Chapter 2
Structural ambiguity and case assignment in Hungarian clausal and phrasal comparatives
This paper presents a contrastive analysis of comparative degree complements in Germanic (English, German) and Hungarian, focussing on two particular types of constructions that are potentially ambiguous in isolation. I argue that Hungarian has both clausal and phrasal comparatives. In clausal comparatives, the morphological case of the single remnant always corresponds to its underlying function (subject or object), hence ambiguities arise only if both interpretations involve subjects, but there are no subject/object ambiguities. This differs from Germanic, where subject/object ambiguities arise due to case syncretism, and where subjects of small clauses can be marked by the accusative case. In Hungarian phrasal comparatives, case distinction does not play a role, and the interpretation is governed by semantic rules.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Ambiguity and case assignment with single predicates (Type I)
- 3.Ambiguity and case assignment with two predicates (Type II)
- 4.The proposal: Semantics and underlying syntactic structures
- 5.Ellipsis
- 6.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
References (43)
References
Asbury, Anna. 2005. Adpositions as case realizations. Leiden Papers in Linguistics 2(3). 69–92.
Asbury, Anna. 2008a. Marking of semantics roles in Hungarian morphosyntax. In Szilárd Szentgyörgyi et al. (eds.), Approaches to Hungarian 10: Papers from the Veszprém conference, 9–30. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Asbury, Anna. 2008b. The morphosyntax of case and adpositions. Utrecht: LOT.
Bacskai-Atkari, Julia. 2014a. The syntax of comparative constructions: Operators, ellipsis phenomena and functional left peripheries. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
Bacskai-Atkari, Julia. 2014b. Structural case and ambiguity in reduced comparative subclauses in English and German. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 61(4). 363–378. 

Bacskai-Atkari, Julia. 2015a. A kérdő modalitás jelölése a beágyazott poláris kérdésekben és viszonya a funkcionális bal perifériák történetéhez [The marking of modality in embedded polar questions and its relation to the history of functional left peripheries]. In Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), Általános nyelvészeti tanulmányok XXVII: Diakrón mondattani kutatások [Papers in general linguistics XVII: Investigations in diachronic syntax], 13–45. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Bacskai-Atkari, Julia. 2015b. Ambiguity and the internal structure of comparative complements in Greek. Paper presented at: 12th International Conference on Greek Linguistics (ICGL 12), Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, 16–19 September 2015. Handout available at: [URL] (21 April, 2016).
Bacskai-Atkari, Julia. 2015c. Syntactic features, overtness, and functional left peripheries. Paper presented at: Syntax-Semantics Colloquium, Potsdam, Universität Potsdam, 20 October 2015. Handout available at: [URL] (28 April, 2016).
Bacskai-Atkari, Julia & Gergely Kántor. 2011. Elliptical comparatives revisited. In Vadim Kimmelman et al. (eds.), Proceedings of MOSS 2: Moscow Syntax and Semantics, 19–34. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Bacskai-Atkari, Julia & Gergely Kántor. 2012. Deletion in Hungarian, Finnish and Estonian comparatives. Finno-Ugric Languages and Linguistics 1(1–2). 44–66.
Bowers, John. 1993. The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 24(4). 591–656.
Bresnan, Joan. 1973. The syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry 4(3). 275–343.
Brody, Michael. 1990. Remarks on the order of elements in the Hungarian focus field. In István Kenesei (ed.), Approaches to Hungarian 3: Structures and arguments, 95–112. Szeged: JATE.
Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On WH-Movement. In Peter Culicover et al. (eds.), Formal syntax, 71–132. New York: Academic Press.
Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van & Anikó Lipták. 2008. On the interaction between verb movement and ellipsis: New evidence from Hungarian. In Charles B. Chang & Hannah J. Haynie (eds.), Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 138–146. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
É. Kiss, Katalin. 1987. Configurationality in Hungarian. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. 

É. Kiss, Katalin. 2002. The syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

É. Kiss, Katalin. 2008a. Free word order, (non)configurationality, and phases. Linguistic Inquiry 39(3). 441–475. 

É. Kiss, Katalin. 2008b. The structure of the Hungarian VP revisited. In: Szilárd Szentgyörgyi et al. (eds.), Approaches to Hungarian 10: Papers from the Veszprém conference, 31–58. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
É. Kiss, Katalin. 2014. The evolution of functional left peripheries in the Hungarian sentence. In: Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), From head-final to head-initial: The evolution of functional left peripheries in Hungarian syntax, 9–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Gyuris, Beáta. 2004. A new approach to the scope of contrastive topics. In Benjamin Shaer et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Dislocated Elements Workshop, ZAS Berlin, November 2003, 133–156. Berlin: ZAS.
Gyuris, Beáta. 2009. The semantics and pragmatics of the contrastive topic in Hungarian. Budapest: The Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences & Lexica Ltd.
Hankamer, Jorge. 1973. Why there are two than’s in English. In Claudia Corum et al. (eds.), Papers from the 9th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 179–191. Chicago, Ill.: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Hegedűs, Veronika. 2013. Non-verbal predicates and predicate movement in Hungarian. Utrecht: LOT.
Kenesei, István. 1989. Adjuncts and arguments in VP focus in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 45(1–2). 61–88.
Kenesei, István & Robert Michael Vago & Anna Fenyvesi. 1998. Hungarian. London & New York: Routledge. 

Kennedy, Christopher. 2002. Comparative Deletion and optimality in syntax. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20. 553–621. 

Kennedy, Christopher & Jason Merchant. 2000. Attributive Comparative Deletion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18. 89–146. 

Kornfilt, Jaklin & Omer Preminger. 2015. Nominative as no case at all: An argument from raising-to-accusative in Sakha. In Andrew Joseph & Esra Predolac (eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics (WAFL 9), 109–120. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Lechner, Winfried. 2004. Ellipsis in comparatives. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 

Lipták, Anikó. 2010. The structure of the topic field in Hungarian. In Paola Benincà & Nicola Munaro (eds.), Mapping the left periphery: The cartography of syntactic structures, volume 5, 163–198. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Matushansky, Ora. 2012. On the internal structure of case in Finno-Ugric small clauses. Finno-Ugric Languages and Linguistics 1(1–2). 3–43.
McFadden, Thomas & Sandhya Sundaresan. 2011. Nominative case is independent of finiteness and agreement. Ms. Available at: [URL] (30 August, 2016).
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Merchant, Jason. 2008. Variable island repair under ellipsis. In Kyle Johnson (ed.), Topics in ellipsis, 132–135. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Merchant, Jason. 2009. Phrasal and clausal comparatives in Greek and the abstractness of syntax. Journal of Greek Linguistics 9. 134–164.
Molnár, Valéria. 1998. On the syntax, phonology, semantics and pragmatics of the so-called “contrastive topic” in Hungarian and German. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 45(1–2). 89–166. 

Schütze, Carson T. 2001. On the nature of default case. Syntax 4(3). 205–238. 

Schwarzschild, Roger. 1999. GIVENness, avoid F and other constraints on the placement of focus. Natural Language Semantics 7(2). 141–177. 

Surányi, Balázs. 2009. Verbal particles inside and outside vP. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 56(2–3). 201–249. 

Szabolcsi, Anna. 1981. The semantics of Topic – Focus articulation. In Jeroen Antonius Gerardus Groenendijk et al. (eds.), Formal methods in the study of language, 513–541. Amsterdam: Matematisch Centrum.
Wunderlich, Dieter. 2001. Two comparatives. In István Kenesei & Robert M. Harnish (eds.), Perspectives on semantics, pragmatics, and discourse: A Festschrift for Ferenc Kiefer, 75–89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 

Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Abu Helal, Abdel-Rahman
2024.
A different kind of phrasal comparatives with a non-transformational Schönfinkelization in semantic composition: the case of Jordanian Arabic.
Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 60:4
► pp. 379 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.