Ádám Szalontai | Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Balázs Surányi | Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences | Pázmány Péter Catholic University
This pioneering study presents results from a forced choice experiment designed to investigate the favoured linear placement of
given constituents within the post-verbal domain of Hungarian. Specifically, the experiment tested the preferred relative
position of textually given topical adjunct phrases. The results indicate that speakers prefer to place topical given
constituents in the immediately post-verbal position, preceding contextually new items in the clause final position. The paper
makes the argument that the results are best explained by an interface approach that sees word order variation as driven by
the prosodic marking associated with givenness.
Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting
linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical
Software 67(1). 1–48.
Baumann, Stefan. 2006. The
intonation of givenness. Evidence from
German. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Baumann, Stefan & Martine Grice. 2006. The
intonation of accessibility. Journal of
Pragmatics 38(10). 1636–1657.
Baumann, Stefan & Arndt Riester. 2013. Coreference,
lexical givenness and prosody in
German. Lingua 136. 16–37.
Behaghel, Otto. 1932. Deutsche
syntax IV. Heidelberg: Carl Winters.
Bianchi, Valentina & Mara Frascarelli. 2010. Is
topic a root
phenomenon?Iberia 2. 43–88.
Bródy, Michael. 1995. Focus
and checking theory. In István Kenesei (ed.), Approaches
to Hungarian
5, 29–44. Szeged: JATE.
Büring, Daniel. 1997. The
meaning of topic and focus: The 59th street bridge
accent. London: Routledge.
Chafe, Wallace. 1974. Language
and
consciousness. Language 50(1).
Chafe, Wallace. 1976. Givenness,
contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of
view, 25–55. Associated Press.
Clark, Herbert H. & Eve V. Clark. 1977. Psychology
and language: Introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Publishers Ltd.
Clark, Herbert H. & Susan E. Haviland. 1977. Comprehension
and the given-new contract. In Roy O. Freedle (ed.), Discourse
production and
comprehension, 1–40. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing.
Cowles, H. Wind & Victor S. Ferreira. 2011. The
influence of topic status on written and spoken sentence production. Discourse
Processes 49(1). 1–28.
Cruttenden, Alan. 1997. Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Dijk, Teun. 1976. Discourse
meaning and memory. Journal of Reading
Behaviour 8. 89–110.
van Dijk, Teun. 1981. Studies
in the pragmatics of discourse. The Hague: Mouton.
É. Kiss, Katalin. 1987. Configurationality
in Hungarian. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing.
É. Kiss, Katalin. 1994. Sentence
structure and word order. In Ferenc Kiefer & Katalin É. Kiss (eds.), The
syntactic structure of Hungarian, 1–90. New York: Academic Press.
É. Kiss, Katalin. 1995. Introduction. In Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), Discourse
configurational languages, 3–28. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
É. Kiss, Katalin. 1996. Többszörös
fókusz a magyar mondatszerkezetben [Multiple foci in Hungarian
syntax]. In T. Mikola, L. Büky, A. Juhász & M. Maleczki (eds.), Néprajz
és nyelvtudomány (Acta Universitatis Szegediensis de Attila József
Nominatae), 47–66. Szeged: JATE.
É. Kiss, Katalin. 1998. Multiple
topic, one focus?Acta Linguistica
Hungarica 45. 3–29.
É. Kiss, Katalin. 2002. The
syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
É. Kiss, Katalin. 2008. Free
word order, (non)configurationality, and phases. Linguistic
Inquiry 39(3). 441–475.
Enc, Müvet. 1991. The
semantics of specificity. Linguistic
Inquiry 22(1). 51–92.
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 2007. Information
structure: The syntax-discourse
interface. Oxford: Oxford Univerisity Press.
Féry, Caroline & Shinichiro Ishihara. 2010. How
focus and givenness shape prosody. In Malte Zimmermann & Caroline Féry (eds.), Information
structure: Theoretical, typological, and experimental
perspectives, 36–63. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Frascarelli, Mara & Roland Hinterhölzl. 2007. Types
of topics in German and Italian. In Susanne Winkler & Kerstin Schwabe (eds.), On
information structure, meaning and
form, 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gécseg, Zsuzsanna & Ferenc Kiefer. 2009. A
new look at information structure in Hungarian. Natural Language & Linguistic
Theory 27(3). 583–622.
Genzel, Susanne, Shinichiro Ishihara & Balázs Surányi. 2015. The
prosodic expression of focus, contrast and givenness: A production study of
Hungarian. Lingua 165. 183–204.
Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg & Ron Zacharski. 1993. Cognitive
status and the form of referring expressions in
discourse. Language 69(2). 274–307.
Gyuris, Beáta. 2012. The
information structure of Hungarian. In Manfre Krifka & Renate Musan (eds.), The
expression of information
structure, 159–186. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Halliday, Michael A. K.1967. Intonation and grammar in
British English. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Heim, Irene. 1991. Artikel
und Definitheit. In Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds.), Semantik:
Ein internationales Handbuch des zeitgenossischen
Forschung, 487–535. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Hunyadi, László. 2002. Hungarian
sentence prosody and Universal
Grammar. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Ishihara, Shinichiro. 2003. Intonation
and interface conditions. Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
Kaiser, Elsi. 2011. Focusing
on pronouns: Consequences of subjecthood, pronominalisation, and contrastive
focus. Language and Cognitive
Processes 26(10). 1625–1666.
Kálmán, László & Ádám Nádasdy. 1994. A
hangsúly [Intonation]. In Strukturális Magyar Nyelvtan 2:
Fonológia., 393–467. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Katz, Jonah & Elisabeth Selkirk. 2011. Contrastive
focus vs. discourse-new: Evidence from phonetic prominence in
English. Language 87(4). 771–816.
Kenesei, István & Irene Vogel. 1989. Prosodic
phonology in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica
Hungarica 39. 149–193.
Krifka, Manfred. 2008. Basic
notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica
Hungarica 55(3–4). 243–276.
Kučerová, Ivona. 2007. The
syntax of givenness. Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
Kučerová, Ivona. 2012. Grammatical
marking of givenness. Natural Language
Semantics 20(1). 1–30.
Ladd, D. Robert. 1980. The structure of
intonational meaning: Evidence from
English. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Ladd, D. Robert. 1990. Intonation: Emotion
vs.
Grammar. Language 66(4). 806–816.
Ladd, D. Robert. 2008. Intonational
phonology (2nd
edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lambrecht, Knut. 1994. Information
structure and sentence
form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Neeleman, Ad & Tanya Reinhart. 1998. Scrambling
and the PF interface. In Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds.), The
projection of
arguments, 309–353. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Neeleman, Ad & Hans van de Koot. 2008. Dutch
scrambling and the nature of discourse templates. The Journal of Comparative Germanic
Linguistics 11(2). 137–189.
Neeleman, Ad & Hans van de Koot. 2016. Word
order and information structure. In Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds.), The
Oxford handbook of information
structure, 383–401. Oxford University Press.
Prince, Ellen. 1981. Towards
a taxonomy of given-new information. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical
pragmatics, 223–256. New York: Academic Press.
Prince, Ellen. 1992. The
zpg letter: Subjects, definitness, and
information-status. In S. Thompson & W. Mann (eds.), Radical
pragmatics, 295–325. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
R Core
Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical
computing. Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna. [URL].
Reinhart, Tanya. 1981. Pragmatics
and linguistics: An analysis of sentence
topics. Philosophica 27(1). 53–94.
Reinhart, Tanya. 2006. Interface
strategies: Optimal and costly computation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. On
the fine structure of the le periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements
of
grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Rochemont, Michael. 2016. Givenness. In Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds.), The
Oxford handbook of information
structure, 41–62. Oxford University Press.
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2008. Contrastive
focus, givenness and the unmarked status of “discourse new”. Acta Linguistica
Hungarica 55(3–4). 331–346.
Šimík, Radek & Marta Wierzba. 2015. The
role of givenness, presupposition, and prosody in czech word order: An experimental
study. Semantics and
pragmatics 8(3). 1–103.
Šimík, Radek & Marta Wierzba. 2017. Expression
of information structure in West Slavic: Modeling the impact of prosodic and word-order
factors. Language 93(3). 671–709.
Šimík, Radek, Marta Wierzba & Beste Kamali. 2014. Givenness
and the position of the direct object in the Czech
clause. In Cassandra Chapman, Olena Kit & Ivona Kučerová (eds.), Formal
approaches to slavic linguistics (FASL) 22: The McMaster Meeting
2013. 302–318. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Skopeteas, Stavros & Gisbert Fanselow. 2009. Effects
of givenness and constraints on free word order. In Malte Zimmermann & Caroline Féry (eds.), Information
structure, 307–331. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Surányi, Balázs. 2006a. Hungarian
as a Japanese-type scrambling language. In Christopher Davis, Amy Rose Deal & Youri Zabbal (eds.), NELS
36: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic
Society, 561–574. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Graduate Linguistic Student Associaton.
Surányi, Balázs. 2012. Identificational
focus and the flexibility of syntax. In Ad Neeleman & Ivona Kučerová (eds.), Information
structure: Contrasts and
positions, 87–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Surányi, Balázs, Shinichiro Ishihara & Fabian Schubö. 2012. Syntax-prosody
mapping: Topic-comment structure and stress-focus correspondence in
Hungarian. In Gorka Elordieta & Pilar Prieto (eds.), Prosody
and meaning, 35–72. Mouton de Gruyter.
Szabolcsi, Anna. 1997. Strategies
for scope taking. In Anna Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways
of scope
taking, 109–155. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Szendrői, Kriszta. 2003. A
stress-based approach to the syntax of Hungarian focus. The Linguistic
Review 20(1). 37–78.
Varga, László. 1981. A
topicról és a fókusz utáni elemek sorrendjéről [On the topic and the order of
elements after the focus]. Magyar
Nyelv 27.
Varga, László. 2002. Intonation
and stress. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Vogel, Irene & István Kenesei. 1987. The
interface between phonology and other components of grammar: The case of
Hungarian. Phonology
Yearbook 4. 243–263.
Vogel, Irene & István Kenesei. 1990. Syntax
and semantics in phonology. In Dragan Zec & Sharon Inkelas (eds.), The
Phonolgy - Syntax
Connection, 339–363. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1998. Prosody, focus and word
order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.