The interpretation of possessive pronouns in Dutch and Limburgian
Joske Piepers | Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University
Theresa Redl | Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University | Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
Gender-(mis)matching pronouns have been studied extensively in experiments. However, a phenomenon common to various languages has thus far been overlooked: the systemic use of non-feminine pronouns when referring to female individuals. The present study is the first to provide experimental insights into the interpretation of such a pronoun: Limburgian zien ‘his/its’ and Dutch zijn ‘his/its’ are grammatically ambiguous between masculine and neuter, but while Limburgian zien can refer to women, the Dutch equivalent zijn cannot. Employing an acceptability judgment task, we presented speakers of Limburgian (N = 51) with recordings of sentences in Limburgian featuring zien, and speakers of Dutch (N = 52) with Dutch translations of these sentences featuring zijn. All sentences featured a potential male or female antecedent embedded in a stereotypically male or female context. We found that ratings were higher for sentences in which the pronoun could refer back to the antecedent. For Limburgians, this extended to sentences mentioning female individuals. Context further modulated sentence appreciation. Possible mechanisms regarding the interpretation of zien as coreferential with a female individual will be discussed.
2017Audacity(R): Free Audio Editor and Recorder [Computer program]. Version 2.2.1, retrieved from [URL].
Audring, Jenny
2006 “Pronominal Gender in Spoken Dutch.” Journal of Germanic Linguistics 18 (2): 85–116.
Barbiers, Sjef C. J., Hans J. Bennis, Gunther De Vogelaer, Magda Devos & Margreet H. van der Ham
2006Dynamische Syntactische Atlas van de Nederlandse Dialecten (DynaSAND). Amsterdam: Meertens Instituut. [URL].
Bakker, Frens
1992 “Wie me euver vrouwluuj sprik. Zeej of het, die of det.” Veldeke 67 (1): 10–15.
Barr, Dale J., Roger Levy, Christoph Scheepers & Harry J. Tily
2013 “Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.” Journal of Memory and Language, 68 (3): 255–278.
Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker
2015 “Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software 67 (1): 1–48.
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink
2017Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.36, retrieved 11 November 2017 from [URL].
Braun, Friederike & Geoffrey Haig
2010 “When are German ‘girls’ feminine? How the semantics of age influences the grammar of gender agreement.” Language in its socio-cultural context: New explorations in global, medial and gendered uses, ed. by M. Bieswanger, H. Motschenbacher and S. Mühleisen, 69–85. Tübingen: Narr.
Carreiras, Manuel, Alan Garnham, Jane Oakhill & Kate Cain
1996 “The use of stereotypical gender information in constructing a mental model: Evidence from English and Spanish.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology 49A (3): 639–663.
Cornips, Leonie
2013 “Recent developments in the Limburg dialect region.” Language and space: Dutch. An international handbook of linguistic variation, ed. by F. Hinskens and J. Taeldeman, 378–399. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Corbett, Greville
1991Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grondelaers, Stefan, Roeland van Hout & Mieke Steegs
2010 “Evaluating Regional Accent Variation in Standard Dutch.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 29(1), 101–116.
Kennison, Shelia M. & Jessie L. Trofe
2003 “Comprehending pronouns: A role for word-specific gender stereotype information.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32(3): 355–378.
2014 “ ‘Who’s he?’ Event-related brain potentials and unbound pronouns.” Journal of Memory and Language 761: 1–28.
Nieuwland, Mante S. & Jos J. A. van Berkum
2006 “Individual differences and contextual bias in pronoun resolution: Evidence from ERPs.” Brain Research 1118 (1): 155–167.
Nübling, Damaris
2015 “Between feminine and neuter, between semantic and pragmatic gender: Hybrid names in German dialects and in Luxembourgish.” Agreement from a diachronic perspective, ed. by J. Fleischer, E. Rieken and P. Widmer, 235–266. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
van Oostendorp, Marc
2012, February18th. “Marie z’n fiets is kapot” [Blog post]. Retrieved from [URL] on January19th 2018.
Osterhout, Lee & Linda A. Mobley
1995 “Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree.” Journal of Memory and Language 34 (6): 739–773.
Qualtrics
2018Qualtrics [Software]. Provo, Utah, USA.
Quené, Hugo & Huub van den Bergh
2004 “On multi-level modeling of data from repeated measures designs: A tutorial.” Speech Communication 43 (1–2): 103–121.
R Core Team
2018R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [URL].
Schmitt, Bernadette M., Monique Lamers & Thomas F. Münte
2002 “Electrophysiological estimates of biological and syntactic gender violation during pronoun processing.” Cognitive Brain Research 141: 333–346.
Schütze, Carson T. & Jon Sprouse
2013 “Judgment data.” Research methods in linguistics, ed. by R. J. Podesva and D. Sharma, 27–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sirin, Selcuk R., Donald R. McCreary & James R. Mahalik
2004 “Differential reactions to men and women’s gender role transgressions: Perceptions of social status, sexual orientation, and value dissimilarity.” The Journal of Men’s Studies 12 (2): 119–132.
van der Sijs, Nicoline
ed.2011Dialectatlas van het Nederlands. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.
Subbarao, K. V. & B. Lalitha Murthy
2011 “Lexical anaphors and pronouns in Telugu.” Lexical anaphors and pronouns in selected South Asian languages: A principled typology, ed. by B. C. Lust, K. Wali, J. W. Gair and K. V. Subbarao, 217–274. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
de Vogelaer, Gunther
2007 “De Nederlandse en Friese subjectsmarkeerders: geografie, typologie en diachronie.” Gent: Koninklijke Academie voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde.
Weijnen, A. A.
1966Nederlandse Dialectkunde. Assen: Van Gorcum.
Zaręba, Alfred
(1984–5) “Osobliwa zmiana rodzaju naturalnego w dialektach polskich.” Zbornik Matice Srpske za Filologiju i Lingvistiku 17–18: 243–247.
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Corbett, Greville G.
2023. The Agreement Hierarchy and (generalized) semantic agreement. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 8:1
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.