Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2019
Edited by Janine Berns and Elena Tribushinina
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 36] 2019
► pp. 37–42
Part I: Invited papers on the occasion of the 50th Dutch Annual Linguistics Day

Description, linguistics 1.0. Theory, linguistics 3.0?

 | Radboud University Nijmegen
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 5 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00019.muy
References (17)
References
Barbiers, Sjef, Bennis, Hans, De Vogelaer, Gunther, De Vos, Magda, Van der Auwera, Johan, Van der Ham, Margreet. 2006. Dynamische Syntactische Atlas van de Nederlandse Dialecten (DynaSAND). Amsterdam: Meertens Instituut. URL: [URL]
Benincá, Paola (Ed.). 1988. Generative Approaches to Dialectology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Bennis, Hans & van Oostendorp, Mark. 2002. The History of GLOW. 1978–2002. Amsterdam: Meertens Institute.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1964. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Howard Lasnik. 1993. “Principles and Parameters Theory”. Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research ed. by J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld & T. Venneman, 506–569. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernand & Norval S. H. Smith. 1977. Lingua Descriptive Studies Questionnaire. Amsterdam: North Holland. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Everaert, Martin & Eric Reuland. 2011. “Generative grammar in Europe: Some historical impressions”. The Languages and Linguistics of Europe: A Comprehensive Guide ed. by B. Kortmann & J. van der Auwera, 867–886. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, Kenneh, Krauss, Michael, Watahomigie, Lucille J., Yamamoto, Akira Y., Craig, Colette, LaVerne Masayesva, Jeanne, & England, Nora C. 1992. “Endangered Languages”. Language 681.1–42.Google Scholar
Koster, Jan. 1983. “The configurational matrix”. Problems in Syntax [Studies in Language 1] ed. by L. Tasmowski & D. Willems, 347–360. Boston, MA: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anhony. 1989. “Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change”. Language Variation and Change 11.199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landsbergen, Frank, Carole Tiberius & Roderik Dernison. 2014. “Taalportaal: An online grammar of Dutch and Frisian”. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14), 2206–2210. Reykjavik, Iceland: European Languages Resources Association (ELRA).Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David W. 1999. The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change and Evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Robins, Robert H., & Eugenius M. Uhlenbeck (Eds.). 1991. Endangered Languages. Oxford: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
Schultink, Henk C. 1957. Review of “Syntactic Structures”. Nieuwe Rotterdamse Courant, July 20th 1957Google Scholar
Van Riemsdijk, Henk C. 1978. A Case Study in Syntactic Markedness: The Binding Nature of Prepositional Phrases. Lisse: Peter de Ridder/Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Zonneveld, Wim. 1978. A Formal Theory of Exceptions in Generative Phonology. Lisse: Peter de Ridder Press/Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Dingemanse, Mark, Eva van Lier & Jorrig Vogels
2021. Foreword. Linguistics in the Netherlands 38 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.