Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2019
Edited by Janine Berns and Elena Tribushinina
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 36] 2019
► pp. 176–191
Part II: Selected papers presented at the Dutch Annual Linguistics Day of 2019

Emphatic reflexives as part-structure modifiers

| Utrecht University
The standard analysis of emphatic reflexives assumes that they are focused expressions of identity in all their uses (e.g. Gast 2006). On the basis of semantic and prosodic data, I argue that exclusive adverbial emphatic reflexives in Dutch and English should instead be analyzed as expressions excluding certain participants from the modified event (“P-exclusives”). The proposed analysis is based on Moltmann’s (2004) account of the part-structure modifier ‘alone’, and avoids a number of problems that the standard analysis has when applied to these data.
Keywords: emphatic reflexives, part-structure modifiers, focus, modification, agentivity
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1The standard account of ERs
  • 2.Properties of exclusive adverbial emphatic reflexives
    • 2.1Prosodic properties
    • 2.2Instrumental readings
    • 2.3Modification
  • 3.Part-structure modifiers
    • 3.1P-exclusives
    • 3.2Moltmann’s theory of part-structure modifiers
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Bibliography
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 5 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00031.tel
References (21)
Bibliography
Alrenga, Peter. 2010. “Comparisons of similarity and difference”. Adjectives: Formal Analyses in Syntax and Semantics ed. by Patricia Cabredo Hofherr and Ora Matushansky, 155–186. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Browning, M. A. 1993. “Adverbial Reflexives”. Proceedings of NELS 231, 83–93.Google Scholar
Charnavel, Isabelle. 2012. “On her own. Parsimonious Compositionality: Probing Syntax and Semantics with French propre ”. PhD Dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
de Clerck, Liesbeth & Els van der Kooij. 2005. “Modifiable and intensifier self in Dutch and Sign Language of the Netherlands”. Linguistics in the Netherlands 2005: 61–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckardt, Regine. 2001. “Reanalysing selbst ”. Natural Language Semantics 91: 371–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, Jerold A. & Frans Plank. 1978. “Great expectations: An intensive self analysis”. Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 373–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gast, Volker. 2006. The Grammar of Identity. Intensifiers and reflexives in Germanic languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hoeksema, Jack. 2011. “Discourse scalarity: the case of Dutch helemaal ”. Journal of Pragmatics 431: 2810–2825. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howell, Jonathan. 2010. “The Semantics and Prosody of Post-nominal Focus Particles”. Proceedings of the 2010 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, ed. by Melinda Heijl.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher & Louise McNally. 2005. “Scale Structure, Degree Modification, and the Semantics of Gradable Predicates”. Language 81(2): 345–381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard and Volker Gast. 2006. “Focused assertion of identity: a typology of intensifiers”. Linguistic Typology 101: 223–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lasersohn, Peter. 1999. “Pragmatic Halos”. Language 751: 522–551. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. “Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface”. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar
Moltmann, Friederike. 1995. “Part-Structure Modifiers”. Proceedings of SALT 5 ed. by Mandy Simons and Teresa Galloway, 255–272. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
. 1998. “Part Structures, Integrity, and the Mass-Count Distinction”. Synthese 1161: 75–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. “The semantics of together ”. Natural Language Semantics 121: 289–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rooth, Mats. 1992. “A theory of focus interpretation”. Natural Language Semantics, 11: 75–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siemund, Peter. 2000. Intensifiers in English and German. A comparison. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Storoshenko, Dennis. 2011. “Distribution and Analysis of Adverbial Emphatic Reflexives in English”. Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association.Google Scholar
Tellings, Jos. 2015. “Expressing identity in Imbabura Quichua”. Proceedings of SULA 8 ed. by J. Pasquereau, 89–104.Google Scholar
Tribushinina, Elena & Theo Janssen. 2011. “Re-conceptualizing scale boundaries: the case of Dutch helemaal ”. Journal of Pragmatics 431: 2043–2056. DOI logoGoogle Scholar