. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marelj, Marijana. 2013. Experiencing linking: Psych verbs at the interface. In Elly van Gelderen, Jóhanna Barðdal & Michela Cennamo (eds.), Argument Structure in Flux: the Naples-Capri Papers. Studies in Language Companion Series 131, 135–168. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Tanya Reinhart. 1998. Scrambling and PF interface. In Miriam Butt & Willhelm Geuder (eds.), The projection of arguments: lexical and compositional factors, 309–353. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero syntax. Experiencers and cascades. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M. 1971. Cross-over phenomena. New York: Holt, Rinheart and Winston.Google Scholar
Preminger, Omer. 2006. Argument-mapping and extraction. Master’s thesis. Tel-Aviv University.
Rákosi, György. 2006. Dative Experiencer Predicates in Hungarian. PhD dissertation. Utrecht. Published as Volume 146 of the LOT Dissertation Series.
. 2009. Én, magam, önmagam. [I, me, myself.] In Márta Maleczki & Enikő Németh T. (eds.), A mai magyar nyelv leírásának újabb módszerei VII. Modellek, elméletek és elvek érvényessége nyelvi adatok tükrében. [New approaches to the description of contemporary Hungarian VII. The validity of models, theories and principles in view of the linguistic data.], 179–196. Szeged: SZTE: Általános Nyelvészet Tanszék.Google Scholar
. 2011. Összetett visszaható névmások a magyarban. [Complex reflexive anaphors in Hungarian] In Huba Bartos (eds.), Általános Nyelvészeti Tanulmányok XXIII, 351–376. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
. 2013. Myself, the armchair linguist: two complex anaphors in Hungarian. Argumentum 9. Debrecen: Debreceni Egyetemi Kiadó. 239–267.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1983. Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. London & Sydney: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
. 2000. The Theta System: syntactic realization of verbal concepts. UIL-OTS Working Papers in Linguistics (00,01/TL). University of Utrecht. [URL]. (23 July, 2014.)
. 2001. Experiencing derivations. In Rachel Hastings, Brendan Jackson & Zsófia Zvolenszky (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) XI, 365–387. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
. 2002. The Theta System: an overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28. 229–290.Google Scholar
. 2006. Interface Strategies. Optimal and Costly Computations. Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 45. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya & Tal Siloni. 2005. The lexicon-syntax parameter: reflexivization and other arity operations. Linguistic Inquiry 36 (3). 389–436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 1991. NP movement, crossover, and chain formation. In Hubert Haider & Netter Klaus (eds.), Representation and derivation in the theory of grammar, 17–52. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siloni, Tal. 2001. Construct states at the PF interface. In Pierre Pica (eds.), Linguistic variation yearbook 1, 229–266. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Surányi, Balázs. 2006a. Scrambling in Hungarian. Acta Linguistics Hungarica 53. 393–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006b. Hungarian as a Japanese-type scrambling language. In Christopher Davis, Amy Rose Deal & Youri Zabbal (eds.), Proceedings of the 36th North East Linguistic Society Conference (NELS) 36, Volume 2, 561–574. University of Massachusetts, Amherst: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar
Szalontai, Ádám. 2012. On the configurationality of Hungarian dative constructions: An experimental study. In Balázs Surányi & Diána Varga (eds.), Proceedings of the First Central European Conference in Linguistics for Postgraduate Students, 294–317. Budapest: Pázmány Péter Catholic University.Google Scholar
Temme, Anne & Elisabeth Verhoeven. Submitted. Verb class, case, and order: A cross-linguistic experiment.
Tenny, Carol. 1998. Psych verbs and verbal passives in Pittsburghese. Linguistics 36 (3). 591–597.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Halm, Tamás
2021. Radically Truncated Clauses in Hungarian and Beyond: Evidence for the Fine Structure of the Minimal VP. Syntax 24:3  pp. 376 ff. DOI logo
Bondaruk, Anna
2020.  The syntax of accusative and dative Experiencers in Polish. In Beyond Emotions in Language [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 263],  pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Rákosi, György
2020. With or without the definite article. In Approaches to Hungarian [Approaches to Hungarian, 16],  pp. 115 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.